Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors of Pancreatic OriginPhase 3RADIANT-3NCT00510068
Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus (RAD001) Compared to Placebo in Patients With Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors
A Phase 3 study testing Everolimus in people with Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors of Pancreatic Origin, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 82 sites in 18 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate progression free survival in those participants assigned everolimus 10 mg/day plus Best Supportive Care versus those assigned to placebo plus Best Supportive Care in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors of pancreatic origin. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors of Pancreatic Origin
- What is being tested?
- Everolimus
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 410 participants
- Where
- 82 sitesin 18 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2007to Mar 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must have advanced (unresectable or metastatic) biopsy-proven pancreatic NET
- Measurable disease by radiologic assessment
- Adequate blood work
- Performance Status 0-2 : Ability to be out of bed most of the time
- Adult male or female patients ≥ 18 years of age
- Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test
- Written informed consent from patients must be obtained in accordance to local guidelines
Who cannot join
- Patients with severe kind of (poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma, adenocarcinoid, goblet cell carcinoid and small cell carcinoma) cancer are not eligible
- Other chemotherapy, immunotherapy or radiotherapy within 4 weeks prior to starting this trial
- Hepatic artery procedure called embolization within the last 6 months (1 month if there are other sites of measurable disease), or cryoablation/ radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastasis within 2 months of enrollment
- Prior therapy with the same kind of medication (mTOR inhibitors: sirolimus, temsirolimus, everolimus).
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus Patients who have any severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions such as:
- Patients receiving chronic treatment with corticosteroids or another immunosuppressive agent
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patients with a known history of HIV seropositivity
- No other prior or concurrent cancer at the time enrolling to this trial
- Other protocol defined inclusion/ exclusion criteria applied
Trial locations and contacts
82 sites in 18 countries.
82 sites in 18 countries
United States24 sites
Pacific Cancer Medical Center, Inc.
Anaheim, California, 92801
St. Luke's Hospital and Health Network St. Luke's Cancer Network
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Boston Medical Center BMC
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
Levine Cancer Institute
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203
Ohio State Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital Dept. of OHSU Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Kaiser Permanente Northwest Franklin Medical Offices
Denver, Colorado
Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute Dept.of KarmanosCancerInst (4)
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
University of Texas/MD Anderson Cancer Center Dept of MD Anderson CancerCent
Houston, Texas, 77030-4009
Indiana University Health Goshen Center for Cancer Dept. of Indiana Univ. Cancer
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
University of Iowa Medical Center Dept. of Iowa Medical Center
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Littleton Regional Hospital Dept. of Hematology/Oncology
Littleton, New Hampshire, 03561
Cedars Sinai Medical Center SC-2
Los Angeles, California, 90048
University of California at Los Angeles UCLA (3)
Los Angeles, California, 90095
University of Louisville / James Graham Brown Cancer Center SC
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
University of South Alabama / Mitchell Cancer Institute Deptof Mitchell Cancer Inst(2)
Mobile, Alabama, 36688
LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER/ LSU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE Dept. of Neuroendocrine Clinic
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115
Columbia University Medical Center- New York Presbyterian Dept. of Columbia Med. Center
New York, New York, 10032
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111-2497
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Oregon Health & Science University Dept. of OHSU (3)
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Mayo Clinic - Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
University of California San Francisco Dept. of UCSF Comp. Cancer
San Francisco, California, 94143-0128
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute Malignant Hematology Clinic
Tampa, Florida, 33612
France13 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Besançon, 25030
Novartis Investigative Site
Clichy, 92110
Novartis Investigative Site
Dijon, 21079
Novartis Investigative Site
Lille, 59020
Novartis Investigative Site
Lyon, 69437
Novartis Investigative Site
Marseille, 13385
Novartis Investigative Site
Montpellier, 34298
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, 75015
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, 75651
Novartis Investigative Site
Reims, 51092
Novartis Investigative Site
Strasbourg, France, 67098
Novartis Investigative Site
Toulouse, 31054
Novartis Investigative Site
Villejuif, 94805
Italy6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bologna, BO, 40138
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, 20132
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, 20141
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, 20162
Novartis Investigative Site
Modena, MO, 41100
Novartis Investigative Site
Pisa, PI, 56124
Canada5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2
Novartis Investigative Site
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Novartis Investigative Site
London, Ontario, N6A 4L6
Novartis Investigative Site
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
Novartis Investigative Site
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1
Germany5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bad Berka, 99438
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 13353
Novartis Investigative Site
Mainz, Germany, 55131
Novartis Investigative Site
Marburg, 35033
Novartis Investigative Site
München, 81377
South Korea4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, Korea, 110 744
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, Korea, 120-752
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, Korea, 135-710
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 738-736
Taiwan4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaohsiung City, 807
Novartis Investigative Site
Lin-Ko, 33305
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, Taiwan, 10002
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, Taiwan, ROC, 112
United Kingdom4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Glasgow, G12 0YN
Novartis Investigative Site
London, EC1A 7BE
Novartis Investigative Site
London, SE5 9RS
Novartis Investigative Site
Withington, Greater Manchester, M20 4BX
Belgium3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Brussels, 1070
Novartis Investigative Site
Brussels, 1200
Novartis Investigative Site
Leuven, 3000
Japan3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Chuo-ku, Tokyo
Novartis Investigative Site
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 812-8582
Novartis Investigative Site
Kashiwa, Chiba
Greece2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Athens, GR, 115 27
Novartis Investigative Site
Athens, GR-115 22
Spain2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035
Novartis Investigative Site
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, 08907
Thailand2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangkok, 10400
Novartis Investigative Site
Songkhla, 90110
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Double-blind Phase III Study of RAD001 10 mg/d Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care in the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor (NET)
The purpose of this study was to evaluate progression free survival in those participants assigned everolimus 10 mg/day plus Best Supportive Care versus those assigned to placebo plus Best Supportive Care in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors of pancreatic origin.
- Being tested
- Everolimus, Everolimus Placebo
- Keywords
- Phase III, Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumor in adults, RAD001, NET, everolimus, mTOr, islet cell, neuroendocrine
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EverolimusDrug
Also called RAD001
A 10-mg dose of everolimus was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5-mg tablets.
Everolimus PlaceboDrug
a 10-mg dose of matching placebo to Everolimus was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5-mg tablets.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Everolimus 10 mg/day | Experimental | Participants received 10 mg per day of Everolimus plus best supportive care. Patients received their first dose of everolimus at Visit 2 (Cycle 1 Day 1). Receives: Drug: Everolimus |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants received matching placebo to everolimus daily plus best supportive care. Patients received their first dose of matching placebo at Visit 2 (Cycle 1 Day 1). Receives: Drug: Everolimus Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based as Per Investigator Using Kaplan-Meier Methodology
Progression of disease is defined as the time from study start to the date of first documented progression of disease or death due to any cause. Progression of disease is defined by RECIST criteria: Progression = 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, from the smallest sum of longest diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline; or a new lesion; or progression of non-target lesions.
Measured: Time from randomisation to dates of disease progression, death from any cause or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 17 August 2007, until cut-off date 28 February 2010
Secondary outcomes (17)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response Rate ( CR {Complete Response} OR PR {Partial Response})
Objective Response defined by RECIST criteria: Partial response (PR) must have ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, from the baseline sum. Complete response (CR) must have disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. For CR or PR, tumor measurements must be confirmed by 2nd assessments within 4 weeks . Progression = 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, from the smallest sum of longest diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline; or a new lesion; or progression of non-target lesions
Measured: Time from randomisation to dates of disease progression, death from any cause or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 17 August 2007, until cut-off date 28 February 2010
Overall Survival
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Analyses were performed using all deaths in the FAS population regardless of whether they were observed during the double-blind treatment period, the open-label treatment period, the post-treatment evaluations, or the survival follow-up period.
Measured: Baseline, to death- no time limit
Progression Free Survival According to Ki-67 Levels Categorized as: Less Than or Equal to 2%, > 2% to Less Than or Equal to 5% and > 5%
The level of Ki 67 expression for evaluable tumor samples were analyzed towards progression free survival (PFS) as per local investigator assessment. The Ki-67 protein is a cellular marker for proliferation. It is strictly associated with cell proliferation. During interphase, the Ki-67 antigen can be exclusively detected within the cell nucleus, whereas in mitosis most of the protein is relocated to the surface of the chromosomes. Baseline Ki 67 levels were categorized as: less than or equal to 2%, > 2% to less than or equal to 5% and > 5%.
Measured: Time from randomisation to dates of disease progression, death from any cause or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 17 August 2007, until cut-off date 28 February 2010
Progression Free Survival According to Chromogramin A Tumor Marker (CgA) Baseline Level and According to CgA Early Response
Baseline levels of serum CgA SE were characterized towards progression free survival (PFS) as per local investigator assessment, relative to the upper limited of normal (ULN). CgA levels exceeding 2 x ULN were considered to be 'Elevated' otherwise considered as "Non-elevated". An 'early response' (applicable to only those patients with elevated levels at baseline) was defined as a decrease of greater than or equal to 30% from baseline to Cycle 2 Day 1 or normalization by Cycle 2 Day 1. CgA is widely expressed in well-differentiated pancreatic NET. CgA is present in the secretory granules of neuroendocrine cells. Pancreatic NET patients often present with elevated circulating levels of CgA in their blood. Baseline levels of these biomarkers are considered as prognostic factors.
Measured: Time from randomisation to dates of disease progression, death from any cause or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 17 August 2007, until cut-off date 28 February 2010
Progression Free Survival According to Neuron Specific Enolase Tumor Marker (NSE) Baseline Level and According to NSE Early Response
Baseline levels of serum NSE were characterized towards PFS as per local investigator assessment, relative to the upper limited of normal (ULN). NSE levels exceeding ULN were considered to be 'Elevated' otherwise considered as "Non-elevated". An 'early response' (applicable to only those patients with elevated levels at baseline) was defined as a decrease of greater than or equal to 30% from baseline to Cycle 2 Day 1 or normalization by Cycle 2 Day 1. NSE is widely expressed in well-differentiated pancreatic NET. NSE is usually expressed in the cytoplasm. Pancreatic NET patients often present with elevated circulating levels of NSE in their blood. Baseline levels of these biomarkers are considered as prognostic factors.
Measured: Time from randomisation to dates of disease progression, death from any cause or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 17 August 2007, until cut-off date 28 February 2010
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Adverse events are defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), syndrome or disease which either occurs during study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require (or prolong) hospitalization, cause persistent or significant disability/incapacity, result in congenital anomalies or birth defects, or are other conditions which in judgment of investigators represent significant hazards.
Measured: on or after the start of double-blind study medication until no later than 28 days after double-blind study medication discontinuation
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Open-label Period)
Adverse events are defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), syndrome or disease which either occurs during study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require (or prolong) hospitalization, cause persistent or significant disability/incapacity, result in congenital anomalies or birth defects, or are other conditions which in judgment of investigators represent significant hazards.
Measured: on or after the start of open-label study medication until no later than 28 days after open-label study medication discontinuation
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: AUC0-t Last
The PK parameters for a full PK profile at steady-state were determined in blood using non compartmental methods. This PK parameter is area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t last).
Measured: Day 1 of every cycle (28 days/cycle) throughout the study
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameters: Cmax, Cmin
The PK parameters for a full PK profile at steady-state were determined in blood using non compartmental methods. The PK parameter: maximum (peak) drug concentration (Cmax) and minimum (trough) drug concentration (Cmin).
Measured: Day 1 of every cycle (28 days/cycle) throughout the study
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: CL/F
The PK parameters for a full PK profile at steady-state were determined in blood using non compartmental methods. The PK parameter clearance of distribution expressed as a function of bioavailability (CL/F).
Measured: Day 1 of every cycle (28 days/cycle) throughout the study
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: Tmax -Time to Maximum (Peak) Drug Concentration
The PK parameters for a full PK profile at steady-state were determined in blood using non compartmental methods. Values for tmax where summarized in median (range).
Measured: Day 1 of every cycle (28 days/cycle) throughout the study
Analysis of Time to Definitive Deterioration of WHO Performance Status Using Kaplan-Meier
Time to definitive worsening is defined as a definitive increase in performance status from a baseline of 0 or 1 to WHO >= 2, or from a baseline value of 2 to WHO >= 3. If no earlier deterioration, patients were censored at the end of follow-up or at the start of further antineoplastic therapy. Rates of patients with no deterioration at 3 and 6 months were computed using Kaplan-meier method. Grade 0: Able to carry out all activity without restriction; Grade 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory \& able to do light work; Grade 2: Ambulatory \& capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work. Up \& about more than 50% of waking hours; Grade 3: Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; Grade 4: Completely disabled \& cannot carry on any self-care; totally confined to bed or chair.
Measured: 3 months, 6 months
Plasma Angiogenesis Marker: Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF)
This biomarker is related to angiogenesis pathway, was analyzed to determine the effects of everolimus on plasma antiangiogenic molecules.
Measured: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1
Plasma Angiogenesis Marker: Placental Growth Factor (PLGF)
This biomarker is related to angiogenesis pathway, was analyzed to determine the effects of everolimus on plasma antiangiogenic molecules.
Measured: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1
Plasma Angiogenesis Marker: Soluble Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 1 (sVEGFR1)
This biomarker is related to angiogenesis pathway, was analyzed to determine the effects of everolimus on plasma antiangiogenic molecules.
Measured: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1
Plasma Angiogenesis Marker: Soluble Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 (sVEGFR2)
This biomarker is related to angiogenesis pathway, was analyzed to determine the effects of everolimus on plasma antiangiogenic molecules.
Measured: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1
Plasma Angiogenesis Marker: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)
This biomarker is related to angiogenesis pathway, was analyzed to determine the effects of everolimus on plasma antiangiogenic molecules.
Measured: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Aug 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2007
- Primary completionFeb 2010
- Study completionMar 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors of Pancreatic OriginStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 410 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00510068
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CRAD001C2324
- Other IDs
- 2006-006819-75
- Acronym
- RADIANT-3
- Status last verified
- Jun 2015
- First submitted
- 31 Jul 2007
- Last updated
- 1 Jul 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Chan DL, Yao JC, Carnaghi C, Buzzoni R, Herbst F, Ridolfi A, Strosberg J, Kulke MH, Pavel M, Singh S. Markers of Systemic Inflammation in Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Pooled Analysis of the RADIANT-3 and RADIANT-4 Studies. Pancreas. 2021 Feb 1;50(2):130-137. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001745.
PubMed 33560090Yao JC, Voi M, Lincy J, Pavel M. Reply to V. Amoroso et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 1;35(13):1488-1489. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.71.3875. Epub 2017 Jan 23. No abstract available.
PubMed 28113028Yao JC, Pavel M, Lombard-Bohas C, Van Cutsem E, Voi M, Brandt U, He W, Chen D, Capdevila J, de Vries EGE, Tomassetti P, Hobday T, Pommier R, Oberg K. Everolimus for the Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Overall Survival and Circulating Biomarkers From the Randomized, Phase III RADIANT-3 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 10;34(32):3906-3913. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.0702. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
PubMed 27621394Lombard-Bohas C, Yao JC, Hobday T, Van Cutsem E, Wolin EM, Panneerselvam A, Stergiopoulos S, Shah MH, Capdevila J, Pommier R. Impact of prior chemotherapy use on the efficacy of everolimus in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a subgroup analysis of the phase III RADIANT-3 trial. Pancreas. 2015 Mar;44(2):181-9. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000262.
PubMed 25479584Yao JC, Shah MH, Ito T, Bohas CL, Wolin EM, Van Cutsem E, Hobday TJ, Okusaka T, Capdevila J, de Vries EG, Tomassetti P, Pavel ME, Hoosen S, Haas T, Lincy J, Lebwohl D, Oberg K; RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, Third Trial (RADIANT-3) Study Group. Everolimus for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 10;364(6):514-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009290.
PubMed 21306238
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jul 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Double-blind Phase III Study of RAD001 10 mg/d Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care in the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor (NET)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00510068
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RADIANT-3 / CRAD001C2324
- Keywords
- Phase III, Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumor in adults, RAD001, NET, everolimus, mTOr, islet cell, neuroendocrine
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 410 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2007
- Primary completion
- Feb 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Aug 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 Dec 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate progression free survival in those participants assigned everolimus 10 mg/day plus Best Supportive Care versus those assigned to placebo plus Best Supportive Care in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors of pancreatic origin.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Everolimus 10 mg/day | Experimental | Drug: EverolimusParticipants received 10 mg per day of Everolimus plus best supportive care. Patients received their first dose of everolimus at Visit 2 (Cycle 1 Day 1). |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Everolimus PlaceboParticipants received matching placebo to everolimus daily plus best supportive care. Patients received their first dose of matching placebo at Visit 2 (Cycle 1 Day 1). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients must have advanced (unresectable or metastatic) biopsy-proven pancreatic NET
- Measurable disease by radiologic assessment
- Adequate blood work
- Performance Status 0-2 : Ability to be out of bed most of the time
- Adult male or female patients ≥ 18 years of age
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients with severe kind of (poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma, adenocarcinoid, goblet cell carcinoid and small cell carcinoma) cancer are not eligible
- Other chemotherapy, immunotherapy or radiotherapy within 4 weeks prior to starting this trial
- Hepatic artery procedure called embolization within the last 6 months (1 month if there are other sites of measurable disease), or cryoablation/ radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastasis within 2 months of enrollment
- Prior therapy with the same kind of medication (mTOR inhibitors: sirolimus, temsirolimus, everolimus).
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus Patients who have any severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions such as:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EverolimusAlso: RAD001A 10-mg dose of everolimus was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5-mg tablets. | Drug | Everolimus 10 mg/day |
| Everolimus Placeboa 10-mg dose of matching placebo to Everolimus was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5-mg tablets. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Time to Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based as Per Investigator Using Kaplan-Meier Methodology
Time frame: Time from randomisation to dates of disease progression, death from any cause or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 17 August 2007, until cut-off date 28 February 2010
Progression of disease is defined as the time from study start to the date of first documented progression of disease or death due to any cause. Progression of disease is defined by RECIST criteria: Progression = 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, from the smallest sum of longest diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline; or a new lesion; or progression of non-target lesions.
17 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response Rate ( CR {Complete Response} OR PR {Partial Response})
Time frame: Time from randomisation to dates of disease progression, death from any cause or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 17 August 2007, until cut-off date 28 February 2010
Overall Survival
Time frame: Baseline, to death- no time limit
Progression Free Survival According to Ki-67 Levels Categorized as: Less Than or Equal to 2%, > 2% to Less Than or Equal to 5% and > 5%
Time frame: Time from randomisation to dates of disease progression, death from any cause or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 17 August 2007, until cut-off date 28 February 2010
Progression Free Survival According to Chromogramin A Tumor Marker (CgA) Baseline Level and According to CgA Early Response
Time frame: Time from randomisation to dates of disease progression, death from any cause or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 17 August 2007, until cut-off date 28 February 2010
Progression Free Survival According to Neuron Specific Enolase Tumor Marker (NSE) Baseline Level and According to NSE Early Response
Time frame: Time from randomisation to dates of disease progression, death from any cause or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 17 August 2007, until cut-off date 28 February 2010
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: on or after the start of double-blind study medication until no later than 28 days after double-blind study medication discontinuation
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Open-label Period)
Time frame: on or after the start of open-label study medication until no later than 28 days after open-label study medication discontinuation
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: AUC0-t Last
Time frame: Day 1 of every cycle (28 days/cycle) throughout the study
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameters: Cmax, Cmin
Time frame: Day 1 of every cycle (28 days/cycle) throughout the study
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: CL/F
Time frame: Day 1 of every cycle (28 days/cycle) throughout the study
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: Tmax -Time to Maximum (Peak) Drug Concentration
Time frame: Day 1 of every cycle (28 days/cycle) throughout the study
Analysis of Time to Definitive Deterioration of WHO Performance Status Using Kaplan-Meier
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months
Plasma Angiogenesis Marker: Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF)
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1
Plasma Angiogenesis Marker: Placental Growth Factor (PLGF)
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1
Plasma Angiogenesis Marker: Soluble Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 1 (sVEGFR1)
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1
Plasma Angiogenesis Marker: Soluble Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 (sVEGFR2)
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1
Plasma Angiogenesis Marker: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jul 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33560090Chan DL, Yao JC, Carnaghi C, Buzzoni R, Herbst F, Ridolfi A, Strosberg J, Kulke MH, Pavel M, Singh S. Markers of Systemic Inflammation in Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Pooled Analysis of the RADIANT-3 and RADIANT-4 Studies. Pancreas. 2021 Feb 1;50(2):130-137. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001745.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28113028Yao JC, Voi M, Lincy J, Pavel M. Reply to V. Amoroso et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 1;35(13):1488-1489. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.71.3875. Epub 2017 Jan 23. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27621394Yao JC, Pavel M, Lombard-Bohas C, Van Cutsem E, Voi M, Brandt U, He W, Chen D, Capdevila J, de Vries EGE, Tomassetti P, Hobday T, Pommier R, Oberg K. Everolimus for the Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Overall Survival and Circulating Biomarkers From the Randomized, Phase III RADIANT-3 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 10;34(32):3906-3913. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.0702. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25479584Lombard-Bohas C, Yao JC, Hobday T, Van Cutsem E, Wolin EM, Panneerselvam A, Stergiopoulos S, Shah MH, Capdevila J, Pommier R. Impact of prior chemotherapy use on the efficacy of everolimus in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a subgroup analysis of the phase III RADIANT-3 trial. Pancreas. 2015 Mar;44(2):181-9. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000262.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21306238Yao JC, Shah MH, Ito T, Bohas CL, Wolin EM, Van Cutsem E, Hobday TJ, Okusaka T, Capdevila J, de Vries EG, Tomassetti P, Pavel ME, Hoosen S, Haas T, Lincy J, Lebwohl D, Oberg K; RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, Third Trial (RADIANT-3) Study Group. Everolimus for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 10;364(6):514-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009290.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
82 sites in 18 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Everolimus in people with Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors of Pancreatic Origin, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 82 sites in 18 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 82 sites in United States, France, Italy, Canada, Germany and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Dec 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based as Per Investigator Using Kaplan-Meier Methodology (time frame: Time from randomisation to dates of disease progression, death from any cause or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 17 August 2007, until cut-off date 28 February 2010). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00510068, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jul 2015.