AzTrials
AzTrials

AstigmatismNCT00583908

Evaluation of Orientation and Visual Acuity of Four Toric Soft Contact Lenses When Head is Tilted at 90 Degrees

A study testing senofilcon A, balafilcon A toric and lotrafilcon B toric in people with Astigmatism, run by Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the relative performance of a new toric soft contact lens against three toric contact lens currently available in market, specifically with orientation and visual acuity when head is tilted at 90 degrees. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years
Conditions the study is for
Astigmatism
What is being tested?
senofilcon A, balafilcon A toric and lotrafilcon B toric
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
14 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Nov 2007to Jan 2008
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • be at least 18 and less than or equal to 50 years of age
  • be able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in the protocol.
  • have a distance spherical component between -1.00 D and -6.00D with cylinder in the range of 0.75 D to 1.75D
  • Sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT.
  • Have normal, healthy eyes

Who cannot join

  • The presence of ocular or systemic disease or need for medication which might interfere with contact lens wear.
  • Pre-existing ocular disease precluding contact lens fitting.
  • Insufficient lacrimal secretions
  • Aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea
  • Previous eye surgery involving the anterior segment
  • Current pregnancy or lactation (to the best of the subject's knowledge).
  • Use of concurrent ocular medication
  • Active participation in another clinical study at any time during this study.-

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Visioncare Research Ltd.

    Farnham, GU9 7EN

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Clinical and Theoretical Evaluation of Factors Affecting Soft Toric Lens Performance: Part 3

The purpose of this study is to determine the relative performance of a new toric soft contact lens against three toric contact lens currently available in market, specifically with orientation and visual acuity when head is tilted at 90 degrees.

Read the detailed description

Non-dispensing single-masked (subject-masked), randomised, 1-visit controlled study, ~2 hour duration.

Conditions
Astigmatism
Being tested
senofilcon A, balafilcon A toric, lotrafilcon B toric, omafilcon A
Keywords
astigmatism, orientation, visual acuity, contact lenses
Medical subject headings
Astigmatism, Orientation, Spatial

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • senofilcon ADevice

    toric contact lens

  • balafilcon A toricDevice

    toric contact lens

  • lotrafilcon B toricDevice

    toric contact lens

  • omafilcon ADevice

    toric contact lens

Study groups in NCT00583908
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1: lotrafilcon B/senofilcon A/balafilcon A/omafilcon AActive comparatorOne intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. Period 1: lotrafilcon B /period 2: senofilcon A / period 3: balafilcon A / period 4: omafilcon A
Receives: Device: senofilcon A; Device: balafilcon A toric; Device: lotrafilcon B toric; Device: omafilcon A
Group 2 lotrafilcon B/omafilcon A/senofilcon A/balafilcon AActive comparatorOne intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: lotrafilcon B / period 2: omafilcon A / period 3: senofilcon A / period 4: balafilcon A
Receives: Device: senofilcon A; Device: balafilcon A toric; Device: lotrafilcon B toric; Device: omafilcon A
Group 3 lotrafilcon B/balafilcon A/senofilcon A/omafilcon AActive comparatorOne intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: lotrafilcon B / period 2: balafilcon A / period 3: senofilcon A / period 4: omafilcon A
Receives: Device: senofilcon A; Device: balafilcon A toric; Device: lotrafilcon B toric; Device: omafilcon A
Group 4 senofilcon A/lotrafilcon B/omafilcon A/balafilcon AActive comparatorOne intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: senofilcon A / period 2: lotrafilcon B / period 3: omafilcon A / period 4: balafilcon A
Receives: Device: senofilcon A; Device: balafilcon A toric; Device: lotrafilcon B toric; Device: omafilcon A
Group 5 senofilcon A/omafilcon A/balafilcon A/lotrafilcon BActive comparatorOne intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: senofilcon A / period 2: omafilcon A / period 3: balafilcon A / period 4: lotrafilcon B
Receives: Device: senofilcon A; Device: balafilcon A toric; Device: lotrafilcon B toric; Device: omafilcon A
Group 6 senofilcon A/balafilcon A/lotrafilcon B/omafilcon AActive comparatorOne intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: senofilcon A / period 2: balafilcon A / period 3: lotrafilcon B / period 4: omafilcon A
Receives: Device: senofilcon A; Device: balafilcon A toric; Device: lotrafilcon B toric; Device: omafilcon A
Group 7 omafilcon B/lotrafilcon B/senofilcon A/balafilcon AActive comparatorOne intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: omafilcon A / period 2: lotrafilcon B / period 3: senofilcon A / period 4: balafilcon A
Receives: Device: senofilcon A; Device: balafilcon A toric; Device: lotrafilcon B toric; Device: omafilcon A
Group 8 balafilcon A/lotrafilcon B/senofilcon A/omafilcon AActive comparatorOne intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: balafilcon A / period 2: lotrafilcon B / period 3: senofilcon A / period 4: omafilcon A
Receives: Device: senofilcon A; Device: balafilcon A toric; Device: lotrafilcon B toric; Device: omafilcon A
Group 9 balafilcon A/lotrafilcon B/omafilcon A/senofilcon AActive comparatorOne intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: balafilcon A / period 2: lotrafilcon B / period 3: omafilcon A / period 4: senofilcon A
Receives: Device: senofilcon A; Device: balafilcon A toric; Device: lotrafilcon B toric; Device: omafilcon A
Group 10 balafilcon A/senofilcon A/lotrafilcon B/omafilcon AActive comparatorOne intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: balafilcon A / period 2: senofilcon A / period 3: lotrafilcon B / period 4: omafilcon A
Receives: Device: senofilcon A; Device: balafilcon A toric; Device: lotrafilcon B toric; Device: omafilcon A
Group 11 balafilcon A/senofilcon A/omafilcon A//lotrafilcon BActive comparatorOne intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: balafilcon A / period 2: senofilcon A / period 3: omafilcon A / period 4: lotrafilcon B
Receives: Device: senofilcon A; Device: balafilcon A toric; Device: lotrafilcon B toric; Device: omafilcon A
Group 12 balafilcon A/omafilcon A/lotrafilcon B/senofilcon AActive comparatorOne intervention was worn during each study period, which consisted of lens insertion, followed by a 15 minute settling period prior to measurement. All four periods were conducted in one day. period 1: balafilcon A / period 2: omafilcon A / period 3: lotrafilcon B / period 4: senofilcon A
Receives: Device: senofilcon A; Device: balafilcon A toric; Device: lotrafilcon B toric; Device: omafilcon A

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Lens Orientation During Head Tilt.

    Degree of lens rotation on the eye with the head tilted.

    Measured: after fit of each of the four lens insertions

  2. Visual Acuity During Head Tilt

    logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMar) ideal is 0.0 and represents 20/20 Snellen acuity.

    logMar values > 0.00 indicate vision poorer than the ideal and values <0.00 indicate vision greater than the ideal.

    Measured: after each of the four lens insertions

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Degree of Lens Rotation in Superior Gaze.

    Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing up.

    Measured: After each of the four lens insertions

  2. Degree of Lens Rotation in Superior-temporal Gaze.

    Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing up and out(towards the temple).

    Measured: After each of 4 lens insertions.,

  3. Degree of Lens Rotation in Superior-nasal Gaze.

    Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing up and in(towards the nose).

    Measured: After each of the four lens insertions

  4. Degree of Lens Rotation in Temporal Gaze.

    Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing out(towards the temple).

    Measured: After each of the four lens insertions

  5. Degree of Lens Rotation in Nasal Gaze.

    Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing in(towards the nose).

    Measured: After each of the four lens insertions

  6. Degree of Lens Rotation Inferior-temporal Gaze.

    Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing down and out.

    Measured: After each of the four lens insertions

  7. Degree of Lens Rotation in Inferior-nasal Gaze.

    Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing down and in.

    Measured: After each of the four lens insertions

  8. Degree of Lens Rotation in Inferior Gaze.

    Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing down.

    Measured: After each of the four lens insertions

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jan 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2007
  3. Primary completionJan 2008
  4. Study completionJan 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
14 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00583908
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR-0710 pt 3
Other IDs
ETOR-507(under GNR-011)
Status last verified
May 2015
First submitted
21 Dec 2007
Last updated
21 May 2015
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing senofilcon A, balafilcon A toric and lotrafilcon B toric in people with Astigmatism, run by Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Sep 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Lens Orientation During Head Tilt. (time frame: after fit of each of the four lens insertions). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in