Pneumonia, BacterialPhase 3NCT00540072
Study of Cidecin™ (Daptomycin) to Rocephin® (Ceftriaxone) in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Community-Acquired Acute Bacterial Pneumonia Due to S. Pneumoniae
A Phase 3 study testing daptomycin in people with Pneumonia, Bacterial, run by Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA).
Trial summary
A COMPARASON OF CIDECIN™ (DAPTOMYCIN) TO ROCEPHIN® (CEFTRIAXONE) IN THE TREATMENT OF MODERATE TO SEVERE COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED ACUTE BACTERIAL PNEUMONIA DUE TO S. PNEUMONIAE Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pneumonia, Bacterial
- What is being tested?
- daptomycin
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 30 Jul 2001to 27 Feb 2002
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Provide signed and dated informed consent.
- Adults, 18 years of age or older of either gender and of any race weighing up to 150 kg. Female patients of childbearing potential MUST be nonpregnant (confirmed by negative serum pregnancy test), nonlactating, and must be willing to practice reliable birth control measures during and for at least 30 days after treatment with study drug(s).
- Have a new pulmonary infiltrate on chest radiograph.
- Exhibit at least two of the following clinical symptoms of pneumonia on history or physical:
- Cough
- Production of purulent sputum or change in character of sputum
Show all 13Show fewer
- Auscultatory findings on pulmonary examination of rales and/or evidence of pulmonary consolidation (dullness to percussion, bronchial breath sounds, or egophony)
- Dyspnea or tachypnea
- Documented fever, defined as body temperature >38.0 ºC (100.4 ºF) taken orally; >38.5 ºC (101.2 ºF) tympanically; or >39.0 ºC (102.2 ºF) rectally or hypothermia, defined as core body temperature of <35.0 ºC (95.0 ºF)
- An elevated total peripheral white blood cell count (WBC >10,000/mm3); or >15% immature neutrophils (bands), regardless of total peripheral white count; or leukopenia with total WBC <4500/mm3.
- Hypoxemia with a PO2 < 60 mmHg (on room air) or O2 saturation <90% on room air
- Pneumonia which requires hospitalization and intravenous therapy for at least 5 days.
- Willingness to participate in this study and to complete all follow-up assessments.
Who cannot join
- Patients with Grade V pneumonia (based on Fine Score; Attachment 8).
- Patients in respiratory failure or incipient respiratory failure if the patient is not a candidate for mechanical ventilation (for any reason).
- Any of the following pulmonary conditions that may preclude interpretation of study results:
- Cystic fibrosis
- Primary lung cancer or another malignancy metastatic to the lungs
- Known bronchial obstruction or a history of post-obstructive pneumonia
Show all 22Show fewer
- Known or suspected active tuberculosis.
- Severe shock (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg for >30 minutes not corrected by fluid bolus).
- Clinical evidence of bacterial meningitis (based on lumbar puncture results).
- Severe renal impairment (calculated creatinine clearance <30 mL/min).
- Moribund clinical condition: high likelihood of death during the first 48 hours.
- If HIV positive, known CD4 counts <200/mm3 or evidence of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia.
- Inability to tolerate ceftriaxone or history of allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics (history of rash alone will not exclude a patient).
- Any individual previously treated with a potentially effective anti-infective agent for > 24 hours (or one dosing day) within 72 hours of enrollment, or prior treatment with any investigational drug (including experimental biologic agents) in previous 30 days or prior therapy with daptomycin.
- Patients who must continue HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy (e.g., simvastatin, lovastatin, etc.) during the study treatment period.
- Anticipation that a second non-protocol systemic antibiotic will be required.
- Induction chemotherapy within 2 weeks prior to enrollment (or exogenous therapies which are anticipated to result in PMN counts of <200 mm3 during Treatment Phase), or patients with severe neutropenia (<200 PMN cells/mm3).
- Patients considered unreliable to return for visits or to comply with study procedures.
- Progressive neoplastic disease (Note: patients with malignancies in remission are eligible).
- Women who are pregnant or nursing/lactating.
- Patients presenting with nosocomial pneumonia (i.e., <14 days after discharge from a skilled nursing facility or hospital with an initial hospitalization of >=3 days duration).
- Clinical suspicion of Legionella pneumonia.
About this study
A COMPARASON OF CIDECIN™ (DAPTOMYCIN) TO ROCEPHIN® (CEFTRIAXONE) IN THE TREATMENT OF MODERATE TO SEVERE COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED ACUTE BACTERIAL PNEUMONIA DUE TO S. PNEUMONIAE
- Conditions
- Pneumonia, Bacterial
- Being tested
- daptomycin
- Keywords
- Moderate to Severe Community-Acquired Acute Bacterial Pneumonia Due to S. Pneumoniae
- Medical subject headings
- Pneumonia, Bacterial
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
daptomycinDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Study start30 Jul 2001
- Primary completion27 Feb 2002
- Study completion27 Feb 2002
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pneumonia, BacterialStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00540072
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DAP-CAP-00-08
- Status last verified
- Nov 2019
- First submitted
- 4 Oct 2007
- Last updated
- 14 Nov 2019
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Pertel PE, Bernardo P, Fogarty C, Matthews P, Northland R, Benvenuto M, Thorne GM, Luperchio SA, Arbeit RD, Alder J. Effects of prior effective therapy on the efficacy of daptomycin and ceftriaxone for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Apr 15;46(8):1142-51. doi: 10.1086/533441.
PubMed 18444848
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Nov 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study of Cidecin™ (Daptomycin) to Rocephin® (Ceftriaxone) in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Community-Acquired Acute Bacterial Pneumonia Due to S. Pneumoniae
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00540072
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DAP-CAP-00-08
- Conditions
- Pneumonia, Bacterial
- Keywords
- Moderate to Severe Community-Acquired Acute Bacterial Pneumonia Due to S. Pneumoniae
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 30 Jul 2001 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Feb 2002 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Feb 2002 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A COMPARASON OF CIDECIN™ (DAPTOMYCIN) TO ROCEPHIN® (CEFTRIAXONE) IN THE TREATMENT OF MODERATE TO SEVERE COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED ACUTE BACTERIAL PNEUMONIA DUE TO S. PNEUMONIAE
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Provide signed and dated informed consent.
- Adults, 18 years of age or older of either gender and of any race weighing up to 150 kg. Female patients of childbearing potential MUST be nonpregnant (confirmed by negative serum pregnancy test), nonlactating, and must be willing to practice reliable birth control measures during and for at least 30 days after treatment with study drug(s).
- Have a new pulmonary infiltrate on chest radiograph.
- Exhibit at least two of the following clinical symptoms of pneumonia on history or physical:
- Pneumonia which requires hospitalization and intravenous therapy for at least 5 days.
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Patients with Grade V pneumonia (based on Fine Score; Attachment 8).
- Patients in respiratory failure or incipient respiratory failure if the patient is not a candidate for mechanical ventilation (for any reason).
- Any of the following pulmonary conditions that may preclude interpretation of study results:
- Severe shock (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg for >30 minutes not corrected by fluid bolus).
- Clinical evidence of bacterial meningitis (based on lumbar puncture results).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| daptomycin | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Nov 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 18444848Pertel PE, Bernardo P, Fogarty C, Matthews P, Northland R, Benvenuto M, Thorne GM, Luperchio SA, Arbeit RD, Alder J. Effects of prior effective therapy on the efficacy of daptomycin and ceftriaxone for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Apr 15;46(8):1142-51. doi: 10.1086/533441.
Related trials for Pneumonia, Bacterial
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Echinocandin Added to Standard Treatment for Severe Pneumocystis Pneumonia
Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia
RecruitingObservational study
Fungal Infection Susceptibility
Cryptococcal Infection, Cryptococcal Pneumonia
RecruitingPhase 3
Randomized, Embedded, Multifactorial Adaptive Platform Trial for Community- Acquired Pneumonia
Respiratory Tract Diseases, Influenza (Pandemic)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of VAX-31 With Influenza Vaccine in Adults ≥ 50 Years of Age
Pneumococcal Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing daptomycin in people with Pneumonia, Bacterial, run by Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00540072, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2019.