AsymptomaticNCT00497094
Stenting Versus Best Medical Treatment of Asymptomatic High Grade Carotid Artery Stenosis
A study testing carotid artery stenting in people with Asymptomatic and Artery, run by Vienna General Hospital at 1 site in Austria.
Trial summary
Background. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) recently has become an accepted method for treatment of patients with high-grade carotid artery stenosis, who are at an increased risk for surgical carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Asymptomatic, Artery
- What is being tested?
- carotid artery stenting
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 148 participants
- Where
- 1 siteAustria
- Study dates
- Mar 2004to Oct 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Atherosclerosis is the underlying disease
- Patients with an asymptomatic stenosis >80% (NASCET) with a documented progression of the degree of stenosis to >80% within 6 months with a very tight stenosis ≥90% at initial presentation with a >80% stenosis plus silent ipsilateral ischemia documented by CCT or MRI with ipsilateral >80% stenosis plus contralateral >80% stenosis or occlusion with >80% stenosis plus planned major surgery
- Neurologist´s explicit consent to potentially perform CAS
Who cannot join
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Underlying disease other than atherosclerosis (inflammatory or autoimmune disease)
- Traumatic or spontaneous carotid dissections
- Life expectancy <6 months
- Advanced dementia
- Advanced renal failure (serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dL)
Show all 9Show fewer
- Unstable severe cardiovascular comorbidities (e.g. unstable angina, heart failure)
- Restenosis after prior CAS or CEA
- Allergy or contraindications to study medications (clopidogrel, statins, ASA)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Stenting vs. Best Medical Treatment of Asymptomatic High Grade Carotid Artery Stenosis - a Randomized Controlled Trial
Background. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) recently has become an accepted method for treatment of patients with high-grade carotid artery stenosis, who are at an increased risk for surgical carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The reported rates of neurological complications of CAS substantially decreased during the past years, and the routine use of cerebral protection devices and low profile catheter systems have further increased the procedure´s safety. In the early 90's large surgical trials in North America and Europe (NASCET, ECST and ACAS) demonstrated superiority of CEA compared to best medical treatment for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Provided that the ongoing randomized controlled trials comparing CAS and CEA confirm equivalence between the these methods, CAS similar to CEA is applicable to symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with high grade carotid stenosis. However, particularly in asymptomatic patients, the indication for revascularisation remains debatable. Protected CAS is associated with a very low rate of neurological complications, which are below the AHA recommendation for treating asymptomatic patients (3%). However, the introduction of new vascular protective medications like statins and clopidogrel during the recent years substantially improved the spectrum of best medical treatment, and the findings of NASCET, ECST and ACAS with respect to best medical treatment may therefore not be applicable any more.
Study hypothesis and aims. Given the low frequency of spontaneous neurological complications, the preferable therapeutic approach to patients with asymptomatic high grade ( > 80%) carotid artery stenoses is currently unknown. Modern best medical treatment may manage to stabilize the atherosclerotic plaque, while CAS has the potential of resolving the carotid stenosis. Comparative data, however, are not available as yet. We hypothesized that protected CAS has a beneficial effect on occurrence of ipsilateral neurological complications and major adverse cardiac events in high-risk patients with asymptomatic > 80% internal carotid artery stenosis. Therefore, the aim of the present randomized controlled trial was to analyze neurological and cardiovascular outcome of patients treated with elective CAS plus best medical treatment compared to best medical treatment only.
Read the detailed description
Carotid artery stenting (CAS) recently has become an accepted method for treatment of patients with high-grade carotid artery stenosis, who are at an increased risk for surgical carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The reported rates of neurological complications of CAS substantially decreased during the past years, and the routine use of cerebral protection devices and low profile catheter systems have further increased the procedure´s safety. In the early 90ies large surgical trials in North America and Europe (NASCET, ECST and ACAS) demonstrated superiority of CEA compared to best medical treatment for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Provided that the ongoing randomized controlled trials comparing CAS and CEA confirm equivalence between the these methods, CAS similar to CEA is applicable to symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with high grade carotid stenosis. However, particularly in asymptomatic patients, the indication for revascularisation remains debatable. Protected CAS is associated with a very low rate of neurological complications, which are below the AHA recommendation for treating asymptomatic patients (3%). However, the introduction of new vascular protective medications like statins and clopidogrel during the recent years substantially improved the spectrum of best medical treatment, and the findings of NASCET, ECST and ACAS with respect to best medical treatment may therefore not be applicable any more.
Given the low frequency of spontaneous neurological complications, the preferable therapeutic approach to patients with asymptomatic high grade ( > 80%) carotid artery stenoses is currently unknown. Modern best medical treatment may manage to stabilize the atherosclerotic plaque, while CAS has the potential of resolving the carotid stenosis. Comparative data, however, are not available as yet. We hypothesized that protected CAS has a beneficial effect on occurrence of ipsilateral neurological complications and major adverse cardiac events in high-risk patients with asymptomatic > 80% internal carotid artery stenosis. Therefore, the aim of the present randomized controlled trial was to analyze neurological and cardiovascular outcome of patients treated with elective CAS plus best medical treatment compared to best medical treatment only.
SYNOPSIS
BACKGROUND:
The preferable treatment - whether revascularization or conservative - of asymptomatic high-risk patients with > 80% internal carotid artery stenosis (NASCET criteria) is currently unknown.
STUDY HYPOTHESIS:
We hypothesized that protected carotid artery stenting (CAS) plus best medical treatment is associated with reduced rates of ipsilateral neurological complications and major adverse cardiac events in high-risk patients with asymptomatic > 80% internal carotid artery stenosis compared to best medical treatment only.
STUDY DESIGN:
The study is designed as a randomized controlled trial with 1:1 random assignment between two treatment modalities including 300 patients within an scheduled inclusion period of 18 months. The primary and secondary study endpoints are evaluated for an initial two year follow-up period after randomization. Secondary follow-up will be performed for 1, 1.5, 3, 5 and 10 years post randomization.
- Conditions
- Asymptomatic, Artery
- Being tested
- carotid artery stenting
- Keywords
- carotid artery stenting, atherosclerosis, cerebrovascular, stroke
- Medical subject headings
- Atherosclerosis, Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
carotid artery stentingDevice
Using retrograde transfemoral access an overview aortic angiogram is established. A stiff wire is then placed in the external carotid or distal common carotid artery to introduce a long hydrophilic sheath into the common carotid artery. The stenosis is then crossed with a Filter wire. For stent implantation Monorail Carotid Wallstents or the Monorail Nitinol Stent of Boston Scientific are used. Road map or overlay technique with a magnification of 20 to 28 inch is used to localize the stenosis during the procedure. Finally a control angiogram is performed to ensure correct placement of the stent. After successful completion of the procedure, the arterial access site is closed using a standard closure device.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Patients receive medical treatment including medical therapy with statins (at least 40mg simvastatin irrespective of the baseline cholesterol level) and clopidogrel (75mg daily). Further conservative medical treatment includes modification of cardiovascular risk factors according to current recommendations. Additionally patients will undergo carotid artery stenting using a filter wire protection device. Receives: Device: carotid artery stenting |
| 2 | No intervention | Patients receive medical treatment including medical therapy with statins (at least 40mg simvastatin daily irrespective of the baseline cholesterol level) and clopidogrel (75mg daily). Further conservative medical treatment includes modification of cardiovascular risk factors according to current recommendations |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary study endpoints: neurological events (ipsilateral and contralateral), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: composite of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death) and any death
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
in-stent restenosis after CAS, neuropsychological function, patient satisfaction, quality of life during follow up.
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jul 2007 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2004
- Primary completionJun 2010
- Study completionOct 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for AsymptomaticStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 148 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vienna General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Petra Dick, Vienna General Hospital
- Investigators
- Martin Schillinger, Prof. Dr., Principal investigator, General Hospital of Vienna
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00497094
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 471/2004
- Status last verified
- Feb 2013
- First submitted
- 5 Jul 2007
- Last updated
- 28 Feb 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Feb 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Stenting vs. Best Medical Treatment of Asymptomatic High Grade Carotid Artery Stenosis - a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00497094
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 471/2004
- Conditions
- Asymptomatic, Artery
- Keywords
- carotid artery stenting, atherosclerosis, cerebrovascular, stroke
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 148 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Vienna General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2004
- Primary completion
- Jun 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jul 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) recently has become an accepted method for treatment of patients with high-grade carotid artery stenosis, who are at an increased risk for surgical carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The reported rates of neurological complications of CAS substantially decreased during the past years, and the routine use of cerebral protection devices and low profile catheter systems have further increased the procedure´s safety. In the early 90's large surgical trials in North America and Europe (NASCET, ECST and ACAS) demonstrated superiority of CEA compared to best medical treatment for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Provided that the ongoing randomized controlled trials comparing CAS and CEA confirm equivalence between the these methods, CAS similar to CEA is applicable to symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with high grade carotid stenosis. However, particularly in asymptomatic patients, the indication for revascularisation remains debatable. Protected CAS is associated with a very low rate of neurological complications, which are below the AHA recommendation for treating asymptomatic patients (3%). However, the introduction of new vascular protective medications like statins and clopidogrel during the recent years substantially improved the spectrum of best medical treatment, and the findings of NASCET, ECST and ACAS with respect to best medical treatment may therefore not be applicable any more.
Study hypothesis and aims. Given the low frequency of spontaneous neurological complications, the preferable therapeutic approach to patients with asymptomatic high grade ( > 80%) carotid artery stenoses is currently unknown. Modern best medical treatment may manage to stabilize the atherosclerotic plaque, while CAS has the potential of resolving the carotid stenosis. Comparative data, however, are not available as yet. We hypothesized that protected CAS has a beneficial effect on occurrence of ipsilateral neurological complications and major adverse cardiac events in high-risk patients with asymptomatic > 80% internal carotid artery stenosis. Therefore, the aim of the present randomized controlled trial was to analyze neurological and cardiovascular outcome of patients treated with elective CAS plus best medical treatment compared to best medical treatment only.
Detailed description
Carotid artery stenting (CAS) recently has become an accepted method for treatment of patients with high-grade carotid artery stenosis, who are at an increased risk for surgical carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The reported rates of neurological complications of CAS substantially decreased during the past years, and the routine use of cerebral protection devices and low profile catheter systems have further increased the procedure´s safety. In the early 90ies large surgical trials in North America and Europe (NASCET, ECST and ACAS) demonstrated superiority of CEA compared to best medical treatment for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Provided that the ongoing randomized controlled trials comparing CAS and CEA confirm equivalence between the these methods, CAS similar to CEA is applicable to symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with high grade carotid stenosis. However, particularly in asymptomatic patients, the indication for revascularisation remains debatable. Protected CAS is associated with a very low rate of neurological complications, which are below the AHA recommendation for treating asymptomatic patients (3%). However, the introduction of new vascular protective medications like statins and clopidogrel during the recent years substantially improved the spectrum of best medical treatment, and the findings of NASCET, ECST and ACAS with respect to best medical treatment may therefore not be applicable any more.
Given the low frequency of spontaneous neurological complications, the preferable therapeutic approach to patients with asymptomatic high grade ( > 80%) carotid artery stenoses is currently unknown. Modern best medical treatment may manage to stabilize the atherosclerotic plaque, while CAS has the potential of resolving the carotid stenosis. Comparative data, however, are not available as yet. We hypothesized that protected CAS has a beneficial effect on occurrence of ipsilateral neurological complications and major adverse cardiac events in high-risk patients with asymptomatic > 80% internal carotid artery stenosis. Therefore, the aim of the present randomized controlled trial was to analyze neurological and cardiovascular outcome of patients treated with elective CAS plus best medical treatment compared to best medical treatment only.
SYNOPSIS
BACKGROUND:
The preferable treatment - whether revascularization or conservative - of asymptomatic high-risk patients with > 80% internal carotid artery stenosis (NASCET criteria) is currently unknown.
STUDY HYPOTHESIS:
We hypothesized that protected carotid artery stenting (CAS) plus best medical treatment is associated with reduced rates of ipsilateral neurological complications and major adverse cardiac events in high-risk patients with asymptomatic > 80% internal carotid artery stenosis compared to best medical treatment only.
STUDY DESIGN:
The study is designed as a randomized controlled trial with 1:1 random assignment between two treatment modalities including 300 patients within an scheduled inclusion period of 18 months. The primary and secondary study endpoints are evaluated for an initial two year follow-up period after randomization. Secondary follow-up will be performed for 1, 1.5, 3, 5 and 10 years post randomization.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Device: carotid artery stentingPatients receive medical treatment including medical therapy with statins (at least 40mg simvastatin irrespective of the baseline cholesterol level) and clopidogrel (75mg daily). Further conservative medical treatment includes modification of cardiovascular risk factors according to current recommendations. Additionally patients will undergo carotid artery stenting using a filter wire protection device. |
| 2 | No intervention | –Patients receive medical treatment including medical therapy with statins (at least 40mg simvastatin daily irrespective of the baseline cholesterol level) and clopidogrel (75mg daily). Further conservative medical treatment includes modification of cardiovascular risk factors according to current recommendations |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Atherosclerosis is the underlying disease
- Patients with an asymptomatic stenosis >80% (NASCET) with a documented progression of the degree of stenosis to >80% within 6 months with a very tight stenosis ≥90% at initial presentation with a >80% stenosis plus silent ipsilateral ischemia documented by CCT or MRI with ipsilateral >80% stenosis plus contralateral >80% stenosis or occlusion with >80% stenosis plus planned major surgery
- Neurologist´s explicit consent to potentially perform CAS
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Underlying disease other than atherosclerosis (inflammatory or autoimmune disease)
- Traumatic or spontaneous carotid dissections
- Life expectancy <6 months
- Advanced dementia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| carotid artery stentingUsing retrograde transfemoral access an overview aortic angiogram is established. A stiff wire is then placed in the external carotid or distal common carotid artery to introduce a long hydrophilic sheath into the common carotid artery. The stenosis is then crossed with a Filter wire. For stent implantation Monorail Carotid Wallstents or the Monorail Nitinol Stent of Boston Scientific are used. Road map or overlay technique with a magnification of 20 to 28 inch is used to localize the stenosis during the procedure. Finally a control angiogram is performed to ensure correct placement of the stent. After successful completion of the procedure, the arterial access site is closed using a standard closure device. | Device | 1 |
Primary outcome
Primary study endpoints: neurological events (ipsilateral and contralateral), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: composite of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death) and any death
Time frame: 24 months
1 secondary outcome
in-stent restenosis after CAS, neuropsychological function, patient satisfaction, quality of life during follow up.
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Feb 2013.
Related trials for Asymptomatic
Recruiting
Watchful Waiting Versus Immediate Repair for Occult Contralateral Inguinal Hernias.
Inguinal Hernia Bilateral, Inguinal Hernia Unilateral
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Early Treatment for Patients With High-Risk Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) or Small Lymphocytic Leukemia (SLL), EVOLVE CLL/SLL Study
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Performance of Multi-Cancer Detection Test in Asymptomatic Patients With Neoplastic Lesions
Cancer, Precancerous Lesion
Not yet recruitingObservational study
PET-MR Imaging of Natriuretic Peptide Receptor C (NPR-C) in Carotid Atherosclerosis With 64Cu-NODAGA-CANF (Multisite)
Carotid Atherosclerosis, Carotid Artery Stenosis Asymptomatic
Recruiting
Assessment of a Portable Digital Device for Quantified Analysis of Markerless Walking in Volunteers With Neuromuscular Diseases or Asymptomatic Volunteers
Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA), Charcot-Marie-Tooth
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Martin Schillinger, Prof. Dr. principal investigator
General Hospital of Vienna
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing carotid artery stenting in people with Asymptomatic and Artery, run by Vienna General Hospital at 1 site in Austria.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Feb 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary study endpoints: neurological events (ipsilateral and contralateral), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: composite of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death) and any death (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Feb 2013.