AzTrials
AzTrials

Ankylosing SpondylitisNCT00544557

Study Evaluating The Use Of Etanercept In Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis

An observational study of Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by Pfizer at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to provide a holistic assessment of patients receiving etanercept in a real-world setting. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Ankylosing Spondylitis
What is being tested?
Etanercept
How many people
1,715 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Oct 2007to May 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with an established diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS)

Who cannot join

  • Hypersensitivity to etanercept
  • Active infection including chronic or localised infection
  • Sepsis or risk of sepsis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Klinikum Benjamin Franklin

    Berlin, 12200

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Observational Study Of The Use Of Enbrel (Registered) (Etanercept) In Routine Clinical Practice To Treat Ankylosing Spondylitis (as) Patients: An Effectiveness, Safety, And Health Economic Evaluation

This study aims to provide a holistic assessment of patients receiving etanercept in a real-world setting.

Read the detailed description

Non-interventional study: subjects to be selected according to the usual clinical practice of their physician

Being tested
Etanercept
Medical subject headings
Spondylitis, Ankylosing

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EtanerceptDrug

    Also called Enbrel

    The patients will be treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of etanercept in Germany. The dosage and duration of therapy is to be determined by the physician to meet the patients' individual needs for treatment.

Study groups in NCT00544557
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients with Ankylosing SpondylitisNot described
Receives: Drug: Etanercept

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 26

    Percentage of participants achieving partial remission was determined by assessment of spondyloarthritis international society (ASAS) criteria. Partial remission was defined as a score of less than 2 units (on a scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity) in each of the 4 assessment in ASAS domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation.

    Measured: Week 26

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 52

    Percentage of participants achieving partial remission was determined by ASAS criteria. Partial remission defined as a score of less than 2 units (on a scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity) in each of the 4 assessment in ASAS domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation.

    Measured: Week 52

Secondary outcomes (26)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life- threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability or incapacity; congenital anomaly. Percentage of participants with AEs included participants affected with both SAEs and non--SAEs.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 52

  2. Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs) by Co-morbidity

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 52

  3. Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 52

    BASDAI is a validated self-assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participant with AS. Utilizing a 11-point Likert-scale (0= none and 10=very severe) participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. The index was computed by adding questions 1 to 4 plus the mean of questions 5 and 6. The resulting 0 to 50 score was divided by 5 to give a final 0-10 BASDAI score (0 being no problem and 10 being the worst problem).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  4. Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 52

    BASFI is a validated self assessment tool that determines the degree of functional limitation in AS. Participants answered 10 questions, consisting of 8 specific questions regarding function in AS and 2 questions reflecting the participant's ability to cope with everyday life. Each question was answered on a 0-10 scale (0 being no problem and 10 being the worst problem), the sum of which (divided by 10) resulted in the BASFI score (0-10).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  5. Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Week 52

    Occiput-to-wall distance is the distance between the occiput (posterior or back portion of the head) and the wall when the participant stood with heels and shoulder against the wall and the back straight.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  6. Change From Baseline in Lateral Lumbar Flexion at Week 52

    Lateral lumbar flexion was determined by the difference of the finger-floor-distance in normal position and in lateral bending position.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  7. Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Pain at Week 52

    Participants were asked to assess their global pain intensity within the past 7 days. Pain was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  8. Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52

    Participants were asked to assess their disease activity within the past 7 days. Disease activity was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  9. Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52

    Physicians were asked to assess the disease activity of participants within the past 7 days. Disease activity was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  10. Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 52

    Duration of morning stiffness is defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  11. Percentage of Participants With Significant Reduction of Morning Stiffness

    Duration of morning stiffness is defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes. A significant reduction of duration of morning stiffness is defined as a reduction of the duration in minutes by at least 20 percent or reduction to 'no morning stiffness' (absence of morning stiffness).

    Measured: Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52

  12. Percentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral Arthritis

    Peripheral arthritis is the inflammation of joints that involved asymmetrically. It involved the hips, shoulder girdle (glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, and sternoclavicular joints), joints of the chest wall (costovertebral joints, costosternal junctions) and symphysis pubis.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52

  13. Change From Baseline in Number of Affected Joints by Peripheral Arthritis at Week 52

    Peripheral arthritis is the inflammation of joints that involved asymmetrically. It involved the hips, shoulder girdle (glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, and sternoclavicular joints), joints of the chest wall (costovertebral joints, costosternal junctions) and symphysis pubis. In case of no presence of peripheral arthritis the number of affected joints was set to 0.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  14. Percentage of Participants With Presence of Enthesitis

    Enthesitis is the inflammation of the enthesis, where the joint capsules, ligaments or tendons attach to the bone. This inflammation can lead to severe pain and discomfort.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52

  15. Change From Baseline in Number of Affected Body Parts by Enthesitis at Week 52

    Enthesitis is the inflammation of the enthesis, where the joint capsules, ligaments or tendons attach to the bone. This inflammation can lead to severe pain and discomfort. In case of no presence of enthesitis the number of affected body parts was set to 0.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  16. Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 52

    The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  17. Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 52

    ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 millimeter/hour (mm/hr). A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  18. Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 (ASAS-20) Response

    ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in AS participants. ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 20= at least >= 20 percent improvement from baseline and an absolute change >=1 unit on a 0-10 numeric scale (0=no disease activity; 10=high disease activity) in at least 3 of the domains (on a 0-10 numerical scale): Global assessment of disease activity by participant, participant's global pain intensity, function measured by BASFI and inflammation measured by the average of the last two Likert-scales in BASDAI concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration and no worsening in the remaining domain.

    Measured: Week 12, 26, 38, 52

  19. Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 40 (ASAS-40) Response

    ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants. ASAS =4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 40= at least (>=) 40 percent improvement from baseline and an absolute change >=2 unit on a 0-10 numeric scale (0=no disease activity; 10=high disease activity) in at least 3 of the domains (on a 0-10 numerical scale): Global assessment of disease activity by participant, participant's global pain intensity, function measured by BASFI and inflammation measured by the average of the last two Likert-scales in BASDAI concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration and no worsening in the remaining domain.

    Measured: Week 12, 26, 38, 52

  20. Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Time Trade Off (TTO)

    EQ 5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (extreme problems). Score of each domain is transformed into a single TTO value using formula developed by Greiner et al and results in a total score range -0.205 to 0.999, higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 26, 52

  21. Euro Quality of Life (EQ--5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health. State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicate worst health state. Score of each domain is transformed into a single VAS score using formula developed by Greiner et al and results in a total score range of 0 to 100, where higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 26, 52

  22. Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)

    WPAI:SHP is 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the amount of absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss and daily activity impairment attributable to rheumatoid arthritis for a period of 7 days prior to each visit. It yields 4 sub-scores: work time missed (absenteeism), impairment while working (presenteeism or reduced on-the-job effectiveness), overall work impairment (work productivity loss or absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment (daily activity impairment). These sub-scores are transformed to impairment percentages (range from 0 to 100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 26, 52

  23. Healthcare Resource Utilization

    Participants utilization of healthcare resources was evaluated as number of events for healthcare resources utilization including: number of visits to general practitioners, visits to rheumatologist, visits to other medical specialists, inpatient hospitalizations, inpatient rehabilitations, inpatient follow-up treatment, outpatient rehabilitations, physiotherapy, and other healthcare utilizations. At baseline, number of events for participants' healthcare resources utilization during last 12 months before enrollment into the study were documented. After enrollment, number of events for participants' healthcare resources utilization were documented for last 6 months after previous documentation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 26, 52

  24. Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization

    Participants duration of healthcare resources utilization was evaluated as number of days for healthcare resources utilization including: duration of visits to general practitioners, to rheumatologist, to other medical specialists, inpatient hospitalizations, inpatient rehabilitations, inpatient follow-up treatment, outpatient rehabilitations, physiotherapy, and other healthcare utilizations. At baseline, number of days for participants' healthcare resources utilizations during last 12 months before enrollment into the study were documented. After enrollment, number of days for participants' healthcare resources utilization were documented for last 6 months after previous documentation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 26, 52

  25. Percentage of Participants With Prior or Concomitant Medication Use for Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis

    Participants taking any non-study medications which were administered either prior to or during the study treatment for AS were reported.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 52

  26. Percentage of Participants With Discontinuation of Treatment Due to Adverse Events

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Oct 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2007
  3. Primary completionMay 2014
  4. Study completionMay 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,715 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00544557
Sponsor's protocol ID
0881X1-4463
Other IDs
B1801087
Status last verified
Apr 2015
First submitted
15 Oct 2007
Last updated
12 May 2015
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Druce KL, Aikman L, Dilleen M, Burden A, Szczypa P, Basu N. Fatigue independently predicts different work disability dimensions in etanercept-treated rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 May 29;20(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1598-8.

    PubMed 29843776

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by Pfizer at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 May 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 26 (time frame: Week 26). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00544557, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 May 2015; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in