The Dementia Study in Northern Norway

Nine municipalities with 11807 inhabitants 65 years and older were allocated to intervention or control, five and four municipalities in each group, respectively. A panel of psychiatric nurses, university lecturers and members of the competence centre of dementia in Northern Norway have worked out a program of stimulation therapy adjusted to each participant taking the stage of functional impairment, education level and work experience into consideration. The individual stimulation program is selected and implemented, based on the life history for each patient, and carried out for a minimum of 30 minutes 5 days a week in the intervention group, as compared to the control group receiving routine care. The individual stimulation program was monitored and adjusted during the period of intervention. All patients included in the nine municipalities were randomized to donepezil or placebo in a double blind manner.

Consequently, the present study has a double design; - an open prospective non-pharmaceutical intervention with control group, to which a double blind and randomized placebo-controlled trial is superimposed (2x2 factorial design). Each patient have been followed-up for one year. The clinical period was three years, two of them allocated recruitment and the third to secure a one-year intervention for all participants.

The Progress of the Study The recruitment of patients through routine general practice has not been successful. The participating general practitioners (GP) rarely examined patients suffering from cognitive impairment. Sometimes patients with a presumptive diagnosis of dementia were prescribed cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) without a preceding clinical examination. As a result of this lack of corporation only 27 patients were recruited to the study during the first year. During the subsequent six months some of the nine participating municipalities reorganized their caring routines for patients suffering from dementia. More patients were examined and diagnosed and another 60 patients were recruited to the study.

As a consequence of the unsatisfactory progress in recruiting patients to the study by GPs in routine clinical practice, the study protocol was changed and the recruiting procedures were supplemented by a population-based screening. The study population (65 years+) was invited to attend the survey by responding to and return a postal questionnaire containing five simple questions regarding memory and cognitive deficits. The screening program was accomplished in June 2007 with a response rate of approximately 32 % for self-reported memory deficits. An algorithm categorizes the responders. Those belonging to the category with the highest risk of having a diagnosis of dementia were invited to a clinical examination carried out by physicians from the study administration. Those fulfilling the inclusion criteria were then asked to be included in this Dementia Study in Northern-Norway.

More than 700 responders answered NO to the five questions about cognitive impairment but YES to a question about participating in the study. From this group of presumptively cognitive healthy people we randomly draw a sample of 500 persons who was invited to participate in a control group for the AD participants. Of these 200 individuals were confirmed cognitively healthy and included in the control group. The two groups have been compared according to clinical data, co-morbidity and drug consumption. A biobank containing whole blood, plasma and serum from AD participants and the cognitively healthy control group is established.

The stimulation program was executed as presupposed, and the randomisation procedures and administration of the medical treatment (placebo/donepezil) has been accomplished without any problems.

The following papers have been published in BMC Methodology and in BMC Geriatrics:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/11/58

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/10/35