Colorectal NeoplasmsPhase 2NCT00609622
Randomized Study Of Sunitinib Plus FOLFOX Versus Bevacizumab Plus FOLFOX In Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing sunitinib, mFOLFOX6 and bevacizumab in people with Colorectal Neoplasms, run by Pfizer at 97 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
This study will compare the safety and efficacy of sunitinib in combination with FOLFOX versus bevacizumab in combination with FOLFOX for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have not been treated before. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- sunitinib, mFOLFOX6 and bevacizumab
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 191 participants
- Where
- 97 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Apr 2008to Jul 2011
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum with locally advanced or metastatic disease
- Evidence of measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0 or 1
Who cannot join
- Previous treatment with Sutent, Avastin, or any other systemic therapy for locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer
- Less than 6 months since completion of adjuvant chemotherapy to documentation of recurrent disease
- History of cardiac disease
- Brain mets
Trial locations and contacts
97 sites in 4 countries.
97 sites in 4 countries
United States81 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30341
Pfizer Investigational Site
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Pfizer Investigational Site
Bakersfield, California, 93309
Pfizer Investigational Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21225
Pfizer Investigational Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21237
Pfizer Investigational Site
Beaumont, Texas, 77701
Pfizer Investigational Site
Bentonville, Arkansas, 72712
Pfizer Investigational Site
Chandler, Arizona, 85224
Pfizer Investigational Site
Chanute, Kansas, 66720
Pfizer Investigational Site
Columbia, Missouri, 65203
Pfizer Investigational Site
Columbus, Mississippi, 39705
Pfizer Investigational Site
Corinth, Mississippi, 38834
Pfizer Investigational Site
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
Pfizer Investigational Site
Dodge City, Kansas, 67801
Pfizer Investigational Site
El Dorado, Kansas, 67042
Pfizer Investigational Site
Fairhope, Alabama, 36532
Pfizer Investigational Site
Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72703
Pfizer Investigational Site
Fresno, California, 93720
Pfizer Investigational Site
Fullerton, California, 92835
Pfizer Investigational Site
Gainesville, Florida, 32605
Pfizer Investigational Site
Henderson, Nevada, 89052
Pfizer Investigational Site
Hot Springs, Arkansas, 71913
Pfizer Investigational Site
Independence, Kansas, 67301
Pfizer Investigational Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32204
Pfizer Investigational Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207
Pfizer Investigational Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32258
Pfizer Investigational Site
Jacksonville Beach, Florida, 32250
Pfizer Investigational Site
Jasonville, Florida, 32207
Pfizer Investigational Site
Kingman, Kansas, 67068
Pfizer Investigational Site
Lancaster, California, 93534
Pfizer Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128
Pfizer Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89148
Pfizer Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89169
Pfizer Investigational Site
Liberal, Kansas, 67905
Pfizer Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1772
Pfizer Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90095-6984
Pfizer Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Pfizer Investigational Site
Lubbock, Texas, 79415
Pfizer Investigational Site
Macon, Georgia, 31217
Pfizer Investigational Site
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Pfizer Investigational Site
Maryville, Illinois, 62062
Pfizer Investigational Site
Meadowbrook, Pennsylvania, 19046
Pfizer Investigational Site
Mesa, Arizona, 85206
Pfizer Investigational Site
Mission Hills, California, 91345
Pfizer Investigational Site
Mobile, Alabama, 36604
Pfizer Investigational Site
Newton, Kansas, 67114
Pfizer Investigational Site
Norman, Oklahoma, 73071
Pfizer Investigational Site
Northrige, California, 91325
Pfizer Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73102
Pfizer Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73109
Pfizer Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120
Pfizer Investigational Site
Orange Park, Florida, 32073
Pfizer Investigational Site
Oxnard, California, 93030
Pfizer Investigational Site
Palatka, Florida, 32177
Pfizer Investigational Site
Parsons, Kansas, 67357
Pfizer Investigational Site
Pasadena, California, 91105
Pfizer Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19106
Pfizer Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Pfizer Investigational Site
Portland, Oregon, 97227
Pfizer Investigational Site
Radnor, Pennsylvania, 19087
Pfizer Investigational Site
Redondo Beach, California, 90277
Pfizer Investigational Site
Saint Augustine, Florida, 32086
Pfizer Investigational Site
Salina, Kansas, 67401
Pfizer Investigational Site
Sandy Springs, Georgia, 30342
Pfizer Investigational Site
Santa Barbara, California, 93105
Pfizer Investigational Site
Santa Maria, California, 93454
Pfizer Investigational Site
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Pfizer Investigational Site
Solvang, California, 93436
Pfizer Investigational Site
Stuart, Florida, 34994
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74133
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801
Pfizer Investigational Site
Valencia, California, 91355
Pfizer Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
Pfizer Investigational Site
Wellington, Kansas, 67152
Pfizer Investigational Site
Wenatchee, Washington, 98801
Pfizer Investigational Site
Wichita, Kansas, 67208
Pfizer Investigational Site
Wichita, Kansas, 67214
Pfizer Investigational Site
Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, 19090
Pfizer Investigational Site
Winfield, Kansas, 67156
Germany7 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Aschaffenburg, 63739
Pfizer Investigational Site
Bad Saarow, 15526
Pfizer Investigational Site
Berlin, 13125
Pfizer Investigational Site
Düsseldorf, 40225
Pfizer Investigational Site
Magdeburg, 39104
Pfizer Investigational Site
Mainz, 55131
Pfizer Investigational Site
Regensburg, 93053
Japan6 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Chuo-ku, Tokyo
Pfizer Investigational Site
Kashiwa, Chiba
Pfizer Investigational Site
Kitaadachi-gun, Ina-cho, Saitama
Pfizer Investigational Site
Sapporo, Hokkaido
Pfizer Investigational Site
Suntougun, Shizuoka
Pfizer Investigational Site
Utsunomiya, Tochigi
Denmark3 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Aalborg, 9100
Pfizer Investigational Site
Herlev, 2730
Pfizer Investigational Site
Koebenhavn OE, 2100
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Phase 2B Study Of Sunitinib Plus Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil And Leucovorin (FOLFOX) Versus Bevacizumab Plus FOLFOX As First-Line Treatment In Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
This study will compare the safety and efficacy of sunitinib in combination with FOLFOX versus bevacizumab in combination with FOLFOX for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have not been treated before.
Read the detailed description
The study was terminated on April 26, 2010 due to lack of efficacy, as determined during the interim analysis of data in April 2010, showing that the study did not meet its primary endpoint to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in PFS. The decision to terminate the trial was not based on any safety concerns.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Being tested
- sunitinib, mFOLFOX6, bevacizumab
- Keywords
- metastatic colorectal cancer sunitinib (Sutent) bevacizumab (Avastin) randomized study
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
sunitinibDrug
Also called Sutent, SU011248
Sunitinib: 37.5 mg/day, oral, administered on an outpatient basis for 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off (Schedule 4/2).
mFOLFOX6Drug
FOLFOX will be administered every 2 weeks, using the modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) regimen, consisting of: - oxaliplatin 85 mg/ m^2 + leucovorin 400 mg/ m^2 (or 200 mg/ m^2 levo-leucovorin) as a 2-hr IV infusion followed by 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/ m^2 IV bolus on day 1 and 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/ m^2 IV infusion over 46 hours on Days 1 and 2 of each 2 week cycle
bevacizumabDrug
Also called Avastin
Bevacizumab: 5 mg/kg, IV infusion, every 2 weeks.
mFOLFOX6Drug
FOLFOX will be administered every 2 weeks, using the modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) regimen, consisting of: - oxaliplatin 85 mg/ m^2 + leucovorin 400 mg/ m^2 (or 200 mg/ m^2 levo-leucovorin) as a 2-hr IV infusion followed by 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/ m^2 IV bolus on day 1 and 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/ m^2 IV infusion over 46 hours on Days 1 and 2 of each 2 week cycle
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Treatment arm A - sunitinib plus mFOLFOX6 Receives: Drug: sunitinib; Drug: mFOLFOX6 |
| B | Active comparator | Treatment arm B - bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 Receives: Drug: bevacizumab; Drug: mFOLFOX6 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time in weeks from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 7. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data meet the criteria for progressive disease [PD]), or from adverse event (AE) data (where the outcome was "Death").
Measured: Baseline, at every 8-week intervals for 18 months then every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression (up to Week 115)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Overall Survival (OS)
Time in weeks from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 7. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the participant current status was death).
Measured: Baseline, at every 8-week intervals for 18 months, and then every 12 weeks thereafter up to every 2 months until death (up to Week 115)
One Year Survival Probability
One year survival probability was defined as the probability of survival at one year after the first dose of study treatment.
Measured: Baseline, at every 8-week intervals for 18 months, and then every 12 weeks thereafter up to every 2 months until death (up to 1 year)
Two Year Survival Probability
Two year survival probability was defined as the probability of survival at two years after the first dose of study treatment.
Measured: Baseline, at every 8-week intervals for 18 months, and then every 12 weeks thereafter up to every 2 months until death (up to 2 years)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)
Percentage of participants with OR based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Confirmed response were those that persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR was defined as disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR were those with at least 30 percent decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions, with non target lesions not increased or absent.
Measured: Baseline until disease progression or discontinuation of the study, at every 8-week intervals for 18 months, and then every 12 weeks thereafter up to Week 115
Duration of Response (DR)
Time in weeks from the first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or death due to any cancer. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 7. DR was calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response.
Measured: Baseline until disease progression or discontinuation of the study, at every 8-week intervals for 18 months, and then every 12 weeks thereafter up to Week 115
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment - Colorectal (FACT-C) Score
FACT-C used for assessment of health-related quality of life (QoL) in participants with cancer. It consists of 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales:physical well-being (PWB) (7 items), functional well-being (FWB) (7 items), social/family well-being (SWB) (7 items); all 3 subscales range from 0 to 28, emotional well-being (EWB) (6 items) range from 0 to 24, colorectal cancer subscale (9 items) range from 0 to 36; higher subscale score=better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score range: 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL.
Measured: Baseline [Day (D) 1 of Cycle (C) 1] then every 3 cycles thereafter and at the end of treatment (EOT) or withdrawal visit (up to Week 115)
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment - Gynecologic Oncology Group Oxaliplatin-Specific Neurotoxicity (FACT&GOG-Ntx) Score
FACT\&GOG-Ntx has a 13-item, treatment-specific subscale for patients with neurotoxicity. It is the sum of the PWB (7 items), FWB (7 items), SWB (7 items) and EWB (6 items) subscales plus a 13 item neurotoxicity subscale. Subscale score ranges from 0 to 28 for PWB, FWB, SWB, 0 to 24 for EWB and 0 to 52 for neurotoxicity subscale. Total possible score range is 0 to 160. Higher scores indicates better QoL, fewer disease symptoms, and/or fewer side effects of treatment and lower scores indicate worse QoL and a greater impact of disease symptoms and/or side effects.
Measured: Baseline (D1 of C1) then every 3 cycles thereafter and at the EOT or withdrawal visit (up to 115 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Feb 2008 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2008
- Primary completionJul 2011
- Study completionJul 2011
Why it stopped: See termination reason in detailed description.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 191 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00609622
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A6181104
- Status last verified
- Sep 2012
- First submitted
- 25 Jan 2008
- Last updated
- 11 Oct 2012
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Breen DM, Kim H, Bennett D, Calle RA, Collins S, Esquejo RM, He T, Joaquim S, Joyce A, Lambert M, Lin L, Pettersen B, Qiao S, Rossulek M, Weber G, Wu Z, Zhang BB, Birnbaum MJ. GDF-15 Neutralization Alleviates Platinum-Based Chemotherapy-Induced Emesis, Anorexia, and Weight Loss in Mice and Nonhuman Primates. Cell Metab. 2020 Dec 1;32(6):938-950.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.10.023. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
PubMed 33207247Hecht JR, Mitchell EP, Yoshino T, Welslau M, Lin X, Chow Maneval E, Paolini J, Lechuga MJ, Kretzschmar A. 5-Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) plus sunitinib or bevacizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized Phase IIb study. Cancer Manag Res. 2015 Jun 15;7:165-73. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S61408. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26109878
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Oct 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Phase 2B Study Of Sunitinib Plus Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil And Leucovorin (FOLFOX) Versus Bevacizumab Plus FOLFOX As First-Line Treatment In Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00609622
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A6181104
- Conditions
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Keywords
- metastatic colorectal cancer sunitinib (Sutent) bevacizumab (Avastin) randomized study
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: See termination reason in detailed description.
- Enrolment
- 191 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2008
- Primary completion
- Jul 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Feb 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 Oct 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will compare the safety and efficacy of sunitinib in combination with FOLFOX versus bevacizumab in combination with FOLFOX for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have not been treated before.
Detailed description
The study was terminated on April 26, 2010 due to lack of efficacy, as determined during the interim analysis of data in April 2010, showing that the study did not meet its primary endpoint to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in PFS. The decision to terminate the trial was not based on any safety concerns.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Drug: sunitinib, Drug: mFOLFOX6Treatment arm A - sunitinib plus mFOLFOX6 |
| B | Active comparator | Drug: bevacizumab, Drug: mFOLFOX6Treatment arm B - bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum with locally advanced or metastatic disease
- Evidence of measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0 or 1
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Previous treatment with Sutent, Avastin, or any other systemic therapy for locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer
- Less than 6 months since completion of adjuvant chemotherapy to documentation of recurrent disease
- History of cardiac disease
- Brain mets
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| sunitinibAlso: Sutent, SU011248Sunitinib: 37.5 mg/day, oral, administered on an outpatient basis for 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off (Schedule 4/2). | Drug | A |
| mFOLFOX6FOLFOX will be administered every 2 weeks, using the modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) regimen, consisting of: - oxaliplatin 85 mg/ m^2 + leucovorin 400 mg/ m^2 (or 200 mg/ m^2 levo-leucovorin) as a 2-hr IV infusion followed by 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/ m^2 IV bolus on day 1 and 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/ m^2 IV infusion over 46 hours on Days 1 and 2 of each 2 week cycle | Drug | A |
| bevacizumabAlso: AvastinBevacizumab: 5 mg/kg, IV infusion, every 2 weeks. | Drug | B |
| mFOLFOX6FOLFOX will be administered every 2 weeks, using the modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) regimen, consisting of: - oxaliplatin 85 mg/ m^2 + leucovorin 400 mg/ m^2 (or 200 mg/ m^2 levo-leucovorin) as a 2-hr IV infusion followed by 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/ m^2 IV bolus on day 1 and 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/ m^2 IV infusion over 46 hours on Days 1 and 2 of each 2 week cycle | Drug | B |
Primary outcome
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: Baseline, at every 8-week intervals for 18 months then every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression (up to Week 115)
Time in weeks from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 7. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data meet the criteria for progressive disease [PD]), or from adverse event (AE) data (where the outcome was "Death").
7 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Baseline, at every 8-week intervals for 18 months, and then every 12 weeks thereafter up to every 2 months until death (up to Week 115)
One Year Survival Probability
Time frame: Baseline, at every 8-week intervals for 18 months, and then every 12 weeks thereafter up to every 2 months until death (up to 1 year)
Two Year Survival Probability
Time frame: Baseline, at every 8-week intervals for 18 months, and then every 12 weeks thereafter up to every 2 months until death (up to 2 years)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or discontinuation of the study, at every 8-week intervals for 18 months, and then every 12 weeks thereafter up to Week 115
Duration of Response (DR)
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or discontinuation of the study, at every 8-week intervals for 18 months, and then every 12 weeks thereafter up to Week 115
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment - Colorectal (FACT-C) Score
Time frame: Baseline [Day (D) 1 of Cycle (C) 1] then every 3 cycles thereafter and at the end of treatment (EOT) or withdrawal visit (up to Week 115)
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment - Gynecologic Oncology Group Oxaliplatin-Specific Neurotoxicity (FACT&GOG-Ntx) Score
Time frame: Baseline (D1 of C1) then every 3 cycles thereafter and at the EOT or withdrawal visit (up to 115 weeks)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Oct 2012.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33207247Breen DM, Kim H, Bennett D, Calle RA, Collins S, Esquejo RM, He T, Joaquim S, Joyce A, Lambert M, Lin L, Pettersen B, Qiao S, Rossulek M, Weber G, Wu Z, Zhang BB, Birnbaum MJ. GDF-15 Neutralization Alleviates Platinum-Based Chemotherapy-Induced Emesis, Anorexia, and Weight Loss in Mice and Nonhuman Primates. Cell Metab. 2020 Dec 1;32(6):938-950.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.10.023. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26109878Hecht JR, Mitchell EP, Yoshino T, Welslau M, Lin X, Chow Maneval E, Paolini J, Lechuga MJ, Kretzschmar A. 5-Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) plus sunitinib or bevacizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized Phase IIb study. Cancer Manag Res. 2015 Jun 15;7:165-73. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S61408. eCollection 2015.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Colorectal Neoplasms
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
97 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing sunitinib, mFOLFOX6 and bevacizumab in people with Colorectal Neoplasms, run by Pfizer at 97 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Oct 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 97 sites in United States, Germany, Japan, Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Oct 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-free Survival (PFS) (time frame: Baseline, at every 8-week intervals for 18 months then every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression (up to Week 115)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00609622, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Oct 2012.