AzTrials
AzTrials

AnemiaPhase 3NCT00605293

A Study of Intravenous Mircera (C.E.R.A or Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-epoetin Beta) for the Maintenance Treatment of Hemodialysis Participants With Chronic Renal Anemia

A Phase 3 study testing methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and Epoetin alfa in people with Anemia, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 19 sites in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This 2 arm study will compare the efficacy and safety of monthly administration of intravenous (IV) Mircera versus epoetin alfa for the maintenance of hemoglobin levels in hemodialysis patients with chronic renal anemia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Anemia
What is being tested?
methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and Epoetin alfa
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
101 participants
Where
19 sitesSpain
Study dates
Jan 2008to Jan 2010
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • chronic renal anemia;
  • continuous iv maintenance epoetin alfa therapy, with the same dosing interval during the previous month to and during SVP;
  • regular hemodialysis for greater than or equal to (>=) 3 months

Who cannot join

  • transfusion of red blood cells during previous 2 months
  • poorly controlled hypertension requiring interruption of epoetin alfa treatment in previous 6 months;

Trial locations and contacts

19 sites in 1 country.

19 sites in 1 country

Spain19 sites
  • Study site

    Badajoz, Badajoz, 06300

  • Study site

    Barcelona, Barcelona, 08035

  • Study site

    Cáceres, Caceres, 10310

  • Study site

    Cádizv, Cadiz, 11008

  • Study site

    Castellon, Castellon, 12004

  • Study site

    Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, 13005

  • Study site

    Huelva, Huelva, 21005

  • Study site

    Madrid, Madrid, 28034

  • Study site

    Madrid, Madrid, 28041

  • Study site

    Madrid, Madrid, 28905

  • Study site

    Marbella, Malaga, 29603

  • Study site

    Pontevedra, Pontevedra, 36071

  • Study site

    Salamanca, Salamanca, 37008

  • Study site

    Teruel, Teruel, 44003

  • Study site

    Tudela, Navarre, 46010

  • Study site

    Valencia, Valencia, 46009

  • Study site

    Valencia, Valencia, 46010

  • Study site

    Zamora, Zamora, 49022

  • Study site

    Zaragoza, Zaragoza, 50009

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: An Open Label Randomised Controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Once-monthly Administration of Intravenous C.E.R.A. Versus Epoetin Alfa for the Maintenance of Haemoglobin Levels in Hemodialysis Patients With Chronic Renal Anaemia

This 2 arm study will compare the efficacy and safety of monthly administration of intravenous (IV) Mircera versus epoetin alfa for the maintenance of hemoglobin levels in hemodialysis patients with chronic renal anemia. Participants currently receiving maintenance treatment with epoetin alfa will be randomized either to receive monthly injections of 120, 200 or 360 micrograms Mircera, with the starting dose derived from the dose of epoetin alfa they were receiving in the week preceding study start, or to continue on epoetin alfa treatment. The anticipated duration of study is 32 weeks, and the target sample size is 146 participants.

Conditions
Anemia
Being tested
methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta, Epoetin alfa
Medical subject headings
Anemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin betaDrug

    Also called Mircera; C.E.R.A

    120, 200 or 360 micrograms iv/month (starting dose)

  • Epoetin alfaDrug

    As prescribed

Study groups in NCT00605293
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
C.E.R.AExperimentalParticipants received starting dose of 120, 200 or 360 mcg of C.E.R.A IV once monthly for 6 months. The starting dose was based on the dose of epoetin alfa administered in Week -1.
Receives: Drug: methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta
Epoetin AlfaActive comparatorParticipants received IV injection of 6000 International Units (IU) of epoetin alfa every 3 weeks (q3wk) during the Stability Verification Period (SVP; Week -4 to -1), and 7443 IU of epoetin alfa q3wk during Dose Titration Period (DTP; Week 0 to 15), 7363 IU of epoetin alfa q3wk during Efficacy Evaluation Period (EEP; Week 16 to 23) up to 23 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Epoetin alfa

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Average Hemoglobin (Hb) Concentration Within Plus Minus (+/-) 1 Grams Per Deciliter (g/dL) of Their Reference Hb and Between 10 and 12 g/dL During the EEP

    Participants who maintained average Hb concentration within +/-1 g/dL of their reference Hb and between 10 to 12 g/dL during EEP are reported. The reference Hb value was defined on the basis of all assessments at Weeks -4, -3, -2, -1 and 0.

    Measured: EEP (Week 16 to 23)

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Change in Hb Concentrations Between Baseline SVP and the EEP

    Change in Hb concentration between baseline SVP and the EEP was evaluated by subtracting the mean of Hb concentration during the SVP (Weeks -4 to -1) with the mean of Hb concentration during the EEP (Weeks 16 to 23).

    Measured: SVP (Week -4 to -1), EEP (Week 16 to 23)

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Hb Concentration Between 10 and 12 g/dL Throughout the EEP

    Participants who maintained Hb concentration between 10 to 12 g/dL throughout the EEP are reported.

    Measured: EEP (Week 16 to 23)

  3. Mean Time Spent in Hb Range 10-12 g/dL

    Measured: SVP (Week -4 to -1), DTP (Week 0 to 15), and EEP (Week 16 to 23)

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Required Dose Adjustments During the DTP and EEP

    Measured: DTP (Week 0 to 15) and EEP (Week 16 to 23)

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Received Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions During DTP and EEP

    RBC transfusions could be given during the study in case of medical need, i.e., in severely anemic participants with recognized symptoms or signs of anemia (e.g., in participants with acute blood loss, with severe angina, or whose hemoglobin decreased to critical levels).

    Measured: DTP (Week 0 to 15) up to EEP (Week 16 to 23)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jan 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2008
  3. Primary completionJan 2010
  4. Study completionJan 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
101 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00605293
Sponsor's protocol ID
ML21060
Other IDs
2007-002065-12
Status last verified
Oct 2013
First submitted
18 Jan 2008
Last updated
13 May 2016

Publications

  • Locatelli F, Choukroun G, Truman M, Wiggenhauser A, Fliser D. Once-Monthly Continuous Erythropoietin Receptor Activator (C.E.R.A.) in Patients with Hemodialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease: Pooled Data from Phase III Trials. Adv Ther. 2016 Apr;33(4):610-25. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0309-6. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

    PubMed 26965694

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and Epoetin alfa in people with Anemia, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 19 sites in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 19 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 May 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Average Hemoglobin (Hb) Concentration Within Plus Minus (+/-) 1 Grams Per Deciliter (g/dL) of Their Reference Hb and Between 10 and 12 g/dL During the EEP (time frame: EEP (Week 16 to 23)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00605293, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in