Renal Cell CarcinomaPhase 2IMA901-202NCT00523159
IMA901 in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients With Measurable Disease
A Phase 2 study testing Endoxana, IMA901, Leukine and IMA901 and Leukine in people with Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH at 44 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
This study was conducted in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the cancer vaccine IMA901 and GM-CSF as adjuvant in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Patients received vaccination with GM-CSF followed by IMA901 during the study period of 9 months. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Endoxana, IMA901, Leukine and IMA901 and Leukine
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 68 participants
- Where
- 44 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- May 2007to Aug 2009
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged at least 18 years
- HLA type: HLA-A*02-positive
- Histologically documented advanced clear-cell RCC
- Patients who have received first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor or cytokine systemic therapy for advanced disease systematic therapy for advanced disease and must be candidates for second-line therapy (NOTE: in Germany and Austria only patients after first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor failure will be included into the study)
- Patients having experienced documented tumor progression
- At least one unidimensional measurable target lesion
Show all 10Show fewer
- Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 80%
- Favorable or intermediate risk according to the 3-score MSKCC criteria.
- Able to understand the nature of the study and give written informed consent
- Willingness and ability to comply with the study protocol for the duration of the study
Who cannot join
- Poor risk according to the 3-score MSKCC criteria
- Immunosuppressive therapy within 4 weeks before study entry, e.g. corticosteroid treatment
- History of other malignant tumors, except non-melanoma-skin cancer or curatively excised cervical carcinoma in situ
- Presence of brain metastases on MRI or CT scan
- Patients with a history or evidence of systemic autoimmune disease
- Any vaccination in the two weeks before study entry
Show all 29Show fewer
- Any planned prophylactic vaccination from study entry until the end of the induction period (5 weeks after the first vaccination)
- Known active hepatitis B or C infection
- Known HIV infection
- Any other infection with a biological agent that can cause a severe disease and poses a severe danger to lab personnel working on patient tissues.
- Any of the following in the 4 weeks before study entry:
- Major surgery
- Anticancer treatments including (but not limited to) cytotoxic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, hormone therapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies
- Unresolved toxicity from prior anticancer treatments including (but not limited to) cytotoxic chemotherapy, hormone therapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy
- Received study drug within any clinical study
- Any of the following abnormal laboratory values:
- Hematology: Hb < 9 g/dL; WBC < 3 x 109/L; neutrophils < 1.5 x 109/L; lymphocytes < 1.0 x 109/L; platelets < 100 x 109/L
- Liver function: serum bilirubin > 1.5 x upper normal limit (unless a history of Gilbert's disease); ALAT or ASAT > 3 x upper normal limit (>5 x upper normal limit if liver metastases are present)
- Renal function: serum creatinine > 200 µmol/L
- Patients with other significant diseases currently uncontrolled by treatment which might interfere with study completion, for example:
- Heart failure or non compensated active heart disease
- Severe coronary heart disease, cardiac arrhythmia requiring medication, or uncontrolled hypertension
- Symptomatic neurotoxicity (motor or sensory) ≥ grade 2 National Cancer Institute - Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC).
- Severe pulmonary dysfunction
- Psychiatric disabilities, seizures or central nervous system disorders that may interfere with the ability to give informed consent or perform adequate follow-up in the investigator's opinion
- Active infections requiring oral or intravenous antibiotics
- Women or men who decline to practice a medically approved method of contraception
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Any condition which in the judgment of the investigator would place the patient at undue risk or interfere with the results of the study
Trial locations and contacts
44 sites in 10 countries.
44 sites in 10 countries
Germany13 sites
Charité Campus Mitte-Klinik für Urologie
Berlin, 10117
Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin - Medizinische Klinik III
Berlin, 12203
Zeisigwaldkliniken Bethanien Chemnitz GmbH
Chemnitz, 09130
Universitätsklinikum Essen
Essen, 45122
Klinik der Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität
Frankfurt am Main, 60590
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf Onkologisches Zentrum (Onkologie / Hämatologie)
Hamburg, 20246
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg - Klinik für Urologie
Heidelberg, 69120
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig Holstein - Campus Lübeck
Lübeck, 23538
Universitätsklinikum Mainz - 3. Medizinische Klinik
Mainz, 55131
Klinikum der Universität - München Großhadern
Munich, 81377
Urologische Klinik Dr. Castringius - München-Planegg
Planegg, 82152
Universitätsklinikum Tübingen - Klinik für Urologie
Tübingen, 72076
Schwarzwald-Baar-Klinik - Abt. Hämatologie und Onkologie
Villingen-Schwenningen, 78050
Hungary9 sites
DRC Gyógyszervizsgáló Központ Kft
Balatonfüred, 8230
Semmelweis Egyetem - Urológiai Klinika
Budapest, 1082
Bajcsy-Zsilinszky Kórház - Urológia Osztály
Budapest, 1106
Fövárosi Önk.Szt.Imre Kórház - Belgyógyászat-Kliniko-FFarmakológia
Budapest, 1115
Országos Onkológiai Intézet - Kemoterápia C osztály-Klinikofarmakológia
Budapest, 1122
Debreceni Egyetem Orvos és Egészségtudományi Centrum
Debrecen, 4012
Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Önk. Kenézy Gyula Kórház/Urológia Osztály
Debrecen, 4043
BAZ megyei Kórház - Urológia Osztály
Miskolc, 3501
Pécs Orvostudomanyi Egyetem - Urológiai Klinika
Pécs, 7621
Romania4 sites
Oncology Institute "Prof. Dr. Alexandru Trestioreanu"
Bucharest, 022328
Oncology Institute - "Prof. Dr. Alexandru Trestioreanu"
Bucharest, 022328
Oncology Institute "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta"
Cluj-Napoca, 400015
Clinical County Hospital Oradea
Oradea, 4170167
Slovakia4 sites
National Cancer Institut - "Narodny onkologicky ustav"
Bratislava, 83310
Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology - East Slovak Oncology Institute
Košice, 04191
Martin Faculty Hospital
Martin, 03659
Department of Clinical Oncology - Faculty Hospital with Policlinic of J.A. Reiman
Prešov, 08181
Spain4 sites
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, 08035
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro
Madrid, 28035
Hospital 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
Clinica Universitaria de Navarra - Servicio de Oncologia
Pamplona, 31008
Poland3 sites
Klinika Chemioterapii Nowotworow - Uniwersytetu Medycznego
Lodz, 93509
Klinika Onkologii Wojskowego Institutu Medycznego
Warsaw, 00909
Clinic of Urology and Urological Oncology Medica University Hospital
Wroclaw, 50-043
United Kingdom3 sites
Beatson Oncology Centre
Glasgow, G11 6NT
Christie Hospital NHS Trust, CRUK Department of Medical Onkology - Paterson Institute for Cancer Research
Manchester, M20 4BX
University of Surrey - Postgraduate Medical School
Surrey, GU2 7WG
Bulgaria2 sites
National Oncology Hospital - Urology
Sofia, 1233
Regional Oncodispensary with inpatient sector-Sofia District
Sofia, 1233
Austria1 site
Medizinische Universität Salzburg - Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin III
Salzburg, 5020
About this study
Official title: Phase 2, Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter Study of Intradermal IMA901 Plus GM-CSF With or Without Low Dose Cyclophosphamide Pre-treatment in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients With Measurable Disease
This study was conducted in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the cancer vaccine IMA901 and GM-CSF as adjuvant in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Patients received vaccination with GM-CSF followed by IMA901 during the study period of 9 months. Patients received pre-treatment with a single i.v. infusion of cyclophosphamide prior to the first vaccination.
Read the detailed description
This is a multicenter, open label, randomized phase 2 study which investigated the effect of a second-line systemic treatment with IMA901 plus GM-CSF in RCC patients. Randomization was done according to a pre-treatment with low-dose cyclophosphamide (CY). Secondary endpoints comprised tumor response parameters.
The study population consisted of HLA-A*02-positive men or women with advanced RCC of the clear-cell type classified as having a favorable or intermediate risk after first-line systemic therapy for. Patients had to be aged 18 years or older, had at least have one measurable tumor lesion and had have received first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor or cytokine systemic therapy for advanced disease, during or after which the patient had experienced disease progression.
Patients in both arms received a total of 17 vaccinations with GM-CSF followed by IMA901 during the 9 month treatment period.
At screening baseline tumor status was assessed by CT or MRI. During the study tumor assessments were performed every 6 weeks.
Immunomonitoring (T-cell responses to peptides contained in IMA901 and analysis of other immune cell populations that may influence T-cell responses), serum levels of antibodies and molecules with suspected influence on immune response were assessed on several occasions during the study.
Safety assessment comprised continuous adverse event reporting, regular physical examinations and regular assessments of vital signs, hematology, blood chemistry and urine. A 12-lead ECG was performed at screening and at the end of the study. Pregnancy testing was performed according to applicable legislation in the country where the trial was performed. At the very least, women of childbearing potential had have to undergo a pregnancy test during screening for the study, before the first dose was applied and at the end of the study.
- Conditions
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Endoxana, IMA901, Leukine, IMA901 and Leukine
- Keywords
- clear cell renal cell carcinoma
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Endoxana, IMA901, LeukineDrug
a single i.v. infusion of Cyclophosphamid and then patients received vaccination therapy with intradermal (i.d.) injections of GM-CSF followed by i.d. injections of IMA901
IMA901 and LeukineDrug
Intradermal injection of GM-CSF followed by intradermal injection of IMA901
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Other | Pre-treatment with a single low dose of Cyclophosphamide followed by IMA901 vaccination plus GM-CSF as adjuvant Receives: Drug: Endoxana, IMA901, Leukine |
| 2 | Other | No pre-treatment with Cyclophosphamide before vaccination with IMA901 and GM-CSF as adjuvant Receives: Drug: IMA901 and Leukine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Disease control rate
Measured: after 26 weeks
Secondary outcomes (9)
Tumor response rates and SD rate
Measured: after 26 and 38 weeks
Duration of response
Measured: from the time response is first documented until the first date of recurrence or PD
Time to response
Measured: From Visit c to PR or CR
TTP
Measured: From visit C to until tumor progression
PFS and OS
Measured: From visit C to tumor progression or death
DCR
Measured: after 38 weeks on study
Immune response
Measured: Visit C, 1, 5, 6, 7, 10 and 14
Effect of cyclophosphamide pre-treatment on immune response
Measured: Visit C, 1, 5,6,7, 10, 14
Safety
Measured: From inclusion on the study until 3 weeks after end of study visit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2007 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2007
- Primary completionAug 2009
- Study completionAug 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Renal Cell CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alexandra Kirner, PhD, Study director, Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00523159
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EudraCT Nr: 2006-006370-25
- Acronym
- IMA901-202
- Status last verified
- Feb 2010
- First submitted
- 30 Aug 2007
- Last updated
- 10 Jul 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jul 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase 2, Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter Study of Intradermal IMA901 Plus GM-CSF With or Without Low Dose Cyclophosphamide Pre-treatment in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients With Measurable Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00523159
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IMA901-202 / EudraCT Nr: 2006-006370-25
- Conditions
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Keywords
- clear cell renal cell carcinoma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Immatics Biotechnologies GmbHIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2007
- Primary completion
- Aug 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study was conducted in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the cancer vaccine IMA901 and GM-CSF as adjuvant in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Patients received vaccination with GM-CSF followed by IMA901 during the study period of 9 months. Patients received pre-treatment with a single i.v. infusion of cyclophosphamide prior to the first vaccination.
Detailed description
This is a multicenter, open label, randomized phase 2 study which investigated the effect of a second-line systemic treatment with IMA901 plus GM-CSF in RCC patients. Randomization was done according to a pre-treatment with low-dose cyclophosphamide (CY). Secondary endpoints comprised tumor response parameters.
The study population consisted of HLA-A*02-positive men or women with advanced RCC of the clear-cell type classified as having a favorable or intermediate risk after first-line systemic therapy for. Patients had to be aged 18 years or older, had at least have one measurable tumor lesion and had have received first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor or cytokine systemic therapy for advanced disease, during or after which the patient had experienced disease progression.
Patients in both arms received a total of 17 vaccinations with GM-CSF followed by IMA901 during the 9 month treatment period.
At screening baseline tumor status was assessed by CT or MRI. During the study tumor assessments were performed every 6 weeks.
Immunomonitoring (T-cell responses to peptides contained in IMA901 and analysis of other immune cell populations that may influence T-cell responses), serum levels of antibodies and molecules with suspected influence on immune response were assessed on several occasions during the study.
Safety assessment comprised continuous adverse event reporting, regular physical examinations and regular assessments of vital signs, hematology, blood chemistry and urine. A 12-lead ECG was performed at screening and at the end of the study. Pregnancy testing was performed according to applicable legislation in the country where the trial was performed. At the very least, women of childbearing potential had have to undergo a pregnancy test during screening for the study, before the first dose was applied and at the end of the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Other | Drug: Endoxana, IMA901, LeukinePre-treatment with a single low dose of Cyclophosphamide followed by IMA901 vaccination plus GM-CSF as adjuvant |
| 2 | Other | Drug: IMA901 and LeukineNo pre-treatment with Cyclophosphamide before vaccination with IMA901 and GM-CSF as adjuvant |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Aged at least 18 years
- HLA type: HLA-A*02-positive
- Histologically documented advanced clear-cell RCC
- Patients who have received first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor or cytokine systemic therapy for advanced disease systematic therapy for advanced disease and must be candidates for second-line therapy (NOTE: in Germany and Austria only patients after first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor failure will be included into the study)
- Patients having experienced documented tumor progression
Key exclusion criteria (29 listed)
- Poor risk according to the 3-score MSKCC criteria
- Immunosuppressive therapy within 4 weeks before study entry, e.g. corticosteroid treatment
- History of other malignant tumors, except non-melanoma-skin cancer or curatively excised cervical carcinoma in situ
- Presence of brain metastases on MRI or CT scan
- Patients with a history or evidence of systemic autoimmune disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Endoxana, IMA901, Leukinea single i.v. infusion of Cyclophosphamid and then patients received vaccination therapy with intradermal (i.d.) injections of GM-CSF followed by i.d. injections of IMA901 | Drug | 1 |
| IMA901 and LeukineIntradermal injection of GM-CSF followed by intradermal injection of IMA901 | Drug | 2 |
Primary outcome
Disease control rate
Time frame: after 26 weeks
9 secondary outcomes
Tumor response rates and SD rate
Time frame: after 26 and 38 weeks
Duration of response
Time frame: from the time response is first documented until the first date of recurrence or PD
Time to response
Time frame: From Visit c to PR or CR
TTP
Time frame: From visit C to until tumor progression
PFS and OS
Time frame: From visit C to tumor progression or death
DCR
Time frame: after 38 weeks on study
Immune response
Time frame: Visit C, 1, 5, 6, 7, 10 and 14
Effect of cyclophosphamide pre-treatment on immune response
Time frame: Visit C, 1, 5,6,7, 10, 14
Safety
Time frame: From inclusion on the study until 3 weeks after end of study visit
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jul 2012.
Related trials for Renal Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Toripalimab and Lenvatinib With or Without SBRT Before Surgery for Non-Clear Cell Kidney Cancer
Nonmetastatic Locally Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Pucotenlimab, Lenvatinib, and SBRT Before Surgery for Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alexandra Kirner, PhD study director
Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH
44 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Endoxana, IMA901, Leukine and IMA901 and Leukine in people with Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH at 44 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 29 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jul 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 44 sites in Germany, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, Spain and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Disease control rate (time frame: after 26 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jul 2012.