Ischemic StrokePhase 3CLOSENCT00562289
Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Anticoagulants Versus Antiplatelet Therapy to Prevent Stroke Recurrence
A Phase 3 study testing aspirin, Antivitamins K or rivaroxaban or dabigatran or apixaban and Devices for PFO closure in people with Ischemic Stroke and Patent Foramen Ovale, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is found more frequently in patients with an ischemic stroke than in control subjects. Therapeutic options to prevent stroke recurrence include antiplatelet drugs, oral anticoagulants, and transcatheter closure of the foramen. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Ischemic Stroke, Patent Foramen Ovale, Atrial Septal Aneurysm
- What is being tested?
- aspirin, Antivitamins K or rivaroxaban or dabigatran or apixaban and Devices for PFO closure
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 664 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Dec 2007to Dec 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female, 16 <= age <= 60 ans.
- Recent (<= 6 months) ischemic stroke documented by CT-san or MRI (whatever the duration of symptoms: shorter or longer than 24 hours).
- Modified Rankin score <=3.
- Absence of any other identifiable cause of stroke
- Presence of a PFO with at least one of the following characteristics:
- right-to-left shunt > 30 microbubbles, at rest or during provocative manoeuvres, by TTE ou TOE
- associated ASA (base ≥ à 15 mm, total excursion > à 10 mm) by TOE
- Informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Any identifiable cause of ischemic stroke other than PFO.
- Isolated atrial septal defect or atrial septal defect associated with PFO with significant left-to-right shunt requiring closure.
- Previous surgical or endovascular treatments of PFO or ASA.
- Known or suspected pregnancy (beta hCG test must be performed before inclusion).
- Women who are breast-feeding.
- Inability to comply with the treatments or follow-up requirements of the study.
Show all 23Show fewer
- No affiliation to the national health service.
- Presence of other medical problems that would either lead to inability to complete the trial or interfere with the assessment of outcomes.
- Participation in another study.
- Unable to understand the full meaning of the informed consent.
- Related medical treatments of the trial:
- Long-term oral anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy is indicated for another disease.
- Contra-indication to antiplatelet therapy or oral anticoagulants :
- 3-arm trial : contra-indication to aspirin or clopidogrel or antivitamins K
- 2-arm trial (closure vs antiplatelet therapy) : contra-indication to aspirin or clopidogrel
- 2-arm trial (antivitamins K vs antiplatelet therapy : contra-indication to antivitamins K or to any antiplatelet drug
- Increased risk of bleeding, such as severe hepatic insufficiency, current peptic ulceration, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, history of severe systemic bleeding (e.g. gastrointestinal bleeding, gross hematuria, intraocular bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, or intracranial hemorrhage), or other history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy.
- Related to endovascular treatments :
- Infection requiring antibiotics (inclusion is possible after healing, 4 weeks after withdrawal of antibiotics).
- Very large or multi-perforated ASA for which endovascular treatments is deemed too risky.
- Presence of thrombus or occlusion between the venous access and the right atrium.
- Presence of an inferior vena cava filter.
- Severe pulmonary hypertension.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale or Anticoagulants Versus Antiplatelet Therapy to Prevent Stroke Recurrence
A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is found more frequently in patients with an ischemic stroke than in control subjects.
Therapeutic options to prevent stroke recurrence include antiplatelet drugs, oral anticoagulants, and transcatheter closure of the foramen. However, there are no published studies showing convincingly the superiority of any one of these strategies in preventing stroke recurrence.
The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to assess whether chronic anticoagulation on the one hand and transcatheter on the other hand are superior to chronic antiplatelet therapy in preventing stroke recurrence.
Read the detailed description
Secondary prevention for stroke patients with PFO is a subject of considerable debate. Therapeutic options include antiplatelet drugs, oral anticoagulants, and transcatheter closure of the foramen. There are no published studies showing convincingly the superiority of any one of these strategies in preventing stroke recurrence. All the therapeutic options have some risks and unless randomised trials can define who should be treated with what (if anything), and for how long, we could end up exposing patients to unnecessary complications of treatment.
The primary objective of this study is to assess whether chronic anticoagulation (INR 2 to 3) on the one hand and endovascular treatment on the other hand are superior to chronic antiplatelet therapy in preventing stroke recurrence in young (16 to 60 years) patients with a PFO (> 30 microbubbles or associated with an atrial septal aneurysm) and an otherwise unexplained ischaemic stroke.
Secondary objectives of the study are:
- to evaluate the safety of the three therapeutic options, in terms of major drug-, device- or procedure-related complications, in order to allow a benefit/risk assessment of each therapeutic option in this population.
- to assess the rate of technical success and effectiveness of endovascular procedure to treat PFO and ASA.
- Being tested
- aspirin, Antivitamins K or rivaroxaban or dabigatran or apixaban, Devices for PFO closure
- Keywords
- Stroke, Patent Foramen Ovale, Atrial septal aneurysm, Antiplatelet therapy, Oral anticoagulants, Transcatheter closure, Migraine
- Medical subject headings
- Ischemic Stroke, Foramen Ovale, Patent, Migraine Disorders, Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
aspirinDrug
Also called clopidogrel, combination aspirin-dipyridamole
during the follow up
Antivitamins K or rivaroxaban or dabigatran or apixabanDrug
during the follow up
Devices for PFO closureDevice
Also called Each device for PFO closure must have the CE mark, and be approved by the Interventional Cardiology Committee
endovascular treatment no longer than 21 days after the random.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| aspirin | Active comparator | aspirin use like antiplatelet Receives: Drug: aspirin |
| anticoagulant | Experimental | Antivitamins K or rivaroxaban or dabigatran or apixaban Receives: Drug: Antivitamins K or rivaroxaban or dabigatran or apixaban |
| Devices for PFO closure | Experimental | Devices for PFO closure Receives: Device: Devices for PFO closure |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
stroke(fatal or not)
Measured: during the follow up (between 2 or 9 years)
Secondary outcomes (8)
Disabling stroke
Measured: during the follow-up
Ischemic stroke
Measured: during the follow-up
Cerebral haemorrhage
Measured: during the follow-up
Ischemic stroke, TIA, or systemic embolism
Measured: during the follow-up
Death (all causes)
Measured: during the follow-up
Vascular death
Measured: during the follow-up
Moderate to severe bleeding complications
Measured: during the follow-up
Procedural or device complications
Measured: within 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Nov 2007 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2007
- Primary completionDec 2016
- Study completionDec 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ischemic StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 664 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MAS Jean-Louis, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Centre hospitalier sainte Anne
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00562289
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P060406
- Acronym
- CLOSE
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 21 Nov 2007
- Last updated
- 19 Oct 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Mas JL, Derumeaux G, Guillon B, Massardier E, Hosseini H, Mechtouff L, Arquizan C, Bejot Y, Vuillier F, Detante O, Guidoux C, Canaple S, Vaduva C, Dequatre-Ponchelle N, Sibon I, Garnier P, Ferrier A, Timsit S, Robinet-Borgomano E, Sablot D, Lacour JC, Zuber M, Favrole P, Pinel JF, Apoil M, Reiner P, Lefebvre C, Guerin P, Piot C, Rossi R, Dubois-Rande JL, Eicher JC, Meneveau N, Lusson JR, Bertrand B, Schleich JM, Godart F, Thambo JB, Leborgne L, Michel P, Pierard L, Turc G, Barthelet M, Charles-Nelson A, Weimar C, Moulin T, Juliard JM, Chatellier G; CLOSE Investigators. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelets after Stroke. N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 14;377(11):1011-1021. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705915.
PubMed 28902593Turc G, Lee JY, Brochet E, Kim JS, Song JK, Mas JL; CLOSE and DEFENSE-PFO Trial Investigators. Atrial Septal Aneurysm, Shunt Size, and Recurrent Stroke Risk in Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 May 12;75(18):2312-2320. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.068.
PubMed 32381162Turc G, Calvet D, Guerin P, Sroussi M, Chatellier G, Mas JL; CLOSE Investigators. Closure, Anticoagulation, or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke With Patent Foramen Ovale: Systematic Review of Randomized Trials, Sequential Meta-Analysis, and New Insights From the CLOSE Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jun 17;7(12):e008356. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008356.
PubMed 29910193Mas JL, Derumeaux G, Amarenco P, Arquizan C, Aubry P, Barthelet M, Bertrand B, Brochet E, Cabanes L, Donal E, Dubois-Rande JL, Durand-Zaleski I, Ernande L, Finet G, Fraisse A, Giroud M, Guerin P, Habib G, Juliard JM, Leys D, Lievre M, Lusson JR, Marcon F, Michel P, Moulin T, Mounier-Vehier F, Pierard L, Piot C, Rey C, Rodier G, Roudaut R, Schleich JM, Teiger E, Turc G, Vuillier F, Weimar C, Woimant F, Chatellier G; CLOSE investigators. close: Closure of patent foramen ovale, oral anticoagulants or antiplatelet therapy to prevent stroke recurrence: Study design. Int J Stroke. 2016 Aug;11(6):724-32. doi: 10.1177/1747493016643551. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
PubMed 27056964
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Oct 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale or Anticoagulants Versus Antiplatelet Therapy to Prevent Stroke Recurrence
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00562289
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CLOSE / P060406
- Keywords
- Stroke, Patent Foramen Ovale, Atrial septal aneurysm, Antiplatelet therapy, Oral anticoagulants, Transcatheter closure, Migraine
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 664 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2007
- Primary completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Nov 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is found more frequently in patients with an ischemic stroke than in control subjects.
Therapeutic options to prevent stroke recurrence include antiplatelet drugs, oral anticoagulants, and transcatheter closure of the foramen. However, there are no published studies showing convincingly the superiority of any one of these strategies in preventing stroke recurrence.
The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to assess whether chronic anticoagulation on the one hand and transcatheter on the other hand are superior to chronic antiplatelet therapy in preventing stroke recurrence.
Detailed description
Secondary prevention for stroke patients with PFO is a subject of considerable debate. Therapeutic options include antiplatelet drugs, oral anticoagulants, and transcatheter closure of the foramen. There are no published studies showing convincingly the superiority of any one of these strategies in preventing stroke recurrence. All the therapeutic options have some risks and unless randomised trials can define who should be treated with what (if anything), and for how long, we could end up exposing patients to unnecessary complications of treatment.
The primary objective of this study is to assess whether chronic anticoagulation (INR 2 to 3) on the one hand and endovascular treatment on the other hand are superior to chronic antiplatelet therapy in preventing stroke recurrence in young (16 to 60 years) patients with a PFO (> 30 microbubbles or associated with an atrial septal aneurysm) and an otherwise unexplained ischaemic stroke.
Secondary objectives of the study are:
- to evaluate the safety of the three therapeutic options, in terms of major drug-, device- or procedure-related complications, in order to allow a benefit/risk assessment of each therapeutic option in this population.
- to assess the rate of technical success and effectiveness of endovascular procedure to treat PFO and ASA.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| aspirin | Active comparator | Drug: aspirinaspirin use like antiplatelet |
| anticoagulant | Experimental | Drug: Antivitamins K or rivaroxaban or dabigatran or apixabanAntivitamins K or rivaroxaban or dabigatran or apixaban |
| Devices for PFO closure | Experimental | Device: Devices for PFO closureDevices for PFO closure |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Male or female, 16 <= age <= 60 ans.
- Recent (<= 6 months) ischemic stroke documented by CT-san or MRI (whatever the duration of symptoms: shorter or longer than 24 hours).
- Modified Rankin score <=3.
- Absence of any other identifiable cause of stroke
- Presence of a PFO with at least one of the following characteristics:
Key exclusion criteria (23 listed)
- Any identifiable cause of ischemic stroke other than PFO.
- Isolated atrial septal defect or atrial septal defect associated with PFO with significant left-to-right shunt requiring closure.
- Previous surgical or endovascular treatments of PFO or ASA.
- Known or suspected pregnancy (beta hCG test must be performed before inclusion).
- Women who are breast-feeding.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| aspirinAlso: clopidogrel, combination aspirin-dipyridamoleduring the follow up | Drug | aspirin |
| Antivitamins K or rivaroxaban or dabigatran or apixabanduring the follow up | Drug | anticoagulant |
| Devices for PFO closureAlso: Each device for PFO closure must have the CE mark, and be approved by the Interventional Cardiology Committeeendovascular treatment no longer than 21 days after the random. | Device | Devices for PFO closure |
Primary outcome
stroke(fatal or not)
Time frame: during the follow up (between 2 or 9 years)
8 secondary outcomes
Disabling stroke
Time frame: during the follow-up
Ischemic stroke
Time frame: during the follow-up
Cerebral haemorrhage
Time frame: during the follow-up
Ischemic stroke, TIA, or systemic embolism
Time frame: during the follow-up
Death (all causes)
Time frame: during the follow-up
Vascular death
Time frame: during the follow-up
Moderate to severe bleeding complications
Time frame: during the follow-up
Procedural or device complications
Time frame: within 30 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Oct 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 28902593Mas JL, Derumeaux G, Guillon B, Massardier E, Hosseini H, Mechtouff L, Arquizan C, Bejot Y, Vuillier F, Detante O, Guidoux C, Canaple S, Vaduva C, Dequatre-Ponchelle N, Sibon I, Garnier P, Ferrier A, Timsit S, Robinet-Borgomano E, Sablot D, Lacour JC, Zuber M, Favrole P, Pinel JF, Apoil M, Reiner P, Lefebvre C, Guerin P, Piot C, Rossi R, Dubois-Rande JL, Eicher JC, Meneveau N, Lusson JR, Bertrand B, Schleich JM, Godart F, Thambo JB, Leborgne L, Michel P, Pierard L, Turc G, Barthelet M, Charles-Nelson A, Weimar C, Moulin T, Juliard JM, Chatellier G; CLOSE Investigators. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelets after Stroke. N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 14;377(11):1011-1021. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705915.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32381162Turc G, Lee JY, Brochet E, Kim JS, Song JK, Mas JL; CLOSE and DEFENSE-PFO Trial Investigators. Atrial Septal Aneurysm, Shunt Size, and Recurrent Stroke Risk in Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 May 12;75(18):2312-2320. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.068.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29910193Turc G, Calvet D, Guerin P, Sroussi M, Chatellier G, Mas JL; CLOSE Investigators. Closure, Anticoagulation, or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke With Patent Foramen Ovale: Systematic Review of Randomized Trials, Sequential Meta-Analysis, and New Insights From the CLOSE Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jun 17;7(12):e008356. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008356.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27056964Mas JL, Derumeaux G, Amarenco P, Arquizan C, Aubry P, Barthelet M, Bertrand B, Brochet E, Cabanes L, Donal E, Dubois-Rande JL, Durand-Zaleski I, Ernande L, Finet G, Fraisse A, Giroud M, Guerin P, Habib G, Juliard JM, Leys D, Lievre M, Lusson JR, Marcon F, Michel P, Moulin T, Mounier-Vehier F, Pierard L, Piot C, Rey C, Rodier G, Roudaut R, Schleich JM, Teiger E, Turc G, Vuillier F, Weimar C, Woimant F, Chatellier G; CLOSE investigators. close: Closure of patent foramen ovale, oral anticoagulants or antiplatelet therapy to prevent stroke recurrence: Study design. Int J Stroke. 2016 Aug;11(6):724-32. doi: 10.1177/1747493016643551. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
Related trials for Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Active, not recruiting
Improving Visual Field Deficits With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation
Visual Field Defect, Peripheral, Stroke
Recruiting
Biomarkers of Paired VNS
Stroke, Ischemic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MAS Jean-Louis, MD, PhD principal investigator
Centre hospitalier sainte Anne
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing aspirin, Antivitamins K or rivaroxaban or dabigatran or apixaban and Devices for PFO closure in people with Ischemic Stroke and Patent Foramen Ovale, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
stroke(fatal or not) (time frame: during the follow up (between 2 or 9 years)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00562289, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2017.