Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseNCT00591669
Non-invasive Imaging of GI Inflammation Using Microbubble Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography
A study testing Definity in people with Inflammatory Bowel Disease, run by University of Virginia at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a common chronic inflammatory disorder, but a noninvasive method of assessing disease location, severity, and extent is currently not available. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- What is being tested?
- Definity
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2006to Dec 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), scheduled for diagnostic colonoscopy or
- Patients scheduled for diagnostic colonoscopy for other indications other than IBD (e.g. screening, family history of colon cancer).
Who cannot join
- Ineligibility for colonoscopy
- For control patients: a personal history of IBD or clinical history suspicious for IBD or other disease associated with intestinal inflammation. To be determined by investigators at the time of screening.
- Abnormal QT, Tic, or PR intervals during screening ECG
- Life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias during screening ECG
- Abnormally low oxygen saturation (<80%)
- History of the following:
Show all 17Show fewer
- An intracardial or intrapulmonary shunt
- Unstable coronary artery disease
- Cerebrovascular disease (e.g. stroke or aneurysm)
- Diagnosed and or current signs or symptoms of severe, progressive or uncontrolled congenital heart failure
- Diagnosed and/or current signs or symptoms of severe, progressive or uncontrolled emphysema/COPD
- Diagnosed and/or current signs or symptoms of severe, progressive or uncontrolled pulmonary hypertension (known PA pressures >50mmHg)
- Uncontrolled high blood pressure (>140/90)
- Abnormal kidney function (creatinine > 2.0 mg/dl or GFR > 90)
- Abnormal liver function (Aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase levels greater than 2 times the upper limit of normal.)
- Known hypersensitivity to octafluoropropane
- Pregnancy or nursing, confirmed by urine pregnancy test.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
About this study
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a common chronic inflammatory disorder, but a noninvasive method of assessing disease location, severity, and extent is currently not available. Recently published animal data suggests that using transabdominal ultrasound enhanced with encapsulated gaseous microbubbles may provide a reliable, noninvasive means to detect and quantify areas of intestinal inflammation. This study will evaluate the role of Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEU) for use as a diagnostic tool in patients with IBD. We hypothesize that the severity and extent of chronic intestinal inflammation, as quantified by CEU-derived video intensity scores, will correlate with endoscopically-derived measures of intestinal inflammation as obtained from the Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Inflammatory Index (CDEIS). A total of 40 patients will be enrolled in the study, 30 patients with IBD and 10 patients undergoing colonoscopy for other reasons. Prior to colonoscopy CEU assessment of small and large intestine will be performed to evaluate neoangiogenesis and intestinal blood flow. The correlation between the CEU-derived video intensity score and CDEIS will be assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Subjects may also undergo scoring using the Rutgeerts Score, an endoscopic disease assessment index used to score disease activity in patients with previous ileocolonic resection. Comparing video intensity between IBD and non-IBD subjects will be performed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, with a secondary aim of establishing preliminary estimates of the sensitivity of the microbubble scoring system.
Read the detailed description
GI inflammation may indicate a number of complications or diseases, one of which is inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), now the second most prevalent inflammatory disorder in the world. Symptoms of the disease include severe abdominal pain, bloody diarrhea, persistent fever, weight loss, and significant malnutrition. There is also an increased risk of colon cancer. If left untreated, the disease is debilitating. Prompt intervention may reduce the amount of immunosuppressive therapy that is required to control the disease, but by the time the patient becomes symptomatic, the inflammatory response is difficult to suppress and much of the damage has already been done. It is therefore important to closely monitor patients with IBD. The location, extent, and severity of the inflammation are of primary consideration for correct diagnosis and treatment. However, no inexpensive and non-invasive procedure exists in protocol for the assessment of these factors of IBD. A non-invasive diagnostic that can detect the onset of inflammation and measure the extent of inflammatory involvement would be a valuable tool for the evaluation of patients with IBD.
Endoscopy, barium contrast X-ray studies, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and transabdominal ultrasound (US) are currently the most common procedures used by gastroenterologists. The preferred manner of investigating GI inflammation includes endoscopy with biopsy, as only endoscopy can confirm the presence of inflammation. However, this procedure is highly invasive and limited to areas accessible to the endoscope. There are also limited but real risks associated with endoscopy. In addition, the cost of such a procedure may be prohibitive, or a qualified professional inaccessible, for some patients. Barium contrast X-ray studies remain the best way to visualize stricture and fistulae in the small intestine, but do not provide insight into the degree and extent of active inflammation. Repeated X-rays in chronic and younger patients also contribute to risk of irradiation. CT and MRI are the gold-standard for imaging extra-intestinal inflammatory disease, but fail in their ability to identify active inflammation. There have recently been many studies attempting to improve these means of assessing GI inflammation.
Transabdominal US presents a non-invasive means of imaging internal organs that imposes no significant health risks or undue discomfort upon the patient. The use of abdominal US for the evaluation of IBD was implemented as early as 1979, where wall thickening of the terminal ileum and cecum, with accompanying inflammatory changes in the mesentery, yielded recognizable patterns in both longitudinal and transverse images.11 These initial ultrasonographic images lacked sufficient resolution to provide a sensitive measure of disease activity, but technological advances in high frequency US have greatly improved resolution over the past twenty years. Still, the location and chronicity of certain conditions may decrease the efficacy of this imaging technique, making endoscopy the preferred method of investigation of GI problems. At present, there are several research groups actively investigating the application of US for the management of IBD. The combined results of these studies, in addition to the relatively wide availability, low cost, and easy use of US equipment, support the rationale for developing US into a useful tool for the evaluation of IBD.
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEU) is the main strategy for improving US quality. One contrast agent that has been studied in the imaging of inflammation, but which has not yet been human-tested for improvement of US quality in inflammation due to IBD, is microbubbles (MB). MB contrast agents are FDA-approved, and are becoming a common clinical tool for the enhancement of US imaging of cardiovascular hemodynamics around the world. Unlike tissue signal, which is produced by US reflection, the strong signal generated by MB is produced by radial oscillation of the MB in the acoustic field. Current MB used for perfusion imaging have lipid or albumin shells and contain high-molecular weight gases (perfluorocarbons, sulfur hexafluoride), which contribute to their high intravascular stability by preventing outward diffusion of gas. MB are generally 2-4µm in size - smaller than average capillary dimension - and passes unimpeded through the microcirculation. They are also hemodynamically inert, and behave similar to red blood cells in vivo. In animal models the acoustic properties of activated Definity® (Perflutren Lipid Microsphere) injectable suspension, were established at or below a mechanical index of 0.7 (1.8 MHz frequency). In clinical trials, the majority of the patients were imaged at or below a mechanical index of .08.
There are two ways that microbubbles might contribute to a strong signal in areas of inflammation in the small intestine or colon. The first is directly through neoangiogenesis and the increase in blood flow to the site. Defined as the growth of new blood vessels, neoangiogenesis is important to the pathogenesis of both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. An expanded microvascular bed in the mucosa and submucosa of IBD patients with active inflammation has been confirmed, and is consistent with the high levels of integrins characteristic for proliferating endothelium (e.g. IL-8, bFGF, and VEGF) found in the microvessels of tissue affected by IBD. The hope is that the increased blood flow in actively inflamed IBD will be correlated with a stronger US signal from the increased concentration of MB flowing through the site.
The second way microbubble CEU may be effective at identifying active inflammation is an indirect effect of new microvasculature. Neoangiogenesis is thought to contribute to pathogenesis by fostering the recruitment and activation of an increased number of leukocyte into the inflamed mucosa. It has been observed that both albumin and lipid shell MB used for echocardiographic studies are phagocytosed intact by activated leukocytes, some of which are adherent to the inflamed endothelium of small intestine or colon. These phagocytosed MB retain a percentage of their acoustic properties, enabling US to image inflammation non-invasively in an in vivo setting. Incorporation of specific lipid moieties into the microbubble shell increases retention and phagocytosis by activated leukocytes.
An investigation of the efficacy of microbubble contrast agents in imaging GI inflammation is the first step towards such targeted imaging and tissue-targeted therapy.
- Conditions
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Being tested
- Definity
- Keywords
- Inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease
- Medical subject headings
- Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Crohn Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DefinityOther
We will be placing one vial (1.3) of Definity® in 50 mL of preservative-free saline. Our infusions will be initiated at slightly lower than recommended starting rate (3mL/min) and will be adjusted as necessary to produce optimal enhancement. The rate will not exceed 10 ml/min and we will not give more than 1.3 mL of Definity® in 50mL saline in any 24-hour period.
DefinityOther
We will be placing one vial (1.3) of Definity® in 50 mL of preservative-free saline. Our infusions will be initiated at slightly lower than recommended starting rate (3mL/min) and will be adjusted as necessary to produce optimal enhancement. The rate will not exceed 10 ml/min and we will not give more than 1.3 mL of Definity® in 50mL saline in any 24-hour period.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | IBD patients Receives: Other: Definity |
| 2 | Other | Control subjects Receives: Other: Definity |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary study endpoint is to assess the degree of correlation of the video intensity score from microbubble imaging with an endoscopic scoring system for IBD, the Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Inflammatory Index (CDEIS).
Measured: Following data collection
Secondary outcomes (1)
Secondary endpoint includes comparing the level of video intensity between 30 subjects with inflammatory bowel disease with 10 control patients who are undergoing endoscopic evaluation for non-inflammatory conditions of the large bowel.
Measured: Following data collection
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2006
- Primary completionDec 2010
- Study completionDec 2010
Why it stopped: Data storage damage plus unexpected loss of funding
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of VirginiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Virginia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Brian Behm, MD, Principal investigator, University of Virginia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00591669
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 11971
- Status last verified
- Apr 2011
- First submitted
- 26 Dec 2007
- Last updated
- 26 Apr 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Apr 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Non-invasive Imaging of GI Inflammation Using Microbubble Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00591669
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 11971
- Conditions
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Keywords
- Inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Data storage damage plus unexpected loss of funding
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of VirginiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2006
- Primary completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a common chronic inflammatory disorder, but a noninvasive method of assessing disease location, severity, and extent is currently not available. Recently published animal data suggests that using transabdominal ultrasound enhanced with encapsulated gaseous microbubbles may provide a reliable, noninvasive means to detect and quantify areas of intestinal inflammation. This study will evaluate the role of Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEU) for use as a diagnostic tool in patients with IBD. We hypothesize that the severity and extent of chronic intestinal inflammation, as quantified by CEU-derived video intensity scores, will correlate with endoscopically-derived measures of intestinal inflammation as obtained from the Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Inflammatory Index (CDEIS). A total of 40 patients will be enrolled in the study, 30 patients with IBD and 10 patients undergoing colonoscopy for other reasons. Prior to colonoscopy CEU assessment of small and large intestine will be performed to evaluate neoangiogenesis and intestinal blood flow. The correlation between the CEU-derived video intensity score and CDEIS will be assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Subjects may also undergo scoring using the Rutgeerts Score, an endoscopic disease assessment index used to score disease activity in patients with previous ileocolonic resection. Comparing video intensity between IBD and non-IBD subjects will be performed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, with a secondary aim of establishing preliminary estimates of the sensitivity of the microbubble scoring system.
Detailed description
GI inflammation may indicate a number of complications or diseases, one of which is inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), now the second most prevalent inflammatory disorder in the world. Symptoms of the disease include severe abdominal pain, bloody diarrhea, persistent fever, weight loss, and significant malnutrition. There is also an increased risk of colon cancer. If left untreated, the disease is debilitating. Prompt intervention may reduce the amount of immunosuppressive therapy that is required to control the disease, but by the time the patient becomes symptomatic, the inflammatory response is difficult to suppress and much of the damage has already been done. It is therefore important to closely monitor patients with IBD. The location, extent, and severity of the inflammation are of primary consideration for correct diagnosis and treatment. However, no inexpensive and non-invasive procedure exists in protocol for the assessment of these factors of IBD. A non-invasive diagnostic that can detect the onset of inflammation and measure the extent of inflammatory involvement would be a valuable tool for the evaluation of patients with IBD.
Endoscopy, barium contrast X-ray studies, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and transabdominal ultrasound (US) are currently the most common procedures used by gastroenterologists. The preferred manner of investigating GI inflammation includes endoscopy with biopsy, as only endoscopy can confirm the presence of inflammation. However, this procedure is highly invasive and limited to areas accessible to the endoscope. There are also limited but real risks associated with endoscopy. In addition, the cost of such a procedure may be prohibitive, or a qualified professional inaccessible, for some patients. Barium contrast X-ray studies remain the best way to visualize stricture and fistulae in the small intestine, but do not provide insight into the degree and extent of active inflammation. Repeated X-rays in chronic and younger patients also contribute to risk of irradiation. CT and MRI are the gold-standard for imaging extra-intestinal inflammatory disease, but fail in their ability to identify active inflammation. There have recently been many studies attempting to improve these means of assessing GI inflammation.
Transabdominal US presents a non-invasive means of imaging internal organs that imposes no significant health risks or undue discomfort upon the patient. The use of abdominal US for the evaluation of IBD was implemented as early as 1979, where wall thickening of the terminal ileum and cecum, with accompanying inflammatory changes in the mesentery, yielded recognizable patterns in both longitudinal and transverse images.11 These initial ultrasonographic images lacked sufficient resolution to provide a sensitive measure of disease activity, but technological advances in high frequency US have greatly improved resolution over the past twenty years. Still, the location and chronicity of certain conditions may decrease the efficacy of this imaging technique, making endoscopy the preferred method of investigation of GI problems. At present, there are several research groups actively investigating the application of US for the management of IBD. The combined results of these studies, in addition to the relatively wide availability, low cost, and easy use of US equipment, support the rationale for developing US into a useful tool for the evaluation of IBD.
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEU) is the main strategy for improving US quality. One contrast agent that has been studied in the imaging of inflammation, but which has not yet been human-tested for improvement of US quality in inflammation due to IBD, is microbubbles (MB). MB contrast agents are FDA-approved, and are becoming a common clinical tool for the enhancement of US imaging of cardiovascular hemodynamics around the world. Unlike tissue signal, which is produced by US reflection, the strong signal generated by MB is produced by radial oscillation of the MB in the acoustic field. Current MB used for perfusion imaging have lipid or albumin shells and contain high-molecular weight gases (perfluorocarbons, sulfur hexafluoride), which contribute to their high intravascular stability by preventing outward diffusion of gas. MB are generally 2-4µm in size - smaller than average capillary dimension - and passes unimpeded through the microcirculation. They are also hemodynamically inert, and behave similar to red blood cells in vivo. In animal models the acoustic properties of activated Definity® (Perflutren Lipid Microsphere) injectable suspension, were established at or below a mechanical index of 0.7 (1.8 MHz frequency). In clinical trials, the majority of the patients were imaged at or below a mechanical index of .08.
There are two ways that microbubbles might contribute to a strong signal in areas of inflammation in the small intestine or colon. The first is directly through neoangiogenesis and the increase in blood flow to the site. Defined as the growth of new blood vessels, neoangiogenesis is important to the pathogenesis of both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. An expanded microvascular bed in the mucosa and submucosa of IBD patients with active inflammation has been confirmed, and is consistent with the high levels of integrins characteristic for proliferating endothelium (e.g. IL-8, bFGF, and VEGF) found in the microvessels of tissue affected by IBD. The hope is that the increased blood flow in actively inflamed IBD will be correlated with a stronger US signal from the increased concentration of MB flowing through the site.
The second way microbubble CEU may be effective at identifying active inflammation is an indirect effect of new microvasculature. Neoangiogenesis is thought to contribute to pathogenesis by fostering the recruitment and activation of an increased number of leukocyte into the inflamed mucosa. It has been observed that both albumin and lipid shell MB used for echocardiographic studies are phagocytosed intact by activated leukocytes, some of which are adherent to the inflamed endothelium of small intestine or colon. These phagocytosed MB retain a percentage of their acoustic properties, enabling US to image inflammation non-invasively in an in vivo setting. Incorporation of specific lipid moieties into the microbubble shell increases retention and phagocytosis by activated leukocytes.
An investigation of the efficacy of microbubble contrast agents in imaging GI inflammation is the first step towards such targeted imaging and tissue-targeted therapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Other: DefinityIBD patients |
| 2 | Other | Other: DefinityControl subjects |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), scheduled for diagnostic colonoscopy or
- Patients scheduled for diagnostic colonoscopy for other indications other than IBD (e.g. screening, family history of colon cancer).
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Ineligibility for colonoscopy
- For control patients: a personal history of IBD or clinical history suspicious for IBD or other disease associated with intestinal inflammation. To be determined by investigators at the time of screening.
- Abnormal QT, Tic, or PR intervals during screening ECG
- Life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias during screening ECG
- Abnormally low oxygen saturation (<80%)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DefinityWe will be placing one vial (1.3) of Definity® in 50 mL of preservative-free saline. Our infusions will be initiated at slightly lower than recommended starting rate (3mL/min) and will be adjusted as necessary to produce optimal enhancement. The rate will not exceed 10 ml/min and we will not give more than 1.3 mL of Definity® in 50mL saline in any 24-hour period. | Other | 1 |
| DefinityWe will be placing one vial (1.3) of Definity® in 50 mL of preservative-free saline. Our infusions will be initiated at slightly lower than recommended starting rate (3mL/min) and will be adjusted as necessary to produce optimal enhancement. The rate will not exceed 10 ml/min and we will not give more than 1.3 mL of Definity® in 50mL saline in any 24-hour period. | Other | 2 |
Primary outcome
The primary study endpoint is to assess the degree of correlation of the video intensity score from microbubble imaging with an endoscopic scoring system for IBD, the Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Inflammatory Index (CDEIS).
Time frame: Following data collection
1 secondary outcome
Secondary endpoint includes comparing the level of video intensity between 30 subjects with inflammatory bowel disease with 10 control patients who are undergoing endoscopic evaluation for non-inflammatory conditions of the large bowel.
Time frame: Following data collection
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Data storage damage plus unexpected loss of funding). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Apr 2011.
Related trials for Inflammatory Bowel Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Clinical and Basic Investigations Into Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome
Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome (HPS)
RecruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Immunophenotyping of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingPhase 1
A Sub Study to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability of Aletekitug in Participants With Moderate To Severe Ulcerative Colitis
Colitis, Ulcerative
RecruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate MORF-057 in Adults With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Measure Mirikizumab Levels in Breast Milk of Lactating Participants Receiving Mirikizumab Therapeutically for an Approved Indication
Lactation, Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Brian Behm, MD principal investigator
University of Virginia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Definity in people with Inflammatory Bowel Disease, run by University of Virginia at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Apr 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Data storage damage plus unexpected loss of funding). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary study endpoint is to assess the degree of correlation of the video intensity score from microbubble imaging with an endoscopic scoring system for IBD, the Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Inflammatory Index (CDEIS). (time frame: Following data collection). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Apr 2011; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.