HIV InfectionsPhase 3NCT00543725
TMC278-TiDP6-C215: A Clinical Trial in Treatment Naive HIV-subjects Patients Comparing TMC278 to Efavirenz in Combination With 2 Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
A Phase 3 study testing TMC278 and efavirenz in people with HIV Infections and HIV-1, run by Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland at 82 sites in 20 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this trial is to compare the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of TMC278 given at a dose of 25 mg once daily versus efavirenz (EFV) at a dose of 600 mg once daily, when combined with a background regimen containing 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors ( investigator choice of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Infections, HIV-1
- What is being tested?
- TMC278 and efavirenz
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 680 participants
- Where
- 82 sitesin 20 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2008to Feb 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient with documented HIV-1 infection
- Patient has never been treated with a therapeutic HIV vaccine or an ARV drug prior to screening
- Patient's HIV-1 plasma viral load at screening is > 5,000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL (assayed by RNA PCR standard specimen procedure)
- Patient's virus is sensitive to the 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors chosen for treatment
- Patient agrees not to start ART before the baseline visit
- Patient is HLA-B*5701 negative in case abacavir is included in the patient's treatment regimen.
Who cannot join
- Previous use of ANY ARV drug for ANY length of time
- Any documented evidence of NNRTI resistance associated mutations in patient's HIV
- Category C AIDS defining illness, except, Stable Kaposi Sarcoma Wasting syndrome if not progressive
- Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) that is considered not cured
- Active TB
- Allergy or hypersensitivity to study or background ARTs
- Specific grade 3 or 4 toxicity
- Kidney impairment: calculated creatinine clearance <50 ml/min
Trial locations and contacts
82 sites in 20 countries.
82 sites in 20 countries
United States25 sites
Study site
Atlantis, Florida
Study site
Baltimore, Maryland
Study site
Boston, Massachusetts
Study site
Chicago, Illinois
Study site
Dallas, Texas
Study site
Detroit, Michigan
Study site
Flushing, New York
Study site
Houston, Texas
Study site
Lexington, Kentucky
Study site
Long Beach, California
Study site
Longview, Texas
Study site
Los Angeles, California
Study site
Miami, Florida
Study site
Miami Beach, Florida
Study site
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Study site
New York, New York
Study site
Newark, New Jersey
Study site
Orlando, Florida
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Study site
Rochester, New York
Study site
San Francisco, California
Study site
Springfield, Massachusetts
Study site
Tampa, Florida
Study site
The Bronx, New York
Study site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia
Germany7 sites
Study site
Berlin
Study site
Cologne
Study site
Essen
Study site
Frankfurt
Study site
Hamburg
Study site
Hanover
Study site
Mannheim
South Africa6 sites
Study site
Bloemfontein
Study site
Cape Town
Study site
Dundee
Study site
Johannesburg
Study site
Pretoria
Study site
Westdene Johannesburg Gauteng
Brazil5 sites
Study site
Campinas
Study site
Distrito Barao Geraldo-Campina
Study site
Pinheiros
Study site
Recife
Study site
São Paulo
Canada5 sites
Study site
Calgary, Alberta
Study site
Montreal, Quebec
Study site
Toronto, Ontario
Study site
Vancouver, British Columbia
Study site
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Belgium4 sites
Study site
Antwerp
Study site
Brussels
Study site
Ghent
Study site
Leuven
France4 sites
Study site
Clamart
Study site
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre
Study site
Montpellier
Study site
Paris
Russia4 sites
Study site
Moscow
Study site
Saint Petersburg
Study site
Smolensk
Study site
Voronezh
Australia3 sites
Study site
Darlinghurst
Study site
Prahran
Study site
Surry Hills
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind Trial of TMC278 25mg q.d. Versus Efavirenz 600mg q.d. in Combination With a Background Regimen Containing 2 Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors in Antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 Infected Subjects.
The purpose of this trial is to compare the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of TMC278 given at a dose of 25 mg once daily versus efavirenz (EFV) at a dose of 600 mg once daily, when combined with a background regimen containing 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors ( investigator choice of ABC/3TC, TDF/FTC or AZT/3TC) in HIV-1 infected patients who have not yet taken any anti-HIV drugs. The following evaluations will be done: antiviral activity, immunologic changes, and viral geno-/phenotype evolution, relationship of Pharmacokinetics (PK) and PK/Pharmacodynamics and Medical resource utilization and treatment adherence.
Read the detailed description
Over the past decade, anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drugs have been introduced sequentially for use in the clinic. Currently, patients are routinely being treated with 3 or 4 drug combinations including nucleoside/tide analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs/NtRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), and/or fusion inhibitors. New potent antiretroviral (ARV) compounds that work in people whose HIV-1 virus is resistant to available drugs are urgently needed. This is a Phase III, randomized (study medication is assigned by chance), double-blind (neither the study physician nor the patient knows the name of the study assigned medication), double-dummy, active-controlled trial to compare the effectiveness, safety, and ability to tolerate TMC278 versus efavirenz (EFV). The study will last for 104 weeks which includes a screening period of 4 weeks, a 96-week treatment period, followed by a 4 week follow-up period. Patients will be randomly assigned (like tossing a coin) to TMC278 or to efavirenz in combination with two other anti-HIV drugs of the class nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The hypothesis to be provided in this study is that the investigational drug TMC278 will perform just like efavirenz (EFV) in terms of antiviral effectiveness (i.e., suppressing of the plasma viral load to a level < 50 HIV-1 RNA (ribonucleic acid) copies/mL, in ARV-naïve HIV-infected patients. During the trial, patients' health will be monitored by physical examination, interview to assess health and well being, and laboratory testing on blood and urine samples. Experimental Group: One tablet of TMC278 25 mg daily; plus efavirenz (EFV) placebo; plus 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors; Control Group: One tablet of Placebo daily that looks just like TMC278 plus EFV 600 mg daily plus 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors for 104 weeks.
- Conditions
- HIV Infections, HIV-1
- Being tested
- TMC278, efavirenz
- Keywords
- Antiretroviral, HIV-1, AIDS, TMC278-C215, TMC278-TiDP6-C215, Treatment Naive
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Infections, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TMC278Drug
25 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks
efavirenzDrug
600 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 002 | Active comparator | efavirenz 600 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks Receives: Drug: efavirenz |
| 001 | Experimental | TMC278 25 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks Receives: Drug: TMC278 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Time to Loss of Virologic Response [TLOVR], <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 48
Virological response is defined as confirmed plasma viral load less than (<) 50 human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) (ribonucleic acid [RNA]) copies/milliliter (ml) at Week 48. The TLOVR algorithm was used to derive response. Response needed to be confirmed at 2 consecutive visits and participants who permanently discontinued were considered nonresponders after discontinuation. Resuppression after confirmed virologic failure was considered as failure. Virologic Failure includes participants who were rebounder (confirmed viral load >= 50 copies/ml after being responder) or who were never suppressed (no confirmed viral load <50 copies/ml).
Measured: Week 48
Secondary outcomes (8)
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Snapshot, <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 48
The analysis is based on the last observed viral load (VL) data within the Week 48 window. Virologic response is defined as a VL<50 copies/mL (observed case). Missing VL was considered as non-response. Virologic Failure includes subjects who had VL>=50 copies/mL in the Wk 48 window, subjects who discontinued early due to lack or loss of efficacy, subjects who discontinued for reasons other than an adverse event, death or lack or loss of efficacy and at the time of discontinuation had a VL>=50 copies/mL and subjects who had a switch in background regimen that was not permitted by the protocol.
Measured: Week 48
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Time to Loss of Virologic Response [TLOVR], <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 96
Measured: Week 96
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Snapshot, <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 96
Measured: Week 96
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Observed, <50 Copies/mL) at Last On-Treatment Visit (Post-Week 96).
Virological response is defined as (observed) plasma viral load less than 50 human immunodeficiency virus-type 1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid (RNA) copies per mL at the last on-treatment post-Week 96 visit.
Measured: Variable, ranging from 3 months up to maximum 18 months for TMC278 and 12 months for Efavirenz
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Time to Loss of Virologic Response [TLOVR], <400 Copies Per mL) at Week 48
Virological response is defined as confirmed plasma viral load < 400 HIV-1 (RNA) copies/mL at Week 48. The TLOVR algorithm was used to derive response. Response needed to be confirmed at 2 consecutive visits and participants who permanently discontinued were considered nonresponders after discontinuation. Resuppression after confirmed virologic failure was considered as failure. Virologic Failure includes participants who were rebounder (confirmed viral load >= 400 copies/mL after being responder) or who were never suppressed (no confirmed viral load <400 copies/mL).
Measured: Week 48
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Time to Loss of Virologic Response [TLOVR], <400 Copies Per mL) at Week 96
Virological response is defined as confirmed plasma viral load < 400 HIV-1 (RNA) copies/mL at Week 96. The TLOVR algorithm was used to derive response. Response needed to be confirmed at 2 consecutive visits and participants who permanently discontinued were considered nonresponders after discontinuation. Resuppression after confirmed virologic failure was considered as failure. Virologic Failure includes participants who were rebounder (confirmed viral load >= 400 copies/mL after being responder) or who were never suppressed (no confirmed viral load <400 copies/mL).
Measured: Week 96
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 48 and Week 96 in Absolute and Relative CD4+ Cell Counts (Using Imputed Data)
Change from baseline in CD4+ cell count was imputed in case of missing values: in case of premature discontinuation, data were imputed with the baseline value after discontinuation (i.e. change=0, Non-Completer [NC] = Failure); otherwise last observation carried forward was applied.
Measured: Baseline, Week 48, and Week 96
Number of Participants With Virologic Failure for the Resistance Determinations by Developing Mutations: First Available On-Treatment Genotypic Data After Failure
Virologic failure for the resistance determinations was defined as lack of virologic response (never having had 2 consecutive plasma viral load <50 copies/mL) and plasma viral load increase of >=0.5 log 10 copies/mL above nadir (i.e., never suppressed), or confirmed loss of virologic response (2 consecutive plasma viral load >=50 copies/mL after having had 2 consecutive plasma viral load <50 copies/mL; i.e., rebounder), or discontinued with a last observed on-treatment plasma viral load >=50 copies/mL after having had 2 consecutive plasma viral load <50 copies/mL. For this study, treatment-emergent reverse transcriptase (RT) resistance associated mutations (RAMs) occurring in at least 2 virologic failures (for at least one treatment group) for the following lists are presented: i) Extended list of Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI RAMs) ii) IAS-USA list of Nucleoside/tide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (N[t]RTI RAMs).
Measured: Week 96
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2008
- Primary completionJan 2010
- Study completionFeb 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 680 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland Clinical Trial, Study director, Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00543725
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR002704
- Other IDs
- TMC278-TIDP6-C215
- Status last verified
- Mar 2016
- First submitted
- 11 Oct 2007
- Last updated
- 1 Apr 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Rimsky L, Van Eygen V, Hoogstoel A, Stevens M, Boven K, Picchio G, Vingerhoets J. 96-Week resistance analyses of rilpivirine in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected adults from the ECHO and THRIVE Phase III trials. Antivir Ther. 2013;18(8):967-77. doi: 10.3851/IMP2636. Epub 2013 May 28.
PubMed 23714781Nelson M, Amaya G, Clumeck N, Arns da Cunha C, Jayaweera D, Junod P, Li T, Tebas P, Stevens M, Buelens A, Vanveggel S, Boven K; ECHO and THRIVE Study Groups. Efficacy and safety of rilpivirine in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients with hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus coinfection enrolled in the Phase III randomized, double-blind ECHO and THRIVE trials. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Aug;67(8):2020-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks130. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
PubMed 22532465Cohen CJ, Andrade-Villanueva J, Clotet B, Fourie J, Johnson MA, Ruxrungtham K, Wu H, Zorrilla C, Crauwels H, Rimsky LT, Vanveggel S, Boven K; THRIVE study group. Rilpivirine versus efavirenz with two background nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-naive adults infected with HIV-1 (THRIVE): a phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2011 Jul 16;378(9787):229-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60983-5.
PubMed 21763935
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Apr 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind Trial of TMC278 25mg q.d. Versus Efavirenz 600mg q.d. in Combination With a Background Regimen Containing 2 Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors in Antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 Infected Subjects.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00543725
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CR002704
- Conditions
- HIV Infections, HIV-1
- Keywords
- Antiretroviral, HIV-1, AIDS, TMC278-C215, TMC278-TiDP6-C215, Treatment Naive
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 680 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, IrelandIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2008
- Primary completion
- Jan 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 12 Jul 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this trial is to compare the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of TMC278 given at a dose of 25 mg once daily versus efavirenz (EFV) at a dose of 600 mg once daily, when combined with a background regimen containing 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors ( investigator choice of ABC/3TC, TDF/FTC or AZT/3TC) in HIV-1 infected patients who have not yet taken any anti-HIV drugs. The following evaluations will be done: antiviral activity, immunologic changes, and viral geno-/phenotype evolution, relationship of Pharmacokinetics (PK) and PK/Pharmacodynamics and Medical resource utilization and treatment adherence.
Detailed description
Over the past decade, anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drugs have been introduced sequentially for use in the clinic. Currently, patients are routinely being treated with 3 or 4 drug combinations including nucleoside/tide analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs/NtRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), and/or fusion inhibitors. New potent antiretroviral (ARV) compounds that work in people whose HIV-1 virus is resistant to available drugs are urgently needed. This is a Phase III, randomized (study medication is assigned by chance), double-blind (neither the study physician nor the patient knows the name of the study assigned medication), double-dummy, active-controlled trial to compare the effectiveness, safety, and ability to tolerate TMC278 versus efavirenz (EFV). The study will last for 104 weeks which includes a screening period of 4 weeks, a 96-week treatment period, followed by a 4 week follow-up period. Patients will be randomly assigned (like tossing a coin) to TMC278 or to efavirenz in combination with two other anti-HIV drugs of the class nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The hypothesis to be provided in this study is that the investigational drug TMC278 will perform just like efavirenz (EFV) in terms of antiviral effectiveness (i.e., suppressing of the plasma viral load to a level < 50 HIV-1 RNA (ribonucleic acid) copies/mL, in ARV-naïve HIV-infected patients. During the trial, patients' health will be monitored by physical examination, interview to assess health and well being, and laboratory testing on blood and urine samples. Experimental Group: One tablet of TMC278 25 mg daily; plus efavirenz (EFV) placebo; plus 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors; Control Group: One tablet of Placebo daily that looks just like TMC278 plus EFV 600 mg daily plus 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors for 104 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 002 | Active comparator | Drug: efavirenzefavirenz 600 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks |
| 001 | Experimental | Drug: TMC278TMC278 25 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patient with documented HIV-1 infection
- Patient has never been treated with a therapeutic HIV vaccine or an ARV drug prior to screening
- Patient's HIV-1 plasma viral load at screening is > 5,000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL (assayed by RNA PCR standard specimen procedure)
- Patient's virus is sensitive to the 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors chosen for treatment
- Patient agrees not to start ART before the baseline visit
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Previous use of ANY ARV drug for ANY length of time
- Any documented evidence of NNRTI resistance associated mutations in patient's HIV
- Category C AIDS defining illness, except, Stable Kaposi Sarcoma Wasting syndrome if not progressive
- Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) that is considered not cured
- Active TB
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TMC27825 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks | Drug | 001 |
| efavirenz600 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks | Drug | 002 |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Time to Loss of Virologic Response [TLOVR], <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 48
Time frame: Week 48
Virological response is defined as confirmed plasma viral load less than (<) 50 human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) (ribonucleic acid [RNA]) copies/milliliter (ml) at Week 48. The TLOVR algorithm was used to derive response. Response needed to be confirmed at 2 consecutive visits and participants who permanently discontinued were considered nonresponders after discontinuation. Resuppression after confirmed virologic failure was considered as failure. Virologic Failure includes participants who were rebounder (confirmed viral load >= 50 copies/ml after being responder) or who were never suppressed (no confirmed viral load <50 copies/ml).
8 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Snapshot, <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 48
Time frame: Week 48
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Time to Loss of Virologic Response [TLOVR], <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 96
Time frame: Week 96
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Snapshot, <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 96
Time frame: Week 96
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Observed, <50 Copies/mL) at Last On-Treatment Visit (Post-Week 96).
Time frame: Variable, ranging from 3 months up to maximum 18 months for TMC278 and 12 months for Efavirenz
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Time to Loss of Virologic Response [TLOVR], <400 Copies Per mL) at Week 48
Time frame: Week 48
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Time to Loss of Virologic Response [TLOVR], <400 Copies Per mL) at Week 96
Time frame: Week 96
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 48 and Week 96 in Absolute and Relative CD4+ Cell Counts (Using Imputed Data)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 48, and Week 96
Number of Participants With Virologic Failure for the Resistance Determinations by Developing Mutations: First Available On-Treatment Genotypic Data After Failure
Time frame: Week 96
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Apr 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23714781Rimsky L, Van Eygen V, Hoogstoel A, Stevens M, Boven K, Picchio G, Vingerhoets J. 96-Week resistance analyses of rilpivirine in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected adults from the ECHO and THRIVE Phase III trials. Antivir Ther. 2013;18(8):967-77. doi: 10.3851/IMP2636. Epub 2013 May 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22532465Nelson M, Amaya G, Clumeck N, Arns da Cunha C, Jayaweera D, Junod P, Li T, Tebas P, Stevens M, Buelens A, Vanveggel S, Boven K; ECHO and THRIVE Study Groups. Efficacy and safety of rilpivirine in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients with hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus coinfection enrolled in the Phase III randomized, double-blind ECHO and THRIVE trials. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Aug;67(8):2020-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks130. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21763935Cohen CJ, Andrade-Villanueva J, Clotet B, Fourie J, Johnson MA, Ruxrungtham K, Wu H, Zorrilla C, Crauwels H, Rimsky LT, Vanveggel S, Boven K; THRIVE study group. Rilpivirine versus efavirenz with two background nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-naive adults infected with HIV-1 (THRIVE): a phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2011 Jul 16;378(9787):229-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60983-5.
Related trials for HIV Infections
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland Clinical Trial study director
Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland
82 sites in 20 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing TMC278 and efavirenz in people with HIV Infections and HIV-1, run by Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland at 82 sites in 20 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 82 sites in United States, Germany, South Africa, Brazil, Canada and 15 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Jul 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Time to Loss of Virologic Response [TLOVR], <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 48 (time frame: Week 48). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00543725, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2016.