Partial EpilepsiesPhase 3NCT00522275
Determine Safety and Efficacy of Long-term Oral Lacosamide in Patients With Partial Seizures
A Phase 3 study testing lacosamide in people with Partial Epilepsies, run by UCB BIOSCIENCES, Inc. at 60 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this trial is to determine whether lacosamide is safe and effective for long-term use in patients with partial-seizures from epilepsy Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Partial Epilepsies
- What is being tested?
- lacosamide
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 308 participants
- Where
- 60 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2004to Oct 2009
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Completion of parent clinical trial for treatment of partial seizures
Who cannot join
- Receiving any study drug or experimental device other than lacosamide
- Meets withdrawal criteria for parent trial or experiencing ongoing serious adverse event
Trial locations and contacts
60 sites in 1 country.
60 sites in 1 country
United States60 sites
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Study site
Asheville, North Carolina
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia
Study site
Baltimore, Maryland
Study site
Beaufort, South Carolina
Study site
Bethesda, Maryland
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama
Study site
Boston, Massachusetts
Study site
Bradenton, Florida
Study site
Buffalo, New York
Study site
Charleston, South Carolina
Study site
Charlottesville, Virginia
Study site
Chesterfield, Missouri
Study site
Chicago, Illinois
Study site
Cincinnati, Ohio
Study site
Cleveland, Ohio
Study site
Columbus, Ohio
Study site
Dallas, Texas
Study site
Durham, North Carolina
Study site
Englewood, Colorado
Study site
Fairfield, Connecticut
Study site
Golden Valley, Minnesota
Study site
Greenville, North Carolina
Study site
Hershey, Pennsylvania
Study site
Indianapolis, Indiana
Study site
Jacksonville, Florida
Study site
Lexington, Kentucky
Study site
Little Rock, Arkansas
Study site
Los Angeles, California
Study site
Louisville, Kentucky
Study site
Maitland, Florida
Study site
Marshfield, Wisconsin
Study site
Medford, Oregon
Study site
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Study site
Mobile, Alabama
Study site
Morgantown, West Virginia
Study site
Nashville, Tennessee
Study site
New York, New York
Study site
Newport News, Virginia
Study site
Norfolk, Virginia
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Study site
Phoenix, Arizona
Study site
Providence, Rhode Island
Study site
Richmond, Virginia
Study site
Rochester, New York
Study site
Saint Cloud, Minnesota
Study site
Saint Paul, Minnesota
Study site
San Antonio, Texas
Study site
San Francisco, California
Study site
Seattle, Washington
Study site
Somerset, New Jersey
Study site
Springfield, Illinois
Study site
St. Petersburg, Florida
Study site
Syracuse, New York
Study site
Tallahassee, Florida
Study site
Tampa, Florida
Study site
Toledo, Ohio
Study site
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Study site
Wichita, Kansas
Study site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
About this study
Official title: An Open-label Extension Trial to Determine Safety and Efficacy of Long-term Oral SPM 927 in Patients With Partial Seizures
The purpose of this trial is to determine whether lacosamide is safe and effective for long-term use in patients with partial-seizures from epilepsy
- Conditions
- Partial Epilepsies
- Being tested
- lacosamide
- Keywords
- Adjunctive treatment in epilepsy, add-on treatment for epilepsy, partial seizures, AEDs, antiepileptic drugs, seizures
- Medical subject headings
- Epilepsies, Partial, Seizures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
lacosamideDrug
50mg or 100 mg tablets, up to 800 mg/day given twice daily (BID) throughout the trial
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lacosamide | Experimental | Up to 800 mg/day lacosamide (flexible dosing) Receives: Drug: lacosamide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Subjects Reporting at Least 1 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 Years)
Adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences in a subject administered study treatment, whether or not these events are related to treatment.
Measured: During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 years)
Number of Subjects Prematurely Discontinuing Due to a Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 Years)
Adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences in a subject administered study treatment, whether or not these events are related to treatment.
Measured: During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 years)
Number of Subjects Reporting at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 Years)
Serious adverse events are any untoward serious medical occurrences in a subject administered study treatment, whether or not these events are related to treatment.
Measured: During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 years)
Secondary outcomes (2)
Median Percentage Change From Baseline in 28-day Seizure Frequency During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 Years)
Negative changes from Baseline indicate an improvement (i.e., a reduction) in 28-day seizure frequency.
Measured: Baseline (8-week Baseline Period from the parent study SP0754 [NCT00136019]), Treatment Period (Maximum 6 years)
Percentage of at Least 50 % Responders During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 Years)
At least 50 percent response is based on the percentage reduction in 28-day seizure frequency during the Treatment Period of the open-label extension relative to the Baseline Phase of the prior study.
Measured: Treatment Period (Maximum 6 years)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Aug 2007 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2004
- Primary completionOct 2009
- Study completionOct 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Partial EpilepsiesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 308 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- UCB BIOSCIENCES, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- UCB Clinical Trial Call Center, Study director, +1 877 822 9493 (UCB)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00522275
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SP0756
- Other IDs
- 2014-004398-18, 2014
- Status last verified
- Jul 2017
- First submitted
- 27 Aug 2007
- Last updated
- 18 Jul 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Expanded access
- Available
Publications
Husain A, Chung S, Faught E, Isojarvi J, McShea C, Doty P. Long-term safety and efficacy in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures treated with adjunctive lacosamide: results from a Phase III open-label extension trial. Epilepsia. 2012 Mar;53(3):521-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03407.x.
PubMed 22372628
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jul 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-label Extension Trial to Determine Safety and Efficacy of Long-term Oral SPM 927 in Patients With Partial Seizures
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00522275
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SP0756
- Conditions
- Partial Epilepsies
- Keywords
- Adjunctive treatment in epilepsy, add-on treatment for epilepsy, partial seizures, AEDs, antiepileptic drugs, seizures
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 308 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- UCB BIOSCIENCES, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2004
- Primary completion
- Oct 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Aug 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Nov 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this trial is to determine whether lacosamide is safe and effective for long-term use in patients with partial-seizures from epilepsy
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lacosamide | Experimental | Drug: lacosamideUp to 800 mg/day lacosamide (flexible dosing) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Completion of parent clinical trial for treatment of partial seizures
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Receiving any study drug or experimental device other than lacosamide
- Meets withdrawal criteria for parent trial or experiencing ongoing serious adverse event
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| lacosamide50mg or 100 mg tablets, up to 800 mg/day given twice daily (BID) throughout the trial | Drug | Lacosamide |
Primary outcome
Number of Subjects Reporting at Least 1 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 Years)
Time frame: During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 years)
Adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences in a subject administered study treatment, whether or not these events are related to treatment.
Number of Subjects Prematurely Discontinuing Due to a Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 Years)
Time frame: During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 years)
Adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences in a subject administered study treatment, whether or not these events are related to treatment.
Number of Subjects Reporting at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 Years)
Time frame: During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 years)
Serious adverse events are any untoward serious medical occurrences in a subject administered study treatment, whether or not these events are related to treatment.
2 secondary outcomes
Median Percentage Change From Baseline in 28-day Seizure Frequency During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 Years)
Time frame: Baseline (8-week Baseline Period from the parent study SP0754 [NCT00136019]), Treatment Period (Maximum 6 years)
Percentage of at Least 50 % Responders During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 Years)
Time frame: Treatment Period (Maximum 6 years)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jul 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 22372628Husain A, Chung S, Faught E, Isojarvi J, McShea C, Doty P. Long-term safety and efficacy in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures treated with adjunctive lacosamide: results from a Phase III open-label extension trial. Epilepsia. 2012 Mar;53(3):521-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03407.x.
- FDA Safety Alerts and RecallsLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Partial Epilepsies
RecruitingPhase 3
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of RAP-219 in Adult Participants With Focal Seizures
Focal Seizure, Epilepsy
RecruitingPhase 3
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of RAP-219 in Adult Participants With Focal Seizures FOCUS-1
Focal Seizure, Epilepsy
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate XEN1101 as Adjunctive Therapy in Focal Epilepsy
Focal Epilepsy
Not yet recruiting
Electrophysiological Dose-Response to Anterior Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy
Drug Resistant Epilepsy, Focal Epilepsy
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
An Open-label Study of XEN1101 in Epilepsy
Focal Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic Seizures
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
UCB Clinical Trial Call Center study director
+1 877 822 9493 (UCB)
60 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing lacosamide in people with Partial Epilepsies, run by UCB BIOSCIENCES, Inc. at 60 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 60 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Nov 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Subjects Reporting at Least 1 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 Years) (time frame: During the Treatment Period (Maximum 6 years)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00522275, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jul 2018.