HIV InfectionsPhase 3MONETNCT00458302
Treatment Simplification by Darunavir/Ritonavir 800/100 mg Once a Day Versus a Triple Combination Therapy With Darunavir/Ritonavir
A Phase 3 study testing darunavir (DRV, TMC114) in people with HIV Infections and AIDS Virus, run by Janssen-Cilag International NV at 27 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once a day (O.D.) as a monotherapy versus a triple combination therapy containing 2 nucleosides and darunavir/ritonavir in 250 HIV-1 infected patients who have been on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Infections, AIDS Virus, Human Immunodeficiency Virus
- What is being tested?
- darunavir (DRV, TMC114)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 256 participants
- Where
- 27 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2007to Jan 2011
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with documented HIV-1 infection
- Patients currently receiving HAART for at least 24 weeks
- Plasma viral load < 50 copies/mL for at least 24 weeks prior to screening (two results must be documented)
- Patients taking the same antiretroviral combination for at least 8 weeks before screening
- Patients and physician's preference to change the current HAART regimen for reasons of simplification and/or toxicity
- CD4 > 100/mm3 at the start of HAART and > 200/mm3 at screening.
Who cannot join
- No history of virological failure defined as two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA > 500 copies/mL while on previous or current antiretroviral therapy
- No history of any primary PI mutations as defined by the IAS-USA guidelines 2006
- No patients co-infected with hepatitis B
- No pregnant or breastfeeding women
- No active clinically significant disease or life threatening disease or findings during screening of medical history or physical examination that, in the investigator's opinion, would compromise the patient's safety or outcome of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
27 sites in 11 countries.
27 sites in 11 countries
Germany5 sites
Study site
Berlin
Study site
Frankfurt
Study site
Hamburg
Study site
Hanover
Study site
Kÿln N/A
Spain5 sites
Study site
Barcelona
Study site
Donostia Guipuzcoa
Study site
Granada
Study site
Madrid
Study site
Valladolid
Denmark4 sites
Study site
Aarhus
Study site
Copenhagen
Study site
Hvidovre
Study site
Odense
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Controlled, Open-label Trial to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a Treatment Simplification by Darunavir/Ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg O.D. vs a Triple Combination Therapy With DRV/r in HIV-1 Infected Patients With Undetectable Plasma HIV-RNA on Their Current Treatments.
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once a day (O.D.) as a monotherapy versus a triple combination therapy containing 2 nucleosides and darunavir/ritonavir in 250 HIV-1 infected patients who have been on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) and have plasma viral load below 50 copies/ml for at least 24 weeks.
Read the detailed description
This study is randomised (patients are assigned different treatments based on chance), controlled, open-label trial to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg once a day (O.D.) as a monotherapy versus a triple combination therapy containing 2 nucleosides and DRV/r in 250 HIV-1 infected patients. Patients will be considered eligible if they have not changed any antiretroviral drugs for at least 8 weeks prior to screening and have documented evidence of plasma viral load (or plasma HIV-1 RNA) < 50 copies/mL for at least 24 weeks prior to being screened. The trial will consist of a screening period up to 4 weeks, a 48-week treatment period, followed by a 4-week follow-up (FU) period. The primary objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority in efficacy of DRV/r versus the triple combination therapy containing DRV/r, with respect to confirmed virologic response, defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at 48 weeks.Patients will be assigned a study medication based on a 1:1 ratio to either switch to a triple combination therapy containing 2 nucleosides and DRV/r 800/100 mg O.D, or initiate monotherapy with DRV/r 800/100 mg O.D. Patients in the triple combination arm who are already on 2 nucleosides prior to randomisation may remain on these or switch them at baseline. Patients randomised to the monotherapy arm will discontinue Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) at baseline and commence DRV/r 800/100 mg O.D. A Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) has been commissioned for this study. The role of the DSMB is to review the progress of the trial and the accumulating data to detect evidence of early safety issues for the patients while the trial is ongoing. An interim analysis will be performed after 24 weeks of treatment. The results of the Week 24 analysis will be used to determine whether long-term follow-up to 72 and 96 weeks will be done. The protease inhibitor (PI) component of the regimen cannot be changed until the end of the treatment period and the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) cannot be modified until the end of the treatment period with the following exception: single antiretroviral (ARV) substitutions will be allowed for tolerability/toxicity reasons, as long as this can be linked to an adverse event (AE) or an serious adverse event (SAE). After withdrawal of the patient from the trial, changes in the ARV regimen are allowed after the assessments of the withdrawal visit have been performed.
Temporary interruption of all ARVs will be allowed in the event of suspected toxicity, as long as the temporary interruption is associated with and can be linked to an AE or a SAE. For the control arm, the nucleoside analogues could be re-optimized at baseline or on study, and all approved ARVs allowed. However, PIs other than DRV/r are not allowed during the treatment period. Patients who cannot resume study medication will have to be withdrawn. A physical examination will be done at protocol-scheduled visits and vital signs will be monitored at each study visit. In addition, at each study visit, every patient will be asked about the occurrence of or change to AEs since they were last seen by the investigator. Laboratory samples for haematology and serum chemistry will be drawn and the results determined and transmitted to the investigator. Urinalysis will be performed. Pregnancy test will be done at each visit for female participants of child-bearing potential. The primary endpoint will be the proportion with virologic response, defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48.The study hypothesis is that DRV/r monotherapy will be as effective as a triple combination regimen and will be well tolerated in this early pre-treated HIV-1 patients. Two 400mg tablets of darunavir once daily orally within 30 minutes after completion of a meal for 48 weeks.
- Conditions
- HIV Infections, AIDS Virus, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Virus
- Being tested
- darunavir (DRV, TMC114)
- Keywords
- HIV, Monotherapy, Darunavir, Protease inhibitor, Early pre-treated, Undetectable, Treatment Experienced
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Infections, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
darunavir (DRV, TMC114)Drug
800 mg qd (2 x 400 mg tablet) + 2 NRTI for 144 weeks
darunavir (DRV, TMC114)Drug
800 mg qd (2 x 400 mg tablet) monotherapy for 144 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| darunavir monotherapy | Experimental | darunavir (DRV, TMC114) 800 mg qd (2 x 400 mg tablet) monotherapy for 144 weeks Receives: Drug: darunavir (DRV, TMC114) |
| darunavir + 2 NRTI | Experimental | darunavir (DRV, TMC114) 800 mg qd (2 x 400 mg tablet) + 2 NRTI for 144 weeks Receives: Drug: darunavir (DRV, TMC114) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Virological Response [Per Protocol (PP) - Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR), < 50 Copies/ml, Week 48]
Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the PP population with a plasma viral load < 50 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 48. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). In addition, any switch in background nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) equaled failure* (referred to as a Switch Equals Failure analysis). *Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until Week 48
Measured: Week 48
Secondary outcomes (12)
Virological Response [Intent To Treat (ITT) - TLOVR, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 48]
Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the ITT population with a plasma viral load < 50 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 48. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). In addition, any switch in background nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) equaled failure* (referred to as a Switch Equals Failure analysis). *Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until start of Week 48 window
Measured: Week 48
Virological Response [Per Protocol (PP), TLOVR - Switch Equals Failure, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 144]
Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the PP population with a plasma viral load < 50 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 144. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). In addition, any switch in background nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) equaled failure* (referred to as a Switch Equals Failure analysis). *Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until Week 144
Measured: Week 144
Virological Response [Intent To Treat (ITT), TLOVR - All Switches Included, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 144]
Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the ITT population with a plasma viral load < 50 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 144. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). All switches included means that all data even after any changes of treatment were kept. *Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until start of Week 144 window.
Measured: Week 144
Virological Response [Per Protocol (PP), TLOVR - Switch Equals Failure, <200 Copies/ml, Week 144]
Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the PP population with a plasma viral load < 200 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 144. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). In addition, any switch in background nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) equaled failure* (referred to as a Switch Equals Failure analysis). *Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until Week 144
Measured: week 144
Mean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count
The mean change in CD4+ cell count from baseline was calculated with a last observation carried forward method; i.e. the last observed value was carried forward, irrespective of the reason for discontinuation.
Measured: at week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 112, 128, 144
Resistance Determinations
Number of patients with resistance mutations at any time point when a patient had a viral load > 50 copies/mL after randomization.
Measured: at each visit from baseline to week 144
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Total Score
The FAHI is a validated health-related quality of life questionnaire. The questionnaire consist of 44 items and includes 5 functional scales (physical, social, emotional, functional and global well-being and cognitive function). Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).
Measured: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Cognitive Function Subscale
The FAHI cognitive function subscale. Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on cognitive function on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).
Measured: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale
The FAHI emotional well-being subscale. Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on emotional well-being on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).
Measured: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Functional and Global Well-Being Subscale
The FAHI functional and global well-being subscale. Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on functional and global well-being on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).
Measured: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale
The FAHI physical well-being subscale. Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on physical well-being on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).
Measured: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale
The FAHI social well-being subscale. Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on physical well-being on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).
Measured: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2007
- Primary completionFeb 2009
- Study completionJan 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 256 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen-Cilag International NV
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen-Cilag International NV Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen-Cilag International NV
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00458302
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR013159
- Other IDs
- TMC114HIV3006, 2006-006437-40
- Acronym
- MONET
- Status last verified
- Dec 2012
- First submitted
- 6 Apr 2007
- Last updated
- 19 Dec 2012
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Arribas JR, Horban A, Gerstoft J, Fatkenheuer G, Nelson M, Clumeck N, Pulido F, Hill A, van Delft Y, Stark T, Moecklinghoff C. The MONET trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV RNA below 50 copies/ml. AIDS. 2010 Jan 16;24(2):223-30. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283348944.
PubMed 20010070
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Dec 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Controlled, Open-label Trial to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a Treatment Simplification by Darunavir/Ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg O.D. vs a Triple Combination Therapy With DRV/r in HIV-1 Infected Patients With Undetectable Plasma HIV-RNA on Their Current Treatments.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00458302
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MONET / CR013159
- Conditions
- HIV Infections, AIDS Virus, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Virus
- Keywords
- HIV, Monotherapy, Darunavir, Protease inhibitor, Early pre-treated, Undetectable, Treatment Experienced
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 256 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen-Cilag International NVIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2007
- Primary completion
- Feb 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 26 Feb 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once a day (O.D.) as a monotherapy versus a triple combination therapy containing 2 nucleosides and darunavir/ritonavir in 250 HIV-1 infected patients who have been on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) and have plasma viral load below 50 copies/ml for at least 24 weeks.
Detailed description
This study is randomised (patients are assigned different treatments based on chance), controlled, open-label trial to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg once a day (O.D.) as a monotherapy versus a triple combination therapy containing 2 nucleosides and DRV/r in 250 HIV-1 infected patients. Patients will be considered eligible if they have not changed any antiretroviral drugs for at least 8 weeks prior to screening and have documented evidence of plasma viral load (or plasma HIV-1 RNA) < 50 copies/mL for at least 24 weeks prior to being screened. The trial will consist of a screening period up to 4 weeks, a 48-week treatment period, followed by a 4-week follow-up (FU) period. The primary objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority in efficacy of DRV/r versus the triple combination therapy containing DRV/r, with respect to confirmed virologic response, defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at 48 weeks.Patients will be assigned a study medication based on a 1:1 ratio to either switch to a triple combination therapy containing 2 nucleosides and DRV/r 800/100 mg O.D, or initiate monotherapy with DRV/r 800/100 mg O.D. Patients in the triple combination arm who are already on 2 nucleosides prior to randomisation may remain on these or switch them at baseline. Patients randomised to the monotherapy arm will discontinue Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) at baseline and commence DRV/r 800/100 mg O.D. A Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) has been commissioned for this study. The role of the DSMB is to review the progress of the trial and the accumulating data to detect evidence of early safety issues for the patients while the trial is ongoing. An interim analysis will be performed after 24 weeks of treatment. The results of the Week 24 analysis will be used to determine whether long-term follow-up to 72 and 96 weeks will be done. The protease inhibitor (PI) component of the regimen cannot be changed until the end of the treatment period and the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) cannot be modified until the end of the treatment period with the following exception: single antiretroviral (ARV) substitutions will be allowed for tolerability/toxicity reasons, as long as this can be linked to an adverse event (AE) or an serious adverse event (SAE). After withdrawal of the patient from the trial, changes in the ARV regimen are allowed after the assessments of the withdrawal visit have been performed.
Temporary interruption of all ARVs will be allowed in the event of suspected toxicity, as long as the temporary interruption is associated with and can be linked to an AE or a SAE. For the control arm, the nucleoside analogues could be re-optimized at baseline or on study, and all approved ARVs allowed. However, PIs other than DRV/r are not allowed during the treatment period. Patients who cannot resume study medication will have to be withdrawn. A physical examination will be done at protocol-scheduled visits and vital signs will be monitored at each study visit. In addition, at each study visit, every patient will be asked about the occurrence of or change to AEs since they were last seen by the investigator. Laboratory samples for haematology and serum chemistry will be drawn and the results determined and transmitted to the investigator. Urinalysis will be performed. Pregnancy test will be done at each visit for female participants of child-bearing potential. The primary endpoint will be the proportion with virologic response, defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48.The study hypothesis is that DRV/r monotherapy will be as effective as a triple combination regimen and will be well tolerated in this early pre-treated HIV-1 patients. Two 400mg tablets of darunavir once daily orally within 30 minutes after completion of a meal for 48 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| darunavir monotherapy | Experimental | Drug: darunavir (DRV, TMC114)darunavir (DRV, TMC114) 800 mg qd (2 x 400 mg tablet) monotherapy for 144 weeks |
| darunavir + 2 NRTI | Experimental | Drug: darunavir (DRV, TMC114)darunavir (DRV, TMC114) 800 mg qd (2 x 400 mg tablet) + 2 NRTI for 144 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with documented HIV-1 infection
- Patients currently receiving HAART for at least 24 weeks
- Plasma viral load < 50 copies/mL for at least 24 weeks prior to screening (two results must be documented)
- Patients taking the same antiretroviral combination for at least 8 weeks before screening
- Patients and physician's preference to change the current HAART regimen for reasons of simplification and/or toxicity
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- No history of virological failure defined as two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA > 500 copies/mL while on previous or current antiretroviral therapy
- No history of any primary PI mutations as defined by the IAS-USA guidelines 2006
- No patients co-infected with hepatitis B
- No pregnant or breastfeeding women
- No active clinically significant disease or life threatening disease or findings during screening of medical history or physical examination that, in the investigator's opinion, would compromise the patient's safety or outcome of the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| darunavir (DRV, TMC114)800 mg qd (2 x 400 mg tablet) + 2 NRTI for 144 weeks | Drug | darunavir + 2 NRTI |
| darunavir (DRV, TMC114)800 mg qd (2 x 400 mg tablet) monotherapy for 144 weeks | Drug | darunavir monotherapy |
Primary outcome
Virological Response [Per Protocol (PP) - Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR), < 50 Copies/ml, Week 48]
Time frame: Week 48
Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the PP population with a plasma viral load < 50 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 48. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). In addition, any switch in background nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) equaled failure* (referred to as a Switch Equals Failure analysis). *Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until Week 48
12 secondary outcomes
Virological Response [Intent To Treat (ITT) - TLOVR, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 48]
Time frame: Week 48
Virological Response [Per Protocol (PP), TLOVR - Switch Equals Failure, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 144]
Time frame: Week 144
Virological Response [Intent To Treat (ITT), TLOVR - All Switches Included, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 144]
Time frame: Week 144
Virological Response [Per Protocol (PP), TLOVR - Switch Equals Failure, <200 Copies/ml, Week 144]
Time frame: week 144
Mean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count
Time frame: at week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 112, 128, 144
Resistance Determinations
Time frame: at each visit from baseline to week 144
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Total Score
Time frame: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Cognitive Function Subscale
Time frame: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale
Time frame: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Functional and Global Well-Being Subscale
Time frame: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale
Time frame: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale
Time frame: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Dec 2012.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20010070Arribas JR, Horban A, Gerstoft J, Fatkenheuer G, Nelson M, Clumeck N, Pulido F, Hill A, van Delft Y, Stark T, Moecklinghoff C. The MONET trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV RNA below 50 copies/ml. AIDS. 2010 Jan 16;24(2):223-30. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283348944.
Related trials for HIV Infections
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen-Cilag International NV Clinical Trial study director
Janssen-Cilag International NV
27 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing darunavir (DRV, TMC114) in people with HIV Infections and AIDS Virus, run by Janssen-Cilag International NV at 27 sites in 11 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Dec 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 27 sites in Germany, Spain, Denmark, Israel, Belgium and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Feb 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Virological Response [Per Protocol (PP) - Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR), < 50 Copies/ml, Week 48] (time frame: Week 48). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00458302, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Dec 2012.