AzTrials
AzTrials

EmphysemaNCT00523094

Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) in Patients That Are Candidates for Undergoing Pulmonary Operation Procedure

An observational study of Emphysema and Cancer, run by Deep Breeze at 1 site in United States.

Suspended

Paused. Enrolment is on hold for now and may resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to estimate the accuracy of the pre-operative VRI quantitative results versus the gold standard pre-operative perfusion scan. The secondary objective is to assess the correlation of the predicted post-operative lung function with the observed post-operative lung function (forced… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Emphysema, Cancer
How many people
75 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2007to Jul 2008
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients evaluated for lung surgery who will undergo perfusion scan

Who may be able to join

  • Able and willing to read, understand, and provide written informed consent;
  • Male or female in the age range of 18-80 years;
  • Patients who were referred to perform perfusion scan for pre lung surgery evaluation such as LVRS, thoracotomy, bullectomy and lobectomy.
  • Body mass index (BMI) > 21.

Who cannot join

  • Chest wall deformation;
  • Spine deformation (including scoliosis);
  • Hirsutism;
  • Potentially contagious skin lesion on the back;
  • Skin lesion that would interfere with sensor placement; (Keloids)
  • Cardiac pacemaker or implantable defibrillator;

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

Other trials in United States

About this study

The primary objective of this study is to estimate the accuracy of the pre-operative VRI quantitative results versus the gold standard pre-operative perfusion scan.

The secondary objective is to assess the correlation of the predicted post-operative lung function with the observed post-operative lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide [DLCO]) in patients who underwent surgical resection.

Read the detailed description

Pre lung operation candidates for procedures such as lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS), lung resection, bullectomy and lung transplant are frequently evaluated for differential lung function by a semi quantitative lung scintigraphy. VRI may offer the same differential lung function information for the physician without the risks, time and patient discomfort of lung scintigraphy in the treating physician office.

Moreover, VRI may provide a safe, quick and simple method to measure "split function" in lung cancer patients who are candidates for lung surgery. Thus eliminating the safety and complexity issue related with the current ventilation perfusion "split function" methods.

In addition the VRI may aid in achieving the goal of developing strategies to reduce risk and maximize the number of patients that can benefit from surgical therapy.

Conditions
Emphysema, Cancer
Medical subject headings
Emphysema, Neoplasms

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Aug 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2007
  3. Study completionJul 2008 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Enrollment was too slow and principal investigator moved to another country

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
75 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00523094
Sponsor's protocol ID
DB032
Status last verified
Jun 2009
First submitted
29 Aug 2007
Last updated
16 Jun 2009
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Benditt JO. Surgical therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Care. 2004 Jan;49(1):53-61; discussion 61-3.

    PubMed 14733622
  • Gurney JW. Pathophysiology of obstructive airways disease. Radiol Clin North Am. 1998 Jan;36(1):15-27. doi: 10.1016/s0033-8389(05)70005-1.

    PubMed 9465866
  • Salzman SH. Can CT measurement of emphysema severity aid patient selection for lung volume reduction surgery? Chest. 2000 Nov;118(5):1231-2. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.5.1231. No abstract available.

    PubMed 11083665
  • Corris PA, Ellis DA, Hawkins T, Gibson GJ. Use of radionuclide scanning in the preoperative estimation of pulmonary function after pneumonectomy. Thorax. 1987 Apr;42(4):285-91. doi: 10.1136/thx.42.4.285.

    PubMed 3616987
  • Arcasoy SM, Kotloff RM. Lung transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1999 Apr 8;340(14):1081-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199904083401406. No abstract available.

    PubMed 10194239
  • Hardoff R, Steinmetz AP, Krausz Y, Bar-Sever Z, Liani M, Kramer MR. The prognostic value of perfusion lung scintigraphy in patients who underwent single-lung transplantation for emphysema and pulmonary fibrosis. J Nucl Med. 2000 Nov;41(11):1771-6.

    PubMed 11079482
  • Cooper JD, Billingham M, Egan T, Hertz MI, Higenbottam T, Lynch J, Mauer J, Paradis I, Patterson GA, Smith C, et al. A working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature and for clinical staging of chronic dysfunction in lung allografts. International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993 Sep-Oct;12(5):713-6.

    PubMed 8241207
  • Kristersson S, Lindell SE, Svanberg L. Prediction of pulmonary function loss due to pneumonectomy using 133 Xe-radiospirometry. Chest. 1972 Dec;62(6):694-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.62.6.694. No abstract available.

    PubMed 4635418
  • Olsen GN, Block AJ, Tobias JA. Prediction of postpneumonectomy pulmonary function using quantitative macroaggregate lung scanning. Chest. 1974 Jul;66(1):13-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.66.1.13. No abstract available.

    PubMed 4846113
  • Ali MK, Mountain CF, Ewer MS, Johnston D, Haynie TP. Predicting loss of pulmonary function after pulmonary resection for bronchogenic carcinoma. Chest. 1980 Mar;77(3):337-42. doi: 10.1378/chest.77.3.337.

    PubMed 7357934
  • Ali MK, Ewer MS, Atallah MR, Mountain CF, Dixon CL, Johnston DA, Haynie TP. Regional and overall pulmonary function changes in lung cancer. Correlations with tumor stage, extent of pulmonary resection, and patient survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983 Jul;86(1):1-8.

    PubMed 6865454
  • Kearney DJ, Lee TH, Reilly JJ, DeCamp MM, Sugarbaker DJ. Assessment of operative risk in patients undergoing lung resection. Importance of predicted pulmonary function. Chest. 1994 Mar;105(3):753-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.105.3.753.

    PubMed 8131537
  • Markos J, Mullan BP, Hillman DR, Musk AW, Antico VF, Lovegrove FT, Carter MJ, Finucane KE. Preoperative assessment as a predictor of mortality and morbidity after lung resection. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Apr;139(4):902-10. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/139.4.902.

    PubMed 2930068

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Emphysema and Cancer, run by Deep Breeze at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: paused, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jun 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00523094, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jun 2009.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in