Acute Bronchial Obstruction, AsthmaPhase 4NCT00460577
Efficacy of Formoterol vs Ipatropioum Bromide Plus Fenoterol in Children (5-<12 Years) With Acute Bronchial Obstruction
A Phase 4 study testing Formoterol fumerate and fenoterol/ipratropium bromide in people with Acute Bronchial Obstruction, Asthma, run by Novartis at 2 sites in Venezuela.
Trial summary
To determine efficacy and tolerability of inhaled Formoterol vs nebulized Ipatropioum Bromide plus Fenoterol in cumulative sequential doses in asthmatic children (5-<12 years) with acute bronchial obstruction attending emergency services Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 12 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Bronchial Obstruction, Asthma
- What is being tested?
- Formoterol fumerate and fenoterol/ipratropium bromide
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesVenezuela
- Study dates
- Mar 2007to Sep 2008
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 12 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Asthmatic children 5-<12 years old, requiring emergency services for acute bronchial obstruction mild to moderate determined by functional and clinical evidence
Who cannot join
- Patients with severe acute bronchial obstruction determined by functional and clinical evidence
- Patients unable to use the inhaling device at time of treatment
- Patients who received a bronchodilator drug within the last 12 hours
- Patients who received inhaled steroids within the last 72 hours
- Patients who received systemic steroids within the last 7 days
- Patients with near fatal asthma history
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patients with fever (>38.5°C axillar temp)
- Patients with any clinical significance condition
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Venezuela2 sites
Novartis Investigator site - five sites in Caracas
Caracas
Novartis Investigator Site
Maracaibo
About this study
Official title: Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Placebo Controlled Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Formoterol vs Ipatropioum Bromide Plus Fenoterol in Asthmatic Children (5-<12 Years) With Acute Bronchial Obstruction Attending Emergency Services
To determine efficacy and tolerability of inhaled Formoterol vs nebulized Ipatropioum Bromide plus Fenoterol in cumulative sequential doses in asthmatic children (5-<12 years) with acute bronchial obstruction attending emergency services
- Conditions
- Acute Bronchial Obstruction, Asthma
- Being tested
- Formoterol fumerate, fenoterol/ipratropium bromide
- Keywords
- Asthma, Formoterol, Bronchial Obstruction, Children
- Medical subject headings
- Asthma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Formoterol fumerateDrug
12 micrograms stat (twice if necessary). Inhaled via aerolizer
fenoterol/ipratropium bromideDrug
0.5 micrograms/0.25 milligrams (20 drops) inhaled via nebulization diluted in 3cc of 0.9% saline.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Formoterol (Foradil®) | Active comparator | Formoterol (Foradil®) 12 micrograms administered through Aerolizer®. Receives: Drug: Formoterol fumerate |
| Fenoterol 0.5 mg + Ipratropium Bromide (Berodual®) 0.25 mg | Active comparator | Fenoterol 0.5 mg + Ipratropium Bromide (Berodual®) 0.25 mg 20 drops in 3 mL of saline solution nebulized. Receives: Drug: fenoterol/ipratropium bromide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change in Maximum Expiratory Flow From Baseline to Final Evaluation
Mean Change from Baseline to Final Evaluation in the Per Protocol population assessed by Maximum Expiratory Flow.
Measured: Baseline,4 hours
Mean Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) From Baseline to Final Evaluation
Mean Change from Baseline to Final Evaluation in the Per Protocol population assessed by Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second. FEV1 is defined as the volume of air that can be forced out of the lungs in 1 second after taking a deep breath.
Measured: Baseline,4 hours
Mean Change in Pulse Oxymetry From Baseline to Final Evaluation
Mean Change from Baseline to Final Evaluation in the Per Protocol population assessed by Pulse Oximetry used to monitor the percentage of oxygen saturation of hemoglobin in the blood.
Measured: Baseline, 4 hours
Mean Change in the Conway Clinical Scale Score From Baseline to Final Evaluation
Mean Change from Baseline to Final Evaluation in the Per Protocol population assessed by the Conway Clinical Scale. Assessment of the following: Wheezing, Accessory Muscle Use and Pulse Frequency in a 0 to 3 point scale according to severity for a minimum of 0 points and a total of 9 points in a very severe clinical case.
Measured: Baseline,4 hours
Secondary outcomes (2)
Safety Assessed by: Pulse Oxymetry, Clinical Assessments, Adverse Events
Not posted: see comment in Limitations and Caveats.
Measured: 4 hours
Pharmacoeconomic Analysis
Pharmacoeconomic analysis comparing the mean direct costs (total cost per prescription) of treatment with Formoterol (Foradil®) to treatment with Fenoterol 0.5 mg + Berodual®.
Measured: 4 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2007
- Primary completionSep 2008
- Study completionSep 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Acute Bronchial Obstruction, AsthmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Novartis de Venezuela, Study chair, Novartis de Venezuela
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00460577
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CFOR258DVE02
- Status last verified
- Mar 2011
- First submitted
- 13 Apr 2007
- Last updated
- 19 Apr 2011
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Apr 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Placebo Controlled Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Formoterol vs Ipatropioum Bromide Plus Fenoterol in Asthmatic Children (5-<12 Years) With Acute Bronchial Obstruction Attending Emergency Services
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00460577
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CFOR258DVE02
- Conditions
- Acute Bronchial Obstruction, Asthma
- Keywords
- Asthma, Formoterol, Bronchial Obstruction, Children
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NovartisIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2007
- Primary completion
- Sep 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Apr 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To determine efficacy and tolerability of inhaled Formoterol vs nebulized Ipatropioum Bromide plus Fenoterol in cumulative sequential doses in asthmatic children (5-<12 years) with acute bronchial obstruction attending emergency services
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Formoterol (Foradil®) | Active comparator | Drug: Formoterol fumerateFormoterol (Foradil®) 12 micrograms administered through Aerolizer®. |
| Fenoterol 0.5 mg + Ipratropium Bromide (Berodual®) 0.25 mg | Active comparator | Drug: fenoterol/ipratropium bromideFenoterol 0.5 mg + Ipratropium Bromide (Berodual®) 0.25 mg 20 drops in 3 mL of saline solution nebulized. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 12 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Asthmatic children 5-<12 years old, requiring emergency services for acute bronchial obstruction mild to moderate determined by functional and clinical evidence
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients with severe acute bronchial obstruction determined by functional and clinical evidence
- Patients unable to use the inhaling device at time of treatment
- Patients who received a bronchodilator drug within the last 12 hours
- Patients who received inhaled steroids within the last 72 hours
- Patients who received systemic steroids within the last 7 days
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Formoterol fumerate12 micrograms stat (twice if necessary). Inhaled via aerolizer | Drug | Formoterol (Foradil®) |
| fenoterol/ipratropium bromide0.5 micrograms/0.25 milligrams (20 drops) inhaled via nebulization diluted in 3cc of 0.9% saline. | Drug | Fenoterol 0.5 mg + Ipratropium Bromide (Berodual®) 0.25 mg |
Primary outcome
Mean Change in Maximum Expiratory Flow From Baseline to Final Evaluation
Time frame: Baseline,4 hours
Mean Change from Baseline to Final Evaluation in the Per Protocol population assessed by Maximum Expiratory Flow.
Mean Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) From Baseline to Final Evaluation
Time frame: Baseline,4 hours
Mean Change from Baseline to Final Evaluation in the Per Protocol population assessed by Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second. FEV1 is defined as the volume of air that can be forced out of the lungs in 1 second after taking a deep breath.
Mean Change in Pulse Oxymetry From Baseline to Final Evaluation
Time frame: Baseline, 4 hours
Mean Change from Baseline to Final Evaluation in the Per Protocol population assessed by Pulse Oximetry used to monitor the percentage of oxygen saturation of hemoglobin in the blood.
Mean Change in the Conway Clinical Scale Score From Baseline to Final Evaluation
Time frame: Baseline,4 hours
Mean Change from Baseline to Final Evaluation in the Per Protocol population assessed by the Conway Clinical Scale. Assessment of the following: Wheezing, Accessory Muscle Use and Pulse Frequency in a 0 to 3 point scale according to severity for a minimum of 0 points and a total of 9 points in a very severe clinical case.
2 secondary outcomes
Safety Assessed by: Pulse Oxymetry, Clinical Assessments, Adverse Events
Time frame: 4 hours
Pharmacoeconomic Analysis
Time frame: 4 hours
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Apr 2011.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis de Venezuela study chair
Novartis de Venezuela
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Formoterol fumerate and fenoterol/ipratropium bromide in people with Acute Bronchial Obstruction, Asthma, run by Novartis at 2 sites in Venezuela.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Venezuela. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Apr 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change in Maximum Expiratory Flow From Baseline to Final Evaluation (time frame: Baseline,4 hours). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2011.