AzTrials
AzTrials

TBPhase 1NCT00480454

Safety, Immunogenicity, and Impact of MVA85A, on the Immunogenicity of the EPI Vaccines

A Phase 1 study testing MVA 85A in people with TB, run by University of Oxford at 1 site in The Gambia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is preliminary to proving that this vaccine could protect against tuberculosis in humans. Although there is no proven data to show that infants will benefit directly from participation in this study by being protected against TB, MVA85A protection of mice, guinea pigs and monkeys against tuberculosis is… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 3 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
TB
What is being tested?
MVA 85A
Type of treatment
Vaccines
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
214 participants
Where
1 siteThe Gambia
Study dates
Oct 2006to Dec 2009
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 3 months
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy infants aged 2 - 3 months
  • Recorded BCG vaccination within first two weeks of life with typical BCG scar on the left arm
  • Receiving standard EPI immunizations according to national immunization programme (DTwPHib at 2/3/4 months, OPV at birth, 1, 2 and 3 months, Hep B at birth, 2 \& 4 months)
  • Written informed consent by parent / guardian

Who cannot join

  • Any clinically significant abnormal finding on screening from biochemistry or haematology
  • Any AIDS defining illness
  • Prior receipt of a recombinant MVA or Fowlpox vaccine, or other experimental vaccine
  • Use of any investigational or non-registered drug, live vaccine or medical device other than the study vaccine within 2 weeks preceding dosing of study vaccine, or planned use during the study period
  • Administration of chronic (defined as more than 14 days) immunosuppressive drugs or other immune modifying drugs within 6 months of vaccination. (For corticosteroids, this will mean prednisolone, or equivalent, ≥ 0.5 mg/kg/day. Inhaled and topical steroids are allowed.)
  • History of allergic disease or reactions likely to be exacerbated by any component of the vaccine, e.g. egg products
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Presence of any underlying disease that compromises the diagnosis and evaluation of response to the vaccine
  • History of > 2 hospitalisations for invasive bacterial infections (pneumonia, meningitis)
  • Any other on-going chronic illness requiring hospital specialist supervision
  • Administration of immunoglobulins and/or any blood products within one month preceding the planned administration of the vaccine candidate
  • Any history of anaphylaxis in reaction to vaccination
  • Research Physician's assessment of lack of willingness by parents to participate and comply with all requirements of the protocol, or identification of any factor felt to significantly increase the infant's risk of suffering an adverse outcome
  • Likelihood of travel away from the study area
  • Untreated malaria infection

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

The Gambia1 site
  • MRC

    Banjul

Other trials in The Gambia

About this study

Official title: An Open Randomized Dose Selection Study Evaluating the Safety, Immunogenicity, and Impact of a TB Vaccine, MVA85A, on the Immunogenicity of EPI Vaccines Administered Simultaneously to Healthy Infants Previously Vaccinated With BCG.

This study is preliminary to proving that this vaccine could protect against tuberculosis in humans. Although there is no proven data to show that infants will benefit directly from participation in this study by being protected against TB, MVA85A protection of mice, guinea pigs and monkeys against tuberculosis is encouraging. It is hoped that the information gained from this study will contribute to the development of a safe and effective TB vaccine for HIV negative and positive individuals. Participants in this study will benefit by having information about their general health status, and the rigorous follow up visit that could enhance early detection and management of medical conditions that might arise in the course of the study.

Read the detailed description

Over the last 3 years Phase I studies with MVA85A allowed for sequential vaccination of volunteer groups with a step-wise increase in mycobacterial exposure, to minimize the possibility of a Koch reaction. Trials were also conducted sequentially in the UK and The Gambia, as there is a greater degree of exposure to both environmental mycobacteria and M.tb in The Gambia. A Koch reaction describes the development of immunopathology in a person or animal with tuberculosis, when an exaggerated immune response to M.tb is stimulated. It has now been demonstrated in the mouse model of therapeutic vaccination (Taylor et al, 2003). Available animal data suggest that these reactions do not occur in mice latently infected with M.tb, suggesting that such reactions may correlate with high bacterial load and that the Koch phenomenon may not pose a problem for vaccination of healthy albeit latently infected humans (Taylor et al, 2003).

In the UK, 14 mycobacterially and BCG naïve, healthy volunteers were vaccinated twice with 5 x 107pfu MVA85A, administered intradermally at 3 week intervals. MVA85A was found to be safe and well tolerated. A single vaccination with MVA85A induced remarkably high levels of specific effector T cell responses 1 week after vaccination (mean γ IFN Elispot response to PPD was 460 spots per million PBMC). MVA85A was also safe in 17 volunteers vaccinated with BCG in the previous 0.5-37 years. The safety profile of MVA85A in these 17 volunteers was the same as in the BCG naïve group. Interestingly, these 17 volunteers showed even higher peak levels of antigen specific T cells (mean response to PPD was 917 spots per million PBMC) 1 week post-vaccination than those immunized with MVA85A alone. Perhaps more importantly for the induction of T cell memory, these volunteers who were previously BCG vaccinated maintained significantly higher levels of antigen specific T cells after MVA85A for up to 24 weeks after vaccination, when compared to those volunteers vaccinated with either BCG or MVA85A alone (McShane et al, 2004). The next trial in the UK looked at the boosting efficacy of MVA85A when administered one month after BCG vaccination. 10 healthy, BCG naïve volunteers were vaccinated with BCG and one month later were boosted with MVA85A. Safety and boosting efficacy was comparable to the previous trial where the interval between BCG and MVA85A was 0.5-37 years.

2.3.2 Gambian studies Following the success of the trials with MVA85A in the UK, a collaboration with the MRC unit in The Gambia was initiated. MVA85A was first evaluated in Phase I clinical trials in BCG naïve subjects (n = 11) and subsequently in BCG primed subjects (n=10). In these studies the safety and immunogenicity profile is comparable to that seen in the UK studies. In both the UK and The Gambian studies, MVA85A induces 5-10 fold higher immune responses than any other recombinant MVA in clinical trials. The most likely explanation for this is that the volunteers have some weak pre-existing anti-mycobacterial immunity induced by exposure to environmental mycobacteria, and this is being boosted by vaccination with MVA85A. When MVA85A is administered to BCG naïve subjects in the Gambia, the magnitude and kinetics of response resemble the BCG primed group in the UK, a finding that is likely to represent a greater degree of environmental priming in tropical climates.

Taken together, over 600 people, including HIV positive and over 250 Gambian adults and children, have now been immunised with various recombinant MVA investigational vaccines including constructs expressing malaria, HIV, hepatitis B and melanoma antigens without significant adverse reactions (Hill, unpublished data). Furthermore, 190 children aged 1-5 years were vaccinated with a recombinant MVA expressing a malarial antigen in 2006, with no vaccine related SAEs (Hill, personal communication). This safety data now allows for progression to testing MVA85A in a phase II study in infants who have been vaccinated with BCG, in a Gambian population which may include low numbers of latently M.tb infected and HIV positive children.

It is important to test the safety, immunogenicity, and possible interference (detrimental, none or beneficial) with other EPI vaccines of the MVA85A vaccine in such a group, which is one of the potential target populations for a large-scale efficacy study. Also the effects of simultaneous EPI vaccine administration on the immunogenicity of MVA85A need to be evaluated.

Conditions
TB
Being tested
MVA 85A
Keywords
TB, Tuberculosis, Infants, EPI
Medical subject headings
Tuberculosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MVA 85ABiological

    Also called TB vaccine, modified vaccinia virus Ankara

    intradermal vaccine

Study groups in NCT00480454
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Active comparatorStage 1 would require 12 per group low dose and 12 per group high dose (total 72)
Receives: Biological: MVA 85A
2Active comparatorStage 2 would require 48 per group (total 144)
Receives: Biological: MVA 85A

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Dose selection, safety and immunogenicity of MVA85A vaccines in 4 month old healthy Gambian infants

    Measured: one year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Impact of MVA85A on the immunogenicity of EPI vaccines (DTwPHib, Hep B) and vice versa when administered simultaneously to children who have had BCG vaccine within the first two weeks of life.

    Measured: One year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 May 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2006
  3. Primary completionDec 2009
  4. Study completionDec 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
214 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00480454
Sponsor's protocol ID
TB012
Status last verified
Feb 2010
First submitted
30 May 2007
Last updated
9 Feb 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • McShane H, Pathan AA, Sander CR, Keating SM, Gilbert SC, Huygen K, Fletcher HA, Hill AV. Recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara expressing antigen 85A boosts BCG-primed and naturally acquired antimycobacterial immunity in humans. Nat Med. 2004 Nov;10(11):1240-4. doi: 10.1038/nm1128. Epub 2004 Oct 24.

    PubMed 15502839
  • Goonetilleke NP, McShane H, Hannan CM, Anderson RJ, Brookes RH, Hill AV. Enhanced immunogenicity and protective efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis of bacille Calmette-Guerin vaccine using mucosal administration and boosting with a recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara. J Immunol. 2003 Aug 1;171(3):1602-9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.3.1602.

    PubMed 12874255
  • Bejon P, Peshu N, Gilbert SC, Lowe BS, Molyneux CS, Forsdyke J, Lang T, Hill AV, Marsh K. Safety profile of the viral vectors of attenuated fowlpox strain FP9 and modified vaccinia virus Ankara recombinant for either of 2 preerythrocytic malaria antigens, ME-TRAP or the circumsporozoite protein, in children and adults in Kenya. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Apr 15;42(8):1102-10. doi: 10.1086/501459. Epub 2006 Mar 14.

    PubMed 16575727
  • Huygen K, Content J, Denis O, Montgomery DL, Yawman AM, Deck RR, DeWitt CM, Orme IM, Baldwin S, D'Souza C, Drowart A, Lozes E, Vandenbussche P, Van Vooren JP, Liu MA, Ulmer JB. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a tuberculosis DNA vaccine. Nat Med. 1996 Aug;2(8):893-8. doi: 10.1038/nm0896-893.

    PubMed 8705859

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing MVA 85A in people with TB, run by University of Oxford at 1 site in The Gambia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in The Gambia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Dose selection, safety and immunogenicity of MVA85A vaccines in 4 month old healthy Gambian infants (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00480454, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in