AzTrials
AzTrials

Melanoma (Skin)Phase 2NCT00568451

Paclitaxel and Carboplatin or Temozolomide in Treating Patients With Stage IV Melanoma

A Phase 2 study testing carboplatin, paclitaxel and temozolomide in people with Melanoma (Skin), run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known whether giving paclitaxel together with carboplatin is more effective than giving temozolomide alone in treating patients with melanoma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 120 years
Conditions the study is for
Melanoma (Skin)
What is being tested?
carboplatin, paclitaxel and temozolomide
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
12 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2006to Apr 2012
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 120 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic melanoma
  • Stage IV disease
  • Progressive disease
  • No known standard therapy that is potentially curative or proven capable of extending life expectancy exists
  • Planning to undergo chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin OR temozolomide alone for progressive disease
  • Measurable disease as defined by RECIST criteria

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • ECOG performance status 0-2
  • Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
  • ANC ≥ 1,500/mL
  • Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mL
  • Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL
  • Creatinine ≤ 2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • AST ≤ 3 x ULN
  • Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 3.0 x ULN
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 1 month after completion of study therapy
  • No uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, any of the following:
  • Active infection
  • NYHA class III or IV congestive heart failure
  • No history of other malignancy within the past 5 years except for basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin treated with local resection only or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
  • Willing to provide research blood samples

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • Recovered from prior therapy
  • At least 4 weeks since prior radiotherapy
  • At least 4 weeks since prior chemotherapy (patients who received chemotherapy in the metastatic setting)
  • No prior chemotherapy treatment with agents similar to study drugs
  • No prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting (for chemo-naive patients)
  • No concurrent enrollment in a different clinical study in which investigational procedures or agents are being used
  • No other concurrent investigational agents
  • No other concurrent chemotherapy or radiotherapy, including palliative radiotherapy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Mayo Clinic Cancer Center

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Releasing the Cancer Patient's Immune System From Down-regulation With Timed Delivery of Standard Chemotherapy

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known whether giving paclitaxel together with carboplatin is more effective than giving temozolomide alone in treating patients with melanoma.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying the side effects and how well giving paclitaxel together with carboplatin or giving temozolomide alone works in treating patients with stage IV melanoma.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

  • To assess the anti-tumor activity and toxicity profile of timed delivery of conventional paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) in patients with stage IV melanoma who have received prior chemotherapy for their metastatic disease.
  • To assess the anti-tumor activity and toxicity profile of timed delivery of conventional temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy in patients with stage IV melanoma who have received prior chemotherapy for their metastatic disease.
  • To assess the anti-tumor activity and toxicity profile of timed delivery of conventional PC in patients with stage IV melanoma who have not received prior chemotherapy for their metastatic disease.
  • To assess the anti-tumor activity and toxicity profile of timed delivery of conventional TMZ chemotherapy in patients with stage IV melanoma who have not received prior chemotherapy for their metastatic disease.
  • To evaluate the changes of T-regulator cells, melanoma-specific functional parameters as a function of time in all four patient cohorts.

OUTLINE: Patients are stratified according to prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease (yes vs no) and scheduled chemotherapy regimen (paclitaxel and carboplatin vs temozolomide).

Beginning at the predicted day of C-reactive peptide (CRP) peak levels, patients receive paclitaxel IV and carboplatin IV on days 1, 8, and 15 OR oral temozolomide alone on days 1-5. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Patients undergo blood sample collection periodically for pharmacological studies. Samples are analyzed for CRP quantification via ELISA; presence and number of circulating blood T-regulator cells via immunophenotyping for CD4/CD25+ and CD4/fox-p3+ T cells; level of functional immunity against melanoma specific antigens (MART-1, tyrosinase, and gp100) and survivin in patients that are HLA-A2+ via intracellular staining; total number of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) capable of reacting against melanoma targets via tetramer staining (Becton-Coulter); and quantification of interferon γ-producing, peptide-specific CTLs via multicolor conventional flow cytometry.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for up to 2 years.

Conditions
Melanoma (Skin)
Keywords
stage IV melanoma, recurrent melanoma
Medical subject headings
Melanoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • carboplatinDrug

    AUC=2 intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15. Re-treat every 4 weeks until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or refusal

  • paclitaxelDrug

    Also called Taxol

    100mg/m^2 intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15. Re-treat every 4 weeks until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or refusal

  • temozolomideDrug

    Also called Temodar

    150mg/m^2 at cycle 1, 200mg/m^2 at cycle 2 and beyond, orally on days 1-5. Re-treat every 4 weeks until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or refusal. One treatment cycle=four weeks

Study groups in NCT00568451
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PC (previously treated)ExperimentalPreviously chemotherapy treated cohorts: Paclitaxel and Carboplatin (PC)
Receives: Drug: carboplatin; Drug: paclitaxel
PC (chemo naive)ExperimentalChemotherapy-naive cohorts: Paclitaxel and Carboplatin (PC)
Receives: Drug: carboplatin; Drug: paclitaxel
TMZ (previously treated)ExperimentalPreviously chemotherapy treated cohorts: Temozolomide (TMZ)
Receives: Drug: temozolomide
TMZ (chemo naive)ExperimentalChemotherapy-naive cohorts: Temozolomide (TMZ)
Receives: Drug: temozolomide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With an Objective Tumor Status of Either a Complete Response(CR) or Partial Response (PR), According to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) Criteria

    Response that was noted on 2 consecutive evaluations for at least 4 weeks apart.

    CR: Disappearance of all target lesions; PR: At least a 30 percent of decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. Target lesions: All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 10 lesions representative of all involved organs.

    Measured: Every other cycle of therapy (cycle=4 weeks) for the first 6 cycles of treatment

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Time to Disease Progression

    Time to disease progression was defined as the time from registration to documentation of disease progression. Disease progression was measured according to the RECIST criteria. Progression: At least a 20 percent increase in the sum of of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions.

    Measured: up to 2 years

  2. Survival Time

    Survival time was defined as the time from registration to death due to any cause.

    Measured: up to 2 years

  3. Duration of Response for All Evaluable Patients Who Have Achieved an Objective Response

    Duration of response was defined as the date at which the participant's objective status was first noted to be either a Complete Response or Partial Response to the date the progression was documented.

    Measured: up to 2 years

  4. Number of Participants Who Experienced Changes in Immunologic Profile (CD4/CD25+ Cells, CD4/Fox-p3+ T Cells) Within a Treatment

    Time series plot of the number of circulating cells will be constructed. The resulting plots will be visually inspected for trends within and between treatments. For each cell type, a point and an interval estimate of the number of participants (receiving a given treatment) who had at least a 2-fold increase in the number of circulating cells of that type will be constructed using the properties of the binomial distribution.

    Measured: up to 2 years

  5. Number of Participants Who Experienced Changes in Immunologic Profile (MART-1, Tyrosinase, and gp100) Within a Treatment

    For those patients who are HLA-A2+, the maximum post-treatment levels of MART-1, tyrosinase, and gp100 will be determined. For each of these specific melanoma specific antigens, the number of participants (within a given treatment) who gained or maintained immunity based on the maximum post-treatment level of that specific melanoma specific antigen will be determined.

    Measured: up to 2 years

  6. Number of Participants Who Experienced Changes in Immunologic Profile (IFNγ Producing Peptide Specific CTLs) Within a Treatment

    For each patient, a time series plot of the number of IFNγ producing peptide specific CTLs will be constructed. The resulting plots will be visually inspected for trends within and between treatments. A point and an interval estimate of the number of participants (receiving a given treatment) who had at least a 2-fold increase in the number of the number of IFNγ producing peptide specific CTLs will be constructed using the properties of the binomial distribution.

    Measured: up to 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Dec 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2006
  3. Primary completionMay 2009
  4. Study completionApr 2012

Why it stopped: Slow accrual.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
12 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00568451
Sponsor's protocol ID
MC057F
Other IDs
P30CA015083, MC057F, 06-002547, NCI-2010-01794
Status last verified
Mar 2014
First submitted
5 Dec 2007
Last updated
30 Dec 2015
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing carboplatin, paclitaxel and temozolomide in people with Melanoma (Skin), run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Mar 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With an Objective Tumor Status of Either a Complete Response(CR) or Partial Response (PR), According to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) Criteria (time frame: Every other cycle of therapy (cycle=4 weeks) for the first 6 cycles of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Dec 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in