CoughPhase 4montelukastNCT00453765
The Effect of Montelukast in Patients With Chronic Cough and Bronchial Hyperreactivity
A Phase 4 study testing montelukast in people with Cough and Bronchial Hyperreactivity, run by Isala at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
The purpose is to determine whether montelukast during 6 weeks has superior antitussive effects (measured with the LCQ) compared with placebo in patients with cough lasting > 8 weeks and enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cough, Bronchial Hyperreactivity
- What is being tested?
- montelukast
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 89 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- Dec 2007to Sep 2010
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients between 18 and 90 years old, referred to the cough outpatient clinic with chronic cough and enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity.
- chronic cough is defined as a cough > 8 weeks duration.
- enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity is a PD20 < 2.5 mg methacholine.
Who cannot join
- concomitant severe disease; lung cancer and diseases with a short life expectancy (< 1 year).
- patients suffering from COPD and/or other relevant lung diseases.
- clinically relevant abnormal laboratory values suggesting an unknown disease requiring further clinical evaluation.
- use of systemic steroids 4 weeks (injectable depot steroids 6 weeks) before entry into the baseline period, or more than 3 courses during the last 6 months.
- pregnancy.
- abnormal chest X-ray.
- use of medication inducing CYP3A4 (for example; fenytoïne, phenobarbital or rifampicin.
- use of medication metabolised by CYP2C8.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Prospective Single-centre, Double Blind Randomised Trial of Montelukast in Patients With Chronic Cough and Bronchial Hyperreactivity
The purpose is to determine whether montelukast during 6 weeks has superior antitussive effects (measured with the LCQ) compared with placebo in patients with cough lasting > 8 weeks and enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity.
Read the detailed description
Chronic cough is a frequent problem in general practice and one of the most common reasons for referral to a respiratory clinic. Prospective studies have shown that the vast majority of cases of chronic cough are due to one or more of three conditions: rhinitis/postnasal drip syndrome, asthma and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Other significant causes of chronic cough include postviral (post-infectious) cough, and eosinophilic bronchitis. In only a minority of the patients with a chronic cough no cause can be found. This is called idiopathic cough.
Analysis and treatment of patients with chronic cough often proved to be difficult and disappointing. Nevertheless, centers in which a comprehensive diagnostic and therapeutic protocol was implemented reported excellent results. Therefore the first cough clinic is started in The Isala Klinieken, Zwolle/The Netherlands in 2004.
Asthmatic cough is often accompanied by the more typical symptoms of dyspnoea and wheezing. In a subgroup of asthmatics, however, cough is the sole or predominant symptom. This condition is termed cough-variant asthma (CVA). Cough due to CVA usually improves within the first week of inhaled bronchodilator therapy, however, complete resolution of cough may require up to 8 weeks of combination therapy with inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids. A subgroup of CVA patients with severe, refractory cough may require systemic (oral) steroids, alone or followed by inhaled therapy.
Leukotrienes are contributing significantly to the pathobiology of asthma. These 'pathways of asthma' could be suppressed by leukotriene inhibitors. Multiple clinical trials have demonstrated the ability of the leukotriene modifiers to improve symptoms, pulmonary function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in chronic asthma, as well as in exercise-induced and aspirin-induced asthma. Until recently, the antitussive effects of this drug class had not been investigated properly. Spector and Tan concluded in a pilot trial with only 14 patients that 10 mg montelukast seems to be effective in CVA. However, nowadays in care of asthma, montelukast is widely used in a dosage of 10 mg. Therefore we intend to study the effects of montelukast on chronic cough (VAS-cough-score) on a wider patient population; is montelukast superior to placebo in the treatment of patients with chronic cough and a demonstrated bronchial hyperreactivity?
Aim of the study:
The purpose is to determine whether montelukast during 6 weeks has superior antitussive effects (measured with the VAS cough) compared with placebo in patients with cough lasting > 8 weeks and enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity.
Study design:
Montelukast trial: prospective single-centre, double blind randomised trial.
In the montelukast study 84 patients between 18 and 90 years old, referred to the cough outpatient clinic with chronic cough and enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity will be recruited after informed consent is obtained.
Patients will be randomised (for gender, age, smoking, duration of symptoms and the use of inhaled corticosteroids) to 6- week treatment with 10 mg daily montelukast or placebo. Before randomisation all patients have to fill in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for detection of the degree of cough in the last 24 hours and the dutch version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) for the detection of illness specific quality of life. Adverse events will be noted in this period. Finally, both groups will be compared.
Inhaled corticosteroids may be continued during the study at a constant dose. Nasal, ophthalmologic and dermatological steroids are allowed according to individual needs, but their dose should be kept constant throughout the trial.
H1 blockers, nasal anticholinergics as well as nasal or ophthalmologic preparations of nedocromil or cromoglycate are permitted for treatment of allergic rhinitis.
Study population:
Patients between 18 and 90 years old, referred to the cough outpatient clinic with chronic cough and enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity.
Intervention:
Patients between 16 and 90 years old, referred to the cough outpatient clinic with chronic cough and enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity will receive daily montelukast 10 mg or placebo during 6 weeks.
Main study endpoint :
- Difference in cough VAS scores; montelukast vs placebo.
Secondary study endpoints:
- Difference in average score on the Leicester Cough Questionaire (LCQ) between the two treatment groups; montelukast vs placebo.
- Comparison of the adverse events of montelukast vs placebo.
Randomisation:
Patients will be randomised by a computer minimisation program for the following factors: gender, age, smoking, duration of symptoms and the use of inhaled corticosteroids.
Statistical analysis:
The primary analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis. The mean change in the primary endpoint (LCQ total and domain scores) after 6 weeks between the groups will be analysed using an unpaired t-test. This test will also be used to analyse differences after 6 weeks in secondary endpoints (VAS cough score).
Since both the primary and secondary endpoints in the study will be measured more than two times (repeatedly measured) the course of these scores over time will be tested using MANOVA-analysis. To test for differences in proportions (proportion of patients with adverse events) the Chi2 -test will be used. Data analyses will be performed using SPSS version 12.
Burden, risks and advantages associated with participation:
Side effects have been reported in 10 % of the cases; mostly of headache and abdominal pain. Also gastrointestinal problems, allergic reactions, psychiatric disorders, liver, and haematological disorders could occur.
Interactions: Montelukast is metabolised by CYP3A4. Concomitant use of CYP3A4 inducing medication like fenytoïne, phenobarbital, or rifampicin must be prevented.
Medication metabolised by CYP2C8 must also be avoided, because in vitro studies have shown that montelukast is an powerful CYP2C8 inhibitor.
Benefits: superior resolution of cough compared to placebo.
- Conditions
- Cough, Bronchial Hyperreactivity
- Being tested
- montelukast, placebo
- Keywords
- cough, hyperreactivity, montelukast
- Medical subject headings
- Cough, Bronchial Hyperreactivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
montelukastDrug
Also called singulair
montelukast, 8 weeks, once daily, 10 milligrams
placeboDrug
placebo
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | montelukast Receives: Drug: montelukast |
| B | Placebo comparator | placebo Receives: Drug: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference in average score on the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) between the two treatment groups; montelukast vs placebo.
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
Difference in cough VAS scores; montelukast vs placebo.
Measured: 2 years
Comparison of the adverse events of montelukast vs placebo.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Mar 2007 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2007
- Primary completionSep 2010
- Study completionSep 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for CoughStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 89 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Isala
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jan W.K. van den Berg, Isala
- Investigators
- Jan Willem Van Den Berg, MD, Study director, Departement of Pulmonology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00453765
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL14828.075.06
- Acronym
- montelukast
- Status last verified
- Apr 2013
- First submitted
- 28 Mar 2007
- Last updated
- 8 Apr 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Apr 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Single-centre, Double Blind Randomised Trial of Montelukast in Patients With Chronic Cough and Bronchial Hyperreactivity
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00453765
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- montelukast / NL14828.075.06
- Conditions
- Cough, Bronchial Hyperreactivity
- Keywords
- cough, hyperreactivity, montelukast
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 89 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IsalaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2007
- Primary completion
- Sep 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Mar 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose is to determine whether montelukast during 6 weeks has superior antitussive effects (measured with the LCQ) compared with placebo in patients with cough lasting > 8 weeks and enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity.
Detailed description
Chronic cough is a frequent problem in general practice and one of the most common reasons for referral to a respiratory clinic. Prospective studies have shown that the vast majority of cases of chronic cough are due to one or more of three conditions: rhinitis/postnasal drip syndrome, asthma and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Other significant causes of chronic cough include postviral (post-infectious) cough, and eosinophilic bronchitis. In only a minority of the patients with a chronic cough no cause can be found. This is called idiopathic cough.
Analysis and treatment of patients with chronic cough often proved to be difficult and disappointing. Nevertheless, centers in which a comprehensive diagnostic and therapeutic protocol was implemented reported excellent results. Therefore the first cough clinic is started in The Isala Klinieken, Zwolle/The Netherlands in 2004.
Asthmatic cough is often accompanied by the more typical symptoms of dyspnoea and wheezing. In a subgroup of asthmatics, however, cough is the sole or predominant symptom. This condition is termed cough-variant asthma (CVA). Cough due to CVA usually improves within the first week of inhaled bronchodilator therapy, however, complete resolution of cough may require up to 8 weeks of combination therapy with inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids. A subgroup of CVA patients with severe, refractory cough may require systemic (oral) steroids, alone or followed by inhaled therapy.
Leukotrienes are contributing significantly to the pathobiology of asthma. These 'pathways of asthma' could be suppressed by leukotriene inhibitors. Multiple clinical trials have demonstrated the ability of the leukotriene modifiers to improve symptoms, pulmonary function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in chronic asthma, as well as in exercise-induced and aspirin-induced asthma. Until recently, the antitussive effects of this drug class had not been investigated properly. Spector and Tan concluded in a pilot trial with only 14 patients that 10 mg montelukast seems to be effective in CVA. However, nowadays in care of asthma, montelukast is widely used in a dosage of 10 mg. Therefore we intend to study the effects of montelukast on chronic cough (VAS-cough-score) on a wider patient population; is montelukast superior to placebo in the treatment of patients with chronic cough and a demonstrated bronchial hyperreactivity?
Aim of the study:
The purpose is to determine whether montelukast during 6 weeks has superior antitussive effects (measured with the VAS cough) compared with placebo in patients with cough lasting > 8 weeks and enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity.
Study design:
Montelukast trial: prospective single-centre, double blind randomised trial.
In the montelukast study 84 patients between 18 and 90 years old, referred to the cough outpatient clinic with chronic cough and enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity will be recruited after informed consent is obtained.
Patients will be randomised (for gender, age, smoking, duration of symptoms and the use of inhaled corticosteroids) to 6- week treatment with 10 mg daily montelukast or placebo. Before randomisation all patients have to fill in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for detection of the degree of cough in the last 24 hours and the dutch version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) for the detection of illness specific quality of life. Adverse events will be noted in this period. Finally, both groups will be compared.
Inhaled corticosteroids may be continued during the study at a constant dose. Nasal, ophthalmologic and dermatological steroids are allowed according to individual needs, but their dose should be kept constant throughout the trial.
H1 blockers, nasal anticholinergics as well as nasal or ophthalmologic preparations of nedocromil or cromoglycate are permitted for treatment of allergic rhinitis.
Study population:
Patients between 18 and 90 years old, referred to the cough outpatient clinic with chronic cough and enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity.
Intervention:
Patients between 16 and 90 years old, referred to the cough outpatient clinic with chronic cough and enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity will receive daily montelukast 10 mg or placebo during 6 weeks.
Main study endpoint :
- Difference in cough VAS scores; montelukast vs placebo.
Secondary study endpoints:
- Difference in average score on the Leicester Cough Questionaire (LCQ) between the two treatment groups; montelukast vs placebo.
- Comparison of the adverse events of montelukast vs placebo.
Randomisation:
Patients will be randomised by a computer minimisation program for the following factors: gender, age, smoking, duration of symptoms and the use of inhaled corticosteroids.
Statistical analysis:
The primary analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis. The mean change in the primary endpoint (LCQ total and domain scores) after 6 weeks between the groups will be analysed using an unpaired t-test. This test will also be used to analyse differences after 6 weeks in secondary endpoints (VAS cough score).
Since both the primary and secondary endpoints in the study will be measured more than two times (repeatedly measured) the course of these scores over time will be tested using MANOVA-analysis. To test for differences in proportions (proportion of patients with adverse events) the Chi2 -test will be used. Data analyses will be performed using SPSS version 12.
Burden, risks and advantages associated with participation:
Side effects have been reported in 10 % of the cases; mostly of headache and abdominal pain. Also gastrointestinal problems, allergic reactions, psychiatric disorders, liver, and haematological disorders could occur.
Interactions: Montelukast is metabolised by CYP3A4. Concomitant use of CYP3A4 inducing medication like fenytoïne, phenobarbital, or rifampicin must be prevented.
Medication metabolised by CYP2C8 must also be avoided, because in vitro studies have shown that montelukast is an powerful CYP2C8 inhibitor.
Benefits: superior resolution of cough compared to placebo.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Drug: montelukastmontelukast |
| B | Placebo comparator | Drug: placeboplacebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- patients between 18 and 90 years old, referred to the cough outpatient clinic with chronic cough and enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity.
- chronic cough is defined as a cough > 8 weeks duration.
- enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity is a PD20 < 2.5 mg methacholine.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- concomitant severe disease; lung cancer and diseases with a short life expectancy (< 1 year).
- patients suffering from COPD and/or other relevant lung diseases.
- clinically relevant abnormal laboratory values suggesting an unknown disease requiring further clinical evaluation.
- use of systemic steroids 4 weeks (injectable depot steroids 6 weeks) before entry into the baseline period, or more than 3 courses during the last 6 months.
- pregnancy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| montelukastAlso: singulairmontelukast, 8 weeks, once daily, 10 milligrams | Drug | A |
| placeboplacebo | Drug | B |
Primary outcome
Difference in average score on the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) between the two treatment groups; montelukast vs placebo.
Time frame: 2 years
2 secondary outcomes
Difference in cough VAS scores; montelukast vs placebo.
Time frame: 2 years
Comparison of the adverse events of montelukast vs placebo.
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Apr 2013.
Related trials for Cough
RecruitingPhase 2
The Effect of Nalbuphine Extended-Release (NAL ER) on Cough in Participants With Refractory Chronic Cough (RCC)
Refractory Chronic Cough
RecruitingObservational study
Physical Impairments in Premature Ventricular Complex
Premature Ventricular Complexes
RecruitingObservational study
Office-Based Superior Laryngeal Nerve Block for Treatment of Neurogenic Cough
Cough
Not yet recruiting
High-Flow Nasal Oxygen-Assisted Deep Extubation Versus Awake Extubation in Morbidly Obese Patients
Deep Tracheal Extubation
Recruiting
Feasibility of Cough Skill Training in Individuals With Head and Neck Cancer
Head and Neck Cancers
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jan Willem Van Den Berg, MD study director
Departement of Pulmonology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing montelukast in people with Cough and Bronchial Hyperreactivity, run by Isala at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference in average score on the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) between the two treatment groups; montelukast vs placebo. (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2013.