AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsPhase 3ENESTNCT00471328

Efficacy and Safety of Nilotinib (AMN107) Compared With Current Treatment Options in Patients With GIST Who Have Failed Both Imatinib and Sunitinib

A Phase 3 study testing Nilotinib in people with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 35 sites in 13 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study evaluated the safety and efficacy of nilotinib versus current treatment in adults with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) who have either progressed or who were intolerant to the first and second line treatments. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
What is being tested?
Nilotinib
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
248 participants
Where
35 sitesin 13 countries
Study dates
Mar 2007to Jun 2011
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Radiological confirmation of disease progression during imatinib and sunitinib therapy OR intolerance to imatinib and/or sunitinib
  • At least one measurable site of disease on CT/MRI scan
  • Physically fit even if not able to work
  • Normal organ, electrolyte, and bone marrow function
  • Patients whose tumors had progressed on the control arm and had crossed over to the nilotinib arm.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • The study was stopped due to meeting the primary efficacy endpoint of PFS at the interim analysis.
  • Patients who were still being treated at the close of the Core study on the control arm or nilotinib arm (whose tumors have not progressed at the time of the end of the Core study).
  • Patients must have had documented, confirmed stable, partial or complete response as defined by the RECIST criteria at the time of entry into the Extension study with the exception of patients who had progressed on the control arm.

Who cannot join

  • Previous treatment with nilotinib or any other drug in this class or other targeted therapy
  • Treatment with any cytotoxic and/or investigational cytotoxic drug ≤ 4 weeks prior to study entry
  • Impaired cardiac function
  • Use of coumarin derivatives (i.e. warfarin, acenocoumarol, phenprocoumon)
  • Women who are pregnant or lactating
  • Use of other anticancer treatments or investigational drugs (with exception of the study drugs)
  • Patients with a history of noncompliance with study drug treatment in the Core study protocol.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria applied

Trial locations and contacts

35 sites in 13 countries.

35 sites in 13 countries

United States11 sites
  • Dana Farber Cancer Institute

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • University of Chicago Hospital

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • Wayne State University/Wertz Clinical Cancer Center

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • University of Texas/MD Anderson Cancer Center

    Houston, Texas, 77030-4009

  • UCLA's Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • St. Vincent's Comprehensive Cancer Center

    New York, New York, 10011

  • Fox Chase Cancer Center

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111-2497

  • Washington University School of Medicine - Siteman Cancer Center

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

  • Washington Hospital Center - Washington Cancer Institute

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010-2965

  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157-1082

Other trials in United States

Germany9 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Berlin

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cologne

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Düsseldorf

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Essen

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Frankfurt

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hanover

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Mannheim

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    München

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tübingen

Other trials in Germany

France3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bordeaux

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lyon

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Marseille

Other trials in France

Australia2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Auchenflower, Queensland, 4066

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002

Other trials in Australia

Italy2 sites
  • Novrtis Investigative Site

    Bologna

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Milan

Other trials in Italy

Austria1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Vienna

Other trials in Austria

Canada1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Toronto

Other trials in Canada

Czechia1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Prague

Other trials in Czechia

Netherlands1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Leiden

Other trials in Netherlands

Poland1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Warsaw

Other trials in Poland

South Korea1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

Spain1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid

Other trials in Spain

Switzerland1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Chur

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Nilotinib Versus Best Supportive Care With or Without a Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (Investigator's Choice) in Adult Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Resistant to Both Imatinib and Sunitinib

The study evaluated the safety and efficacy of nilotinib versus current treatment in adults with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) who have either progressed or who were intolerant to the first and second line treatments.

Being tested
Nilotinib, Best Supportive Care (BSC) +/- imatinib or sunitinib
Keywords
GIST, adults, imatinib resistant, sunitinib resistant, AMN107, nilotinib, treatment, Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)
Medical subject headings
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NilotinibDrug

    Also called AMN107, Tasigna®

    Nilotinib 400 mg twice daily (bid)

  • Best Supportive Care (BSC) +/- imatinib or sunitinibOther

    Can include pain medication, localized radiotherapy, nutritional support, and/or oxygen therapy and blood transfusions. Imatinib or sunitinib can be administered at the last tolerated dose and regimen or at the Investigator's choice.

Study groups in NCT00471328
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NilotinibExperimental400mg twice daily in core and extension phases of the study.
Receives: Drug: Nilotinib
Control/cross-over to NilotinibActive comparatorIn core study phase, patients in this arm received Best Supportive Care (BSC) with or without imatinib or sunitinib at the last tolerated dose or at the investigator's choice until documented disease progression followed by cross-over to nilotinib arm. Patients entering the extension study on this control arm were permitted to cross over to nilotinib arm only upon documented disease progression.
Receives: Drug: Nilotinib; Other: Best Supportive Care (BSC) +/- imatinib or sunitinib

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS) From Central Radiology Review Based on Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off: June, 2008)

    Progression-free survival (PFS) is the time from date of randomization to the date of first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a participant has not had an event, progression-free survival is censored at the time of last adequate tumor assessment. Progression is defined according to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (modified RECIST) criteria as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, worsening of the non-target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions.

    Measured: Up to 16 months

  2. Progression-free Survival (PFS) From Local Investigator's Assessment Based on Treatment Crossover Analysis Set

    PFS is defined as the time from the first date of cross-over to nilotinib therapy from the control arm to the date of the first observation of documented disease progression. Tumor assessment was based on the local investigator's measurement using Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (modified RECIST) criteria. Progression is defined according to modified RECIST criteria as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, worsening of the non-target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions.

    Measured: Up to 34 months

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Overall Survival Based on Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off:June, 2008)

    Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. If a participant is not known to have died, survival will be censored at the date of last contact.

    Measured: Up to 16 months

  2. Overall Survival During Core and Extension Phases of the Study

    Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. If a participant is not known to have died, survival will be censored at the date of last contact. This analysis included both Core and Extension data as well as survival follow up data.

    Measured: Up to 50 months (including core, extension and follow up period)

  3. Overall Survival for Treatment Crossover Analysis Set

    For patients who crossed-over to nilotinib from the control arm, the overall survival was the time from the first dose date of nilotinib after switching from control arm to the date of death due to any cause. If death was not observed, the OS was censored at the latest date the patient was known to be alive.

    Measured: Up to 34 months

  4. Number of Responders With Confirmed Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) From Central Radiology Review During Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off: June, 2008)

    The best overall response is the best response recorded from randomization until disease progression. The CR/PR must be confirmed by at least two determinations at least 4 weeks apart before progression. Using modified RECIST criteria, a Complete Response is defined as disappearance of all lesions, and a Partial Response is defined as either 1) at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions and no new lesions or progression of non-target lesions or 2) disappearance of all target lesions but persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s).

    Measured: Up to 16 months

  5. Number of Responders With Confirmed Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) From Local Investigator's Assessment Based on Treatment Crossover Analysis Set

    The best overall response (CR/PR) must be confirmed by at least two determinations at least 4 weeks apart before progression. Using modified RECIST criteria, a Complete Response is defined as disappearance of all lesions, and a Partial Response is defined as either 1) at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions and no new lesions or progression of non-target lesions or 2) disappearance of all target lesions but persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s).

    Measured: Up to 34 months

  6. Overall Clinical Benefit (Complete Response [CR]/Partial Response [PR] or Stable Disease [SD]) From Central Radiology Review Based on Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off: June, 2008)

    The overall clinical benefit includes the best overall responses of CR, PR, or SD. The best overall responses of CR/PR must be confirmed by at least two determinations at least 4 weeks apart before progression. The best overall response of SD must have at least one SD (or better) at least 6 weeks (or 6 months or 12 months as applicable) after randomization but before progression.

    Measured: Up to 16 months

  7. Overall Clinical Benefit (Complete Response [CR]/Partial Response [PR] or Stable Disease [SD]) From Local Investigator's Assessment Based on Treatment Crossover Analysis Set

    The overall clinical benefit includes the best overall responses of CR, PR, or SD. The best overall responses of CR/PR must be confirmed by at least two determinations at least 4 weeks apart before progression. The best overall response of SD must have at least one SD (or better) at least 6 weeks (or 6 months or 12 months as applicable) after randomization but before progression.

    Measured: Up to 34 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 May 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2007
  3. Primary completionAug 2008
  4. Study completionJun 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
248 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00471328
Sponsor's protocol ID
CAMN107A2201
Other IDs
2006-002267-11
Acronym
ENEST
Status last verified
Jun 2012
First submitted
26 Apr 2007
Last updated
12 Jun 2012
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Nilotinib in people with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 35 sites in 13 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 35 sites in United States, Germany, France, Australia, Italy and 8 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 May 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression-free Survival (PFS) From Central Radiology Review Based on Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off: June, 2008) (time frame: Up to 16 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in