Congenital Heart DefectsPhase 2/3CARE-CHDNCT00450684
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Congenital Heart Defects
A Phase 2/3 study testing Implantation and testing of CRT in people with Congenital Heart Defects, run by Competence Network for Congenital Heart Defects at 16 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The objective of this multicentre prospective therapeutic study is to evaluate the effects of CRT on the right and left ventricular function of patients with CHD in the medium and long term. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Congenital Heart Defects
- What is being tested?
- Implantation and testing of CRT
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 55 participants
- Where
- 16 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- May 2007to Sep 2013
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with congenital heart defects
- Heart failure of the Morphologically right or left system ventricle with an absolute ejection fraction of < 40% in the failed ventricle
- NYHA classes II-IV
- Optimal drug therapy for heart failure according to the ESC guidelines
- QRS interval ≥ 120 ms (demonstrated in at least two relevant ECG derivations, depending on existing bundle branch block symptoms)
- Patients with chronic stimulation of the subpulmonary ventricle by a 1- or 2-ventricle pacemaker, which also meets the above-mentioned criteria
- Patients with morphologically right ventricle in system position and significant insufficiency of the systemic atrioventricular valve, if they also meet the criteria listed above
Who cannot join
- PTCA, cardiomyoplasty or myocardial infarction / unstable angina pectoris or cerebral insult within the 6 weeks preceding the planned cardiac resynchronisation therapy
- Patients with pulmonary hypertension / Eisenmenger's syndrome
- Life expectancy < 1 year due to a non-cardiac disease
- Anticipated poor compliance by the patient
- Pregnancy and breastfeeding
- Known or persistent abuse of prescription medicines, recreational drugs or alcohol
Trial locations and contacts
16 sites in 2 countries.
16 sites in 2 countries
Germany15 sites
Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, AÖR, Klinik für Kinderkardiologie
Aachen, D-52074
Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Klinik für Kinderkardiologie und angeborene Herzfehler
Bad Oeynhausen, D-32545
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Pädiatrie mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie
Berlin, D-13353
Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Klinik für Angeborene Herzfehler/Kinderkardiologie
Berlin, D-13353
Elektrophysiologie Bremen und Herzzentrum Bremen, Abteilung für Angeborene Herzfehler/Kinderkardiologie
Bremen, D-28227
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Kinderkardiologische Abteilung
Erlangen, D-91054
Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg Bad Krozingen, Zentrum für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Angeborene Herzfehler/Pädiatrische Kardiologie
Freiburg im Breisgau, D-79106
Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Pädiatrische Kardiologie
Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, D-06120
Universitäres Herzzentrum Hamburg, Kinderkardiologie
Hamburg, D-20246
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Klinik für Pädiatrische Kardiologie
Homburg/Saar, D-66421
Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Klinik für Kinderkardiologie und angeborene Herzfehler
München, D-80336
Universitätsklinikum Münster, Klinik für angeborene (EMAH) und erworbene Herzfehler
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, D-48149
Universitätsklinikum Münster, Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Pädiatrische Kardiologie
Münster, D-48149
Deutsches Kinderherzzentrum Sankt Augustin, Abt. Kardiologie/Angeborene Herzfehler
Sankt Augustin, D-53757
Universitätsklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin Tübingen, Abt. Kinderkardiologie, Pulmologie, Intensivmedizin
Tübingen, D-72076
Austria1 site
AKH Wien, Klinische Abteilung für Pädiatrische Kardiologie
Vienna, A-1090
About this study
Official title: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patients With Congenital Heart Defects
The objective of this multicentre prospective therapeutic study is to evaluate the effects of CRT on the right and left ventricular function of patients with CHD in the medium and long term. Patients who reject the randomization or cannot be paced with right ventricular pacing alone will be enrolled in group C with continuous biventricular pacing, which is the main group in this study. Optional: Immediately after implantation the patients are divided into group A and B (randomized, single blind (for the patient), cross-over design).
The treatment and the completing follow-up examination will take approximately 18 months and includes seven visits - one previous to the CRT and six at certain times afterward. At selected time intervals echocardiographic 3D and Tissue Doppler Imaging to evaluate the global and regional ventricular function are performed. Subjective quality of life assessment (questionnaire) will also be performed at the defined follow-up intervals, and if applicable (optional) also objective assessment of the physical performance (VO2 max).
55 patients also including children and adults with CHD are planned to be included in the study. The main target is to provide evidence of the effectiveness of CRT with biventricular stimulation in terms of improved ventricular function (ejection fraction and QRS interval).
- Conditions
- Congenital Heart Defects
- Being tested
- Implantation and testing of CRT
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Defects, Congenital
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Implantation and testing of CRTDevice
Biventricular pacing for 12 weeks (CRT ON) followed by automatic rhythmicity or the original, conventional biventricular stimulation for 12 weeks (CRT OFF), then returning to biventricular pacing (CRT ON).
Implantation and testing of CRTDevice
Automatic rhythmicity or original conventional biventricular stimulation for 12 weeks (CRT OFF) followed by biventricular pacing (CRT ON).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | Implantation and testing of CRT Receives: Device: Implantation and testing of CRT |
| Group B | Experimental | IImplantation and testing of CRT Receives: Device: Implantation and testing of CRT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ejection fraction
Measured: 7 visits
QRS-interval
Measured: 7 visits
Secondary outcomes (11)
Echocardiographic standard parameters (e.g. LVIDd. FS, RVIDd)
Measured: 7 visits
Tissue Doppler echocardiography: dyssynchrony parameters, regional myocardiac function
Measured: 7 visits
3D echocardiography:LV volumes, LVEF, Dyssynchrony index
Measured: 7 visits
NT pro-BNP
Measured: 7 visits
Spiroergometry: performance P (W/kg), incl. VO2,max
Measured: 6 visits
Walking distance in 6 minutes
Measured: 6 visits
Decrease of hospitalization
Measured: 18 months
Decrease of ventricular and atrial arrhythmias
Measured: 18 months
Prevention or postponement of heart transplantation
Measured: 18 Months
Quality of life
Measured: 6 visits
death
Measured: 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Mar 2007 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2007
- Primary completionFeb 2012
- Study completionSep 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Congenital Heart DefectsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Competence Network for Congenital Heart Defects
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hashim Abdul-Khaliq, Prof., MD, Principal investigator, Competence Network for Congenital Heart Defects
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00450684
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CARE-CHD
- Acronym
- CARE-CHD
- Status last verified
- Oct 2014
- First submitted
- 21 Mar 2007
- Last updated
- 10 Oct 2014
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Oct 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patients With Congenital Heart Defects
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00450684
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CARE-CHD / CARE-CHD
- Conditions
- Congenital Heart Defects
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Competence Network for Congenital Heart DefectsOther government
- Study start
- May 2007
- Primary completion
- Feb 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Mar 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this multicentre prospective therapeutic study is to evaluate the effects of CRT on the right and left ventricular function of patients with CHD in the medium and long term. Patients who reject the randomization or cannot be paced with right ventricular pacing alone will be enrolled in group C with continuous biventricular pacing, which is the main group in this study. Optional: Immediately after implantation the patients are divided into group A and B (randomized, single blind (for the patient), cross-over design).
The treatment and the completing follow-up examination will take approximately 18 months and includes seven visits - one previous to the CRT and six at certain times afterward. At selected time intervals echocardiographic 3D and Tissue Doppler Imaging to evaluate the global and regional ventricular function are performed. Subjective quality of life assessment (questionnaire) will also be performed at the defined follow-up intervals, and if applicable (optional) also objective assessment of the physical performance (VO2 max).
55 patients also including children and adults with CHD are planned to be included in the study. The main target is to provide evidence of the effectiveness of CRT with biventricular stimulation in terms of improved ventricular function (ejection fraction and QRS interval).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | Device: Implantation and testing of CRTImplantation and testing of CRT |
| Group B | Experimental | Device: Implantation and testing of CRTIImplantation and testing of CRT |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients with congenital heart defects
- Heart failure of the Morphologically right or left system ventricle with an absolute ejection fraction of < 40% in the failed ventricle
- NYHA classes II-IV
- Optimal drug therapy for heart failure according to the ESC guidelines
- QRS interval ≥ 120 ms (demonstrated in at least two relevant ECG derivations, depending on existing bundle branch block symptoms)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- PTCA, cardiomyoplasty or myocardial infarction / unstable angina pectoris or cerebral insult within the 6 weeks preceding the planned cardiac resynchronisation therapy
- Patients with pulmonary hypertension / Eisenmenger's syndrome
- Life expectancy < 1 year due to a non-cardiac disease
- Anticipated poor compliance by the patient
- Pregnancy and breastfeeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Implantation and testing of CRTBiventricular pacing for 12 weeks (CRT ON) followed by automatic rhythmicity or the original, conventional biventricular stimulation for 12 weeks (CRT OFF), then returning to biventricular pacing (CRT ON). | Device | Group A, Group B |
| Implantation and testing of CRTAutomatic rhythmicity or original conventional biventricular stimulation for 12 weeks (CRT OFF) followed by biventricular pacing (CRT ON). | Device | Group A, Group B |
Primary outcome
Ejection fraction
Time frame: 7 visits
QRS-interval
Time frame: 7 visits
11 secondary outcomes
Echocardiographic standard parameters (e.g. LVIDd. FS, RVIDd)
Time frame: 7 visits
Tissue Doppler echocardiography: dyssynchrony parameters, regional myocardiac function
Time frame: 7 visits
3D echocardiography:LV volumes, LVEF, Dyssynchrony index
Time frame: 7 visits
NT pro-BNP
Time frame: 7 visits
Spiroergometry: performance P (W/kg), incl. VO2,max
Time frame: 6 visits
Walking distance in 6 minutes
Time frame: 6 visits
Decrease of hospitalization
Time frame: 18 months
Decrease of ventricular and atrial arrhythmias
Time frame: 18 months
Prevention or postponement of heart transplantation
Time frame: 18 Months
Quality of life
Time frame: 6 visits
death
Time frame: 18 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Oct 2014.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Congenital Heart Defects
Not yet recruiting
Autologous Thymus Transplant in Children With Congenital Heart Disease: A Pilot Study
Congenital Heart Disease (CHD)
RecruitingPhase 3
Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Weekly Lonapegsomatropin Compared to Daily Somatropin in Children and Adolescents With Short Stature or Growth Failure Due to Growth Hormone Sufficient Disorders
Turner Syndrome, Short Stature Homeobox Gene Mutation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Hummingbird ICE Study
ATRIAL APPENDAGE CLOSURE for ATRIAL FIBRILLATION, Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Active, not recruiting
Learning by Heart: The Effectiveness of an EF Training Program for Pre-schoolers With Critical CHD
Congenital Heart Disease, Executive Dysfunction
Recruiting
Discontinuation of Antithrombotic Treatment Following Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Young Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke
Patent Foramen Ovale, Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hashim Abdul-Khaliq, Prof., MD principal investigator
Competence Network for Congenital Heart Defects
16 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Implantation and testing of CRT in people with Congenital Heart Defects, run by Competence Network for Congenital Heart Defects at 16 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Oct 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 16 sites in Germany, Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Ejection fraction (time frame: 7 visits). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Oct 2014.