Anesthesia, GeneralPhase 3NCT00451100
Comparison of Rocuronium and Org 25969 With Cisatracurium and Neostigmine (19.4.310)(P05931)
A Phase 3 study testing Sugammadex and neostigmine in people with Anesthesia, General, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate in adult patients a faster recovery from a neuromuscular block with 2.0 mg/kg Org 25969 (sugammadex) after rocuronium as compared to 50 ug/kg neostigmine after cisatracurium when administered at reappearance of T2 Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Anesthesia, General
- What is being tested?
- Sugammadex and neostigmine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 10 Nov 2005to 29 Aug 2006
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects of ASA 1 - 4;
- Subjects above or equal to the age of 18;
- Scheduled for surgical procedures with a general anesthesia requiring neuromuscular relaxation with the use of rocuronium or cisatracurium;
- Scheduled for surgical procedures in supine position;
- Given written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Subjects in whom a difficult intubation because of anatomical malformations was expected;
- Subjects known or suspected to have neuromuscular disorders impairing neuromuscular block (NMB) and/or significant renal dysfunction;
- Subjects known or suspected to have a (family) history of malignant hyperthermia;
- Subjects known or suspected to have an allergy to narcotics, muscle relaxants or other medication used during general anesthesia;
- Subjects receiving medication in a dose and/or at a time point known to interfere with neuromuscular blocking agents such as antibiotics, anticonvulsants and Mg2+;
- Subjects in whom the use of neostigmine and/or glycopyrrolate may be contraindicated;
Show all 11Show fewer
- Subjects who had already participated in an Org25969 trial;
- Subjects who had participated in another clinical trial (not pre-approved by NV Organon) within 30 days of entering into CT 19.4.310.
- Female subjects who are pregnant:
- Female subjects of childbearing potential not using any method of birth control: condom or using only hormonal contraception as birth control;
- Female subjects who were breast -feeding.
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Rocuronium and Org25969 With Cisatracurium and Neostigmine When Neuromuscular Block is Reversed at Reappearance of T2
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate in adult patients a faster recovery from a neuromuscular block with 2.0 mg/kg Org 25969 (sugammadex) after rocuronium as compared to 50 ug/kg neostigmine after cisatracurium when administered at reappearance of T2
- Conditions
- Anesthesia, General
- Being tested
- Sugammadex, neostigmine
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SugammadexDrug
Also called Org 25969
Subjects received a bolus dose of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. After the last dose of rocuronium, at reappearance of T2, a dose of 2.0 mg/kg Org 25969 was to be administered
neostigmineDrug
Also called premix neostigmine/glycopyrrolate
Subjects received a bolus dose of 0.15 mg/kg cisatracurium. After the last dose of cisatracurium, at reappearance of T2, a dose of 50 ug/kg neostigmine was to be administered. In accordance to the labeling of neostigmine, a maximum of 5 mg neostigmine was to be administered
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sugammadex | Experimental | 2.0 mg/kg Org 25969 (sugammadex) Receives: Drug: Sugammadex |
| Neostigmine | Active comparator | 50 ug/kg neostigmine Receives: Drug: neostigmine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time from start administration of Org 25969/neostigmine to recovery T4/T1 ratio to 0.9
Measured: After surgery
Secondary outcomes (2)
Time from start administration of Org 25969/neostigmine to recovery T4/T1 ratio to 0.7 and 0.8
Measured: After surgery
Assessment of clinical signs of recovery (level of consciousness, 5 sec head lift, and general muscle weakness)
Measured: after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Mar 2007 (estimated)
- Study start10 Nov 2005
- Primary completion22 May 2006
- Study completion29 Aug 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Anesthesia, GeneralStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00451100
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P05931
- Other IDs
- Crystal Trial, 19.4.310
- Status last verified
- Nov 2019
- First submitted
- 22 Mar 2007
- Last updated
- 15 Nov 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Flockton EA, Mastronardi P, Hunter JM, Gomar C, Mirakhur RK, Aguilera L, Giunta FG, Meistelman C, Prins ME. Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex is faster than reversal of cisatracurium-induced block with neostigmine. Br J Anaesth. 2008 May;100(5):622-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen037. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
PubMed 18385265
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Nov 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Rocuronium and Org25969 With Cisatracurium and Neostigmine When Neuromuscular Block is Reversed at Reappearance of T2
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00451100
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- P05931
- Conditions
- Anesthesia, General
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 10 Nov 2005 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 May 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Aug 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Mar 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate in adult patients a faster recovery from a neuromuscular block with 2.0 mg/kg Org 25969 (sugammadex) after rocuronium as compared to 50 ug/kg neostigmine after cisatracurium when administered at reappearance of T2
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sugammadex | Experimental | Drug: Sugammadex2.0 mg/kg Org 25969 (sugammadex) |
| Neostigmine | Active comparator | Drug: neostigmine50 ug/kg neostigmine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Subjects of ASA 1 - 4;
- Subjects above or equal to the age of 18;
- Scheduled for surgical procedures with a general anesthesia requiring neuromuscular relaxation with the use of rocuronium or cisatracurium;
- Scheduled for surgical procedures in supine position;
- Given written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Subjects in whom a difficult intubation because of anatomical malformations was expected;
- Subjects known or suspected to have neuromuscular disorders impairing neuromuscular block (NMB) and/or significant renal dysfunction;
- Subjects known or suspected to have a (family) history of malignant hyperthermia;
- Subjects known or suspected to have an allergy to narcotics, muscle relaxants or other medication used during general anesthesia;
- Subjects receiving medication in a dose and/or at a time point known to interfere with neuromuscular blocking agents such as antibiotics, anticonvulsants and Mg2+;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SugammadexAlso: Org 25969Subjects received a bolus dose of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. After the last dose of rocuronium, at reappearance of T2, a dose of 2.0 mg/kg Org 25969 was to be administered | Drug | Sugammadex |
| neostigmineAlso: premix neostigmine/glycopyrrolateSubjects received a bolus dose of 0.15 mg/kg cisatracurium. After the last dose of cisatracurium, at reappearance of T2, a dose of 50 ug/kg neostigmine was to be administered. In accordance to the labeling of neostigmine, a maximum of 5 mg neostigmine was to be administered | Drug | Neostigmine |
Primary outcome
Time from start administration of Org 25969/neostigmine to recovery T4/T1 ratio to 0.9
Time frame: After surgery
2 secondary outcomes
Time from start administration of Org 25969/neostigmine to recovery T4/T1 ratio to 0.7 and 0.8
Time frame: After surgery
Assessment of clinical signs of recovery (level of consciousness, 5 sec head lift, and general muscle weakness)
Time frame: after surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Nov 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 18385265Flockton EA, Mastronardi P, Hunter JM, Gomar C, Mirakhur RK, Aguilera L, Giunta FG, Meistelman C, Prins ME. Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex is faster than reversal of cisatracurium-induced block with neostigmine. Br J Anaesth. 2008 May;100(5):622-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen037. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
- Click here to access a synopsis of the study results.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Anesthesia, General
Not yet recruitingObservational study
"Comparison of Oxygen Reserve Index (ORI), End-Tidal Oxygen, and Time-Based Preoxygenation Targets With Arterial Blood Gas During Preoxygenation
Preoxygenation Adequacy Assessed by Oxygen Reserve Index, End-tidal Oxygen and Arterial Blood Gas
Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Controlled SaCo-VLM Trial
General Anaesthesia Using Supraglotic Airway
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Not yet recruiting
Tizanidine Premedication Versus Placebo for Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion and Recovery in Adults Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery
Airway Management
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Prophylactic Dexamethasone vs Placebo on Airway Dimensions Assessed by Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Airway Edema, Postoperative Complications
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Sugammadex and neostigmine in people with Anesthesia, General, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time from start administration of Org 25969/neostigmine to recovery T4/T1 ratio to 0.9 (time frame: After surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00451100, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2019.