MalariaPhase 1NCT00538382
Study of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Artesunate in Pregnant Women in the Democratic Republic of Congo
A Phase 1 study testing Artesunate in people with Malaria, run by NICHD Global Network for Women's and Children's Health at 1 site in Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a standard dose of orally administered artesunate, in order to determine if the current adult dose (200 mg) is appropriate in parasitemic pregnant women when compared to the same women at three months postpartum and to… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Malaria
- What is being tested?
- Artesunate
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 51 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDemocratic Republic of the Congo
- Study dates
- May 2007to Dec 2008
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- 2nd trimester (22-26 weeks) or 3rd trimester (32-36 weeks) of pregnancy, based on an ultrasound conducted at <22 weeks gestation (composite of BPD, HC, AC, FL)
- Singleton pregnancy documented by ultrasound
- Parasitemic (> 500 parasites/μl)
- Afebrile and asymptomatic
- Hematocrit ≥ 30%
- Negative HIV test result
Show all 18Show fewer
- At least 18 years of age and less than 40 years of age
- Able to spend three days in the clinic following their laboratory screening visit and again at three months postpartum
- Willing to provide informed consent
- Negative urine pregnancy test
- Parasitemic (> 500 parasites/μl)
- Afebrile and asymptomatic
- Hematocrit ≥ 30%
- Negative Determine® HIV test result
- At least 18 years of age and less than 40 years of age
- Able to spend three days in the clinic following screening
- Willing to provide informed consent
- Negative urine pregnancy test
Who cannot join
- Parasitemia > 300,000 parasites/μl or symptomatic malaria
- Medical contraindications to participation or medical disorders (known high blood pressure, diabetes, sickle cell disease or tuberculosis)
- Have taken artesunate or any medicine containing artesunate during the current pregnancy
- Have taken any antimalarial in the past two weeks
- Have taken any medication in the past two weeks other than antipyretics (e.g., acetyl- salicylic acid, acetaminophen), folic acid or iron
- Have a fetus with any ultrasonographically visible structural fetal abnormalities identified on entry by ultrasound
Show all 16Show fewer
- Past or present pregnancy complications that would preclude participation in the study (gestational diabetes/diabetes, incompetent cervix, pre-eclampsia/ eclampsia, and high blood pressure)
- Between 32-36 weeks gestation and have already participated in the study at 22-26 weeks gestation
- Parasitemia > 300,000 parasites/μl or have symptomatic malaria
- Medical contraindications to participation or medical disorders (known high blood pressure, diabetes, sickle cell disease or tuberculosis)
- Have taken any antimalarial in the past two weeks
- Have taken any medication in the past two weeks other than antipyretics (e.g., acetyl- salicylic acid, acetaminophen), folic acid or iron
- Parasitemia > 300,000 parasites/μl or have symptomatic malaria
- Have taken antimalarial medication in the past two weeks.
- Have taken any medication in the past two weeks other than antipyretics (e.g., acetyl- salicylic acid, acetaminophen), folic acid or iron
- Pregnant
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Democratic Republic of the Congo1 site
Kingasani Maternity Clinic
Kinshasa
About this study
Official title: Phase I Study of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Artesunate in Pregnant Women in the Democratic Republic of Congo
The objective of this study is to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a standard dose of orally administered artesunate, in order to determine if the current adult dose (200 mg) is appropriate in parasitemic pregnant women when compared to the same women at three months postpartum and to parasitemic non-pregnant women. Preliminary evidence on safety, tolerability and efficacy will be gathered.
Read the detailed description
Annually, approximately 25 million African women become pregnant and are at risk of Plasmodium falciparum malaria infection during pregnancy [WHO]. The adverse effects of malaria during pregnancy include increased risk of maternal anemia, low birth weight (LBW) and infant death. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) of malaria be used routinely in pregnant women living in areas of Africa where malaria infection is endemic. IPT involves the periodic presumptive administration of antimalarial treatment to all pregnant women as part of routine antenatal care.
This strategy has proven to be effective in much of sub-Saharan Africa where diagnostic facilities are often unavailable and pregnant woman are at high risk for malaria infection [WHO 2005]. This is representative of our study site in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), where a 2004 pilot study conducted by the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research (GN) revealed that the prevalence of malaria in pregnant women was 34.3% [personal communication, Tshefu]. Currently sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is the WHO-recommended drug for prevention of malaria during pregnancy where transmission of Plasmodium falciparum malaria is stable and where resistance to SP is low.
The DRC is an area of stable malaria transmission. In stable areas of transmission, non-pregnant adults have high levels of immunity to malaria and usually do not become severely ill with infection. However, pregnant women, especially primigravidas, have increased susceptibility to malaria. Pregnant women are not protected by immunity acquired in the non-pregnant state because parasites are exposed to different antigens in pregnancy than in the non-pregnant state. In addition, Plasmodium falciparum infection in pregnancy can lead to anemia and can affect placental nutrient transport, resulting in the birth of low birth weight infants with an increased risk for infant mortality [Steketee, 2001]. In a 2004 pilot study conducted by the Global Network in two large maternity clinics in Kinshasa, DRC, 34.3% (182/530) of pregnant women were thick smear positive for malaria [personal communication, Tshefu].
Currently, in Kinshasa, DRC the standard of care for IPT treatment of malaria during pregnancy is to administer 1500 mg sulfadoxine with 75 mg pyrimethamine during the second trimester (after the fourth month and usually in association with the mother's report of fetal quickening) and again during the third trimester, between 28-32 weeks gestation. SP has proven to be safe when used as IPT in pregnant women; clinical studies have shown no serious adverse events or cases of kernicterus nor has there been a significant difference in the rate of spontaneous abortions, premature deliveries, or neonatal deaths between IPT/SP and other interventions [Newman, 2004].
Since the 1980's, SP resistance in Africa and Asia has been steadily increasing. The 1999-2000 data from the East African Network for Monitoring Anti-malarial Treatment indicated that in vivo SP failure at some sites in Kenya was greater than 25% and had reached 45% at one site in Tanzania. Focal areas of low- to moderate-level SP resistance exist throughout Africa [Bilj, 2000; Deloron 1989; Landgraf, 1994; Nizla, 2000]. Resistance is likely to progress geographically and rapidly if nothing is done to interrupt this course. One of the reasons for the increasingly high SP failure rates may be the recently observed cross-resistance between SP and cotrimoxazole (sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim) in Plasmodium falciparum [Lyer, 2001]. A second possible reason is that the long half-life of the drug may result in prolonged maintenance of subtherapeutic concentrations of the drug in the plasma [Nzila, 2000].
Resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to SP in Kinshasa appears to be low, but on the verge of increasing with selective pressure. In 2000, an in vivo drug efficacy trial in children found that 94.5% of the subjects responded adequately to SP [Kazadi, 2003]. These results have been corroborated by the genotyping of clinical samples from pregnant women in the 2004 pilot study conducted by the Global Network in Kinshasa for molecular markers for drug resistance [personal communication, Tshefu]. Molecular markers are used to survey the development and evolution of drug resistance. SP resistance is associated with mutations in the genes DHFR and DHPS. Presence of a quintuplet mutation (51, 59, 108, 437, and 540) is most strongly associated with SP resistance. Only 4.1% of the clinical samples in the pilot study contained the quintuplet mutation, which suggests that drug resistance was minimal at the time the study was conducted. However, 33.2% of the samples were found to be one mutation away from having the quintuplet mutation, indicating that full SP resistance (5 mutations) is likely to occur soon. Therefore, if adequate selective pressure were applied, e.g. by widespread use of SP, as is currently being practiced in the DRC, the prevalence of the quintuplet mutation and treatment failure due to drug resistance would increase dramatically.
Drug resistance to SP has spread more rapidly in the eastern part of the DRC, some 2000 kilometers (km) from Kinshasa. A report from a 2001 in vivo drug efficacy study in Bukavu, located on the Rwandan border in Eastern DRC, reported that 85.0% of the children responded adequately to SP [Kazadi, 2003]; however, a subsequent drug efficacy study in Rutshuru, also located on the Rwanda/Uganda border of Eastern DRC approximately 200 km south of Bukavu, demonstrated that only 39.4% of children responded adequately to treatment [Kazadi, personal communication]. In addition, 43.4% of these clinical samples contained the quintuplet mutation [Alker, personal communication]. Given this rise in resistance to SP in eastern DRC and the likelihood of increased resistance in Kinshasa, it is necessary to begin to explore other alternatives for SP.
While the pharmacokinetics of artemisinin is well known in non-pregnant adults, little is known about the specific pharmacokinetics of artemisinin in pregnant women, particularly pregnant women in developing countries. Dosages of drugs often need to be adjusted because of physiological and metabolic changes associated with pregnancy. The aim of this study is to determine the most appropriate dosage of artesunate to use in pregnant women in order to begin to investigate artesunate and artesunate combinations as options for IPT.
- Conditions
- Malaria
- Being tested
- Artesunate
- Keywords
- Malaria, Pregnancy, Artesunate, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Democratic Republic of Congo
- Medical subject headings
- Malaria
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ArtesunateDrug
Also called Arsumax®
A 200 mg dose of orally administered artesunate at the beginning of a 48-hour clinical sampling period.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Case | Experimental | Cases are defined as parasitemic pregnant women during the second trimester (22-26 weeks gestation) and the third trimester (32-36 weeks gestation). Receives: Drug: Artesunate |
| Non-pregnant Control | Active comparator | Non-pregnant controls are defined as parasitemic non-pregnant women recruited from the same community as the cases. Receives: Drug: Artesunate |
| Internal Control | Active comparator | Internal controls are defined as the same women(cases)at three months postpartum. Receives: Drug: Artesunate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Levels of the unbound active major metabolite, dihydroartemisinin (DHA), will be similar for parasitemic pregnant women during their 2nd and 3rd trimesters vs. the same women 3 months postpartum
Measured: 48 hours
Secondary outcomes (5)
The levels of unbound DHA will be similar for parasitemic pregnant women (during the second and third trimesters) vs. parasitemic non-pregnant women.
Measured: 48 hours after drug administration
The pharmacokinetics of ARTS and total DHA will be similar for parasitemic pregnant women (during the second and third trimesters) vs. the same women three months postpartum and parasitemic non-pregnant women.
Measured: 48 hours after drug administration
The pharmacodynamics of therapy will be similar for parasitemic pregnant women (during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters) vs. parasitemic non-pregnant women. Pharmacodynamics will be determined by measuring the parasite clearance time (PCT), PC50, and PC90.
Measured: 48 hours after drug administration
The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic outcomes (as elaborated above) will be similar between the 2nd and 3rd trimester in parasitemic pregnant women.
Measured: 48 hours after drug administration
Description of safety and tolerability of Artesunate in the target population (pregnant women in the 2nd and 3rd trimester).
Measured: 0ne year postpartum
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2007
- Primary completionNov 2008
- Study completionDec 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MalariaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NICHD Global Network for Women's and Children's Health
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), RTI International, University of North Carolina, Kinshasa School of Public Health
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Carl Bose, M.D., Principal investigator, University of North CarolinaAntoinette Tshefu, M.D., M.P.H., Principal investigator, Kinshasa School of Public Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00538382
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GN02- PK/PD of artesunate
- Status last verified
- Jul 2014
- First submitted
- 28 Sep 2007
- Last updated
- 31 Jul 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Onyamboko MA, Meshnick SR, Fleckenstein L, Koch MA, Atibu J, Lokomba V, Douoguih M, Hemingway-Foday J, Wesche D, Ryder RW, Bose C, Wright LL, Tshefu AK, Capparelli EV. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of artesunate and dihydroartemisinin following oral treatment in pregnant women with asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infections in Kinshasa DRC. Malar J. 2011 Feb 28;10:49. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-49.
PubMed 21352601
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jul 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase I Study of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Artesunate in Pregnant Women in the Democratic Republic of Congo
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00538382
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GN02- PK/PD of artesunate
- Conditions
- Malaria
- Keywords
- Malaria, Pregnancy, Artesunate, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Democratic Republic of Congo
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NICHD Global Network for Women's and Children's HealthResearch network
- Collaborators
- Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), RTI International, University of North Carolina, Kinshasa School of Public Health
- Study start
- May 2007
- Primary completion
- Nov 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a standard dose of orally administered artesunate, in order to determine if the current adult dose (200 mg) is appropriate in parasitemic pregnant women when compared to the same women at three months postpartum and to parasitemic non-pregnant women. Preliminary evidence on safety, tolerability and efficacy will be gathered.
Detailed description
Annually, approximately 25 million African women become pregnant and are at risk of Plasmodium falciparum malaria infection during pregnancy [WHO]. The adverse effects of malaria during pregnancy include increased risk of maternal anemia, low birth weight (LBW) and infant death. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) of malaria be used routinely in pregnant women living in areas of Africa where malaria infection is endemic. IPT involves the periodic presumptive administration of antimalarial treatment to all pregnant women as part of routine antenatal care.
This strategy has proven to be effective in much of sub-Saharan Africa where diagnostic facilities are often unavailable and pregnant woman are at high risk for malaria infection [WHO 2005]. This is representative of our study site in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), where a 2004 pilot study conducted by the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research (GN) revealed that the prevalence of malaria in pregnant women was 34.3% [personal communication, Tshefu]. Currently sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is the WHO-recommended drug for prevention of malaria during pregnancy where transmission of Plasmodium falciparum malaria is stable and where resistance to SP is low.
The DRC is an area of stable malaria transmission. In stable areas of transmission, non-pregnant adults have high levels of immunity to malaria and usually do not become severely ill with infection. However, pregnant women, especially primigravidas, have increased susceptibility to malaria. Pregnant women are not protected by immunity acquired in the non-pregnant state because parasites are exposed to different antigens in pregnancy than in the non-pregnant state. In addition, Plasmodium falciparum infection in pregnancy can lead to anemia and can affect placental nutrient transport, resulting in the birth of low birth weight infants with an increased risk for infant mortality [Steketee, 2001]. In a 2004 pilot study conducted by the Global Network in two large maternity clinics in Kinshasa, DRC, 34.3% (182/530) of pregnant women were thick smear positive for malaria [personal communication, Tshefu].
Currently, in Kinshasa, DRC the standard of care for IPT treatment of malaria during pregnancy is to administer 1500 mg sulfadoxine with 75 mg pyrimethamine during the second trimester (after the fourth month and usually in association with the mother's report of fetal quickening) and again during the third trimester, between 28-32 weeks gestation. SP has proven to be safe when used as IPT in pregnant women; clinical studies have shown no serious adverse events or cases of kernicterus nor has there been a significant difference in the rate of spontaneous abortions, premature deliveries, or neonatal deaths between IPT/SP and other interventions [Newman, 2004].
Since the 1980's, SP resistance in Africa and Asia has been steadily increasing. The 1999-2000 data from the East African Network for Monitoring Anti-malarial Treatment indicated that in vivo SP failure at some sites in Kenya was greater than 25% and had reached 45% at one site in Tanzania. Focal areas of low- to moderate-level SP resistance exist throughout Africa [Bilj, 2000; Deloron 1989; Landgraf, 1994; Nizla, 2000]. Resistance is likely to progress geographically and rapidly if nothing is done to interrupt this course. One of the reasons for the increasingly high SP failure rates may be the recently observed cross-resistance between SP and cotrimoxazole (sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim) in Plasmodium falciparum [Lyer, 2001]. A second possible reason is that the long half-life of the drug may result in prolonged maintenance of subtherapeutic concentrations of the drug in the plasma [Nzila, 2000].
Resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to SP in Kinshasa appears to be low, but on the verge of increasing with selective pressure. In 2000, an in vivo drug efficacy trial in children found that 94.5% of the subjects responded adequately to SP [Kazadi, 2003]. These results have been corroborated by the genotyping of clinical samples from pregnant women in the 2004 pilot study conducted by the Global Network in Kinshasa for molecular markers for drug resistance [personal communication, Tshefu]. Molecular markers are used to survey the development and evolution of drug resistance. SP resistance is associated with mutations in the genes DHFR and DHPS. Presence of a quintuplet mutation (51, 59, 108, 437, and 540) is most strongly associated with SP resistance. Only 4.1% of the clinical samples in the pilot study contained the quintuplet mutation, which suggests that drug resistance was minimal at the time the study was conducted. However, 33.2% of the samples were found to be one mutation away from having the quintuplet mutation, indicating that full SP resistance (5 mutations) is likely to occur soon. Therefore, if adequate selective pressure were applied, e.g. by widespread use of SP, as is currently being practiced in the DRC, the prevalence of the quintuplet mutation and treatment failure due to drug resistance would increase dramatically.
Drug resistance to SP has spread more rapidly in the eastern part of the DRC, some 2000 kilometers (km) from Kinshasa. A report from a 2001 in vivo drug efficacy study in Bukavu, located on the Rwandan border in Eastern DRC, reported that 85.0% of the children responded adequately to SP [Kazadi, 2003]; however, a subsequent drug efficacy study in Rutshuru, also located on the Rwanda/Uganda border of Eastern DRC approximately 200 km south of Bukavu, demonstrated that only 39.4% of children responded adequately to treatment [Kazadi, personal communication]. In addition, 43.4% of these clinical samples contained the quintuplet mutation [Alker, personal communication]. Given this rise in resistance to SP in eastern DRC and the likelihood of increased resistance in Kinshasa, it is necessary to begin to explore other alternatives for SP.
While the pharmacokinetics of artemisinin is well known in non-pregnant adults, little is known about the specific pharmacokinetics of artemisinin in pregnant women, particularly pregnant women in developing countries. Dosages of drugs often need to be adjusted because of physiological and metabolic changes associated with pregnancy. The aim of this study is to determine the most appropriate dosage of artesunate to use in pregnant women in order to begin to investigate artesunate and artesunate combinations as options for IPT.
Study design
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Case | Experimental | Drug: ArtesunateCases are defined as parasitemic pregnant women during the second trimester (22-26 weeks gestation) and the third trimester (32-36 weeks gestation). |
| Non-pregnant Control | Active comparator | Drug: ArtesunateNon-pregnant controls are defined as parasitemic non-pregnant women recruited from the same community as the cases. |
| Internal Control | Active comparator | Drug: ArtesunateInternal controls are defined as the same women(cases)at three months postpartum. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (18 listed)
- 2nd trimester (22-26 weeks) or 3rd trimester (32-36 weeks) of pregnancy, based on an ultrasound conducted at <22 weeks gestation (composite of BPD, HC, AC, FL)
- Singleton pregnancy documented by ultrasound
- Parasitemic (> 500 parasites/μl)
- Afebrile and asymptomatic
- Hematocrit ≥ 30%
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Parasitemia > 300,000 parasites/μl or symptomatic malaria
- Medical contraindications to participation or medical disorders (known high blood pressure, diabetes, sickle cell disease or tuberculosis)
- Have taken artesunate or any medicine containing artesunate during the current pregnancy
- Have taken any antimalarial in the past two weeks
- Have taken any medication in the past two weeks other than antipyretics (e.g., acetyl- salicylic acid, acetaminophen), folic acid or iron
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ArtesunateAlso: Arsumax®A 200 mg dose of orally administered artesunate at the beginning of a 48-hour clinical sampling period. | Drug | Case, Internal Control, Non-pregnant Control |
Primary outcome
Levels of the unbound active major metabolite, dihydroartemisinin (DHA), will be similar for parasitemic pregnant women during their 2nd and 3rd trimesters vs. the same women 3 months postpartum
Time frame: 48 hours
5 secondary outcomes
The levels of unbound DHA will be similar for parasitemic pregnant women (during the second and third trimesters) vs. parasitemic non-pregnant women.
Time frame: 48 hours after drug administration
The pharmacokinetics of ARTS and total DHA will be similar for parasitemic pregnant women (during the second and third trimesters) vs. the same women three months postpartum and parasitemic non-pregnant women.
Time frame: 48 hours after drug administration
The pharmacodynamics of therapy will be similar for parasitemic pregnant women (during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters) vs. parasitemic non-pregnant women. Pharmacodynamics will be determined by measuring the parasite clearance time (PCT), PC50, and PC90.
Time frame: 48 hours after drug administration
The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic outcomes (as elaborated above) will be similar between the 2nd and 3rd trimester in parasitemic pregnant women.
Time frame: 48 hours after drug administration
Description of safety and tolerability of Artesunate in the target population (pregnant women in the 2nd and 3rd trimester).
Time frame: 0ne year postpartum
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jul 2014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21352601Onyamboko MA, Meshnick SR, Fleckenstein L, Koch MA, Atibu J, Lokomba V, Douoguih M, Hemingway-Foday J, Wesche D, Ryder RW, Bose C, Wright LL, Tshefu AK, Capparelli EV. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of artesunate and dihydroartemisinin following oral treatment in pregnant women with asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infections in Kinshasa DRC. Malar J. 2011 Feb 28;10:49. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-49.
- Website of the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health ResearchLink provided by the sponsor.
- RTI InternationalLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Malaria
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Trajectories and Mechanisms of Recovery From Malaria: An Observational Study
Malaria
Not yet recruiting
Positron Emission Tomography and Organ-Specific Changes in Participants Co-Enrolled in NIH Studies of Plasmodium Vivax Controlled Human Malaria Infection
Healthy Volunteer, Malaria
Recruiting
The Effects of Iron Treatment on Vaccine Immunogenicity in Kenyan Infants With Iron Deficiency
Iron Deficiencies
RecruitingObservational study
Host and Parasite Factors That Influence Susceptibility to Malaria Infection and Disease During Pregnancy and Early Childhood in Ouelessebougou and Bamako, Mali
Malaria
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of PfSPZ-LARC2 Vaccine Against CHMI in Malaria-Naïve Adults
Malaria Falciparum
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Carl Bose, M.D. principal investigator
University of North Carolina
Antoinette Tshefu, M.D., M.P.H. principal investigator
Kinshasa School of Public Health
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Artesunate in people with Malaria, run by NICHD Global Network for Women's and Children's Health at 1 site in Democratic Republic of the Congo.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 18 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jul 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Democratic Republic of the Congo. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Levels of the unbound active major metabolite, dihydroartemisinin (DHA), will be similar for parasitemic pregnant women during their 2nd and 3rd trimesters vs. the same women 3 months postpartum (time frame: 48 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00538382, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jul 2014.