AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerPhase 2NCT00559754

A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) and Sequential Chemotherapy in Patients With Primary HER2 Negative Operable Breast Cancer.

A Phase 2 study testing bevacizumab [Avastin], Docetaxel and Standard chemotherapy in people with Breast Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 6 sites in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This single arm study will assess the efficacy and safety of a combination of Avastin and docetaxel following cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin, in patients with HER2 negative operable breast cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer
What is being tested?
bevacizumab [Avastin], Docetaxel and Standard chemotherapy
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
72 participants
Where
6 sitesSpain
Study dates
Dec 2007to Sep 2010
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • female patients, >=18 years of age;
  • primary HER2-negative operable breast cancer;
  • tumor >2cm in size;
  • ECOG performance status 0-1.

Who cannot join

  • previous treatment for breast cancer;
  • metastatic disease;
  • current or recent (within 10 days of first dose of Avastin) use of aspirin (>325mg/day) or full-dose anticoagulants for therapeutic purposes;
  • clinically significant cardiovascular disease.

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country.

6 sites in 1 country

Spain6 sites
  • Study site

    Córdoba, Cordoba, 14004

  • Study site

    Jaén, Jaen, 23007

  • Study site

    Lleida, Lerida, 25198

  • Study site

    Málaga, Malaga, 29010

  • Study site

    Sabadell, Barcelona, Barcelona, 08208

  • Study site

    Zaragoza, Zaragoza, 50009

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: An Open Label Study to Assess the Effect of a Combination of Avastin and Docetaxel and Sequential Chemotherapy on Pathological Response in Patients With Primary Operable HER2 Negative Breast Cancer

This single arm study will assess the efficacy and safety of a combination of Avastin and docetaxel following cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin, in patients with HER2 negative operable breast cancer. Patients will receive 4 x 3 week cycles of chemotherapy with doxorubicin (60mg/m2 iv on day 1 of each cycle) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 iv on day 1 of each cycle). They will then receive 4 x 3 week cycles of docetaxel (75mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle) in combination with Avastin (15mg/kg on day 1 of each cycle). The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is <100 individuals.

Conditions
Breast Cancer
Being tested
bevacizumab [Avastin], Docetaxel, Standard chemotherapy
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • bevacizumab [Avastin]Drug

    15mg/kg iv on day 1 of each 3 week cycle

  • DocetaxelDrug

    75mg/m2 iv on day 1 of each 3 week cycle

  • Standard chemotherapyDrug

    As prescribed

Study groups in NCT00559754
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: bevacizumab [Avastin]; Drug: Docetaxel; Drug: Standard chemotherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR)

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria: 1) the primary tumor was Grade 5 (no malignant cells identified at the location of the primary tumor (ductal carcinoma in situ may be present); 2) no involvement was identified in the lymph nodes; 3) the tumour size at evaluation of the surgical piece was 0 centimeters (cm); and 4) the pathological staging of the tumour from the surgical piece was pT0pN0pM0, the stage is not applicable (NA). It will only be considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes.

    Measured: After Week 24 (surgery)

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Objective Clinical Response

    Overall clinical response is the best response obtained through physical examination and/or radiological tests after completion of chemotherapy cycles. The percentage of participants with objective response based on assessment of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and was categorized as clinical response (CR+PR) or clinical benefit (CR+PR+ no change [NC]). Per RECIST, CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. PR was defined as greater than or equal to (≥)30 percent (%) decrease under baseline of the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions. Complete and partial responses must have been confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met.

    Measured: Within 28 days of enrollment, Weeks 12 and 24

  2. Percentage of Participants With Breast-Conserving Surgery

    Breast-conserving surgery was defined as lumpectomy + lymphadenectomy (LA), segmentectomy + LA, quadrantectomy + LA, or other (including sentinal node extirpation tumorectomy).

    Measured: Week 24

  3. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Proliferation of Ki67

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. Biomarker Ki67 proliferation was defined as low (less than [<]15% ) and high (≥15%).

    Measured: After Week 24 (surgery)

  4. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Kisspeptin (KISS1) Amplification

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. KISS1 amplification was defined as 1 (aneuploid), 2 (normal), 4 (amplification), or NE (not evaluated).

    Measured: After Week 24 (surgery)

  5. Percentage of Participants With pCR by KISS1 Protein Expression

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. KISS1 protein expression was defined as 0 (no expression), 1 (normal), 2 (augmented expression), or NE (not evaluated).

    Measured: After Week 24 (surgery)

  6. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor (VEGFR) Amplification

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. VEFGR amplification was defined as 1 (aneuploid), 2 (normal), 4 (amplification), or NE (not evaluated).

    Measured: After Week 24 (surgery)

  7. Percentage of Participants With pCR by VEGFR Protein Expression

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. VEGFR protein expression was defined as 0 (no expression), 1 (normal), 2 (augmented expression), or NE (not evaluated).

    Measured: After Week 24 (surgery)

  8. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Hypoxia Inducible Factor (HIF) Protein Expression

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. HIF protein expression was defined as 0 (no expression), 1 (normal), 2 (augmented expression), or NE (not evaluated).

    Measured: After Week 24 (surgery)

  9. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (ENOS) Protein Expression

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. ENOS protein expression was defined as 0 (no expression), 1 (normal), 2 (augmented expression), or NE (not evaluated).

    Measured: After Week 24 (surgery)

  10. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Angiotension Protein Expression

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. Angiotensin protein expression was defined as 0 (no expression), 1 (normal), 2 (augmented expression), or NE (not evaluated).

    Measured: After Week 24 (surgery)

  11. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Gene Expression

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. VEGF gene expression was defined as below the housekeeping reference level (>0), above the housekeeping reference level (<0), or equal to the housekeeping reference level (0).

    Measured: After Week 24 (surgery)

  12. Percentage of Participants With pCR by VEGFR Gene Expression

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. VEGFR gene expression was defined as below the housekeeping reference level (>0), above the housekeeping reference level (<0), or equal to the housekeeping reference level (0).

    Measured: After Week 24 (surgery)

  13. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Phosphorylated AKT (pAKT) Gene Expression

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. pAKT gene expression was defined as below the housekeeping reference level (>0), above the housekeeping reference level (<0), or equal to the housekeeping reference level (0).

    Measured: After Week 24 (surgery)

  14. Percentage of Participants With pCR by HIF Gene Expression

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. HIF gene expression was defined as below the housekeeping reference level (>0), above the housekeeping reference level (<0), or equal to the housekeeping reference level (0).

    Measured: After Week 24 (surgery)

  15. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF) Gene Expression

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. IGF gene expression was defined as below the housekeeping reference level (>0), above the housekeeping reference level (<0), or equal to the housekeeping reference level (0).

    Measured: After Week 24 (surgery)

  16. Percentage of Participants With pCR by ENOS Gene Expression

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. ENOS gene expression was defined as below the housekeeping reference level (>0), above the housekeeping reference level (<0), or equal to the housekeeping reference level (0).

    Measured: After Week 24 (surgery)

  17. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Phosphorylated MAP Kinase (pMAPK) Gene Expression

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. pMAPK gene expression was defined as below the housekeeping reference level (>0), above the housekeeping reference level (<0), or equal to the housekeeping reference level (0).

    Measured: After Week 24 (surgery)

  18. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Angiotensin II Receptor Type I (AGTR) Gene Expression

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. AGTR gene expression was defined as below the housekeeping reference level (>0), above the housekeeping reference level (<0), or equal to the housekeeping reference level (0).

    Measured: After Week 24 (surgery)

  19. Percentage of Participants With pCR by KISS1 Gene Expression

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. KISS1 gene expression was defined as below the housekeeping reference level (>0), above the housekeeping reference level (<0), or equal to the housekeeping reference level (0).

    Measured: After Week 24 (surgery)

  20. Percentage of Participants With pCR by RKISS1 Gene Expression

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. RKISS1 gene expression was defined as below the housekeeping reference level (>0), above the housekeeping reference level (<0), or equal to the housekeeping reference level (0).

    Measured: After Week 24 (surgery)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Nov 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2007
  3. Primary completionSep 2010
  4. Study completionSep 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
72 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00559754
Sponsor's protocol ID
ML20382
Status last verified
Nov 2014
First submitted
15 Nov 2007
Last updated
10 Nov 2014

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing bevacizumab [Avastin], Docetaxel and Standard chemotherapy in people with Breast Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 6 sites in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Nov 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Nov 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) (time frame: After Week 24 (surgery)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Nov 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in