AzTrials
AzTrials

Neurogenic BladderPhase 2NCT00512148

Study of Autologous Neo-Bladder Construct in Subjects With Neurogenic Bladder Following Spinal Cord Injury

A Phase 2 study testing Autologous neobladder construct in people with Neurogenic Bladder, run by Tengion at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Subjects with neurogenic bladder secondary to spinal cord injury that is refractory to medical treatment and requires augmentation cystoplasty will be enrolled. The hypothesis is that augmentation cystoplasty using an autologous neo-bladder construct will reduce maximum detrusor pressure. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Neurogenic Bladder
What is being tested?
Autologous neobladder construct
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
7 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jul 2007to Apr 2011
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • subjects with neurogenic bladders secondary to spinal cord injury

Who cannot join

  • prior augmentation procedures or urinary diversion
  • recent urologic or intraperitoneal surgery or device implantation
  • recent history of spinal cord injury of less than a year
  • recent neurologic surgery
  • requirement for concomitant urological surgical procedures

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: An Open Label Multicenter Study of Augmentation Cystoplasty Using an Autologous Neo-Bladder Construct in Subjects With Neurogenic Bladder Following Spinal Cord Injury

Subjects with neurogenic bladder secondary to spinal cord injury that is refractory to medical treatment and requires augmentation cystoplasty will be enrolled. The hypothesis is that augmentation cystoplasty using an autologous neo-bladder construct will reduce maximum detrusor pressure.

Being tested
Autologous neobladder construct
Medical subject headings
Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Autologous neobladder constructDevice

    augmentation cystoplasty with autologous neo-bladder construct

Study groups in NCT00512148
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalReceipt of autologous neo-bladder construct consisting of a device regenerated in the laboratory from the patient's own muscle and urothelial cells
Receives: Device: Autologous neobladder construct

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Maximum Detrusor Pressure From Baseline to 12 Months

    Detrusor pressure is measured using urodynamic testing, which involves inserting a catheter through the urethra and into the bladder and measuring the pressure in the bladder as it is filled with fluid. The primary outcome measure for this study was the change in the maximum pressure observed during bladder filling from baseline to 12 months. The goal of the therapy was to decrease pressure.

    Measured: baseline and 12 months

  2. Overall Safety Profile - Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event

    Clinical evaluation of adverse events experienced by patients enrolled in the trial.

    Measured: through month 12

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Urodynamic Measurements and Long Term Safety

    Safety results are summarized in the Adverse Events section of this listing.

    Measured: month 12 through month 60

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Aug 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2007
  3. Primary completionJan 2010
  4. Study completionApr 2011

Why it stopped: 24 months follow up completed without substantial change to the profile.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Note: Tengion no longer exists following Chapter 7 bankruptcy in 2014. No further information is available. No data are available to be reviewed or re-analyzed.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
7 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00512148
Sponsor's protocol ID
TNG-CL004
Other IDs
NOTE: TENGION NO LONGER EXISTS
Status last verified
Aug 2018
First submitted
3 Aug 2007
Last updated
17 Aug 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Autologous neobladder construct in people with Neurogenic Bladder, run by Tengion at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Feb 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Maximum Detrusor Pressure From Baseline to 12 Months (time frame: baseline and 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in