AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart BlockNCT00542854

iPod and Other MP3 Players on ICDs and Pacemakers in Children

An observational study of Heart Block and Bradycardia, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Unlike phones, which are commonly held to the ear, music is now available via portable MP3 players and they can be held almost anywhere. Thaker et al state that Apple iPods cause pacemaker interference in 50% of their patients, with over-sensing in 20% of patients, telemetry interference in 29% of patients and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 55 years
Conditions the study is for
Heart Block, Bradycardia, Tachycardia
What is being tested?
MP3
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2007to Sep 2008
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Study population: Children and adults with congenital heart disease who have an implanted pacemaker or defibrillator

Who may be able to join

  • Children and adults with congenital heart disease who have an implanted pacemaker or defibrillator

Who cannot join

  • Age less than 4 or inability to communicate adequately with study team

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Children's Hospital Boston

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Pilot Study on the Effects of Digital Music Players on Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Pacemakers in Pediatrics and Congenital Heart Disease

Unlike phones, which are commonly held to the ear, music is now available via portable MP3 players and they can be held almost anywhere. Thaker et al state that Apple iPods cause pacemaker interference in 50% of their patients, with over-sensing in 20% of patients, telemetry interference in 29% of patients and pacemaker inhibition in 1.2% of patients. The mean age for their sample was 76.1 years +/- 8.6 years. We anticipate that a higher proportion of teenagers and children who have pacemakers use portable MP3 players than in the elderly adult population.We will include the first 100 patients with pacemakers and ICDs who consent for the prospective observational study a single tertiary care center. We intend to conduct a descriptive study, tabulating the number of times that a pacemaker or ICD has changes in the sensing thresholds, pacing thresholds, telemetry interference or pacemaker inhibition when exposed to a series of portable MP3 players at various distances. In addition, we will describe the nature and quantitative differences of those changes.

Read the detailed description

Since pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have been used, there have been questions about what external sources interference could alter their functioning or event recording properties. Because these devices are often intended to be life-saving, their proper functioning is of critical importance.

The literature documents a number of common sources of possible interference. Interference with MRI and electrocautery have been observed (1, 2). Outside the hospital, store security devices and personal digital assistants (PDAs) have been evaluated (3, 4). In 1997, Hayes et al published a randomized, prospective trial concluding that cellular telephones impacted the functioning of pacemakers, but that they did not seem to have any effect at any significant distance (5). They showed that a phone being used at the ear was sufficiently far away to prevent a health risk and recommended that phones not be put in shirt pockets or used near the device.

Unlike phones, which are commonly held to the ear, music is now available via portable MP3 players and they can be held almost anywhere. Thaker et al state that Apple iPods cause pacemaker interference in 50% of their patients, with over-sensing in 20% of patients, telemetry interference in 29% of patients and pacemaker inhibition in 1.2% of patients (6). The mean age for their sample was 76.1 years +/- 8.6 years. We anticipate that a higher proportion of teenagers and kids who have pacemakers use portable MP3 players than in the elderly adult population.

Design Prospective observational study a single tertiary care center.

Subjects

The electrophysiology department at Children's Hospital, Boston follows a large number of patients with pacemakers and ICDs. Approximately 15 patients are seen each week in clinic for routine pacemaker evaluation.

Entry Criteria We will include the first 100 patients with pacemakers and ICDs who consent for the prospective trial.

  1. Consent for participation
  2. Active pacemaker/ICD, which is functioning appropriately at the time of interrogation based on internal diagnostics and the judgment of an appropriate clinician (electrophysiology nurse, fellow and/or attending.
  3. Normally functioning leads and thresholds at the time of interrogation based on internal diagnostics and the judgment of an appropriate clinician (electrophysiology nurse, fellow and/or attending.

Variables

Primary Outcome Change in pacemaker sensing thresholds, pacing thresholds, telemetry interference or pacemaker inhibition.

Methods

Study investigators will first obtain informed consent from each patient or family and, where appropriate, assent from the child.

At the conclusion of their routine clinic visit, each patient will have his or her pacemaker attached to the appropriate proprietary interrogation system for their pacemaker device. We will then monitor the pacemaker/ICD system while placing a series of portable music devices at various distances from the pacemaker/ICD system: (1) 2cm, (2) 30cm, (3) 100cm. At each distance the pacemaker will be re-interrogated for changes in pacemaker sensing thresholds, pacing thresholds, telemetry interference or pacemaker inhibition. At the end of the testing process, the devices will be removed from near the patient and the device will be interrogated again to assure that the device is at the appropriate clinical settings.

Risks

We believe that there are no more than minimal risks associated with this study. The principle intervention is the placement of a music device near the pacemaker/ICD during the time of pacemaker monitoring. We consider this risk to be similar to the risks encountered by many patients who are currently using portable music devices outside the hospital. In addition, we do not expect any permanent change in the pacemaker or ICD settings, thresholds or functioning.

Statistical Issues

Hypothesis Our hypothesis is that the close approximation of portable MP3 players interfere with the appropriate sensing and recording of pacemakers and ICDs.

Sample Size and Power Calculations We intend to conduct a descriptive study, tabulating the number of times that a pacemaker or ICD has changes in the sensing thresholds, pacing thresholds, telemetry interference or pacemaker inhibition when exposed to a series of portable MP3 players at various distances. In addition, we will describe the nature and quantitative differences of those changes.

Because we do not intend to do comparisons for significance against a control group, we have chosen 100 patients as a reasonable sample size for evaluating possible changes in pacemaker/ICD function.

Being tested
MP3
Keywords
arrhythmia, pacemaker, defibrillator, electromagnetic interference
Medical subject headings
Heart Block, Bradycardia, Tachycardia, Arrhythmias, Cardiac

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MP3Device

    4 different brands of MP3 players will be tested at 3 distances from ICD/pacemaker site in children and adults with congenital heart disease.

Study groups in NCT00542854
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MP34 different brands of MP3 players will be tested at 3 distances from pacemakers and ICDs.
Receives: Device: MP3

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in pacemaker sensing thresholds, pacing thresholds, telemetry interference or pacemaker inhibition.

    Measured: 10 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Oct 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2007
  3. Primary completionSep 2008
  4. Study completionSep 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case crossover
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00542854
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHB-07-08-0308
Status last verified
Jan 2009
First submitted
10 Oct 2007
Last updated
28 Jan 2009
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Heart Block and Bradycardia, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in pacemaker sensing thresholds, pacing thresholds, telemetry interference or pacemaker inhibition. (time frame: 10 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2009.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in