AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerPhase 2NCT00545688

A Study of Pertuzumab in Combination With Herceptin in Patients With HER2 Positive Breast Cancer.

A Phase 2 study testing Herceptin, Docetaxel and Pertuzumab in people with Breast Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 77 sites in 18 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This 4 arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4 neoadjuvant treatment regimens in female patients with locally advanced, inflammatory or early stage HER2 positive breast cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer
What is being tested?
Herceptin, Docetaxel and Pertuzumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
417 participants
Where
77 sitesin 18 countries
Study dates
26 Jun 2006to 22 Sep 2014
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • female patients, >=18 years of age;
  • locally advanced, inflammatory or early stage invasive breast cancer;
  • HER2 positive (HER2+++ by IHC or FISH/CISH+).

Who cannot join

  • metastatic disease (Stage IV) or bilateral breast cancer;
  • previous anticancer therapy or radiotherapy for any malignancy;
  • other malignancy, other than cancer in situ of the cervix, or basal cell cancer;
  • insulin-dependent diabetes;
  • clinically relevant cardiovascular disease.

Trial locations and contacts

77 sites in 18 countries.

77 sites in 18 countries

Russia11 sites
  • SI of Healthcare Kazan Oncology Dispensary

    Kazan', 420111

  • Russian Oncology Research Center n.a. N.N. Blokhin Dpt of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy

    Moscow, 115478

  • NSI of Healthcare Central Clinical Hospital #2 n.a. N.A.Semashko of the Russian Railways

    Moscow, 129128

  • State Institution Of Healthcare Republican Oncology Dispensary

    Petrozavodsk, 185007

  • State Budget Institution of Healthcare of Stavropol region Pyatigorsk Oncology Dispensary

    Pyatigorsk, 357502

  • SBI for HPE "Ryazan State Medical University n.a. I.P. Pavlov" of MoH of RF

    Ryazan, 390011

  • FSBI "Scientific Research Institute of Oncology named after N.N.Petrov" Ministry of Health of RF

    Saint Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburg, 197758

  • SBI of Healthcare Leningrad Regional Oncology Dispensary

    Saint Petersburg, 191104

  • SBI of Healthcare Samara Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary

    Samara, 443031

  • SI of HealthCare Oncologic Dispensary #2 of department of healthcare of Krasnodar region

    Sashi, 354057

  • Ulyanovsk Regional Oncology Dispensary; Chemotherapy

    Ulyanovsk, ND

Other trials in Russia

Brazil9 sites
  • Hospital de Caridade de Ijui; Oncologia

    Ijuí, Rio Grande do Sul, 98700-000

  • Clinica de Neoplasias Litoral

    Itajaí, Santa Catarina, 88301-220

  • Hospital Amaral Carvalho

    Jaú, São Paulo, 17210-080

  • Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceicao

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 91350-200

  • Faculdade de Medicina do ABC - FMABC; Oncologia e Hematologia

    Santo André, São Paulo, 09060-650

  • Instituto do Cancer Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho - ICAVC; Pesquisa Clinica

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 01221-020

  • Hospital Perola Byington

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 01317-000

  • Inst. Brasileiro de Controle Ao Cancer; Oncologia Clinica / Quimioterapia

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 03102-002

  • Instituto de Oncologia de Sorocaba - CEPOS

    Sorocaba, São Paulo, 18030-245

Other trials in Brazil

Italy9 sites
  • Az. Osp. S. Orsola Malpighi; Istituto Di Oncologia Seragnoli

    Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, 40138

  • ASST OVEST MILANESE; Oncologia Medica

    Legnano, Lombardy, 20025

  • Ospedale San Raffaele, Servizio di Oncologia e Chemioterapia

    Milan, Lombardy, 20132

  • Irccs Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori (Int);S.C. Medicina Oncologica 1

    Milan, Lombardy, 20133

  • Ospedale Calvi di Noale; U.O. Complessa di Oncologia ed Ematologia Oncologica

    Mirano, Veneto, 30035

  • Ospedale Regionale Di Parma; Divisione Di Oncologia Medica

    Parma, Emilia-Romagna, 43100

  • Polo Ospedaliero Santorso

    Santorso, Veneto, 36014

  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Dipartimento Interaziendale Di Oncologia

    Udine, Friuli Venezia Giulia, 33100

  • Ospedale Di Vicenza; Nefrologia, Oncologia Medica

    Vicenza, Veneto, 36100

Other trials in Italy

Spain8 sites
  • Hospital de Cruces; Servicio de Oncologia

    Barakaldo, Vizcaya, 48903

  • Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia; Servicio de Oncologia

    Córdoba, 14004

  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon; Servicio de Oncologia

    Madrid, 28007

  • Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Servicio de Oncologia

    Madrid, 28034

  • Hospital Universitario La Paz; Servicio de Oncologia

    Madrid, 28046

  • Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli; Servicio de Oncologia

    Sabadell, Barcelona, 08208

  • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia; Servicio de Onco-hematologia

    Valencia, 46010

  • Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet; Servicio Oncologia

    Zaragoza, 50009

Other trials in Spain

Poland7 sites
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Kliniczny Nr 1 W Lublinie; Klinika Chirurgii Onkologicznej

    Lublin, 20-081

  • COZL Oddzial Onkologii Klinicznej z pododdzialem Chemioterapii Dziennej

    Lublin, 20-090

  • Olsztyński Ośrodek Onkologiczny Kopernik sp. z o.o.

    Olsztyn, 10-513

  • Oddzial Chemioterapii Szpitala Klinicznego Nr 1 w Poznaniu

    Poznan, 60-569

  • NZOZ Centrum Medyczne HCP Sp. z o.o.

    Poznan, 61-485

  • Central Hospital of Military School of Medicine; Oncology

    Warsaw, 00-909

  • Centrum Onkologii - Instytut im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie Klinika Nowotworów Piersi i Chirurgii

    Warsaw, 02-781

Other trials in Poland

Canada5 sites
  • Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario; Kingston General Hospital

    Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5P9

  • Moncton Hospital

    Moncton, New Brunswick, E1C 6Z8

  • McGill University; Montreal General Hosptial; Oncology

    Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4

  • CHU de Québec - Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement / ONCOLOGY

    Québec, G1S 4L8

  • University Health Network; Princess Margaret Hospital; Medical Oncology Dept

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9

Other trials in Canada

Israel3 sites
  • Hadassah Ein Karem Hospital; Oncology Dept

    Jerusalem, 91120-01

  • Meir Medical Center; Oncology

    Kfar Saba, 4428164

  • Sourasky / Ichilov Hospital; Dept. of Oncology

    Tel Aviv, 6423906

Other trials in Israel

Mexico3 sites
  • Hospital Miguel Hidalgo

    Aguascalientes, 20230

  • ARKE Estudios Clínicos S.A. de C.V.

    Mexico City, 06700

  • Issstep Puebla, ; Oncology

    Puebla City, 72530

Other trials in Mexico

Taiwan3 sites
  • VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL; Department of General Surgery

    Taipei, 00112

  • National Taiwan Uni Hospital; Dept of Oncology

    Taipei, 100

  • Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center; Hemato-Oncology

    Taipei, 112

Other trials in Taiwan

Thailand3 sites
  • Chulalongkorn Hospital; Medical Oncology

    Bangkok, 10330

  • Faculty of Med. Siriraj Hosp.; Med.-Div. of Med. Oncology

    Bangkok, 10700

  • Prince of Songkla Uni ; Unit of Medical Oncology

    Songkhla, 90110

Other trials in Thailand

Australia2 sites
  • Geelong Hospital; Andrew Love Cancer Centre

    Geelong, Victoria, 3220

  • Mount Medical Center

    Perth, Western Australia, 6000

Other trials in Australia

Austria2 sites
  • Medizinische Universität Wien; Univ.Klinik für Innere Medizin I

    Vienna, 1090

  • Kaiser Franz Josef Spital; Iii. Medizinische Abt. Mit Onkologie

    Vienna, 1100

Other trials in Austria

Peru2 sites
  • Instituto Regional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas del Sur; Centro de Inv. de Medicina Oncológica

    Arequipa, 5154

  • Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins; Oncologia

    Lima, 11

Other trials in Peru

South Korea2 sites
  • Seoul National Uni Hospital; Dept. of Internal Medicine/Hematology/Oncology

    Seoul, 03080

  • Samsung Medical Centre; Division of Hematology/Oncology

    Seoul, 135-710

Other trials in South Korea

Sweden2 sites
  • Karolinska Hospital; Oncology - Radiumhemmet

    Stockholm, 17176

  • Akademiska sjukhuset, Onkologkliniken

    Uppsala, 75185

Other trials in Sweden

Switzerland2 sites
  • Kantonsspital Baden; Frauenklinik

    Baden, 5405

  • Brustzentrum

    Zurich, 8008

Other trials in Switzerland

Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
  • Dokuz Eylul Uni Medical Faculty; Oncology Dept

    Izmir, 35340

  • Hacettepe Uni Medical Faculty Hospital; Oncology Dept

    Sıhhiye, Ankara, 06100

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

United Kingdom2 sites
  • Walsgrave Hospital; Dept of Oncology

    Coventry, CV2 2DX

  • Christie Hospital; Breast Cancer Research Office

    Manchester, M20 4QL

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Open Label Study to Compare the Complete Pathological Response Rate Achieved With 4 Combinations of Herceptin, Docetaxel and Pertuzumab in Patients With Locally Advanced, Inflammatory or Early Stage HER2 Positive Breast Cancer

This 4 arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4 neoadjuvant treatment regimens in female patients with locally advanced, inflammatory or early stage HER2 positive breast cancer. Before surgery, patients will be randomized to one of 4 treatment arms, to receive 4 cycles of a)Herceptin + docetaxel b)Herceptin + docetaxel + pertuzumab c)Herceptin + pertuzumab or 4)pertuzumab + docetaxel. Pertuzumab will be administered at a loading dose of 840mg iv, then 420mg iv 3-weekly, Herceptin at a loading dose of 8mg/kg iv then 6mg/kg 3-weekly, and docetaxel at a dose of 75mg/m2 escalating to 100mg/m2 3-weekly. During the entire pre- and post-surgery period all patients will receive adequate chemotherapy as per standard of care, as well as any surgery and/or radiotherapy as required. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Conditions
Breast Cancer
Being tested
Herceptin, Docetaxel, Pertuzumab
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HerceptinDrug

    Also called Trastuzumab

    8mg/kg iv loading dose, followed by 6mg/kg iv 3-weekly

  • DocetaxelDrug

    75mg/m2 iv escalating to 100mg/m2 iv 3-weekly

  • PertuzumabDrug

    840mg iv loading dose, followed by 420mg iv 3-weekly

Study groups in NCT00545688
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Herceptin; Drug: Docetaxel
2ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Herceptin; Drug: Docetaxel; Drug: Pertuzumab
3ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Herceptin; Drug: Pertuzumab
4ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Docetaxel; Drug: Pertuzumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Pathological Complete Response (pCR)

    pCR was defined as an absence of invasive neoplastic cells at microscopic examination of the tumor remnants after surgery following primary systemic therapy. Participants with invalid/missing pCR assessments were defined as non-responders

    Measured: Approximately 4 months from randomization following surgery or early withdrawal, whichever occurred first (Surgery was performed within 2 weeks after Cycle 4)

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving pCR by Breast Cancer Type

    pCR was defined as an absence of invasive neoplastic cells at microscopic examination of the tumor remnants after surgery following primary systemic therapy. Based on the type of breast cancer participants were categorized as those with 1. Operable breast cancer, 2. Inflammatory breast cancer and 3. Locally advanced breast cancer. Participants with invalid/missing pCR assessments were defined as non-responders.

    Measured: Approximately 4 months from randomization following surgery or early withdrawal, whichever occurred first (Surgery was performed within 2 weeks after Cycle 4)

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving pCR by Hormone Receptor Status

    pCR was defined as an absence of invasive neoplastic cells at microscopic examination of the tumor remnants after surgery following primary systemic therapy. Participants were classified as Estrogen and/or Progesterone positive (+ve), Estrogen and/or Progesterone negative (-ve) or receptor status unknown. Participants with invalid/missing pCR assessments were defined as non-responders.

    Measured: Approximately 4 months from randomization following surgery or early withdrawal, whichever occurred first (Surgery was performed within 2 weeks after Cycle 4)

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving pCR by Lymph Node Status

    pCR was defined as an absence of invasive neoplastic cells at microscopic examination of the tumor remnants after surgery following primary systemic therapy. Lymph node status was defined as either negative lymph node at surgery or positive lymph node at surgery. Participants with invalid/missing pCR assessments were defined as non-responders.

    Measured: Approximately 4 months from randomization following surgery or early withdrawal, whichever occurred first (Surgery was performed within 2 weeks after Cycle 4)

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving pCR by Presence or Absence of Residual Intraductal Carcinoma (DCIS) / Intalobular Carcinoma (LCIS)

    pCR was defined as an absence of invasive neoplastic cells at microscopic examination of the tumor remnants after surgery following primary systemic therapy. Participants with invalid/missing pCR assessments were defined as non-responders.

    Measured: Approximately 4 months from randomization following surgery or early withdrawal, whichever occurred first (Surgery was performed within 2 weeks after Cycle 4)

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Best Primary Tumor Response (Complete Response [CR], Partial Response [PR], Stable Disease [SD] or Disease Progression [PD]) During Neo-Adjuvant Treatment by X-Ray/Mammography

    Tumor assessments were made based upon the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria - version 1.0. The clinical response at each cycle up to the last assessment prior to surgery was derived for primary breast tumor using the following algorithm: CR: if measurement of '0' is noted at a given cycle as compared to baseline measurement which is greater than (>)0 at screening or cycle 1 Day 1; PR: if measurement is at least a 30 percent (%) decreased compared to baseline levels . (Reference= baseline size or sum of sizes); SD: if measurement at a given cycle is not sufficient shrinkage to qualify for neither PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD compared to baseline levels. PD: if lesion is at least a 20 % increase from measurements at baseline.

    Measured: Baseline up to Cycle 4 (assessed at, Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 1-4 Pre-Surgery) Up to approximately 24 months

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving Best Overall Response (CR, PR, SD or PD) During Neo-Adjuvant Period by X-Ray/Mammography

    Tumor assessments were made based on the RECIST criteria - version 1.0 The overall response at each cycle up to the last assessment prior to surgery was derived for: i) the primary breast lesion; (ii) across secondary breast lesions, (iii) across all breast lesions (iv) across axillary nodes (v) across supraclavicular nodes and (vi) across all nodes (vii) across all lesions (overall) using the following algorithm: CR: if measurement of '0' is noted at a given cycle as compared to baseline measurement which is >0 at screening or cycle 1 day 1; PR: if measurement is at least a 30% decreased compared to baseline levels . (Reference= baseline size or sum of sizes); SD: if measurement at a given cycle is not sufficient shrinkage to qualify for neither PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD compared to baseline levels. PD: if lesion is at least a 20 % increase from measurements at baseline. Overall response is derived based on the sum total of breast tumors and all nodes examined.

    Measured: Baseline up to Cycle 4 (assessed at Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 1-4 Pre-Surgery) Up to approximately 24 months

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving Best Primary Breast Tumor Response (CR, PR, SD or PD) During Neo-Adjuvant Period by Clinical Examination

    Tumor assessments were made based on the RECIST criteria - version 1.0 The clinical response at each cycle up to the last assessment prior to surgery was derived for primary breast tumor using the following algorithm: CR: if measurement of '0' is noted at a given cycle as compared to baseline measurement which is >0 at screening or cycle 1 day 1; PR: if measurement is at least a 30% decreased compared to baseline levels . (Reference= baseline size or sum of sizes); SD: if measurement at a given cycle is not sufficient shrinkage to qualify for neither PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD compared to baseline levels. PD: if lesion is at least a 20 % increase from measurements at baseline. Overall response is derived based on the sum total of breast tumors and all nodes examined.

    Measured: Baseline up to Cycle 4 (assessed at Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 1-4 Pre-Surgery) Up to approximately 24 months

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving Best Overall Response (CR, PR, SD or PD) During the Neo-Adjuvant Period by Clinical Examination

    Tumor assessments were made based on the RECIST criteria - version 1.0 The clinical response at each cycle up to the last assessment prior to surgery was derived for: i) the primary breast lesion; (ii) across secondary breast lesions, (iii) across all breast lesions (iv) across axillary nodes (v) across supraclavicular nodes and (vi) across all nodes (vii) across all lesions (overall) using the following algorithm: CR: if measurement of '0' is noted at a given cycle as compared to baseline measurement which is >0 at screening or cycle 1 day 1; PR: if measurement is at least a 30% decreased compared to baseline levels . (Reference= baseline size or sum of sizes); SD: if measurement at a given cycle is not sufficient shrinkage to qualify for neither PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD compared to baseline levels. PD: if lesion is at least a 20 % increase from measurements at baseline. Overall response is derived based on the sum total of breast tumors and all nodes examined.

    Measured: Baseline up to Cycle 4 (assessed at Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 1-4 Pre-Surgery) Up to approximately 24 months

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response During Neo-Adjuvant Period by X-Ray/Mammography

    Clinical response was determined based on tumor measurements by sponsor in combination with tumor response assessment by investigator. Tumor assessments were made based on the RECIST criteria - version 1.0 The clinical response at each cycle up to the last assessment prior to surgery was derived for: i) the primary breast lesion; (ii) across secondary breast lesions, (iii) across all breast lesions (iv) across axillary nodes (v) across supraclavicular nodes and (vi) across all nodes (vii) across all lesions (overall) using the following algorithm: CR: if measurement of '0' is noted at a given cycle as compared to baseline measurement which is >0 at screening or cycle 1 day 1; PR: if measurement is at least a 30% decreased compared to baseline levels . (Reference= baseline size or sum of sizes). Clinical Responders are participants who have achieved CR or PR during the Neo-adjuvant treatment. Overall response is derived based on the sum total of breast tumors and all nodes examined.

    Measured: Baseline up to Cycle 4 (assessed at Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 1-4 Pre-Surgery) Up to approximately 24 months

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response During Neo-Adjuvant Period by Clinical Examination

    Tumor assessments were made based on the RECIST criteria - version 1.0 The clinical response at each cycle up to the last assessment prior to surgery was derived for: i) the primary breast lesion; (ii) across secondary breast lesions, (iii) across all breast lesions (iv) across axillary nodes (v) across supraclavicular nodes and (vi) across all nodes (vii) across all lesions (overall) using the following algorithm: CR: if measurement of '0' is noted at a given cycle as compared to baseline measurement which is >0 at screening or cycle 1 day 1; PR: if measurement is at least a 30% decreased compared to baseline levels . (Reference= baseline size or sum of sizes). Clinical Responders are participants who have achieved CR or PR during the Neo-adjuvant treatment. Primary breast tumor clinical response is based on primary breast tumor assessment. Overall response is derived based on the sum total of breast tumors and all nodes examined.

    Measured: Baseline up to Cycle 4 (assessed at Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 1-4 Pre-Surgery) Up to approximately 24 months

  7. Time to Clinical Response During Neo-Adjuvant Treatment Period

    Time to clinical response was defined as the time from the date of first dose received to the date of assessment of clinical response. Time to Clinical response was determined by Kaplan-Meier estimates. Tumor assessments were made based on the RECIST criteria - version 1.0. The clinical response at each cycle up to the last assessment prior to surgery was derived for: i) the primary breast lesion; (ii) across secondary breast lesions, (iii) across all breast lesions (iv) across axillary nodes (v) across supraclavicular nodes and (vi) across all nodes (vii) across all lesions (overall) using the following algorithm: CR: if measurement of '0' is noted at a given cycle as compared to baseline measurement which is >0 at screening or cycle 1 day 1; PR: if measurement is at least a 30% decreased compared to baseline levels . (Reference= baseline size or sum of sizes). Clinical Responders are participants who have achieved CR or PR during the Neo-adjuvant treatment.

    Measured: Baseline up to Cycle 4 (assessed at Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 1-4 Pre-Surgery) Up to approximately 24 months

  8. Percentage of Participants With Progressive Disease During Neo-Adjuvant Treatment Period

    Tumor assessments were made based upon the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria - version 1.0. The clinical response at each cycle up to the last assessment prior to surgery was derived for: i) the primary breast lesion; (ii) across secondary breast lesions, (iii) across all breast lesions (iv) across axillary nodes (v) across supraclavicular nodes and (vi) across all nodes (vii) across all lesions (overall) using the following algorithm: PD: if lesion is at least a 20 % increased from measurements at baseline. Percentage of participants along with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for one sample binomial using Pearson-Clopper method were reported. Missing investigator assessments were considered as no progressive disease.

    Measured: Baseline up to Cycle 4 (assessed at Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 1-4 Pre-Surgery) Up to approximately 24 months

  9. Percentage of Participants Achieving Breast Conserving Surgery For Whom Mastectomy Was Planned

    Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) was defined as quadrantectomy, lumpectomy, no surgery, sentinel node biopsy, axillary surgical resection or other method of avoiding mastectomy.

    Measured: Surgery (Within 2 weeks after Cycle 4) Up to approximately 24 months

  10. Percentage of Participants Who Were Progression Free and Disease Free

    Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the time from first date of no disease to first documentation of PD or death. Participants without progression after surgery were considered Disease Free. Any evidence of contralateral disease in-situ was not considered as PD. Participants who were withdrawn from the study without documented progression and for whom evaluations were made, were censored at date of last assessment when participant was known to be disease-free. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from date of randomization to first documentation of PD or death. Any evidence of contralateral disease in-situ was not considered as PD. Participants who were withdrawn from study without documented progression and for whom evaluations were made, were censored at date of last assessment when the participant was known to be free from progressive disease. Participants without post baseline assessments but known to be alive were censored at the time of randomization.

    Measured: Randomization up to a maximum of 329 weeks

  11. Progression Free and Disease Free Survival

    DFS was defined as the time from the first date of no disease (date of surgery) to the first documentation of PD or death. Participants without progression after surgery were considered Disease Free. Any evidence of contralateral disease in-situ was not considered as PD. PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first documentation of PD or death. Any evidence of contralateral disease in-situ was not considered as PD. DFS and PFS were determined using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

    Measured: Randomization up to a maximum of 329 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Oct 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study start26 Jun 2006
  3. Primary completion22 Sep 2014
  4. Study completion22 Sep 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
417 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00545688
Sponsor's protocol ID
WO20697
Status last verified
Jul 2017
First submitted
16 Oct 2007
Last updated
15 Aug 2017

Publications

  • Bianchini G, Kiermaier A, Bianchi GV, Im YH, Pienkowski T, Liu MC, Tseng LM, Dowsett M, Zabaglo L, Kirk S, Szado T, Eng-Wong J, Amler LC, Valagussa P, Gianni L. Biomarker analysis of the NeoSphere study: pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel versus trastuzumab plus docetaxel, pertuzumab plus trastuzumab, or pertuzumab plus docetaxel for the neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2017 Feb 9;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0806-9.

    PubMed 28183321
  • Swain SM, Schneeweiss A, Gianni L, Gao JJ, Stein A, Waldron-Lynch M, Heeson S, Beattie MS, Yoo B, Cortes J, Baselga J. Incidence and management of diarrhea in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated with pertuzumab. Ann Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;28(4):761-768. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw695.

    PubMed 28057664
  • Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, Tseng LM, Liu MC, Lluch A, Staroslawska E, de la Haba-Rodriguez J, Im SA, Pedrini JL, Poirier B, Morandi P, Semiglazov V, Srimuninnimit V, Bianchi GV, Magazzu D, McNally V, Douthwaite H, Ross G, Valagussa P. 5-year analysis of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in patients with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):791-800. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00163-7. Epub 2016 May 11.

    PubMed 27179402
  • Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, Roman L, Tseng LM, Liu MC, Lluch A, Staroslawska E, de la Haba-Rodriguez J, Im SA, Pedrini JL, Poirier B, Morandi P, Semiglazov V, Srimuninnimit V, Bianchi G, Szado T, Ratnayake J, Ross G, Valagussa P. Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jan;13(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70336-9. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

    PubMed 22153890

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Herceptin, Docetaxel and Pertuzumab in people with Breast Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 77 sites in 18 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 77 sites in Russia, Brazil, Italy, Spain, Poland and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Jan 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Achieving Pathological Complete Response (pCR) (time frame: Approximately 4 months from randomization following surgery or early withdrawal, whichever occurred first (Surgery was performed within 2 weeks after Cycle 4)). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00545688, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Aug 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in