HERNIA, VENTRALProLOVENCT00472537
ProLOVE - Prospective Randomized Study of Midline Incisional Hernia Treatment
An observational study of HERNIA, VENTRAL, run by Skane University Hospital at 7 sites in Sweden.
Trial summary
This purpose of this study is to compare the recovery after an operation of an incisional hernia within the limits of the rectus muscles of the abdominal wall. The use of a mesh in the repair of a postoperative hernia is considered obligatory. Placement of a retromuscular mesh is done by open or laparoscopic surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HERNIA, VENTRAL
- What is being tested?
- Retromuscular Mesh repair of midline incisional hernia and Laparoscopic repair of midline incisional hernia
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 157 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesSweden
- Study dates
- Nov 2005to Nov 2010
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients referred to specialist centers for treatment of midline incisional hernias.
Who may be able to join
- Age over 18 years
- Postoperative hernias in the region of the recti abdomini muscles with a defect of less than 10 cm transversal width
- No contraindications to laparoscopic procedure
- The patient should be able to adequate ventilation/respiration after reduction of hernia contents
- Indications for elective surgery
Who cannot join
- Pregnant women
- Prior operation of abdominal hernia with mesh placement in the compartment of the rectus abdominus muscle (i.e. prior onlay mesh is acceptable)
- Need of an interpreter
- Current drug abuse, mental disorder or other condition which makes the patient incapable of postoperative follow up
- Body Mass index (BMI) >40
- Other planned concurrent operation
Show all 15Show fewer
- Current oral steroid treatment, or other immune system modulating treatment
- Incarcerated incisional hernias
- Parastomal hernias
- Prior history of open abdomen
- Enterocutaneous fistula or cutaneous infection
- Hepatic cirrhosis or ascites
- Generalized malignancy
- History of radiation treatment in the abdomen.
- ASA >III
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country.
7 sites in 1 country
Sweden7 sites
Arvika Hospital, Department of Surgery
Arvika, SE-671 80
Helsingborg Hospital, Department of Surgery
Helsingborg, 251 87
Lund University Hospital, Department of Surgery
Lund, SE-222 41
Malmö University Hospital, Department of Surgery
Malmö, Malmö, 20502
Mora Hospital, Department of Surgery
Mora, SE-792 85
Södertälje Hospital, Department of Surgery
Södertälje, SE-152 86
Västerås Central Hospital, Department of Surgery
Västerås, SE-721 89
About this study
Official title: Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Open vs. Laparoscopic Operation of Ventral Incisional Eventrations. A Swedish Multicenter Study
This purpose of this study is to compare the recovery after an operation of an incisional hernia within the limits of the rectus muscles of the abdominal wall. The use of a mesh in the repair of a postoperative hernia is considered obligatory. Placement of a retromuscular mesh is done by open or laparoscopic surgery. Focus is on the recovery phase assuming a less painful recovery after a laparoscopic procedure.
Read the detailed description
Incisional ventral hernia after abdominal surgery is a fairly common condition. In recent years the use of a prosthesis in the repair procedure has proved very effective in preventing a new hernia. A retromuscular mesh placement seems to have superior results. The mesh may be placed retromuscular through an open surgical procedure or through a laparoscopic procedure in an intra-abdominal position. Both procedures are highly standardized. A heavy weight mesh is used in the open procedure, fixed in the midline only, and a composite mesh is used intraabdominally and fixed only with titanium tackers.
SF-36 is used to assess the quality of life, and its subscale BP (bodily pain) is used as primary outcome 3 weeks postoperatively. Secondary endpoints are return to daily life, pain, complications, recurrence, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome.
Subjects are assessed at 1,3,8 weeks post operation and after 12 months.
- Conditions
- HERNIA, VENTRAL
- Being tested
- Retromuscular Mesh repair of midline incisional hernia, Laparoscopic repair of midline incisional hernia
- Keywords
- Ventral hernia, Incisional hernia
- Medical subject headings
- Hernia, Ventral, Incisional Hernia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Retromuscular Mesh repair of midline incisional herniaProcedure or surgery
Laparoscopic repair of midline incisional herniaProcedure or surgery
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Postoperative pain recorded in SF-36
Pain measured 3 weeks after surgery in SF36 subscale Bodily Pain
Measured: 3 weeks after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 May 2007 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2005
- Primary completionNov 2010
- Study completionNov 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HERNIA, VENTRALStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 157 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Skane University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Region Skane, Lund University, Ethicon, Inc., The Einar & Inga Nilsson Foundation, The Anna-Lisa & Sven-Eric Lundgren Foundation, Malmö Sweden, Crafoord Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Peder Rogmark, Skane University Hospital
- Investigators
- Agneta Montgomery, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Malmo University Hospital, Lund University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00472537
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LU030123PR
- Other IDs
- 200-06-005
- Acronym
- ProLOVE
- Status last verified
- Apr 2013
- First submitted
- 10 May 2007
- Last updated
- 24 Apr 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Rogmark P, Ekberg O, Montgomery A. Long-term retromuscular and intraperitoneal mesh size changes within a randomized controlled trial on incisional hernia repair, including a review of the literature. Hernia. 2017 Oct;21(5):687-696. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1624-9. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
PubMed 28634690Rogmark P, Petersson U, Bringman S, Eklund A, Ezra E, Sevonius D, Smedberg S, Osterberg J, Montgomery A. Short-term outcomes for open and laparoscopic midline incisional hernia repair: a randomized multicenter controlled trial: the ProLOVE (prospective randomized trial on open versus laparoscopic operation of ventral eventrations) trial. Ann Surg. 2013 Jul;258(1):37-45. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828fe1b2.
PubMed 23629524
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Apr 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Open vs. Laparoscopic Operation of Ventral Incisional Eventrations. A Swedish Multicenter Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00472537
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ProLOVE / LU030123PR
- Conditions
- HERNIA, VENTRAL
- Keywords
- Ventral hernia, Incisional hernia
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 157 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Skane University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Region Skane, Lund University, Ethicon, Inc., The Einar & Inga Nilsson Foundation, The Anna-Lisa & Sven-Eric Lundgren Foundation, Malmö Sweden, Crafoord Foundation
- Study start
- Nov 2005
- Primary completion
- Nov 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 May 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This purpose of this study is to compare the recovery after an operation of an incisional hernia within the limits of the rectus muscles of the abdominal wall. The use of a mesh in the repair of a postoperative hernia is considered obligatory. Placement of a retromuscular mesh is done by open or laparoscopic surgery. Focus is on the recovery phase assuming a less painful recovery after a laparoscopic procedure.
Detailed description
Incisional ventral hernia after abdominal surgery is a fairly common condition. In recent years the use of a prosthesis in the repair procedure has proved very effective in preventing a new hernia. A retromuscular mesh placement seems to have superior results. The mesh may be placed retromuscular through an open surgical procedure or through a laparoscopic procedure in an intra-abdominal position. Both procedures are highly standardized. A heavy weight mesh is used in the open procedure, fixed in the midline only, and a composite mesh is used intraabdominally and fixed only with titanium tackers.
SF-36 is used to assess the quality of life, and its subscale BP (bodily pain) is used as primary outcome 3 weeks postoperatively. Secondary endpoints are return to daily life, pain, complications, recurrence, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome.
Subjects are assessed at 1,3,8 weeks post operation and after 12 months.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients referred to specialist centers for treatment of midline incisional hernias.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age over 18 years
- Postoperative hernias in the region of the recti abdomini muscles with a defect of less than 10 cm transversal width
- No contraindications to laparoscopic procedure
- The patient should be able to adequate ventilation/respiration after reduction of hernia contents
- Indications for elective surgery
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Pregnant women
- Prior operation of abdominal hernia with mesh placement in the compartment of the rectus abdominus muscle (i.e. prior onlay mesh is acceptable)
- Need of an interpreter
- Current drug abuse, mental disorder or other condition which makes the patient incapable of postoperative follow up
- Body Mass index (BMI) >40
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Retromuscular Mesh repair of midline incisional hernia | Procedure or surgery | – |
| Laparoscopic repair of midline incisional hernia | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Postoperative pain recorded in SF-36
Time frame: 3 weeks after surgery
Pain measured 3 weeks after surgery in SF36 subscale Bodily Pain
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Apr 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28634690Rogmark P, Ekberg O, Montgomery A. Long-term retromuscular and intraperitoneal mesh size changes within a randomized controlled trial on incisional hernia repair, including a review of the literature. Hernia. 2017 Oct;21(5):687-696. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1624-9. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23629524Rogmark P, Petersson U, Bringman S, Eklund A, Ezra E, Sevonius D, Smedberg S, Osterberg J, Montgomery A. Short-term outcomes for open and laparoscopic midline incisional hernia repair: a randomized multicenter controlled trial: the ProLOVE (prospective randomized trial on open versus laparoscopic operation of ventral eventrations) trial. Ann Surg. 2013 Jul;258(1):37-45. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828fe1b2.
Related trials for HERNIA, VENTRAL
Recruiting
Duramesh Versus Minimally Invasive IPOM for High-Risk Umbilical Hernia Repairs
Umbilical Hernia, Ventral Hernia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Assessment of GORE® SYNECOR Biomaterial in Focused Patient Populations and Long-Term Application
Hernia, Ventral, Hernia Incisional
Recruiting
GORE® ENFORM Biomaterial Product Study
Hernia, Ventral, Hernia, Hiatal
RecruitingPhase 4
Preoperative BOTOX® Injection for Large Ventral Hernia Repair
Hernia Abdominal Wall, Botox Injection
Not yet recruiting
SUTURE TYPE AND RECURRENCE RISK AFTER INCISIONAL HERNIA REPAIR
Ventral Incisional Hernia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Agneta Montgomery, MD, PhD principal investigator
Malmo University Hospital, Lund University
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of HERNIA, VENTRAL, run by Skane University Hospital at 7 sites in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Postoperative pain recorded in SF-36 (time frame: 3 weeks after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00472537, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2013.