HypertensionPhase 3NCT00591578
Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Azilsartan Medoxomil to Valsartan in Participants With Essential Hypertension
A Phase 3 study testing Azilsartan Medoxomil and Valsartan in people with Hypertension, run by Takeda at 88 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of TAK-491 (azilsartan medoxomil), once daily (QD), to valsartan in participants with essential hypertension. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypertension
- What is being tested?
- Azilsartan Medoxomil and Valsartan
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 984 participants
- Where
- 88 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Dec 2007to Mar 2010
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Essential hypertension (defined as sitting trough clinic systolic blood pressure between 150 and 180 mm Hg inclusive at Day minus 1 and 24-hour mean systolic blood pressure between 130 and 170 mm Hg inclusive at Day 1).
- Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must agree to use adequate contraception, and can neither be pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study.
- Clinical laboratory evaluations (including clinical chemistry, hematology, and complete urinalysis) within the reference range for the testing laboratory or the results are deemed not clinically significant for inclusion into this study by the investigator.
- Willing to discontinue current antihypertensive medications at the Screening Day minus 21 visit. If the subject is on amlodipine prior to Screening, the subject is willing to discontinue this medication at Screening Day minus 28.
Who cannot join
- Sitting trough clinic diastolic blood pressure greater than 114 mm Hg at Day minus 1.
- The subject has a baseline 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitor reading of insufficient quality.
- Is required to take or continues taking any disallowed medication, prescription medication, herbal treatment or over-the counter medication that may interfere with evaluation of the study medication.
- Hypersensitive to angiotensin II receptor blockers.
- Recent history (within the last 6 months) of myocardial infarction, heart failure, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack.
- Clinically significant cardiac conduction defects (eg, 3rd degree atrioventricular block, left bundle branch block, sick sinus syndrome, atrial fibrillation or flutter).
Show all 21Show fewer
- Hemodynamically significant left ventricular outflow obstruction due to aortic valvular disease.
- Secondary hypertension of any etiology.
- Non-compliant (less than 70% or greater than 130%) with study medication during placebo run-in period.
- Severe renal dysfunction or disease (based on calculated creatinine clearance less than 30 mL per min/1.73m2) at Screening.
- Known or suspected unilateral or bilateral renal artery stenosis.
- History of drug or alcohol abuse within the past 2 years.
- Previous history of cancer that has not been in remission for at least 5 years prior to the first dose of study drug. (This criterion does not apply to those subjects with basal cell or Stage 1 squamous cell carcinoma of the skin).
- Type 1 or poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (glycosylated hemoglobin greater than 8.0%) at Screening.
- Hyperkalemia as defined by the central laboratory normal reference range at Screening.
- Upper arm circumference less than 24 cm or greater than 42 cm.
- Works night (3rd) shift (defined as 11PM to 7AM).
- Alanine aminotransferase level of greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal, active liver disease, or jaundice at Screening.
- Currently is participating in another investigational study or has participated in an investigational study within 30 days prior to randomization.
- Any other serious disease or condition at Screening (or Randomization) that would compromise subject safety, might affect life expectancy, or make it difficult to successfully manage and follow the subject according to the protocol.
- Randomized in a previous azilsartan medoxomil study.
Trial locations and contacts
88 sites in 4 countries.
88 sites in 4 countries
United States77 sites
Study site
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Study site
Arlington, Virginia
Study site
Austin, Texas
Study site
Avon, Indiana
Study site
Baltimore, Maryland
Study site
Beverly Hills, California
Study site
Bloomington, Indiana
Study site
Boise, Idaho
Study site
Bridgeville, Pennsylvania
Study site
Brockton, Massachusetts
Study site
Burbank, California
Study site
Burke, Virginia
Study site
Charleston, South Carolina
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina
Study site
Chicago, Illinois
Study site
Cincinnati, Ohio
Study site
City of Saint Peters, Missouri
Study site
Columbia, Maryland
Study site
Crestview Hills, Kentucky
Study site
Dallas, Texas
Study site
DeLand, Florida
Study site
Delaware, Ohio
Study site
Downingtown, Pennsylvania
Study site
Eugene, Oregon
Study site
Florissant, Missouri
Study site
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Study site
Fort Worth, Texas
Study site
Glendale, Arizona
Study site
Gurnee, Illinois
Study site
Hollywood, Florida
Study site
Houston, Texas
Study site
Huntsville, Alabama
Study site
Inverness, Florida
Study site
Jacksonville, Florida
Study site
Jenkintown, Pennsylvania
Study site
Kansas City, Missouri
Study site
Kingsport, Tennessee
Study site
La Jolla, California
Study site
Lakewood, Washington
Study site
Lansdale, Pennsylvania
Study site
Long Beach, California
Study site
Los Angeles, California
Study site
Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin
Study site
Mogadore, Ohio
Study site
Morton, Illinois
Study site
Newark, Delaware
Study site
Norfolk, Virginia
Study site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Study site
Paramount, California
Study site
Park Ridge, Illinois
Study site
Pearland, Texas
Study site
Phoenix, Arizona
Study site
Port Richard, Washington
Study site
Portland, Oregon
Study site
Ridgefield, Connecticut
Study site
Riverton, Utah
Study site
Rosenberg, Texas
Study site
Salisbury, North Carolina
Study site
Salt Lake City, Utah
Study site
San Antonio, Texas
Study site
San Diego, California
Study site
Santa Monica, California
Study site
Scottsdale, Arizona
Study site
Shelby, North Carolina
Study site
Spartanburg, South Carolina
Study site
Spring Valley, California
Study site
Tuscon, Arizona
Study site
Tustin, California
Study site
Vista, California
Study site
Washington, Missouri
Study site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia
Study site
Wentzville, Missouri
Study site
West Jordan, Utah
Study site
West Yarmouth, Massachusetts
Study site
Westlake Village, California
Study site
Willoughby Hills, Ohio
Study site
Zanesville, Ohio
Mexico7 sites
Study site
Cabo San Lucas
Study site
Colonia Escandón
Study site
Culiacán
Study site
Mexico City
Study site
Monterrey Nuevo Leon
Study site
Morelia
Study site
Querétaro
About this study
Official title: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of TAK-491 With Valsartan in Subjects With Essential Hypertension
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of TAK-491 (azilsartan medoxomil), once daily (QD), to valsartan in participants with essential hypertension.
Read the detailed description
Hypertension affects approximately 50 million individuals in the United States. As the population ages, the prevalence of hypertension will continue to increase if broad and effective preventive measures are not implemented. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), hypertension is the most common attributable cause of preventable death in developed nations, as uncontrolled hypertension greatly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, and renal failure. Despite the availability of antihypertensive treatments, hypertension remains inadequately controlled; only about one-third of patients continue to maintain control successfully.
This study is being conducted to determine whether administration of azilsartan medoxomil in subjects with essential hypertension is more efficacious in reducing systolic blood pressure than valsartan.
Study participation is anticipated to be approximately 7 months. Outside of the study center, participants will be required to wear an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device at 24 hour intervals.
Following completion of the 6-month double-blind treatment period, all available subjects will be offered the option to continue in a 28-week extension study with open-label azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg.
For the extension study, participants will take azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 28 weeks. Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg or 25 mg or any other antihypertensive (except angiotensin II receptor blockers) may be added in a step-wise fashion to maintain blood pressure within target <140/90 mmHg for non-diabetic subjects and <130/80 mmHg for diabetic subjects
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Being tested
- Azilsartan Medoxomil, Valsartan
- Keywords
- Blood pressure, blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertension
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Azilsartan MedoxomilDrug
Also called TAK-491, Edarbi
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for 2 weeks; titrated to 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 22 weeks.
Azilsartan MedoxomilDrug
Also called TAK-491, Edarbi
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for 2 weeks; titrated to 80 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 22 weeks.
ValsartanDrug
Also called Diovan
Valsartan 80 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for 2 weeks; titrated to 320 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 22 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Azilsartan Medoxomil |
| Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Azilsartan Medoxomil |
| Valsartan 320 mg QD | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Valsartan |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
The change in 24-hour mean systolic blood pressure measured at week 24 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The 24-hour mean is the average of all measurements recorded for 24 hours after dosing.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24.
Secondary outcomes (14)
Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Clinic Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure.
The change in mean trough clinic sitting systolic blood pressure measured at final visit or week 24 relative to baseline. Systolic blood pressure is the arithmetic mean of the 3 trough sitting systolic blood pressure measurements.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline in the 24-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
The change in 24-hour mean diastolic blood pressure measured at week 24 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The 24-hour mean is the average of all measurements recorded for 24 hours after dosing.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Clinic Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure
The change in mean trough clinic sitting diastolic blood pressure measured at final visit or week 24 relative to baseline. Diastolic blood pressure is the arithmetic mean of the 3 trough sitting systolic blood pressure measurements.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline in Daytime (6am to 10 pm) Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
The change in daytime (6am to 10pm) mean systolic blood pressure measured at week 24 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. Daytime mean is the average of all measurements recorded between the hours of 6 am and 10 pm.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline in Daytime (6am to 10 pm) Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
The change in daytime (6am to 10pm) mean systolic blood pressure measured at week 24 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. Daytime mean is the average of all measurements recorded between the hours of 6 am and 10 pm.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline in the Nighttime (12 am to 6 am) Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
The change in nighttime (12am to 6am) mean systolic blood pressure measured at week 24 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. Nighttime mean is the average of all measurements recorded between the hours of 12 am and 6 am.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline in the Nighttime (12 am to 6 am) Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
The change in nighttime (12am to 6am) mean diastolic blood pressure measured at week 24 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. Nighttime mean is the average of all measurements recorded between the hours of 12 am and 6 am.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline in the 12-hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
The change in the 12-hour mean systolic blood pressure measured at week 24 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The 12-hour mean is the average of all measurements recorded in the first 12 hours after dosing.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline in the 12-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
The change in the 12-hour mean diastolic blood pressure measured at week 24 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The 12-hour mean is the average of all measurements recorded in the first 12 hours after dosing.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline in the Trough (22-24-hr) Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
The change in trough mean systolic blood pressure measured at week 24 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The trough mean is the average of all measurements recorded from 22 to 24 hours after dosing.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline in the Trough (22-24-hr) Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
The change in trough mean diastolic blood pressure measured at week 24 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The trough mean is the average of all measurements recorded from 22 to 24 hours after dosing.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure Response, Defined as < 140 mm Hg and/or Reduction From Baseline ≥ 20 mm Hg.
Percentage of participants who achieve a clinic systolic blood pressure response measured at week 24, defined as less than 140 mm Hg and/or reduction from baseline of greater than or equal to 20 mm Hg. Systolic blood pressure is the arithmetic mean of the 3 trough sitting systolic blood pressure measurements.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure Response, Defined as < 90 mm Hg and/or Reduction From Baseline ≥ 10 mm Hg.
Percentage of participants who achieve a clinic diastolic blood pressure response measured at week 24, defined as less than 90 mm Hg and/or reduction from baseline of greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg. Diastolic blood pressure is the arithmetic mean of the 3 trough sitting diastolic blood pressure measurements.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Both a Clinic Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure Response.
Percentage of participants who achieve both a clinic diastolic and systolic blood pressure response measured at week 24, defined as less than 90 mm Hg and/or reduction from baseline of greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg AND less than 140 mm Hg and/or reduction from baseline of greater than or equal to 20 mm Hg. Diastolic and systolic blood pressure is based on the arithmetic mean of the 3 sitting blood pressure measurements.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2007
- Primary completionSep 2009
- Study completionMar 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HypertensionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by TakedaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 984 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Takeda
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Executive Medical Director Clinical Science, Study director, Takeda
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00591578
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TAK-491_301
- Other IDs
- U1111-1113-9238
- Status last verified
- Jan 2012
- First submitted
- 27 Dec 2007
- Last updated
- 2 Feb 2012
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Sica D, White WB, Weber MA, Bakris GL, Perez A, Cao C, Handley A, Kupfer S. Comparison of the novel angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil vs valsartan by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Jul;13(7):467-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00482.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
PubMed 21762358
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Feb 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of TAK-491 With Valsartan in Subjects With Essential Hypertension
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00591578
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TAK-491_301
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Keywords
- Blood pressure, blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 984 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- TakedaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2007
- Primary completion
- Sep 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Apr 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of TAK-491 (azilsartan medoxomil), once daily (QD), to valsartan in participants with essential hypertension.
Detailed description
Hypertension affects approximately 50 million individuals in the United States. As the population ages, the prevalence of hypertension will continue to increase if broad and effective preventive measures are not implemented. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), hypertension is the most common attributable cause of preventable death in developed nations, as uncontrolled hypertension greatly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, and renal failure. Despite the availability of antihypertensive treatments, hypertension remains inadequately controlled; only about one-third of patients continue to maintain control successfully.
This study is being conducted to determine whether administration of azilsartan medoxomil in subjects with essential hypertension is more efficacious in reducing systolic blood pressure than valsartan.
Study participation is anticipated to be approximately 7 months. Outside of the study center, participants will be required to wear an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device at 24 hour intervals.
Following completion of the 6-month double-blind treatment period, all available subjects will be offered the option to continue in a 28-week extension study with open-label azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg.
For the extension study, participants will take azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 28 weeks. Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg or 25 mg or any other antihypertensive (except angiotensin II receptor blockers) may be added in a step-wise fashion to maintain blood pressure within target <140/90 mmHg for non-diabetic subjects and <130/80 mmHg for diabetic subjects
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD | Experimental | Drug: Azilsartan Medoxomil |
| Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD | Experimental | Drug: Azilsartan Medoxomil |
| Valsartan 320 mg QD | Active comparator | Drug: Valsartan |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Essential hypertension (defined as sitting trough clinic systolic blood pressure between 150 and 180 mm Hg inclusive at Day minus 1 and 24-hour mean systolic blood pressure between 130 and 170 mm Hg inclusive at Day 1).
- Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must agree to use adequate contraception, and can neither be pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study.
- Clinical laboratory evaluations (including clinical chemistry, hematology, and complete urinalysis) within the reference range for the testing laboratory or the results are deemed not clinically significant for inclusion into this study by the investigator.
- Willing to discontinue current antihypertensive medications at the Screening Day minus 21 visit. If the subject is on amlodipine prior to Screening, the subject is willing to discontinue this medication at Screening Day minus 28.
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Sitting trough clinic diastolic blood pressure greater than 114 mm Hg at Day minus 1.
- The subject has a baseline 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitor reading of insufficient quality.
- Is required to take or continues taking any disallowed medication, prescription medication, herbal treatment or over-the counter medication that may interfere with evaluation of the study medication.
- Hypersensitive to angiotensin II receptor blockers.
- Recent history (within the last 6 months) of myocardial infarction, heart failure, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Azilsartan MedoxomilAlso: TAK-491, EdarbiAzilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for 2 weeks; titrated to 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 22 weeks. | Drug | Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD |
| Azilsartan MedoxomilAlso: TAK-491, EdarbiAzilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for 2 weeks; titrated to 80 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 22 weeks. | Drug | Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD |
| ValsartanAlso: DiovanValsartan 80 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for 2 weeks; titrated to 320 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 22 weeks. | Drug | Valsartan 320 mg QD |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24.
The change in 24-hour mean systolic blood pressure measured at week 24 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The 24-hour mean is the average of all measurements recorded for 24 hours after dosing.
14 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Clinic Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline in the 24-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Clinic Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline in Daytime (6am to 10 pm) Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline in Daytime (6am to 10 pm) Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline in the Nighttime (12 am to 6 am) Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline in the Nighttime (12 am to 6 am) Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline in the 12-hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline in the 12-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline in the Trough (22-24-hr) Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline in the Trough (22-24-hr) Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure Response, Defined as < 140 mm Hg and/or Reduction From Baseline ≥ 20 mm Hg.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure Response, Defined as < 90 mm Hg and/or Reduction From Baseline ≥ 10 mm Hg.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Both a Clinic Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure Response.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Feb 2012.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 21762358Sica D, White WB, Weber MA, Bakris GL, Perez A, Cao C, Handley A, Kupfer S. Comparison of the novel angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil vs valsartan by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Jul;13(7):467-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00482.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
Related trials for Hypertension
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Enrolling by invitation
Testing Implementation Strategies to Support Clinic Fidelity to an Outpatient Hypertension Bundle
Pregnancy Related, Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Executive Medical Director Clinical Science study director
Takeda
88 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Azilsartan Medoxomil and Valsartan in people with Hypertension, run by Takeda at 88 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 88 sites in United States, Mexico, Chile, Peru. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Apr 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring. (time frame: Baseline and Week 24.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00591578, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2012.