AzTrials
AzTrials

MalariaNCT00461578

Tolerability and Efficacy of CD+A Compared to AQ+SP for the Treatment of P.Falciparum Malaria in Rwandan Children

A study testing Chlorproguanil-dapsone + artesunate in people with Malaria, run by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine at 1 site in Rwanda.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In 2005-2006, a clinical trial was carried out to test safety, tolerability and efficacy of the combination chlorproguanil-dapsone+artesunate (CD+A): 800 children aged 12-59 months with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria randomly allocated to AQ+SP or CD+A were followed up until day 28 after treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 59 months
Conditions the study is for
Malaria
What is being tested?
Chlorproguanil-dapsone + artesunate
How many people
800 participants
Where
1 siteRwanda
Study dates
Apr 2005to Oct 2006
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 59 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Age 12-59 months;
  • Weight ≥5 kg;
  • Monoinfection with P. falciparum;
  • Parasite density between 2,000-200,000/µL;
  • Fever (axillary body temperature =>37.5C) or history of fever in the preceding 24 hours;
  • Packed Cell Volume (PCV) >21%.

Who cannot join

  • Severe malaria;
  • Mixed malaria infection;
  • Any other concomitant illness or underlying disease;
  • Known allergy to the study drugs being used in this trial;
  • Clear history of adequate antimalarial treatment in the previous 72 hours.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Rwanda1 site
  • Programme Nationale Integre de Lutte contre le Paludisme

    Kigali, BP 2514

Other trials in Rwanda

About this study

Official title: Open Study on the Tolerability and Efficacy of the Combination Chlorproguanil-Dapsone+Artesunate Compared to Amodiaquine+Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria in Rwandan Children

In 2005-2006, a clinical trial was carried out to test safety, tolerability and efficacy of the combination chlorproguanil-dapsone+artesunate (CD+A): 800 children aged 12-59 months with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria randomly allocated to AQ+SP or CD+A were followed up until day 28 after treatment. Adverse events, clinical and parasitological outcomes were recorded.

Read the detailed description

Between 2001 and 2006, as an interim strategy, Rwanda chose amodiaquine+ sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (AQ+SP) as the first line anti-malaria treatment. Although the clinical response to this combination was relatively good in 2001, since then its efficacy has steadily declined: in 2002 the proportion of successful treatment (recorded at 28 days and PCR-unadjusted) was 83 % (Rwagacondo et al., 2003) and in 2003 it was 74% (Karema et al., 2006). Different artemisinin-based combination treatments (ACTs) such as amodiaquine+artesunate (AQ+AS), dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHAPPQ) and artemether-lumefantrine (ALN) have been tested in the past few years as possible alternatives to AQ+SP (Fanello et al., 2006; Karema et al., 2006).

Chlorproguanil-dapsone (also known asLapDap) is an antifolate combination similar to sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP) but for two important features: (1) it is rapidly eliminated and therefore exerts less selective pressure for resistance-conferring parasite mutations than does SP (Winstanley et al., 1997; Nzila et al., 2000b) and (2) it is active against the SP-resistant forms of the parasite that are found in Africa (Mutabingwa et al., 2001a,b; Kublin et al., 2002). Moreover, a pediatric course of treatment of LapDap is estimated to cost $0.15 (Mutabingwa et al., 2001b), making it orders of magnitude less expensive than any marketed antimalarial drug other than chloroquine and SP.

In 2005-2006, a clinical trial was carried out to test safety, tolerability and efficacy of the combination chlorproguanil-dapsone+artesunate (CD+A): 800 children aged 12-59 months with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria randomly allocated to AQ+SP or CD+A were followed up until day 28 after treatment. Adverse events, clinical and parasitological outcomes were recorded.

Based on the results of all trials carried out by the NMCP, The Rwandan Ministry of Health has now changed the first line to artemether-lumefantrine (ALN), Coartem®. The drug arrived in the country in October 2006.

Conditions
Malaria
Being tested
Chlorproguanil-dapsone + artesunate
Keywords
P.falciparum, malaria, lapdap+artesunate, safety, efficay
Medical subject headings
Malaria

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Chlorproguanil-dapsone + artesunateDrug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of microscopically and genotypically confirmed recrudescent infections in the different treatment groups by day 28

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Parasite clearance

  2. Fever clearance

  3. Occurrence of adverse events

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Apr 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2005
  3. Study completionOct 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
800 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00461578
Sponsor's protocol ID
CDA/RWD/2006
Status last verified
Apr 2007
First submitted
16 Apr 2007
Last updated
18 Apr 2007
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Fanello CI, Karema C, Avellino P, Bancone G, Uwimana A, Lee SJ, d'Alessandro U, Modiano D. High risk of severe anaemia after chlorproguanil-dapsone+artesunate antimalarial treatment in patients with G6PD (A-) deficiency. PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e4031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004031. Epub 2008 Dec 29.

    PubMed 19112496
  • Fanello CI, Karema C, Ngamije D, Uwimana A, Ndahindwa V, Van Overmeir C, Van Doren W, Curtis J, D'Alessandro U. A randomised trial to assess the efficacy and safety of chlorproguanil/dapsone + artesunate for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008 May;102(5):412-20. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.01.013. Epub 2008 Mar 6.

    PubMed 18328518

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Chlorproguanil-dapsone + artesunate in people with Malaria, run by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine at 1 site in Rwanda.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Rwanda. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of microscopically and genotypically confirmed recrudescent infections in the different treatment groups by day 28. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00461578, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2007.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in