AzTrials
AzTrials

Partial EpilepsiesPhase 3NCT00522275

Determine Safety and Efficacy of Long-term Oral Lacosamide in Patients With Partial Seizures

A Phase 3 study testing lacosamide in people with Partial Epilepsies, run by UCB BIOSCIENCES, Inc. at 60 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this trial is to determine whether lacosamide is safe and effective for long-term use in patients with partial-seizures from epilepsy Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Partial Epilepsies
What is being tested?
lacosamide
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
308 participants
Where
60 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2004to Oct 2009
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Completion of parent clinical trial for treatment of partial seizures

Who cannot join

  • Receiving any study drug or experimental device other than lacosamide
  • Meets withdrawal criteria for parent trial or experiencing ongoing serious adverse event

Trial locations and contacts

60 sites in 1 country.

60 sites in 1 country

United States60 sites
  • Study site

    Albuquerque, New Mexico

  • Study site

    Asheville, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Atlanta, Georgia

  • Study site

    Baltimore, Maryland

  • Study site

    Beaufort, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Bethesda, Maryland

  • Study site

    Birmingham, Alabama

  • Study site

    Boston, Massachusetts

  • Study site

    Bradenton, Florida

  • Study site

    Buffalo, New York

  • Study site

    Charleston, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Charlottesville, Virginia

  • Study site

    Chesterfield, Missouri

  • Study site

    Chicago, Illinois

  • Study site

    Cincinnati, Ohio

  • Study site

    Cleveland, Ohio

  • Study site

    Columbus, Ohio

  • Study site

    Dallas, Texas

  • Study site

    Durham, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Englewood, Colorado

  • Study site

    Fairfield, Connecticut

  • Study site

    Golden Valley, Minnesota

  • Study site

    Greenville, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Hershey, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Indianapolis, Indiana

  • Study site

    Jacksonville, Florida

  • Study site

    Lexington, Kentucky

  • Study site

    Little Rock, Arkansas

  • Study site

    Los Angeles, California

  • Study site

    Louisville, Kentucky

  • Study site

    Maitland, Florida

  • Study site

    Marshfield, Wisconsin

  • Study site

    Medford, Oregon

  • Study site

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin

  • Study site

    Mobile, Alabama

  • Study site

    Morgantown, West Virginia

  • Study site

    Nashville, Tennessee

  • Study site

    New York, New York

  • Study site

    Newport News, Virginia

  • Study site

    Norfolk, Virginia

  • Study site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Phoenix, Arizona

  • Study site

    Providence, Rhode Island

  • Study site

    Richmond, Virginia

  • Study site

    Rochester, New York

  • Study site

    Saint Cloud, Minnesota

  • Study site

    Saint Paul, Minnesota

  • Study site

    San Antonio, Texas

  • Study site

    San Francisco, California

  • Study site

    Seattle, Washington

  • Study site

    Somerset, New Jersey

  • Study site

    Springfield, Illinois

  • Study site

    St. Petersburg, Florida

  • Study site

    Syracuse, New York

  • Study site

    Tallahassee, Florida

  • Study site

    Tampa, Florida

  • Study site

    Toledo, Ohio

  • Study site

    Tulsa, Oklahoma

  • Study site

    Wichita, Kansas

  • Study site

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: An Open-label Extension Trial to Determine Safety and Efficacy of Long-term Oral SPM 927 in Patients With Partial Seizures

The purpose of this trial is to determine whether lacosamide is safe and effective for long-term use in patients with partial-seizures from epilepsy

Being tested
lacosamide
Keywords
Adjunctive treatment in epilepsy, add-on treatment for epilepsy, partial seizures, AEDs, antiepileptic drugs, seizures
Medical subject headings
Epilepsies, Partial, Seizures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • lacosamideDrug

    50mg or 100 mg tablets, up to 800 mg/day given twice daily (BID) throughout the trial

Study groups in NCT00522275
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
LacosamideExperimentalUp to 800 mg/day lacosamide (flexible dosing)
Receives: Drug: lacosamide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Subjects Reporting at Least 1 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 Years)

    Adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences in a subject administered study treatment, whether or not these events are related to treatment.

    Measured: During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 years)

  2. Number of Subjects Prematurely Discontinuing Due to a Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 Years)

    Adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences in a subject administered study treatment, whether or not these events are related to treatment.

    Measured: During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 years)

  3. Number of Subjects Reporting at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 Years)

    Serious adverse events are any untoward serious medical occurrences in a subject administered study treatment, whether or not these events are related to treatment.

    Measured: During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 years)

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Median Percentage Change From Baseline in 28-day Seizure Frequency During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 Years)

    Negative changes from Baseline indicate an improvement (i.e., a reduction) in 28-day seizure frequency.

    Measured: Baseline (8-week Baseline Period from the parent study SP0754 [NCT00136019]), Treatment Period (Maximum 6 years)

  2. Percentage of at Least 50 % Responders During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 Years)

    At least 50 percent response is based on the percentage reduction in 28-day seizure frequency during the Treatment Period of the open-label extension relative to the Baseline Phase of the prior study.

    Measured: Treatment Period (Maximum 6 years)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Aug 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2004
  3. Primary completionOct 2009
  4. Study completionOct 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
308 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00522275
Sponsor's protocol ID
SP0756
Other IDs
2014-004398-18, 2014
Status last verified
Jul 2017
First submitted
27 Aug 2007
Last updated
18 Jul 2018
Data monitoring committee
No
Expanded access
Available

Publications

  • Husain A, Chung S, Faught E, Isojarvi J, McShea C, Doty P. Long-term safety and efficacy in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures treated with adjunctive lacosamide: results from a Phase III open-label extension trial. Epilepsia. 2012 Mar;53(3):521-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03407.x.

    PubMed 22372628

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing lacosamide in people with Partial Epilepsies, run by UCB BIOSCIENCES, Inc. at 60 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 60 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Nov 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Subjects Reporting at Least 1 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 Years) (time frame: During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 years)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00522275, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in