Non-Hodgkin's LymphomaPhase 2NCT00576758
GAUSS: A Study of Obinutuzumab (RO5072759) in Patients With Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
A Phase 2 study testing obinutuzumab (RO5072759) and rituximab in people with Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 71 sites in 17 countries.
Trial summary
This study will investigate the efficacy of weekly intravenous obinutuzumab [GA101 (RO5072759)] monotherapy, in patients with relapsed CD20+ indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Patients will be randomized to receive either GA101 or rituximab, given as four weekly infusions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
- What is being tested?
- obinutuzumab (RO5072759) and rituximab
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 175 participants
- Where
- 71 sitesin 17 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2008to Mar 2013
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adult patients, >=18 years of age
- relapsed CD20+ indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
- documented history of response of >/= 6 months duration from last rituximab-containing regimen
- clinical indication for treatment as determined by the investigator
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
Who cannot join
- prior use of any investigational monoclonal antibody within 6 months of study start
- prior use of any anti-cancer vaccine
- prior use of rituximab within 8 weeks of study entry
- radioimmunotherapy within 3 months prior to study entry
- Central Nervous System (CNS) lymphoma or evidence of transformation to high-grade or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Trial locations and contacts
71 sites in 17 countries.
71 sites in 17 countries
United States13 sites
Study site
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
Study site
Columbus, Ohio, 43219
Study site
Concord, North Carolina, 28025
Study site
Cumberland, Maryland, 21502
Study site
Denver, Colorado, 80220
Study site
Gainesville, Florida, 32610
Study site
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77030
Study site
Los Angeles, California, 90024
Study site
New York, New York, 10065
Study site
Rochester, New York, 14642
Study site
Seattle, Washington, 98109
Study site
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Spain9 sites
Study site
A Coruña, La Coruña, 15006
Study site
Barcelona, Barcelona, 08025
Study site
Barcelona, Barcelona, 08035
Study site
Madrid, Madrid, 28046
Study site
Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, 07198
Study site
Salamanca, Salamanca, 37007
Study site
Seville, Sevilla, 41013
Study site
Valencia, Valencia, 46010
Study site
Zaragoza, Zaragoza, 50009
Italy8 sites
Study site
Bologna, 40138
Study site
Brescia, 25123
Study site
Milan, 20141
Study site
Milan, 20162
Study site
Novara, 28100
Study site
Pisa, 56100
Study site
Reggio Calabria, 89100
Study site
Rozzano, 20089
Canada7 sites
Study site
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2
Study site
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5P9
Study site
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1
Study site
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
Study site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6
Brazil5 sites
Study site
Goiânia, Goiás, 74140-050
Study site
Piracicaba, São Paulo, 13419-155
Study site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903
Study site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01323-020
Study site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04029-000
Netherlands4 sites
Study site
Amsterdam, 1105 AZ
Study site
Groningen, 9713 GZ
Study site
Rotterdam, 3015 CE
Study site
Rotterdam, 3075EA
Argentina3 sites
Study site
Buenos Aires, 1406
Study site
Buenos Aires, C1221ADC
Study site
Buenos Aires, C1431FWO
Austria3 sites
Study site
Innsbruck, 6020
Study site
Salzburg, 5020
Study site
Vienna, 1090
Belgium3 sites
Study site
Brussels, 1200
Study site
Ghent, 9000
Study site
Mont-godinne, 5530
Denmark3 sites
Study site
Aarhus, 8000
Study site
Copenhagen, 2100
Study site
Vejle, 7100
Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
Study site
Istanbul, 34365
Study site
Izmir, 35100
About this study
Official title: An Open-label, Multi-center, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy on Tumor Response of GA101 (RO5072759) Monotherapy Versus Rituximab Monotherapy in Patients With Relapsed CD20+ Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
This study will investigate the efficacy of weekly intravenous obinutuzumab [GA101 (RO5072759)] monotherapy, in patients with relapsed CD20+ indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Patients will be randomized to receive either GA101 or rituximab, given as four weekly infusions. At the conclusion of the initial trial patients may be eligible to continue therapy up to 24 months. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3- 24 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.
- Conditions
- Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
- Being tested
- obinutuzumab (RO5072759), rituximab
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
obinutuzumab (RO5072759)Drug
Also called RO5072759, GA101, GAZYVA®
1000 mg obinutuzumab intravenous (IV) infusion once a week for 4 weeks.
rituximabDrug
375 mg/m^2 rituximab IV infusion once a week for 4 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Obinutuzumab | Experimental | Participants received 1000 mg obinutuzumab intravenous (IV) infusion once a week on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 in the Induction Period. 2 months following the last infusion, participants without disease progression, were eligible to receive a 1000 mg IV infusion every two months for 2 years in the Extension Period. All participants received oral acetaminophen/ paracetamol (1000 mg) and an antihistamine such as diphenhydramine (50-100 mg), 30-60 minutes prior to each infusion. Receives: Drug: obinutuzumab (RO5072759) |
| Rituximab | Active comparator | Participants received 375 mg/m^2 rituximab IV infusion once a week on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 in the Induction Period. 2 months following the last infusion, participants without disease progression were eligible to receive a 375 mg/m^2 rituximab IV infusion once every two months for 2 years in the Extension Period. All participants received oral acetaminophen/ paracetamol (1000 mg) and an antihistamine such as diphenhydramine (50-100 mg), 30-60 minutes prior to each infusion. Receives: Drug: rituximab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response At the End of Induction Period
Overall response was defined as Complete Response (CR), Complete Response/Unconfirmed (CRu) or Partial Response (PR) as assessed by investigator at end of induction treatment. Computed tomography imaging was used for the primary assessment of tumor response per 1999 criteria by Cheson.
CR was defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease, disease-related symptoms and normalization of biochemical abnormalities of NHL.
CRu was CR plus one or more of the following: A residual lymph node mass greater than 1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter that has regressed by more than 75% in the sum of the products of the greatest diameter (tumors)(SPD) and/or indeterminate bone marrow.
PR was defined as 50% decrease in SPD of the 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. No increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules must regress by at least 50% in the SPD. No new sites of disease.
Measured: Randomization to clinical cutoff: 01 September 2011 (Up to 70 days)
Secondary outcomes (23)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response at the End of the Induction Period
Computed tomography imaging was used for the primary assessment of tumor response per 1999 criteria by Cheson. CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease, disease-related symptoms and normalization of biochemical abnormalities of NHL. All lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed to normal size. The spleen, if considered to be enlarged before therapy on the basis of a CT scan, must have regressed in size and must not be palpable on physical examination. Any macroscopic nodules in any organs detectable on imaging techniques should no longer be present. Other organs considered to be enlarged before therapy due to involvement by lymphoma, such as liver and kidneys, must have decreased in size. If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma before treatment, the infiltrate must be cleared on repeat bone marrow aspirate and biopsy of the same site.
Measured: Randomization to clinical cutoff : 01 September 2011 (Up to 70 days)
Percentage of Participants With Partial Response (PR) at the End of the Induction Period
Computed tomography imaging was used for the primary assessment of tumor response per 1999 criteria by Cheson. PR was defined as 50% decrease in SPD of the 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. No increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules must regress by at least 50% in the SPD. No new sites of disease.
Measured: Randomization to clinical cutoff : 01 September 2011 (Up to 70 days)
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response Achieved at Any Time During the Study Treatment
Overall response was defined as Complete Response (CR), Complete Response/Unconfirmed (CRu) or Partial Response (PR) as assessed by investigators during study treatment (induction or extended treatment phase). Computed tomography imaging was used for the primary assessment of tumor response per 1999 criteria by Cheson.
CR was defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease, disease-related symptoms and normalization of biochemical abnormalities of NHL.
CRu was CR plus one or more of the following: A residual lymph node mass greater than 1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter that has regressed by more than 75% in the sum of the products of the greatest diameter (tumors)(SPD) and/or indeterminate bone marrow.
PR was defined as 50% decrease in SPD of the 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. No increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules must regress by at least 50% in the SPD. No new sites of disease.
Measured: Randomization to clinical cutoff : 01 September 2011 (Up to 70 days)
Number of Participants With Improved Overall Response During the Extended Treatment Period
Overall response was defined as Complete Response (CR), Complete Response/Unconfirmed (CRu) or Partial Response (PR) as assessed by investigators at end of induction treatment. Computed tomography imaging was used for the primary assessment of tumor response per 1999 criteria by Cheson.
Measured: Randomization to Clinical cutoff: 07 March 2013 (Up to 43.2 months)
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response Achieved at Any Time During the Study Treatment
Overall response was defined as Complete Response (CR), Complete Response/Unconfirmed (CRu) or Partial Response (PR) as assessed by investigators during study treatment (induction or extended treatment phase). Computed tomography imaging was used for the primary assessment of tumor response per 1999 criteria by Cheson.
CR was defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease, disease-related symptoms and normalization of biochemical abnormalities of NHL.
CRu was CR plus one or more of the following: A residual lymph node mass greater than 1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter that has regressed by more than 75% in the sum of the products of the greatest diameter (tumors)(SPD) and/or indeterminate bone marrow.
PR was defined as 50% decrease in SPD of the 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. No increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules must regress by at least 50% in the SPD. No new sites of disease.
Measured: Randomization to Clinical cutoff: 07 March 2013 (Up to 43.2 months)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of progression, relapse, or death from any cause as assessed by the Investigator.
Progression was defined as a ≥ 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously identified abnormal node and/or the appearance of any new lesion during or at the end of therapy.
Relapse was defined as the appearance of any new lesion or increase by ≥ 50% in the size of previously involved sites and/or a ≥ 50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node greater than 1 cm in its short axis or in the SPD of more than one node.
Measured: Randomization to Clinical cutoff: 07 March 2013 (Up to 43.2 months)
Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Events
The percentage of participants with progression, relapse, or death events from any cause as assessed by the Investigator.
Progression was defined as a ≥ 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously identified abnormal node and/or the appearance of any new lesion during or at the end of therapy.
Relapse was defined as the appearance of any new lesion or increase by ≥ 50% in the size of previously involved sites and/or a ≥ 50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node greater than 1 cm in its short axis or in the SPD of more than one node.
Measured: Randomization to Clinical cutoff: 07 March 2013 (Up to 43.2 months)
Event Free Survival
Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time between date of randomization and the date of disease progression/relapse, death, or start of a new anti-leukemic therapy.
Progression was defined as a ≥ 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously identified abnormal node and/or the appearance of any new lesion during or at the end of therapy.
Relapse was defined as the appearance of any new lesion or increase by ≥ 50% in the size of previously involved sites and/or a ≥ 50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node greater than 1 cm in its short axis or in the SPD of more than one node.
Measured: Randomization to Clinical cutoff: 07 March 2013 (Up to 43.2 months)
Percentage of Participants With Event Free Survival (EFS) Events
Percentage of participants with Event Free Events: disease progression/relapse, death, or start of a new anti-leukemic therapy.
Progression was defined as a ≥ 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously identified abnormal node and/or the appearance of any new lesion during or at the end of therapy.
Relapse was defined as the appearance of any new lesion or increase by ≥ 50% in the size of previously involved sites and/or a ≥ 50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node greater than 1 cm in its short axis or in the SPD of more than one node.
Measured: Randomization to Clinical cutoff: 07 March 2013 (Up to 43.2 months)
Duration of Response
Duration of Response was defined as the date the response, either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR), was first recorded until the date of Disease Progression or death due to any cause. Computed tomography imaging was used for the primary assessment of tumor response per 1999 criteria by Cheson.
CR was defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease, disease-related symptoms and normalization of biochemical abnormalities of NHL.
PR was defined as 50% decrease in SPD of the 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. No increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules must regress by at least 50% in the SPD. No new sites of disease.
Disease Progression was defined as a ≥ 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously identified abnormal node and/or the appearance of any new lesion during or at the end of therapy.
Measured: Randomization to Clinical cutoff: 07 March 2013 (Up to 43.2 months)
Obinutuzumab Serum PK Parameter: Terminal Half-Life (t1/2)
Blood was collected for Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters before and after dose administration of obinutuzumab in Induction Phase Cycle 4. Serum samples were sent to a central lab and were analyzed for obinutuzumab using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Terminal Half-Life was calculated in days.
Measured: Day 22 (pre-infusion, at end of infusion, 3-6, 20-28, 66-80 hours, 6-8, 12-16, 18-24, 28-56 days post-infusion)
Obinutuzumab Serum PK Parameter: Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax)
Blood was collected for PK Parameters before and after dose administration of obinutuzumab in Induction Phase Cycles 1, 2, 3 and 4. Serum samples were sent to a central lab and were analyzed for obinutuzumab using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Cmax was calculated in micrograms/milliliter (μg/mL).
Measured: Day 1 (pre-infusion, at end of infusion, 3-6, 20-28, 66-80 hours post-infusion), Days 8 and 15 (pre-infusion, at end of infusion), Day 22 (pre-infusion, at end of infusion, 3-6, 20-28, 66-80 hours, 6-8, 12-16, 18-24, 28-56 days post-infusion)
Obinutuzumab Serum PK Parameter: Area Under the Concentration Curve (AUClast)
Blood was collected for PK Parameters before and after dose administration of obinutuzumab in Induction Phase Cycle 4. Serum samples were sent to a central lab and were analyzed for obinutuzumab using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). AUClast was calculated in days* micrograms/milliliter (μg/mL)
Measured: Day 22 (pre-infusion, at end of infusion, 3-6, 20-28, 66-80 hours, 6-8, 12-16, 18-24, 28-56 days post-infusion)
Obinutuzumab Serum PK Parameter: Clearance at Steady-State (CLss)
Blood was collected for PK Parameters before and after dose administration of obinutuzumab in Induction Phase Cycle 4. Serum samples were sent to a central lab and were analyzed for obinutuzumab using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). CLsst was calculated in milliliter/day (mL/day)
Measured: Day 22 (pre-infusion, at end of infusion, 3-6, 20-28, 66-80 hours, 6-8, 12-16, 18-24, 28-56 days post-infusion)
Obinutuzumab Serum PK Parameter: Volume of Distribution at Steady-State (Vss)
Blood was collected for PK Parameters before and after dose administration of obinutuzumab in Induction Phase Cycle 4. Serum samples were sent to a central lab and were analyzed for obinutuzumab using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Vss was calculated in liters (L).
Measured: Day 22 (pre-infusion, at end of infusion, 3-6, 20-28, 66-80 hours, 6-8, 12-16, 18-24, 28-56 days post-infusion)
Obinutuzumab Serum PK Parameter: Area Under the Concentration Curve Between Dosing Interval (AUCtau)
Blood was collected for PK Parameters before and after dose administration of obinutuzumab in Induction Phase Cycle 4. Serum samples were sent to a central lab and were analyzed for obinutuzumab using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). AUCtau was calculated in days* micrograms/milliliter (μg/mL)
Measured: Day 22 (pre-infusion, at end of infusion, 3-6, 20-28, 66-80 hours, 6-8, 12-16, 18-24, 28-56 days post-infusion)
Obinutuzumab Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough)
Blood was collected for PK Parameters before and after dose administration of obinutuzumab in Induction Phase Cycles 2, 3 and 4. Serum samples were sent to a central lab and were analyzed for obinutuzumab using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Ctrough was calculated in micrograms/milliliter (μg/mL).
Measured: Days 8 and 15 (pre-infusion, at end of infusion), Day 22 (pre-infusion, at end of infusion, 3-6, 20-28, 66-80 hours, 6-8, 12-16, 18-24, 28-56 days post-infusion)
Number of Participants With Peripheral Blood B-Cell Depletion
Blood was collected and sent to a central laboratory for the evaluation of cluster of differentiation 19 (CD19) by flow cytometry at the end of the induction period. B-cell depletion was defined as a CD19 result 5 % of the Baseline value after at least one dose of study drug was administered.
Measured: Day 22
Number of Participants With Peripheral Blood B-Cell Recovery
Blood was sent to a central laboratory for the evaluation of cluster of differentiation 19 (CD19) by flow cytometry. B-cell recovery was defined as the time point when the CD-19 values return to ≥ 50% of baseline levels. The number of participants with B-cell recovery from End of Induction (treatment) Phase to 6 months of Follow-up is reported in two categories: Recovery with Progressive Disease (PD) or Recovery without PD. PD required one of the following: 50 % increase in the absolute number of circulating lymphocytes, Appearance of new palpable lymph nodes, 50 % increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of lymphadenopathy, 50 % increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen or Transformation to a more aggressive histology.
Measured: End of last dose + 6 Months Follow-Up
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory result), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational medicinal product (IMP) or other protocol-imposed intervention, regardless of attribution. A SAE was any AE that was one of the following: fatal, life-threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product or considered a significant medical event by the investigator. Additional information about AEs can be found in the Adverse Event Section.
Measured: Randomization to Clinical cutoff: 07 March 2013 (Up to 43.2 months) [Includes all AEs reported 28 days after last dose and all Related SAEs regardless of time of last dose.]
Number of Participants With Infusion Related Reactions
Infusion Related Reactions were AEs that occurred during the infusion or within 24 hours of the infusion.
Measured: Randomization to Clinical cutoff: 07 March 2013 (Up to 43.2 months)
Number of Participants With Human Anti-Chimeric Antibodies (HACA)
Blood was collected on Day 1 and was sent to a central laboratory for analysis of human anti-chimeric antibodies (anti-rituximab antibodies) using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). HACA samples were not collected for participants randomized to the rituximab arm.
Measured: Day 1
Number of Participants With Human Anti-Human Antibodies (HAHA)
Blood was collected on Day 1 pre-infusion, during the safety follow-up for those patients who did not enter the Extension period and 6 months after the last infusion of the Extension Period if applicable. Blood was sent to a central laboratory and was tested for anti-obinutuzumab antibodies using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). HAHA samples were not collected for participants randomized to the rituximab arm.
Measured: Randomization to Clinical cutoff: 07 March 2013 (Up to 43.2 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Dec 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2008
- Primary completionSep 2011
- Study completionMar 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Non-Hodgkin's LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 175 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00576758
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BO21003
- Status last verified
- Aug 2014
- First submitted
- 18 Dec 2007
- Last updated
- 19 Aug 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Gibiansky E, Gibiansky L, Buchheit V, Frey N, Brewster M, Fingerle-Rowson G, Jamois C. Pharmacokinetics, exposure, efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab in rituximab-refractory follicular lymphoma patients in the GADOLIN phase III study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Sep;85(9):1935-1945. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13974. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
PubMed 31050355Kostakoglu L, Goy A, Martinelli G, Caballero D, Crump M, Gaidano G, Baetz T, Buckstein R, Fine G, Fingerle-Rowson G, Berge C, Sahin D, Press O, Sehn L. FDG-PET is prognostic and predictive for progression-free survival in relapsed follicular lymphoma: exploratory analysis of the GAUSS study. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Feb;58(2):372-381. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1196815. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
PubMed 27339738Sehn LH, Goy A, Offner FC, Martinelli G, Caballero MD, Gadeberg O, Baetz T, Zelenetz AD, Gaidano G, Fayad LE, Buckstein R, Friedberg JW, Crump M, Jaksic B, Zinzani PL, Padmanabhan Iyer S, Sahin D, Chai A, Fingerle-Rowson G, Press OW. Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Obinutuzumab (GA101) With Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed CD20+ Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Final Analysis of the GAUSS Study. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 20;33(30):3467-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.2139. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
PubMed 26282650Sehn LH, Assouline SE, Stewart DA, Mangel J, Gascoyne RD, Fine G, Frances-Lasserre S, Carlile DJ, Crump M. A phase 1 study of obinutuzumab induction followed by 2 years of maintenance in patients with relapsed CD20-positive B-cell malignancies. Blood. 2012 May 31;119(22):5118-25. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-02-408773. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
PubMed 22438256
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Aug 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-label, Multi-center, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy on Tumor Response of GA101 (RO5072759) Monotherapy Versus Rituximab Monotherapy in Patients With Relapsed CD20+ Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00576758
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BO21003
- Conditions
- Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 175 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2008
- Primary completion
- Sep 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Dec 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 31 Mar 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will investigate the efficacy of weekly intravenous obinutuzumab [GA101 (RO5072759)] monotherapy, in patients with relapsed CD20+ indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Patients will be randomized to receive either GA101 or rituximab, given as four weekly infusions. At the conclusion of the initial trial patients may be eligible to continue therapy up to 24 months. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3- 24 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Obinutuzumab | Experimental | Drug: obinutuzumab (RO5072759)Participants received 1000 mg obinutuzumab intravenous (IV) infusion once a week on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 in the Induction Period. 2 months following the last infusion, participants without disease progression, were eligible to receive a 1000 mg IV infusion every two months for 2 years in the Extension Period. All participants received oral acetaminophen/ paracetamol (1000 mg) and an antihistamine such as diphenhydramine (50-100 mg), 30-60 minutes prior to each infusion. |
| Rituximab | Active comparator | Drug: rituximabParticipants received 375 mg/m^2 rituximab IV infusion once a week on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 in the Induction Period. 2 months following the last infusion, participants without disease progression were eligible to receive a 375 mg/m^2 rituximab IV infusion once every two months for 2 years in the Extension Period. All participants received oral acetaminophen/ paracetamol (1000 mg) and an antihistamine such as diphenhydramine (50-100 mg), 30-60 minutes prior to each infusion. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- adult patients, >=18 years of age
- relapsed CD20+ indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
- documented history of response of >/= 6 months duration from last rituximab-containing regimen
- clinical indication for treatment as determined by the investigator
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- prior use of any investigational monoclonal antibody within 6 months of study start
- prior use of any anti-cancer vaccine
- prior use of rituximab within 8 weeks of study entry
- radioimmunotherapy within 3 months prior to study entry
- Central Nervous System (CNS) lymphoma or evidence of transformation to high-grade or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| obinutuzumab (RO5072759)Also: RO5072759, GA101, GAZYVA®1000 mg obinutuzumab intravenous (IV) infusion once a week for 4 weeks. | Drug | Obinutuzumab |
| rituximab375 mg/m^2 rituximab IV infusion once a week for 4 weeks. | Drug | Rituximab |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response At the End of Induction Period
Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff: 01 September 2011 (Up to 70 days)
Overall response was defined as Complete Response (CR), Complete Response/Unconfirmed (CRu) or Partial Response (PR) as assessed by investigator at end of induction treatment. Computed tomography imaging was used for the primary assessment of tumor response per 1999 criteria by Cheson. CR was defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease, disease-related symptoms and normalization of biochemical abnormalities of NHL. CRu was CR plus one or more of the following: A residual lymph node mass greater than 1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter that has regressed by more than 75% in the sum of the products of the greatest diameter (tumors)(SPD) and/or indeterminate bone marrow. PR was defined as 50% decrease in SPD of the 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. No increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules must regress by at least 50% in the SPD. No new sites of disease.
23 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response at the End of the Induction Period
Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff : 01 September 2011 (Up to 70 days)
Percentage of Participants With Partial Response (PR) at the End of the Induction Period
Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff : 01 September 2011 (Up to 70 days)
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response Achieved at Any Time During the Study Treatment
Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff : 01 September 2011 (Up to 70 days)
Number of Participants With Improved Overall Response During the Extended Treatment Period
Time frame: Randomization to Clinical cutoff: 07 March 2013 (Up to 43.2 months)
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response Achieved at Any Time During the Study Treatment
Time frame: Randomization to Clinical cutoff: 07 March 2013 (Up to 43.2 months)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: Randomization to Clinical cutoff: 07 March 2013 (Up to 43.2 months)
Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Events
Time frame: Randomization to Clinical cutoff: 07 March 2013 (Up to 43.2 months)
Event Free Survival
Time frame: Randomization to Clinical cutoff: 07 March 2013 (Up to 43.2 months)
Percentage of Participants With Event Free Survival (EFS) Events
Time frame: Randomization to Clinical cutoff: 07 March 2013 (Up to 43.2 months)
Duration of Response
Time frame: Randomization to Clinical cutoff: 07 March 2013 (Up to 43.2 months)
Obinutuzumab Serum PK Parameter: Terminal Half-Life (t1/2)
Time frame: Day 22 (pre-infusion, at end of infusion, 3-6, 20-28, 66-80 hours, 6-8, 12-16, 18-24, 28-56 days post-infusion)
Obinutuzumab Serum PK Parameter: Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax)
Time frame: Day 1 (pre-infusion, at end of infusion, 3-6, 20-28, 66-80 hours post-infusion), Days 8 and 15 (pre-infusion, at end of infusion), Day 22 (pre-infusion, at end of infusion, 3-6, 20-28, 66-80 hours, 6-8, 12-16, 18-24, 28-56 days post-infusion)
Obinutuzumab Serum PK Parameter: Area Under the Concentration Curve (AUClast)
Time frame: Day 22 (pre-infusion, at end of infusion, 3-6, 20-28, 66-80 hours, 6-8, 12-16, 18-24, 28-56 days post-infusion)
Obinutuzumab Serum PK Parameter: Clearance at Steady-State (CLss)
Time frame: Day 22 (pre-infusion, at end of infusion, 3-6, 20-28, 66-80 hours, 6-8, 12-16, 18-24, 28-56 days post-infusion)
Obinutuzumab Serum PK Parameter: Volume of Distribution at Steady-State (Vss)
Time frame: Day 22 (pre-infusion, at end of infusion, 3-6, 20-28, 66-80 hours, 6-8, 12-16, 18-24, 28-56 days post-infusion)
Obinutuzumab Serum PK Parameter: Area Under the Concentration Curve Between Dosing Interval (AUCtau)
Time frame: Day 22 (pre-infusion, at end of infusion, 3-6, 20-28, 66-80 hours, 6-8, 12-16, 18-24, 28-56 days post-infusion)
Obinutuzumab Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough)
Time frame: Days 8 and 15 (pre-infusion, at end of infusion), Day 22 (pre-infusion, at end of infusion, 3-6, 20-28, 66-80 hours, 6-8, 12-16, 18-24, 28-56 days post-infusion)
Number of Participants With Peripheral Blood B-Cell Depletion
Time frame: Day 22
Number of Participants With Peripheral Blood B-Cell Recovery
Time frame: End of last dose + 6 Months Follow-Up
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
Time frame: Randomization to Clinical cutoff: 07 March 2013 (Up to 43.2 months) [Includes all AEs reported 28 days after last dose and all Related SAEs regardless of time of last dose.]
Number of Participants With Infusion Related Reactions
Time frame: Randomization to Clinical cutoff: 07 March 2013 (Up to 43.2 months)
Number of Participants With Human Anti-Chimeric Antibodies (HACA)
Time frame: Day 1
Number of Participants With Human Anti-Human Antibodies (HAHA)
Time frame: Randomization to Clinical cutoff: 07 March 2013 (Up to 43.2 months)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Aug 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31050355Gibiansky E, Gibiansky L, Buchheit V, Frey N, Brewster M, Fingerle-Rowson G, Jamois C. Pharmacokinetics, exposure, efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab in rituximab-refractory follicular lymphoma patients in the GADOLIN phase III study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Sep;85(9):1935-1945. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13974. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27339738Kostakoglu L, Goy A, Martinelli G, Caballero D, Crump M, Gaidano G, Baetz T, Buckstein R, Fine G, Fingerle-Rowson G, Berge C, Sahin D, Press O, Sehn L. FDG-PET is prognostic and predictive for progression-free survival in relapsed follicular lymphoma: exploratory analysis of the GAUSS study. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Feb;58(2):372-381. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1196815. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26282650Sehn LH, Goy A, Offner FC, Martinelli G, Caballero MD, Gadeberg O, Baetz T, Zelenetz AD, Gaidano G, Fayad LE, Buckstein R, Friedberg JW, Crump M, Jaksic B, Zinzani PL, Padmanabhan Iyer S, Sahin D, Chai A, Fingerle-Rowson G, Press OW. Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Obinutuzumab (GA101) With Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed CD20+ Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Final Analysis of the GAUSS Study. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 20;33(30):3467-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.2139. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22438256Sehn LH, Assouline SE, Stewart DA, Mangel J, Gascoyne RD, Fine G, Frances-Lasserre S, Carlile DJ, Crump M. A phase 1 study of obinutuzumab induction followed by 2 years of maintenance in patients with relapsed CD20-positive B-cell malignancies. Blood. 2012 May 31;119(22):5118-25. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-02-408773. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
Related trials for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Ibrutinib Combination Therapy in Transplant Ineligible Individuals With Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma
Non-hodgkin Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Brentuximab Vedotin and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With CD30-Positive Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, ALK-Negative
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Obesity Treatment With Phentermine-Topiramate ER in AYA Surviving Leukemia and Lymphoma
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Hodgkin Lymphoma in Remission
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Anakinra to Prevent or Treat Severe Side Effects for Patients Receiving CAR-T Cell Therapy
B Cell ALL, B-Cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Rollover Study of CC-122
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
71 sites in 17 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing obinutuzumab (RO5072759) and rituximab in people with Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 71 sites in 17 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 71 sites in United States, Spain, Italy, Canada, Brazil and 12 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Mar 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response At the End of Induction Period (time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff: 01 September 2011 (Up to 70 days)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00576758, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2014.