AzTrials
AzTrials

Primary SjogrenPhase 4NCT00438048

A Comparison of Orally Pilocarpine and Artificial Saliva in Xerostomy Treatment

A Phase 4 study testing pilocarpine and Artificial Saliva in people with Primary Sjogren and Secondary Sjogren, run by Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile at 1 site in Chile.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the safetyness and efficacy of pilocarpine drops versus artificial saliva as symptomatic treatment for dry mouth and dry eyes caused by SS in a multicenter, doubleblind, controlled trial. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Primary Sjogren, Secondary Sjogren, Xerostomia
What is being tested?
pilocarpine and Artificial Saliva
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
76 participants
Where
1 siteChile
Study dates
Nov 2006to May 2008
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patiens over 18 years, with primary or secondary Sjogren's Syndrome and xerostomia.

Who cannot join

  • Patiens with cardiac, pulmonary, renal, gastric diseases,
  • Patients with diabetes, glaucoma, Multipleesclerosis,
  • Pregnant women.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Chile1 site
  • Unidad Docente Asociada Dermatologia. Escuela de MEdicina Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

    Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan

Other trials in Chile

About this study

Official title: Xerostomy Treatment in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome in Chile :A Double Blind Control Trial Comparing Orally Pilocarpine Drops and Artificial Saliva

The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the safetyness and efficacy of pilocarpine drops versus artificial saliva as symptomatic treatment for dry mouth and dry eyes caused by SS in a multicenter, doubleblind, controlled trial.

Read the detailed description

Title:

Xerostomy treatment in patients with Sjogren's syndrome in Chile :A double blind control trial comparing orally Pilocarpine drops and Artificial Saliva

Authors:

Cristian Vera Kellet, Mirtha Cifuentes Mutinelli. Affiliations: Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

BACKGROUND Sjogren's syndrome (SS) is characterized by diminished exocrine secretions with the resultant xerostomia and xerophthalmia due to slowly progressive infiltration of lacrimal and salivary glands by inflamatory cells.

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the safetyness and efficacy of pilocarpine drops versus artificial saliva as symptomatic treatment for dry mouth and dry eyes caused by SS in a multicenter, doubleblind, controlled trial.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS After providing written informed consent, 72 patients with primary or secondary SS and clinically significant dry mouth and dry eyes will be randomized to receive either 5-mg pilocarpine drops, or artificial saliva 3 times daily for 12 weeks. Global evaluation and subjective responses of patients will be assessed by questionnaires with visual analog scales or categorical checkboxes. All patients will be submited to anxiety and psicological test before and after 12 weeks. Whole-mouth salivary flow and lacrimal flow will be measured using Schirmer test.

Being tested
pilocarpine, Artificial Saliva
Keywords
Pilocarpine, Artificial saliva, Xerostomia, Xerostomy, Primary Sjogren, Secondary Sjogren
Medical subject headings
Xerostomia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • pilocarpineProcedure or surgery

    Also called Artificial saliva

    or secondary symptomatic SS with clinically significant dry mouth were randomized to receive either 5 mg oral Pilocarpine solution (5ml) or artificial saliva (5 ml) 3 times a day for 12 weeks

  • Artificial SalivaDrug

    Also called pilocarpine

    5ml 3 times daily

Study groups in NCT00438048
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
a,bActive comparatorCompare Pilocarpine and Artificial saliva
Receives: Procedure: pilocarpine; Drug: Artificial Saliva

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To assess and compare the safetyness and efficacy of pilocarpine drops versus artificial saliva as symptomatic treatment for dry mouth and dry eyes caused by SS in a multicenter, doubleblind, controlled trial.

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Determine on a subjetive manner wich treatment is better fot patients.

    Measured: 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Feb 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2006
  3. Primary completionMay 2008
  4. Study completionMay 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
76 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00438048
Sponsor's protocol ID
CAVK-130108245-1
Status last verified
May 2008
First submitted
20 Feb 2007
Last updated
22 May 2008
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Papas AS, Sherrer YS, Charney M, Golden HE, Medsger TA Jr, Walsh BT, Trivedi M, Goldlust B, Gallagher SC. Successful Treatment of Dry Mouth and Dry Eye Symptoms in Sjogren's Syndrome Patients With Oral Pilocarpine: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Adjustment Study. J Clin Rheumatol. 2004 Aug;10(4):169-77. doi: 10.1097/01.rhu.0000135553.08057.21.

    PubMed 17043506
  • Al-Hashimi I. Xerostomia secondary to Sjogren's syndrome in the elderly: recognition and management. Drugs Aging. 2005;22(11):887-99. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200522110-00001.

    PubMed 16323968
  • Masters KJ. Pilocarpine treatment of xerostomia induced by psychoactive medications. Am J Psychiatry. 2005 May;162(5):1023. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.5.1023. No abstract available.

    PubMed 15863819
  • Gotrick B, Akerman S, Ericson D, Torstenson R, Tobin G. Oral pilocarpine for treatment of opioid-induced oral dryness in healthy adults. J Dent Res. 2004 May;83(5):393-7. doi: 10.1177/154405910408300508.

    PubMed 15111631
  • Hendrickson RG, Morocco AP, Greenberg MI. Pilocarpine toxicity and the treatment of xerostomia. J Emerg Med. 2004 May;26(4):429-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2003.09.013.

    PubMed 15093850
  • Solans R, Bosch JA, Selva A, Simeon CP, Fonollosa V, Vilardell M. [Usefulness of oral pilocarpin therapy in the treatment of xerostomia and xerophthalmia in patients with primary Sjogren's syndrome]. Med Clin (Barc). 2004 Feb 28;122(7):253-5. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(04)75314-2. Spanish.

    PubMed 15012873
  • Tsifetaki N, Kitsos G, Paschides CA, Alamanos Y, Eftaxias V, Voulgari PV, Psilas K, Drosos AA. Oral pilocarpine for the treatment of ocular symptoms in patients with Sjogren's syndrome: a randomised 12 week controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Dec;62(12):1204-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2002.003889.

    PubMed 14644860
  • Wu CH, Hsieh SC, Lee KL, Li KJ, Lu MC, Yu CL. Pilocarpine hydrochloride for the treatment of xerostomia in patients with Sjogren's syndrome in Taiwan--a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Formos Med Assoc. 2006 Oct;105(10):796-803. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60266-7.

    PubMed 17000452
  • Brito-Zeron P, Ramos-Casals M, Nardi N, Font J. [Results of the treatment with oral pilocarpine in 100 patients with primary Sjogrens syndrome]. Med Clin (Barc). 2006 Apr 29;126(16):637. doi: 10.1157/13087738. No abstract available. Spanish.

    PubMed 16759558
  • Aframian DJ, Helcer M, Livni D, Markitziu A. Pilocarpine for the treatment of salivary glands' impairment caused by radioiodine therapy for thyroid cancer. Oral Dis. 2006 May;12(3):297-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01195.x.

    PubMed 16700739
  • Aragona P, Di Pietro R, Spinella R, Mobrici M. Conjunctival epithelium improvement after systemic pilocarpine in patients with Sjogren's syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Feb;90(2):166-70. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.078865.

    PubMed 16424527

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing pilocarpine and Artificial Saliva in people with Primary Sjogren and Secondary Sjogren, run by Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile at 1 site in Chile.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Chile. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To assess and compare the safetyness and efficacy of pilocarpine drops versus artificial saliva as symptomatic treatment for dry mouth and dry eyes caused by SS in a multicenter, doubleblind, controlled trial. (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00438048, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in