Major Depressive DisorderPhase 3NCT00596817
Efficacy of Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in the Prevention of Relapse of Major Depressive Episodes
A Phase 3 study testing Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in people with Major Depressive Disorder, run by H. Lundbeck A/S.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate the efficacy of Vortioxetine in the prevention of relapse of major depressive episodes in patients who responded to open-label treatment with Vortioxetine. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Major Depressive Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 639 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Dec 2007to Oct 2009
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Major Depressive Episode (MDE) as the primary diagnosis according to DSM-IV TR criteria
- At least one other MDE before the current one
- Moderate to severe depression
Who cannot join
- Any current psychiatric disorder other than Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) as defined in the DSM-IV TR
- Any substance disorder within the previous 6 months
- Female patients of childbearing potential who are not using effective contraception
- Use of any psychoactive medication 2 weeks prior to screening and during the study
- Randomisation Criteria: Patients in remission (MADRS total score <=10) at both Week 10 and Week 12
- Other protocol-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria may apply.
About this study
Official title: A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Multicentre, Relapse-prevention Study With Two Doses of [Vortioxetine] Lu AA21004 in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
This study will evaluate the efficacy of Vortioxetine in the prevention of relapse of major depressive episodes in patients who responded to open-label treatment with Vortioxetine.
- Conditions
- Major Depressive Disorder
- Being tested
- Placebo, Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004)
- Keywords
- Relapse prevention, Antidepressants, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Multicentre study
- Medical subject headings
- Depressive Disorder, Major
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PlaceboDrug
capsules, daily, orally
Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004)Drug
Also called Brintellix
encapsulated tablets, daily, orally
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Vortioxetine: 5 or 10 mg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Relapse Within First 24 Weeks of the Double-blind Period Based on a MADRS Total Score >=22 or an Unsatisfactory Treatment Effect (Lack of Efficacy) as Judged by the Investigator
The Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a depression rating scale consisting of 10 items, each rated 0 (no symptom) to 6 (severe symptom). The 10 items represent the core symptoms of depressive illness. The rating should be based on a clinical interview with the patient, moving from broadly phrased questions about symptoms to more detailed ones, which allow a precise rating of severity, covering the last 7 days. Total score from 0 to 60. The higher the score, the more severe.
Measured: Within first 24 weeks of the double-blind period
Secondary outcomes (8)
Relapse During the Entire Double-blind Period Based on a MADRS Total Score >=22 or an Unsatisfactory Treatment Effect (Lack of Efficacy) as Judged by the Investigator
Measured: Within 64 weeks of the double-blind period
Change From Double-blind Baseline in MADRS Total Score After 24 Weeks of Double-blind Treatment
Measured: Double-blind Baseline and Week 24 of the double-blind period
Change From Double-blind Baseline in HAM-D-17 Total Score After 24 Weeks of Double-blind Treatment
The Hamilton Depression Scale - 17 items (HAM-D-17) measures depression severity. Items are rated on a scale from 0 (symptoms not present) to a maximum of 2 to 4 (symptom extremely severe) for a total score range of 0 to 52. The higher the score, the more severe.
Measured: Double-blind Baseline and Week 24 of the double-blind period
Change From Double-blind Baseline in HAM-A Total Score After 24 Weeks of Double-blind Treatment
The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) consists of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behaviour at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic, and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total score from 0 to 56. The higher the score, the more severe.
Measured: Double-blind Baseline and Week 24 of the double-blind period
Change From Double-blind Baseline in CGI-S Score After 24 Weeks of Double-blind Treatment
The Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale rated from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). The investigator should use his/her total clinical experience with this patient population to judge how mentally ill the patient is at the time of rating.
Measured: Double-blind Baseline and Week 24 of the double-blind period
Proportion of Responders at Week 24 of the Double-blind Period (Response Defined as a >=50% Reduction in MADRS Total Score From Open-label Baseline)
Measured: Week 24 of the double-blind period (Counted From Open-label Baseline)
Proportion of Remitters at Week 24 of the Double-blind Period (Remission Defined as a MADRS Total Score <=10)
Measured: Week 24 of the double-blind period
Change From Double-blind Baseline in SDS Total Score at Week 24 of the Double-blind Period
The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) comprises self-rated items designed to measure impairment. The patient rates the extent to which his or her (1) work, (2) social life or leisure activities and (3) home life or family responsibilities are impaired on a 10-point visual analogue scales, on which 0 = normal functioning and 10 = severe functional impairment. The three items may be summed into a single dimensional measure of global functional impairment that ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). The higher the score, the more severe.
Measured: Week 24 of the double-blind period (Counted From Double-blind Baseline)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2007
- Primary completionSep 2009
- Study completionOct 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Major Depressive DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by H. Lundbeck A/SThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 639 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- H. Lundbeck A/S
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Email contact via H. Lundbeck A/S, Study director, LundbeckClinicalTrials@lundbeck.com
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00596817
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 11985A
- Other IDs
- 2007-001871-13
- Status last verified
- Feb 2014
- First submitted
- 8 Jan 2008
- Last updated
- 31 Mar 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Boulenger JP, Loft H, Florea I. A randomized clinical study of Lu AA21004 in the prevention of relapse in patients with major depressive disorder. J Psychopharmacol. 2012 Nov;26(11):1408-16. doi: 10.1177/0269881112441866. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
PubMed 22495621Christensen MC, Florea I, Loft H, McIntyre RS. Efficacy of vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder reporting childhood or recent trauma. J Affect Disord. 2020 Feb 15;263:258-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.074. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
PubMed 31818787McIntyre RS, Florea I, Tonnoir B, Loft H, Lam RW, Christensen MC. Efficacy of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Functioning in Working Patients With Major Depressive Disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;78(1):115-121. doi: 10.4088/JCP.16m10744.
PubMed 27780334
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Mar 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Multicentre, Relapse-prevention Study With Two Doses of [Vortioxetine] Lu AA21004 in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00596817
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 11985A
- Conditions
- Major Depressive Disorder
- Keywords
- Relapse prevention, Antidepressants, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Multicentre study
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 639 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- H. Lundbeck A/SIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2007
- Primary completion
- Sep 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 31 Mar 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate the efficacy of Vortioxetine in the prevention of relapse of major depressive episodes in patients who responded to open-label treatment with Vortioxetine.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo |
| Vortioxetine: 5 or 10 mg | Experimental | Drug: Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Major Depressive Episode (MDE) as the primary diagnosis according to DSM-IV TR criteria
- At least one other MDE before the current one
- Moderate to severe depression
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Any current psychiatric disorder other than Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) as defined in the DSM-IV TR
- Any substance disorder within the previous 6 months
- Female patients of childbearing potential who are not using effective contraception
- Use of any psychoactive medication 2 weeks prior to screening and during the study
- Randomisation Criteria: Patients in remission (MADRS total score <=10) at both Week 10 and Week 12
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Placebocapsules, daily, orally | Drug | Placebo |
| Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004)Also: Brintellixencapsulated tablets, daily, orally | Drug | Vortioxetine: 5 or 10 mg |
Primary outcome
Relapse Within First 24 Weeks of the Double-blind Period Based on a MADRS Total Score >=22 or an Unsatisfactory Treatment Effect (Lack of Efficacy) as Judged by the Investigator
Time frame: Within first 24 weeks of the double-blind period
The Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a depression rating scale consisting of 10 items, each rated 0 (no symptom) to 6 (severe symptom). The 10 items represent the core symptoms of depressive illness. The rating should be based on a clinical interview with the patient, moving from broadly phrased questions about symptoms to more detailed ones, which allow a precise rating of severity, covering the last 7 days. Total score from 0 to 60. The higher the score, the more severe.
8 secondary outcomes
Relapse During the Entire Double-blind Period Based on a MADRS Total Score >=22 or an Unsatisfactory Treatment Effect (Lack of Efficacy) as Judged by the Investigator
Time frame: Within 64 weeks of the double-blind period
Change From Double-blind Baseline in MADRS Total Score After 24 Weeks of Double-blind Treatment
Time frame: Double-blind Baseline and Week 24 of the double-blind period
Change From Double-blind Baseline in HAM-D-17 Total Score After 24 Weeks of Double-blind Treatment
Time frame: Double-blind Baseline and Week 24 of the double-blind period
Change From Double-blind Baseline in HAM-A Total Score After 24 Weeks of Double-blind Treatment
Time frame: Double-blind Baseline and Week 24 of the double-blind period
Change From Double-blind Baseline in CGI-S Score After 24 Weeks of Double-blind Treatment
Time frame: Double-blind Baseline and Week 24 of the double-blind period
Proportion of Responders at Week 24 of the Double-blind Period (Response Defined as a >=50% Reduction in MADRS Total Score From Open-label Baseline)
Time frame: Week 24 of the double-blind period (Counted From Open-label Baseline)
Proportion of Remitters at Week 24 of the Double-blind Period (Remission Defined as a MADRS Total Score <=10)
Time frame: Week 24 of the double-blind period
Change From Double-blind Baseline in SDS Total Score at Week 24 of the Double-blind Period
Time frame: Week 24 of the double-blind period (Counted From Double-blind Baseline)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Mar 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 22495621Boulenger JP, Loft H, Florea I. A randomized clinical study of Lu AA21004 in the prevention of relapse in patients with major depressive disorder. J Psychopharmacol. 2012 Nov;26(11):1408-16. doi: 10.1177/0269881112441866. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31818787Christensen MC, Florea I, Loft H, McIntyre RS. Efficacy of vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder reporting childhood or recent trauma. J Affect Disord. 2020 Feb 15;263:258-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.074. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27780334McIntyre RS, Florea I, Tonnoir B, Loft H, Lam RW, Christensen MC. Efficacy of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Functioning in Working Patients With Major Depressive Disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;78(1):115-121. doi: 10.4088/JCP.16m10744.
Related trials for Major Depressive Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
RecruitingPhase 4
Biomarker-Guided Antidepressant Selection
Depression - Major Depressive Disorder, Treatment-resistant Depression (TRD)
Recruiting
Targeting Network Dysfunction in Apathy of Late-life Depression Using Digital Therapeutics
Major Depressive Disorder, Apathy
RecruitingObservational study
Student Precarity and Psychiatry
Depressive Disorder, Major, Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Acute Intermittent Hypoxia Therapy for Depression
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Email contact via H. Lundbeck A/S study director
LundbeckClinicalTrials@lundbeck.com
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in people with Major Depressive Disorder, run by H. Lundbeck A/S.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Mar 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Mar 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Relapse Within First 24 Weeks of the Double-blind Period Based on a MADRS Total Score >=22 or an Unsatisfactory Treatment Effect (Lack of Efficacy) as Judged by the Investigator (time frame: Within first 24 weeks of the double-blind period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00596817, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Mar 2014.