Accidental FallsCPNCT00512655
Trial to Reduce Falls Incidence Rate in Frail Elderly
A study testing Fall prevention course in people with Accidental Falls, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 3 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Background: Approximately 750,000 elderly Dutch people fall at least once a year, which often results in physical injuries and a fear of falling, with high costs and far-reaching consequences on functionality, physical activity, quality of life and mental well-being. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Accidental Falls
- What is being tested?
- Fall prevention course
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 320 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- Jan 2008to Mar 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- At least one fall in the last 6 months
- Living in their own home or in a home for the aged
- Availability of a primary caregiver caring for the patient at least once a week
- Ability to walk 15 meters independently (use of a walking aid is permitted)
- Life expectancy of more than 6 months, as judged by their geriatrician
Who cannot join
- Dyads of patients and caregivers in whom outcome assessment is highly unlikely to succeed, for example because they proved not to be able to register falls in the three months before randomization, will be excluded
- MMSE score of less than 15
- On the waiting list for a nursing home
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Netherlands3 sites
Rijnstate Ziekenhuis
Arnhem
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6500 HB
CWZ
Nijmegen
About this study
Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Falls Incidence Rate in Frail Elderly
Background: Approximately 750,000 elderly Dutch people fall at least once a year, which often results in physical injuries and a fear of falling, with high costs and far-reaching consequences on functionality, physical activity, quality of life and mental well-being. Falling is not only a burden for patients, it is also a burden for their caregivers. Recurrent falling is a complex problem. However, the pathophysiological background of falls, gait problems and dementia is largely unknown. The general pathophysiological hallmark of aging is a liability in homeostatic mechanisms of organs. This liability results in an impaired ability to adapt to stress and in increased biological variation in outcome measures within individuals. In this study the investigators aim at developing an intervention to reduce recurrent falling in frail elderly fallers.
Hypotheses: The investigators hypothesize that the intervention program will decrease the number of falls and fear of falling and increase mental well-being, physical activity and functional performance in frail elderly people with a history of recurrent falling. In addition, the burden on the caregivers will be reduced due to the intervention and will be cost-effective. Furthermore, the investigators hypothesize that patients with a high short-term intra-individual biological variability in gait and cognition variables have a higher risk of falling, worse gait performance and cognitive decline after long term follow-up.
Read more
Study Design: Randomized, controlled, single-blind trial.
Study Population: 160 patients referred to a geriatric outpatient clinic, who fell at least once in the last 6 months and their primary caregivers (N=160).
Intervention: A multifaceted fall prevention program for frail elders to reduce falls incidence rate, consisting of physical and cognitive components. Moreover, it includes a training program for caregivers in which they learn to support and give advice to the patients, aiming to decrease the burden on the caregivers.
Primary Outcome Measures: The fall incidence rate is the primary outcome measure. Total observation time of falls will be 6 months after the start of the intervention.
Secondary Outcome Measures: In the patients, the secondary outcome measures are fear of falling (FES), quality of life (MOS-20), depression and general anxiety, functional performance in activities of daily living, physical activity, mobility, gait parameters, body sway and biomarkers of endothelial function and frailty. For the caregiver, the secondary outcome measures are caregiver's burden, mood and quality of life. In addition, intraindividual variability of cognition, balance and gait in both patients and caregivers, will be assessed and cost-effectiveness of the intervention will also be determined.
Read the detailed description
Nature and Extent of the Burden and Risks Associated with Participation, Benefit and Group Relatedness: The outcome of this study may have important reflections on protocols to prevent falling among elders and on health care decision makers to stimulate starting new fall clinics and implement these protocols. Through this study, the well-being and functionality of frail elders and their caregivers could be improved. As falling has an enormous economic burden, a new effective fall prevention intervention could reduce health care costs substantially. The tests consisting of questionnaires and gait and balance measurement are non-invasive and safe. Taking blood samples is an invasive procedure, although no serious adverse effects are expected. There are no foreseeable risks associated with participation in this study. However, a burden will be placed on participating individuals because the training sessions and measurements are time-consuming.
- Conditions
- Accidental Falls
- Being tested
- Fall prevention course
- Keywords
- Fear of falling, Intraindividual variability, Cognition, Fall prevention, Fear, Frail elderly, Intervention
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fall prevention courseBehavioural
Duration: 5 weeks, 2 sessions of 2 hours per week: 10 sessions in total.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Intervention: 5 week training program, 2 sessions per week (total of 10 sessions). Training includes both the patient and the caregiver. The training consists of two components: a cognitive and a physical component. Receives: Behavioral: Fall prevention course |
| 2 | No intervention | Usual care. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Falls incidence rate
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (12)
Burden for the caregiver
Measured: 4 measurements within 6 months
Quality of life (MOS-20)
Measured: 4 measurements within 6 months
Balance confidence
Measured: 4 measurements within 6 months
Depression and general anxiety
Measured: 4 measurements within 6 months
Functional performance and activities of daily living
Measured: 4 measurements within 6 months
Mood
Measured: 4 measurements within 6 months
Physical activity
Measured: 4 measurements within 6 months
Mobility
Measured: 4 measurements within 6 months
Balance
Measured: 4 measurements within 6 months
Cognition
Measured: 4 measurements within 6 months
Fear of falling (FES)
Measured: 4 measurements within 6 months
Mental well being
Measured: 4 measurements within 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Aug 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2008
- Primary completionMar 2010
- Study completionMar 2010
Why it stopped: Extremely difficult recruitment. Preliminary analysis showed no effect of the intervention.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Accidental FallsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Radboud University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 320 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Stichting Nuts Ohra
- Investigators
- Prof. Dr. M. Olde Rikkert, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Radboud University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00512655
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CP MM 19-08-12-05-30-08
- Other IDs
- SNO-T-0601-60, ZonMw 920-03-457
- Acronym
- CP
- Status last verified
- Jun 2010
- First submitted
- 7 Aug 2007
- Last updated
- 7 Jul 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Faes MC, Reelick MF, Melis RJ, Borm GF, Esselink RA, Rikkert MG. Multifactorial fall prevention for pairs of frail community-dwelling older fallers and their informal caregivers: a dead end for complex interventions in the frailest fallers. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011 Jul;12(6):451-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.11.006. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
PubMed 21450224
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jul 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Falls Incidence Rate in Frail Elderly
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00512655
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CP / CP MM 19-08-12-05-30-08
- Conditions
- Accidental Falls
- Keywords
- Fear of falling, Intraindividual variability, Cognition, Fall prevention, Fear, Frail elderly, Intervention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Extremely difficult recruitment. Preliminary analysis showed no effect of the intervention.
- Enrolment
- 320 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Stichting Nuts Ohra
- Study start
- Jan 2008
- Primary completion
- Mar 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Aug 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: Approximately 750,000 elderly Dutch people fall at least once a year, which often results in physical injuries and a fear of falling, with high costs and far-reaching consequences on functionality, physical activity, quality of life and mental well-being. Falling is not only a burden for patients, it is also a burden for their caregivers. Recurrent falling is a complex problem. However, the pathophysiological background of falls, gait problems and dementia is largely unknown. The general pathophysiological hallmark of aging is a liability in homeostatic mechanisms of organs. This liability results in an impaired ability to adapt to stress and in increased biological variation in outcome measures within individuals. In this study the investigators aim at developing an intervention to reduce recurrent falling in frail elderly fallers.
Hypotheses: The investigators hypothesize that the intervention program will decrease the number of falls and fear of falling and increase mental well-being, physical activity and functional performance in frail elderly people with a history of recurrent falling. In addition, the burden on the caregivers will be reduced due to the intervention and will be cost-effective. Furthermore, the investigators hypothesize that patients with a high short-term intra-individual biological variability in gait and cognition variables have a higher risk of falling, worse gait performance and cognitive decline after long term follow-up.
Study Design: Randomized, controlled, single-blind trial.
Study Population: 160 patients referred to a geriatric outpatient clinic, who fell at least once in the last 6 months and their primary caregivers (N=160).
Intervention: A multifaceted fall prevention program for frail elders to reduce falls incidence rate, consisting of physical and cognitive components. Moreover, it includes a training program for caregivers in which they learn to support and give advice to the patients, aiming to decrease the burden on the caregivers.
Primary Outcome Measures: The fall incidence rate is the primary outcome measure. Total observation time of falls will be 6 months after the start of the intervention.
Secondary Outcome Measures: In the patients, the secondary outcome measures are fear of falling (FES), quality of life (MOS-20), depression and general anxiety, functional performance in activities of daily living, physical activity, mobility, gait parameters, body sway and biomarkers of endothelial function and frailty. For the caregiver, the secondary outcome measures are caregiver's burden, mood and quality of life. In addition, intraindividual variability of cognition, balance and gait in both patients and caregivers, will be assessed and cost-effectiveness of the intervention will also be determined.
Detailed description
Nature and Extent of the Burden and Risks Associated with Participation, Benefit and Group Relatedness: The outcome of this study may have important reflections on protocols to prevent falling among elders and on health care decision makers to stimulate starting new fall clinics and implement these protocols. Through this study, the well-being and functionality of frail elders and their caregivers could be improved. As falling has an enormous economic burden, a new effective fall prevention intervention could reduce health care costs substantially. The tests consisting of questionnaires and gait and balance measurement are non-invasive and safe. Taking blood samples is an invasive procedure, although no serious adverse effects are expected. There are no foreseeable risks associated with participation in this study. However, a burden will be placed on participating individuals because the training sessions and measurements are time-consuming.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Behavioral: Fall prevention courseIntervention: 5 week training program, 2 sessions per week (total of 10 sessions). Training includes both the patient and the caregiver. The training consists of two components: a cognitive and a physical component. |
| 2 | No intervention | –Usual care. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- At least one fall in the last 6 months
- Living in their own home or in a home for the aged
- Availability of a primary caregiver caring for the patient at least once a week
- Ability to walk 15 meters independently (use of a walking aid is permitted)
- Life expectancy of more than 6 months, as judged by their geriatrician
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Dyads of patients and caregivers in whom outcome assessment is highly unlikely to succeed, for example because they proved not to be able to register falls in the three months before randomization, will be excluded
- MMSE score of less than 15
- On the waiting list for a nursing home
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fall prevention courseDuration: 5 weeks, 2 sessions of 2 hours per week: 10 sessions in total. | Behavioural | 1 |
Primary outcome
Falls incidence rate
Time frame: 6 months
12 secondary outcomes
Burden for the caregiver
Time frame: 4 measurements within 6 months
Quality of life (MOS-20)
Time frame: 4 measurements within 6 months
Balance confidence
Time frame: 4 measurements within 6 months
Depression and general anxiety
Time frame: 4 measurements within 6 months
Functional performance and activities of daily living
Time frame: 4 measurements within 6 months
Mood
Time frame: 4 measurements within 6 months
Physical activity
Time frame: 4 measurements within 6 months
Mobility
Time frame: 4 measurements within 6 months
Balance
Time frame: 4 measurements within 6 months
Cognition
Time frame: 4 measurements within 6 months
Fear of falling (FES)
Time frame: 4 measurements within 6 months
Mental well being
Time frame: 4 measurements within 6 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Extremely difficult recruitment. Preliminary analysis showed no effect of the intervention.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jul 2010.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21450224Faes MC, Reelick MF, Melis RJ, Borm GF, Esselink RA, Rikkert MG. Multifactorial fall prevention for pairs of frail community-dwelling older fallers and their informal caregivers: a dead end for complex interventions in the frailest fallers. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011 Jul;12(6):451-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.11.006. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
Related trials for Accidental Falls
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Effects of Exercises on Reactive Balance and Fall Risk in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
COMMUNITY-DWELLING OLDER ADULTS
Not yet recruiting
Pilates vs. Core Stabilization for Balance and Mobility in Elderly Type 2 Diabetics
Mellitus Balance Deficits Postural Balance Mobility Limitation, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Recruiting
Evaluation of the PPAL
Age Problems
Not yet recruiting
Multicomponent Exercise and Pain Science Education for Fall Prevention in Older Adults With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain (MovePainFall)
Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Impact of Osteosarcopenia on Falls, Kinesiophobia, and Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Women
Osteosarcopenia, Sarcopenia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Prof. Dr. M. Olde Rikkert, MD PhD principal investigator
Radboud University Medical Center
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Fall prevention course in people with Accidental Falls, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 3 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Extremely difficult recruitment. Preliminary analysis showed no effect of the intervention.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Falls incidence rate (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00512655, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2010.