Heart BlockNCT00542854
iPod and Other MP3 Players on ICDs and Pacemakers in Children
An observational study of Heart Block and Bradycardia, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Unlike phones, which are commonly held to the ear, music is now available via portable MP3 players and they can be held almost anywhere. Thaker et al state that Apple iPods cause pacemaker interference in 50% of their patients, with over-sensing in 20% of patients, telemetry interference in 29% of patients and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 to 55 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Block, Bradycardia, Tachycardia
- What is being tested?
- MP3
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2007to Sep 2008
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 to 55 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Study population: Children and adults with congenital heart disease who have an implanted pacemaker or defibrillator
Who may be able to join
- Children and adults with congenital heart disease who have an implanted pacemaker or defibrillator
Who cannot join
- Age less than 4 or inability to communicate adequately with study team
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Children's Hospital Boston
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
About this study
Official title: A Pilot Study on the Effects of Digital Music Players on Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Pacemakers in Pediatrics and Congenital Heart Disease
Unlike phones, which are commonly held to the ear, music is now available via portable MP3 players and they can be held almost anywhere. Thaker et al state that Apple iPods cause pacemaker interference in 50% of their patients, with over-sensing in 20% of patients, telemetry interference in 29% of patients and pacemaker inhibition in 1.2% of patients. The mean age for their sample was 76.1 years +/- 8.6 years. We anticipate that a higher proportion of teenagers and children who have pacemakers use portable MP3 players than in the elderly adult population.We will include the first 100 patients with pacemakers and ICDs who consent for the prospective observational study a single tertiary care center. We intend to conduct a descriptive study, tabulating the number of times that a pacemaker or ICD has changes in the sensing thresholds, pacing thresholds, telemetry interference or pacemaker inhibition when exposed to a series of portable MP3 players at various distances. In addition, we will describe the nature and quantitative differences of those changes.
Read the detailed description
Since pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have been used, there have been questions about what external sources interference could alter their functioning or event recording properties. Because these devices are often intended to be life-saving, their proper functioning is of critical importance.
The literature documents a number of common sources of possible interference. Interference with MRI and electrocautery have been observed (1, 2). Outside the hospital, store security devices and personal digital assistants (PDAs) have been evaluated (3, 4). In 1997, Hayes et al published a randomized, prospective trial concluding that cellular telephones impacted the functioning of pacemakers, but that they did not seem to have any effect at any significant distance (5). They showed that a phone being used at the ear was sufficiently far away to prevent a health risk and recommended that phones not be put in shirt pockets or used near the device.
Unlike phones, which are commonly held to the ear, music is now available via portable MP3 players and they can be held almost anywhere. Thaker et al state that Apple iPods cause pacemaker interference in 50% of their patients, with over-sensing in 20% of patients, telemetry interference in 29% of patients and pacemaker inhibition in 1.2% of patients (6). The mean age for their sample was 76.1 years +/- 8.6 years. We anticipate that a higher proportion of teenagers and kids who have pacemakers use portable MP3 players than in the elderly adult population.
Design Prospective observational study a single tertiary care center.
Subjects
The electrophysiology department at Children's Hospital, Boston follows a large number of patients with pacemakers and ICDs. Approximately 15 patients are seen each week in clinic for routine pacemaker evaluation.
Entry Criteria We will include the first 100 patients with pacemakers and ICDs who consent for the prospective trial.
- Consent for participation
- Active pacemaker/ICD, which is functioning appropriately at the time of interrogation based on internal diagnostics and the judgment of an appropriate clinician (electrophysiology nurse, fellow and/or attending.
- Normally functioning leads and thresholds at the time of interrogation based on internal diagnostics and the judgment of an appropriate clinician (electrophysiology nurse, fellow and/or attending.
Variables
Primary Outcome Change in pacemaker sensing thresholds, pacing thresholds, telemetry interference or pacemaker inhibition.
Methods
Study investigators will first obtain informed consent from each patient or family and, where appropriate, assent from the child.
At the conclusion of their routine clinic visit, each patient will have his or her pacemaker attached to the appropriate proprietary interrogation system for their pacemaker device. We will then monitor the pacemaker/ICD system while placing a series of portable music devices at various distances from the pacemaker/ICD system: (1) 2cm, (2) 30cm, (3) 100cm. At each distance the pacemaker will be re-interrogated for changes in pacemaker sensing thresholds, pacing thresholds, telemetry interference or pacemaker inhibition. At the end of the testing process, the devices will be removed from near the patient and the device will be interrogated again to assure that the device is at the appropriate clinical settings.
Risks
We believe that there are no more than minimal risks associated with this study. The principle intervention is the placement of a music device near the pacemaker/ICD during the time of pacemaker monitoring. We consider this risk to be similar to the risks encountered by many patients who are currently using portable music devices outside the hospital. In addition, we do not expect any permanent change in the pacemaker or ICD settings, thresholds or functioning.
Statistical Issues
Hypothesis Our hypothesis is that the close approximation of portable MP3 players interfere with the appropriate sensing and recording of pacemakers and ICDs.
Sample Size and Power Calculations We intend to conduct a descriptive study, tabulating the number of times that a pacemaker or ICD has changes in the sensing thresholds, pacing thresholds, telemetry interference or pacemaker inhibition when exposed to a series of portable MP3 players at various distances. In addition, we will describe the nature and quantitative differences of those changes.
Because we do not intend to do comparisons for significance against a control group, we have chosen 100 patients as a reasonable sample size for evaluating possible changes in pacemaker/ICD function.
- Conditions
- Heart Block, Bradycardia, Tachycardia, Arrhythmia
- Being tested
- MP3
- Keywords
- arrhythmia, pacemaker, defibrillator, electromagnetic interference
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Block, Bradycardia, Tachycardia, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MP3Device
4 different brands of MP3 players will be tested at 3 distances from ICD/pacemaker site in children and adults with congenital heart disease.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MP3 | 4 different brands of MP3 players will be tested at 3 distances from pacemakers and ICDs. Receives: Device: MP3 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in pacemaker sensing thresholds, pacing thresholds, telemetry interference or pacemaker inhibition.
Measured: 10 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2007
- Primary completionSep 2008
- Study completionSep 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Heart BlockStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boston Children's HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case crossover
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Children's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Charles Berul, MD, Principal investigator, Boston Children's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00542854
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHB-07-08-0308
- Status last verified
- Jan 2009
- First submitted
- 10 Oct 2007
- Last updated
- 28 Jan 2009
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jan 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pilot Study on the Effects of Digital Music Players on Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Pacemakers in Pediatrics and Congenital Heart Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00542854
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHB-07-08-0308
- Conditions
- Heart Block, Bradycardia, Tachycardia, Arrhythmia
- Keywords
- arrhythmia, pacemaker, defibrillator, electromagnetic interference
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Children's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2007
- Primary completion
- Sep 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Unlike phones, which are commonly held to the ear, music is now available via portable MP3 players and they can be held almost anywhere. Thaker et al state that Apple iPods cause pacemaker interference in 50% of their patients, with over-sensing in 20% of patients, telemetry interference in 29% of patients and pacemaker inhibition in 1.2% of patients. The mean age for their sample was 76.1 years +/- 8.6 years. We anticipate that a higher proportion of teenagers and children who have pacemakers use portable MP3 players than in the elderly adult population.We will include the first 100 patients with pacemakers and ICDs who consent for the prospective observational study a single tertiary care center. We intend to conduct a descriptive study, tabulating the number of times that a pacemaker or ICD has changes in the sensing thresholds, pacing thresholds, telemetry interference or pacemaker inhibition when exposed to a series of portable MP3 players at various distances. In addition, we will describe the nature and quantitative differences of those changes.
Detailed description
Since pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have been used, there have been questions about what external sources interference could alter their functioning or event recording properties. Because these devices are often intended to be life-saving, their proper functioning is of critical importance.
The literature documents a number of common sources of possible interference. Interference with MRI and electrocautery have been observed (1, 2). Outside the hospital, store security devices and personal digital assistants (PDAs) have been evaluated (3, 4). In 1997, Hayes et al published a randomized, prospective trial concluding that cellular telephones impacted the functioning of pacemakers, but that they did not seem to have any effect at any significant distance (5). They showed that a phone being used at the ear was sufficiently far away to prevent a health risk and recommended that phones not be put in shirt pockets or used near the device.
Unlike phones, which are commonly held to the ear, music is now available via portable MP3 players and they can be held almost anywhere. Thaker et al state that Apple iPods cause pacemaker interference in 50% of their patients, with over-sensing in 20% of patients, telemetry interference in 29% of patients and pacemaker inhibition in 1.2% of patients (6). The mean age for their sample was 76.1 years +/- 8.6 years. We anticipate that a higher proportion of teenagers and kids who have pacemakers use portable MP3 players than in the elderly adult population.
Design Prospective observational study a single tertiary care center.
Subjects
The electrophysiology department at Children's Hospital, Boston follows a large number of patients with pacemakers and ICDs. Approximately 15 patients are seen each week in clinic for routine pacemaker evaluation.
Entry Criteria We will include the first 100 patients with pacemakers and ICDs who consent for the prospective trial.
- Consent for participation
- Active pacemaker/ICD, which is functioning appropriately at the time of interrogation based on internal diagnostics and the judgment of an appropriate clinician (electrophysiology nurse, fellow and/or attending.
- Normally functioning leads and thresholds at the time of interrogation based on internal diagnostics and the judgment of an appropriate clinician (electrophysiology nurse, fellow and/or attending.
Variables
Primary Outcome Change in pacemaker sensing thresholds, pacing thresholds, telemetry interference or pacemaker inhibition.
Methods
Study investigators will first obtain informed consent from each patient or family and, where appropriate, assent from the child.
At the conclusion of their routine clinic visit, each patient will have his or her pacemaker attached to the appropriate proprietary interrogation system for their pacemaker device. We will then monitor the pacemaker/ICD system while placing a series of portable music devices at various distances from the pacemaker/ICD system: (1) 2cm, (2) 30cm, (3) 100cm. At each distance the pacemaker will be re-interrogated for changes in pacemaker sensing thresholds, pacing thresholds, telemetry interference or pacemaker inhibition. At the end of the testing process, the devices will be removed from near the patient and the device will be interrogated again to assure that the device is at the appropriate clinical settings.
Risks
We believe that there are no more than minimal risks associated with this study. The principle intervention is the placement of a music device near the pacemaker/ICD during the time of pacemaker monitoring. We consider this risk to be similar to the risks encountered by many patients who are currently using portable music devices outside the hospital. In addition, we do not expect any permanent change in the pacemaker or ICD settings, thresholds or functioning.
Statistical Issues
Hypothesis Our hypothesis is that the close approximation of portable MP3 players interfere with the appropriate sensing and recording of pacemakers and ICDs.
Sample Size and Power Calculations We intend to conduct a descriptive study, tabulating the number of times that a pacemaker or ICD has changes in the sensing thresholds, pacing thresholds, telemetry interference or pacemaker inhibition when exposed to a series of portable MP3 players at various distances. In addition, we will describe the nature and quantitative differences of those changes.
Because we do not intend to do comparisons for significance against a control group, we have chosen 100 patients as a reasonable sample size for evaluating possible changes in pacemaker/ICD function.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case crossover
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MP3 | – | Device: MP34 different brands of MP3 players will be tested at 3 distances from pacemakers and ICDs. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
- Study population
- Children and adults with congenital heart disease who have an implanted pacemaker or defibrillator
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Children and adults with congenital heart disease who have an implanted pacemaker or defibrillator
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Age less than 4 or inability to communicate adequately with study team
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MP34 different brands of MP3 players will be tested at 3 distances from ICD/pacemaker site in children and adults with congenital heart disease. | Device | MP3 |
Primary outcome
Change in pacemaker sensing thresholds, pacing thresholds, telemetry interference or pacemaker inhibition.
Time frame: 10 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jan 2009.
Related trials for Heart Block
Recruiting
Trial of the F2 Filter and Delivery System for Embolic Protection During TAVR
Aortic Stenosis Treated With TAVI, Aortic Diseases
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Intravascular Lithotripsy in High Risk Calcified Iliac Anatomy for Transfemoral TAVR
Iliac Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
NHLBI SESAME (SEptal Scoring Along Midline Endocardium) Multi-Center Prospective Study Using Improvised Off-Label Devices
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Left Ventricular Outflow Obstruction
Recruiting
Early Closure of Left Atrial Appendage for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke Despite Anticoagulation Therapy
Ischemic Stroke, Atrial Fibrillation
Recruiting
Exercise and Diet Supplements for Older Patients Undergoing TAVI: the IRON-TAVI Trial
Aortic Stenosis Disease, Aortic Stenosis Symptomatic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Charles Berul, MD principal investigator
Boston Children's Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Heart Block and Bradycardia, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in pacemaker sensing thresholds, pacing thresholds, telemetry interference or pacemaker inhibition. (time frame: 10 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2009.