Uterine CancerPhase 2NCT00584909
A Phase II Study of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Patients With an Elevated-Risk Cancer of the Uterus
A Phase 2 study testing Paclitaxel and carboplatin combination in people with Uterine Cancer, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The main purpose of this study us to determine the best treatment for patients with endometrial cancer who are at an elevated risk for recurrence. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Uterine Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Paclitaxel and carboplatin combination
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 13 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2006to Sep 2011
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must have a elevated risk, surgical stage II, stage IC, grade 2 or 3 adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.
- Patients must have undergone, a total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, peritoneal washings, and a pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.
- Patients must have adequate organ function defined as:
- Platelets >/= 100,000/µ
- Granulocytes (ANC)>/= 1,500/µl
- Creatinine</= 1.6 mg/dl
Show all 10Show fewer
- SGOT (AST) </= 3x upper limits of normal
- Bilirubin within institutional normal limits
- Patients must have adequate performance status (ECOG performance status 0-2 or Karnofsky Performance Status >40)
- Patients must be age 19 or greater and have signed informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Patients with history of other malignancies within 5 years (except non- melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma-in-situ of the cervix) are ineligible.
- Patients with high-risk histologic subtypes of endometrial cancer such as papillary serous or clear cell histology are ineligible.
- Patients with histologic evidence of uterine sarcoma, including leiomyosarcoma, carcinosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, and adenosarcoma are ineligible.
- Patients who have received past pelvic radiotherapy are ineligible.
- Patients receiving any other investigational agents are ineligible.
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to paclitaxel and/or carboplatin are ineligible.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
UAB Women's and Infant Center, 1700 6th Avenue South
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Study of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Adenocarcinoma of the Endometrium
The main purpose of this study us to determine the best treatment for patients with endometrial cancer who are at an elevated risk for recurrence.
Read the detailed description
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States with 40,880 new cases diagnosed and 7,310 deaths attributable to this malignancy expected in 2005. The majority of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer have early stage disease that is amenable to treatment with hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with excellent clinical outcomes. Surgical staging has improved accuracy over clinical staging for defining a low-risk population of patients who have favorable long-term outcomes with surgery alone. However, approximately 10-15% of patients with surgical stage I endometrial carcinoma (confined to the uterus) will have invasion to the outer one-half of the myometrium (stage IC) and a moderately to poorly differentiated tumor (grade 2 or 3). These patients are at a higher risk for recurrence (approximately 20-25% recurrence rate over 5 years). This patient population has been historically considered at "intermediate-risk" for recurrence because they are at lower risk than patient with disease spread beyond the uterus, but higher risk than patients with a grade 1 tumor or minimally invasive (Stage IA or IB). The optimal mode of postoperative management for this population of patients has yet to be defined.
Historically, radiation therapy has been used in some form in patients diagnosed with intermediate-risk endometrial cancer. Two randomized trials published in the last 5 years have evaluated the use of adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with intermediate-risk endometrial adenocarcinoma. the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) studied the use of adjuvant whole pelvic radiation (WPRT) versus no adjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with stage IB, IC, and II (occult)endometrial adenocarcinoma. In a study of 392 patients, the use of WPRT had a substantial impact on local recurrences (18 in NAT versus 3 in WPRT), but had no impact on the risk of distant recurrence (18 NAT versus 11 in WPRT). Because of the lack of distant control, the use of WPRT did not impact overall survival (estimated 4 year survival 86% in NAT versus 92% in WPRT, p=0.557). The PORTEC trial randomized patients with intermediate-risk Stage I endometrial carcinoma to WPRT versus NAT. Of note, patients in this trial were not surgically staged. Of 714 patients with a median follow-up of 52 months,local recurrence rates were 4% in the WPRT group versus 14% in the control group (p<0.001). The use of WPRT did not impact 5-year overall survival (81% WPRT versus 85% NAT). Furthermore, some clinicians have advocated observation after surgical staging with radiation therapy reserved for those patients who recur locally. Several reports have reported salvage rates of 50-66% for patients with local recurrences. Given that approximately 20-25% patients in this population will recur locally, many clinicians prefer to use local radiation therapy as salvage therapy, thus sparing the majority of patients the potential long-term effects of pelvic radiation therapy. Given that radiation therapy does not affect distant metastasis and carries significant long-term morbidity, other therapies are necessary to improve disease-free survival in this setting. Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy is one potential option for these patients since it may sterilize both local and distant metastases. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy may be more desirable than radiation therapy because most side effects of chemotherapy are short-term and subside once therapy is completed or discontinued.
Multiple chemotherapeutic agents including cisplatin, doxorubicin HCL, paclitaxel, carboplatin, and oral etoposide have been studied for patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. A phase III study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) compared doxorubicin with and without cisplatin (GOG 107) for patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. A higher response rate (42% vs. 25%) was noted for combination therapy and has been considered by many to be the standard chemotherapy regimen for treatment of patients with advanced endometrial cancer. Paclitaxel has also been studied as a single agent and in combination with platinum compounds in this setting. A phase II study that combined paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 as a 3-hour infusion with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 reported a 67% response rate. There were seven complete responses and nine partial responses with an 18-month median overall survival. An additional phase II study evaluated the efficacy of combining paclitaxel and carboplatin in both primary and recurrent non-papillary and papillary tumors following radiation therapy. the response rate was 78% in patients with primary advanced non-papillary tumors with a median disease-free survival of 23 months, with the median overall survival of 15 months. Currently, many clinicians are using a combination of paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (TAP), based on a phase III GOG study that demonstrated not only a significantly higher response rate (57% vs. 33%) over the combination of doxorubicin and cisplatin (AP), but also a survival advantage (median, 15.3 vs. 12.3 months; P=.037). Significantly more neurotoxicity was experienced by patients in the TAP arm. Currently, the GOG is evaluating the TAP combination versus the more tolerable regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin in a phase III setting.
The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin is considered the standard of care for both high-risk early stage ovarian cancer and advanced ovarian cancer. The safety of this combination is well established in a number of phase III trials and currently is used in the primary setting for patients with ovarian cancer and advanced endometrial cancer. Although this combination is considered active in endometrial carcinoma, there is a paucity of data regarding the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in the setting of intermediate-risk endometrial adenocarcinoma. Accordingly, this phase II study will evaluate the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin as adjuvant therapy for patients with early stage adenocarcinoma of the endometrium at elevated-risk for recurrence.
- Conditions
- Uterine Cancer
- Being tested
- Paclitaxel and carboplatin combination
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Paclitaxel and carboplatin combinationDrug
Paclitaxel will be administered at an appropriate dose (175 mg/m2) as a 3-hour continuous IV infusion every 21 days. Carboplatin will be administered at an appropriate dose utilizing the Calvert formula for determining the area under the curve (AUC) based on the patient's glomerular filtration rate (GFR).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Open Label | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Paclitaxel and carboplatin combination |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Disease-free Survival
Number of months of survival with no evidence of disease
Measured: 4 years - Median follow up time of 45.3 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Toxicity
Toxicity secondary to paclitaxel and carboplatin based upon the NCI common toxicity criteria version
Measured: 4 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2006
- Primary completionSep 2010
- Study completionSep 2011
Why it stopped: low accrual
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Uterine CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Alabama at BirminghamThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, J. Michael Straughn, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Investigators
- John M. Straughn, MD, Principal investigator, Assistant Professor, Dept of OB/Gyn, Division of GYN Oncology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00584909
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- F060328016 (UAB 0604)
- Other IDs
- UAB 0604
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 21 Dec 2007
- Last updated
- 27 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Study of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Adenocarcinoma of the Endometrium
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00584909
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- F060328016 (UAB 0604)
- Conditions
- Uterine Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: low accrual
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alabama at BirminghamUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2006
- Primary completion
- Sep 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 29 Mar 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main purpose of this study us to determine the best treatment for patients with endometrial cancer who are at an elevated risk for recurrence.
Detailed description
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States with 40,880 new cases diagnosed and 7,310 deaths attributable to this malignancy expected in 2005. The majority of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer have early stage disease that is amenable to treatment with hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with excellent clinical outcomes. Surgical staging has improved accuracy over clinical staging for defining a low-risk population of patients who have favorable long-term outcomes with surgery alone. However, approximately 10-15% of patients with surgical stage I endometrial carcinoma (confined to the uterus) will have invasion to the outer one-half of the myometrium (stage IC) and a moderately to poorly differentiated tumor (grade 2 or 3). These patients are at a higher risk for recurrence (approximately 20-25% recurrence rate over 5 years). This patient population has been historically considered at "intermediate-risk" for recurrence because they are at lower risk than patient with disease spread beyond the uterus, but higher risk than patients with a grade 1 tumor or minimally invasive (Stage IA or IB). The optimal mode of postoperative management for this population of patients has yet to be defined.
Historically, radiation therapy has been used in some form in patients diagnosed with intermediate-risk endometrial cancer. Two randomized trials published in the last 5 years have evaluated the use of adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with intermediate-risk endometrial adenocarcinoma. the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) studied the use of adjuvant whole pelvic radiation (WPRT) versus no adjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with stage IB, IC, and II (occult)endometrial adenocarcinoma. In a study of 392 patients, the use of WPRT had a substantial impact on local recurrences (18 in NAT versus 3 in WPRT), but had no impact on the risk of distant recurrence (18 NAT versus 11 in WPRT). Because of the lack of distant control, the use of WPRT did not impact overall survival (estimated 4 year survival 86% in NAT versus 92% in WPRT, p=0.557). The PORTEC trial randomized patients with intermediate-risk Stage I endometrial carcinoma to WPRT versus NAT. Of note, patients in this trial were not surgically staged. Of 714 patients with a median follow-up of 52 months,local recurrence rates were 4% in the WPRT group versus 14% in the control group (p<0.001). The use of WPRT did not impact 5-year overall survival (81% WPRT versus 85% NAT). Furthermore, some clinicians have advocated observation after surgical staging with radiation therapy reserved for those patients who recur locally. Several reports have reported salvage rates of 50-66% for patients with local recurrences. Given that approximately 20-25% patients in this population will recur locally, many clinicians prefer to use local radiation therapy as salvage therapy, thus sparing the majority of patients the potential long-term effects of pelvic radiation therapy. Given that radiation therapy does not affect distant metastasis and carries significant long-term morbidity, other therapies are necessary to improve disease-free survival in this setting. Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy is one potential option for these patients since it may sterilize both local and distant metastases. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy may be more desirable than radiation therapy because most side effects of chemotherapy are short-term and subside once therapy is completed or discontinued.
Multiple chemotherapeutic agents including cisplatin, doxorubicin HCL, paclitaxel, carboplatin, and oral etoposide have been studied for patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. A phase III study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) compared doxorubicin with and without cisplatin (GOG 107) for patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. A higher response rate (42% vs. 25%) was noted for combination therapy and has been considered by many to be the standard chemotherapy regimen for treatment of patients with advanced endometrial cancer. Paclitaxel has also been studied as a single agent and in combination with platinum compounds in this setting. A phase II study that combined paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 as a 3-hour infusion with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 reported a 67% response rate. There were seven complete responses and nine partial responses with an 18-month median overall survival. An additional phase II study evaluated the efficacy of combining paclitaxel and carboplatin in both primary and recurrent non-papillary and papillary tumors following radiation therapy. the response rate was 78% in patients with primary advanced non-papillary tumors with a median disease-free survival of 23 months, with the median overall survival of 15 months. Currently, many clinicians are using a combination of paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (TAP), based on a phase III GOG study that demonstrated not only a significantly higher response rate (57% vs. 33%) over the combination of doxorubicin and cisplatin (AP), but also a survival advantage (median, 15.3 vs. 12.3 months; P=.037). Significantly more neurotoxicity was experienced by patients in the TAP arm. Currently, the GOG is evaluating the TAP combination versus the more tolerable regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin in a phase III setting.
The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin is considered the standard of care for both high-risk early stage ovarian cancer and advanced ovarian cancer. The safety of this combination is well established in a number of phase III trials and currently is used in the primary setting for patients with ovarian cancer and advanced endometrial cancer. Although this combination is considered active in endometrial carcinoma, there is a paucity of data regarding the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in the setting of intermediate-risk endometrial adenocarcinoma. Accordingly, this phase II study will evaluate the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin as adjuvant therapy for patients with early stage adenocarcinoma of the endometrium at elevated-risk for recurrence.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Open Label | Experimental | Drug: Paclitaxel and carboplatin combination |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Patients must have a elevated risk, surgical stage II, stage IC, grade 2 or 3 adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.
- Patients must have undergone, a total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, peritoneal washings, and a pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.
- Patients must have adequate organ function defined as:
- Patients must have adequate performance status (ECOG performance status 0-2 or Karnofsky Performance Status >40)
- Patients must be age 19 or greater and have signed informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with history of other malignancies within 5 years (except non- melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma-in-situ of the cervix) are ineligible.
- Patients with high-risk histologic subtypes of endometrial cancer such as papillary serous or clear cell histology are ineligible.
- Patients with histologic evidence of uterine sarcoma, including leiomyosarcoma, carcinosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, and adenosarcoma are ineligible.
- Patients who have received past pelvic radiotherapy are ineligible.
- Patients receiving any other investigational agents are ineligible.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Paclitaxel and carboplatin combinationPaclitaxel will be administered at an appropriate dose (175 mg/m2) as a 3-hour continuous IV infusion every 21 days. Carboplatin will be administered at an appropriate dose utilizing the Calvert formula for determining the area under the curve (AUC) based on the patient's glomerular filtration rate (GFR). | Drug | Open Label |
Primary outcome
Disease-free Survival
Time frame: 4 years - Median follow up time of 45.3 months
Number of months of survival with no evidence of disease
1 secondary outcome
Toxicity
Time frame: 4 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jan 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Uterine Cancer
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Prospective Study of TVRFA Treatment for FIGO Type 3-5 Uterine Fibroids
Leiomyoma (Uterine Fibroids)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (MK-2870) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) as First-line Maintenance Treatment of Cervical Cancer (MK-2870-036/TroFuse-036/GOG-3123/ENGOT-cx22)
Cervical Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Endometrial Cancer Patientes MMR Deficient Comparing Chemotherapy vs Dostarlimab in First Line
Endometrial Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John M. Straughn, MD principal investigator
Assistant Professor, Dept of OB/Gyn, Division of GYN Oncology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Paclitaxel and carboplatin combination in people with Uterine Cancer, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Mar 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Disease-free Survival (time frame: 4 years - Median follow up time of 45.3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2017.