AzTrials
AzTrials

Arthritis, RheumatoidPhase 2NCT00463424

Comparison of NeuFlex and Swanson Metacarpophalangeal Implants for Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Phase 2 study testing NeuFlex metacarpophalangeal implant and Swanson metacarpophalangeal implant in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Unity Health Toronto at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main hypotheses for this study are as follows: 1. The use of NeuFlex implant results in flexion in the fourth and fifth MP joints that is at least 10 degrees greater than with teh use of the Swanson implant. 2. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What is being tested?
NeuFlex metacarpophalangeal implant and Swanson metacarpophalangeal implant
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Oct 2000to Aug 2005
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • primary metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty of all 4 digits

Who cannot join

  • diagnosis of other connective tissue disorder (e.g. SLE, MCTD)
  • previous surgery of MP joints
  • revision metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • St. Michael's Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: NeuFlex and Swanson Metacarpophalangeal Implants for Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The main hypotheses for this study are as follows:

  1. The use of NeuFlex implant results in flexion in the fourth and fifth MP joints that is at least 10 degrees greater than with teh use of the Swanson implant.
  2. The use of the NeuFlex implant is associated with a significantly (2.5 kg or more) greater grip strength than with the use of the Swanson implant.
Read the detailed description

Many studies have evaluated metacarpophalangeal joint (MP) range of motion following Swanson arthroplasty. These studies report that overall MP flexion is restricted postoperatively. They do not usually report individual range of motion values for each digit. Therefore one cannot identify if the degree of MP flexion restriction differs by digit.

We, and others, have observed that MP flexion is particularly restricted in the ring and litter finger following Swanson arthroplasty.

There is a new implant (NeuFlex), which instead of being introduced in full extension, like the Swanson implant, has a resting position of 30 degrees of flexion. As MP flexion is particularly restricted in the ring and little finger, an implant that by design encourages flexion may be helpful. A need exists to establish if the use of the NeuFlex implant produces greater MP flexion in the ring and little finger where restricted flexion has been identified as a problem.

Being tested
NeuFlex metacarpophalangeal implant, Swanson metacarpophalangeal implant
Keywords
Metacarpophalangeal Joint, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Range of Motion, Articular, Randomized Controlled Trials, Swanson, NeuFlex
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NeuFlex metacarpophalangeal implantDevice

  • Swanson metacarpophalangeal implantDevice

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Maximum active postoperative MP flexion

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Maximum active postoperative MP extension

  2. Maximum active postoperative MP arc of motion

  3. Ulnar drift

  4. Jamar grip strength

  5. Sollerman Hand Function Score

  6. Michigan Hand Questionnaire

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Apr 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2000
  3. Study completionAug 2005

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Enrolment
40 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00463424
Sponsor's protocol ID
REB#2K-049C
Status last verified
Apr 2007
First submitted
19 Apr 2007
Last updated
20 Apr 2007
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Delaney R, Trail IA, Nuttall D. A comparative study of outcome between the Neuflex and Swanson metacarpophalangeal joint replacements. J Hand Surg Br. 2005 Feb;30(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.10.013.

    PubMed 15620484
  • Erdogan A, Weiss AP. [NeuFlex Silastic implant in metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty]. Orthopade. 2003 Sep;32(9):789-93. doi: 10.1007/s00132-003-0524-0. German.

    PubMed 14508644
  • Joyce TI, Unsworth A. NeuFlex metacarpophalangeal prostheses tested in vitro. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2005;219(2):105-10. doi: 10.1243/095441105X9192.

    PubMed 15819481
  • Weiss AP, Moore DC, Infantolino C, Crisco JJ, Akelman E, McGovern RD. Metacarpophalangeal joint mechanics after 3 different silicone arthroplasties. J Hand Surg Am. 2004 Sep;29(5):796-803. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.04.023.

    PubMed 15465227

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing NeuFlex metacarpophalangeal implant and Swanson metacarpophalangeal implant in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Unity Health Toronto at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Apr 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Maximum active postoperative MP flexion. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00463424, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Apr 2007.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in