AzTrials
AzTrials

Pancreatic PseudocystNCT00541593

Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) Cystgastrostomy for the Treatment of Pancreatic Pseudocysts

A study testing Pancreatic Pseudocystgastrostomy in people with Pancreatic Pseudocyst, run by Baystate Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) describes a new field of investigational surgery which uses the endoscope as the primary operative tool. The insertion sites for the endoscope include natural orifices such as the mouth, anus, vagina, or urethra. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pancreatic Pseudocyst
What is being tested?
Pancreatic Pseudocystgastrostomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
5 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2007to Jun 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult (over 18 years old) patients who are able to provide informed consent for this surgical procedure
  • Patients scheduled to undergo non-emergent surgical treatment removal of pancreatic pseudocyst

Who cannot join

  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, would not be appropriate for enrollment into this experimental research project
  • Patients who are deemed to be unstable from a medical standpoint to undergo pancreatic surgery
  • Pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Baystate Medical Center

    Springfield, Massachusetts, 01199

Other trials in United States

About this study

Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) describes a new field of investigational surgery which uses the endoscope as the primary operative tool. The insertion sites for the endoscope include natural orifices such as the mouth, anus, vagina, or urethra. Multidisciplinary teams consist of surgeons and gastroenterologists who are collaborating to develop safe and effective surgical techniques via the natural orifice route in order to avoid surgical incisions. Pancreatic pseudocysts are cavities that form typically in the lesser sac following an episode of acute pancreatitis, that may be able to be drained by a variety of techniques, including endoscopically. Chronic pseudocysts often require surgical drainage into the stomach. The medical device company known as "Power Medical Interventions" has a computer-powered surgical stapler which rests on a flexible shaft. Following the insertion of the endoscope, the powered stapler will be passed alongside the endoscope to help the surgeon and gastroenterologist (working as a team) to see where to properly place the stapler. Once the stapler is in position, one jaw of the stapler will be placed into the pseudocyst, and the other jaw will be left in the stomach. The stapler will then be closed and fired, creating a permanent connection between the two hollow spaces and allow the contents of the pseudocyst to drain naturally out into the stomach and intestines. Utilizing this technique, a surgical incision is avoided.

Hypothesis: Patients who undergo the Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery for treatment of their pancreatic pseudocyst will experience effective treatment with less discomfort and with quicker recovery than standard surgical techniques.

Read the detailed description

Introduction: Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) describes a new field of investigational surgery which uses the endoscope as the primary operative tool. Multiple animal studies utilizing similar techniques are ongoing at several institutions, including Baystate Medical Center. These multidisciplinary teams consist of surgeons and gastroenterologists who are collaborating to develop safe and effective surgical techniques via the natural orifice route in order to avoid surgical incisions.

Pancreatic pseudocysts are cavities that form typically in the lesser sac following an episode of acute pancreatitis. These pseudocysts may become infected, and may have detrimental outcomes caused by their mass effect on the stomach and/or small intestine. Pseudocysts are able to be drained by a variety of techniques, including endoscopically. Chronic pseudocysts often require surgical drainage into the stomach or jejunum as they may contain solid material that does not drain. Typically, cystgastrostomies or cystenterotomies are performed utilizing an abdominal incision with subsequent suturing or stapling.

The medical device company known as "Power Medical Interventions" has a computer-powered surgical stapler which rests on a flexible shaft. There has been subsequent development of a linear version of this stapler which was designed for gastrointestinal anastomosis which will be utilized in this research project known as a "powered stapler".

An endoscope would be inserted in the mouth, and down into the stomach after the induction of general anesthesia. Following the insertion of the endoscope, the powered stapler will be passed alongside the endoscope to help the surgeon and gastroenterologist (working as a team) to see where to properly place the stapler. If a connection has been previously made between the stomach and pseudocyst, the stapler will be maneuvered into the proper position. If a connection has not yet been made, this will be done during the procedure with the aid of an endoscopic ultrasound probe passed through the mouth. Once the stapler is in position, one jaw of the stapler will be placed into the pseudocyst, and the other jaw will be left in the stomach. The stapler will then be closed and fired, creating a permanent connection between the two hollow spaces and allow the contents of the pseudocyst to drain naturally out into the stomach and intestines. The stapler and the endoscope are then removed and the anesthesia is allowed to wear off. Utilizing this technique, a surgical incision is avoided.

Primary Objective: The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that the Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) technique is as effective as standard surgical technique for the permanent drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Secondary Objective: The secondary objective of this research project is to demonstrate a decreased degree of pain experienced by patients undergoing the Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery versus traditional methods.

Hypothesis: Patients who undergo the Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery for treatment of their pancreatic pseudocyst will experience effective treatment with less discomfort and with quicker recovery than standard surgical techniques.

Background: The NOTES team (surgeon and gastroenterologist) at Baystate has extensive experience with animal work in developing novel techniques with commercially available products. While we have not ever performed a cystgastrostomy on an animal, there is no known animal model to simulate this pathologic condition. We have, however, operated the flexible gastrointestinal anastomotic stapler translumenally in an animal model in order to prepare for this procedure. The surgeon on the team has performed human stapled cystgastrostomies before, via both open and laparoscopic approaches. A pilot case has recently been done performed and the patient continues to do well.

Study Design: There will be a total of 10 patients undergoing this experimental surgical procedure once meeting all entry criteria and subsequent to obtaining informed consent. Follow-up endoscopic examination will be conducted approximately 6 weeks following the procedure to determine the success of the drainage of the pseudocyst. Longer term follow-up will be determined by the patient's overall condition. These 10 patients will be compared to a retrospective review of 10 patients to compare pseudocyst size, degree of pain and hospital length of stay. The degree of pain will be assessed using the Wong-Baker Pain Scale. The retrospective series will be a matched cohort based on size of the pseudocyst and age and comorbidities of the patient.

Safety Monitoring: Due to the novelty of the procedure, safety information will be monitored on a continuous basis. Should there be any untoward results, the study may be terminated prematurely, or temporarily suspended while we assess the events. In the event of any serious adverse event or outcome, the IRB will be notified immediately.

Risks and Benefits: The anticipated risks associated with this type of surgery include:

Bleeding, infection, need for open surgery, pancreatic leak, gastric leak, inadequate drainage of the pseudocyst. A risk specific to the NOTES approach includes trauma to oropharynx resulting in bleeding or infection.

The anticipated benefits include a decrease in the amount of pain experienced with the drainage of the pancreatic pseudocyst, as well as an anticipated decreased length of hospital stay.

Statistics: A comparison of the means will be performed using both the numerical values from the Pain Scale, the largest diameter of the pseudocyst, and the hospital length of stay.

Data Storage: The data collected will be kept in a locked filing cabinet in the primary investigator's office. Only the PI will have access to this file.

Enrollment Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult (over 18 years old) patients who are able to provide informed consent for this surgical procedure
  2. Patients scheduled to undergo non-emergent surgical treatment removal of pancreatic pseudocyst

Enrollment Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to provide informed consent
  2. Patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, would not be appropriate for enrollment into this experimental research project
  3. Patients who are deemed to be unstable from a medical standpoint to undergo pancreatic surgery
  4. Pregnancy

It is anticipated that there will be more similar type of "natural orifice" type surgeries in the future for a variety of procedures and a multitude of reasons (no incision, less pain, and less time in the hospital). This surgery is the first of its kind for the drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Being tested
Pancreatic Pseudocystgastrostomy
Keywords
Pancreatic pseudocyst, NOTES
Medical subject headings
Pancreatic Pseudocyst

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pancreatic PseudocystgastrostomyProcedure or surgery

    An operation to connect the pancreatic pseudocyst to the stomach so it can drain into the stomach and intestines

Study groups in NCT00541593
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NOTES pancreatic pseudocystgastrostomyExperimentalPatients who undergo pancreatic pseudocystgastrostomy via a NOTES technique.
Receives: Procedure: Pancreatic Pseudocystgastrostomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mortality

    Number of patients who died as a result of the surgery: Death (mortality).

    Please note that pain was previously listed as an outcome measure, but this was edited out of this submission and was not tracked as an outcome measure.

    Measured: One year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Oct 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2007
  3. Primary completionMar 2011
  4. Study completionJun 2011

Why it stopped: SurgAssist device is no longer clinically available.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
5 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00541593
Sponsor's protocol ID
07-164
Status last verified
Sep 2013
First submitted
7 Oct 2007
Last updated
7 Nov 2013
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pancreatic Pseudocystgastrostomy in people with Pancreatic Pseudocyst, run by Baystate Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Nov 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mortality (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in