AzTrials
AzTrials

Quality of Health CareNCT00571376

Evaluating the Impact on Quality and Costs of Regional Clinical Data Exchange Programs in New York State

An observational study of Quality of Health Care and Health Care Costs, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to measure the financial effects of health information technology and health information exchange in regional health information organizations in New York State. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Quality of Health Care, Health Care Costs
What is being tested?
Health information technology and exchange
How many people
218,766 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2009to Dec 2010
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients and health care providers in the Rochester, NY community

Who may be able to join

  • Patients and health care providers participating in regional health information organizations or their affiliate institutions.

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Rochester RHIO

    Rochester, New York, 14614

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to measure the financial effects of health information technology and health information exchange in regional health information organizations in New York State.

Read the detailed description

In 2004, the federal government set an ambitious goal of ensuring that most Americans have electronic health records within 10 years and the presence of a widespread clinical information exchange capability will greatly facilitate this goal. Through HEAL NY, New York State is currently awarding millions of dollars in grants to support health information technology initiatives across the state through regional clinical information exchanges. The financial success of these initiatives is expected to result from improvements in health care quality and efficiency. However, whether these initiatives will be cost saving, as experts assert, and what the return-on-investments of these initiatives will be are unknown. Answering these questions will provide critical information to the nation as we progress towards a national health information network. We will conduct a multi-center financial evaluation of regional clinical information exchanges. The results of the financial evaluations proposed in this study will provide a framework and standardized methodology including metrics for financial evaluations of regional health information organizations and return-on-investment analyses from the perspectives of providers and payers. We will consider the financial effects as driven by changes in quality, safety, and efficiency.

The most advanced community we studied was Rochester, NY, and studying this community allowed us to measure the effects of health information technology and health information exchange on 3 major utilization outcomes (hospital admissions, hospital re-admissions, and repeat medical imaging).

Being tested
Health information technology and exchange
Keywords
Quality of health care, Health care costs

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Health information technology and exchangeOther

    Health information technology includes electronic health records, electronic prescribing, and electronic results notification and/or viewers. Health information exchange includes use of central repositories of data and peer-to-peer models.

Study groups in NCT00571376
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Those exposed to health information technology or health information exchange
Receives: Other: Health information technology and exchange
2Those not exposed to health information technology or health information exchange

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hospital admissions

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Hospital re-admissions

    Measured: 2 years

  3. Repeat medical imaging

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Usage of health information technology and health information exchange

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Changes in health care quality

    Measured: 2 years

  3. Changes in patient safety

    Measured: 2 years

  4. Changes in health care efficiency

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Dec 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2009
  3. Primary completionDec 2010
  4. Study completionDec 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
218,766 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00571376
Sponsor's protocol ID
20060550
Status last verified
Feb 2017
First submitted
11 Dec 2007
Last updated
23 Feb 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Quality of Health Care and Health Care Costs, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hospital admissions (time frame: 2 years). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in