AzTrials
AzTrials

DyspepsiaNCT00437346

Functional Dyspepsia - Effect of Acid-Reducing Treatment and Information.

A study testing Individualized and comprehensive information and Lanzo Melt in people with Dyspepsia, run by Helse Fonna at 5 sites in Norway.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Study title: Functional dyspepsia -- effect of acid reducing treatment and individualized information. Summary: 15-20% of all people experience dyspepsia each year. Dyspepsia means pain or discomfort in the upper part of the abdomen. Accompanying symptoms from the esophagus may be present. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Dyspepsia
What is being tested?
Individualized and comprehensive information and Lanzo Melt
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
35 participants
Where
5 sitesNorway
Study dates
Jan 2007to Jul 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 20 - 60 years
  • Rome II criteria fulfilled
  • Helicobacter test negative (urease-test)
  • Informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Diabetes
  • Prior gastrointestinal surgery
  • Treatment with proton pump inhibitors / H2 blockers the last 30 days
  • Pregnancy / lactation
  • Current use of NSAIDs
  • Serious psychiatric illness
  • Serious egg allergy

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

Norway5 sites
  • Department of Medicine, Haugesund Hospital

    Haugesund, N-5504

  • Department of Medisin, Haugesund Hospital

    Haugesund, N-5504

  • Department of Radiology, Haugesund Hospital

    Haugesund, N-5504

  • Surgical Department, Haugesund Hospital

    Haugesund, N-5504

  • Gastro-group

    Haugesund, N-5527

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Official title: Study of Gastroscopy Negative Dyspepsia - Effect of Acid-reducing Treatment and Information on Various Types of Dysmotility.

Study title: Functional dyspepsia -- effect of acid reducing treatment and individualized information.

Summary: 15-20% of all people experience dyspepsia each year. Dyspepsia means pain or discomfort in the upper part of the abdomen. Accompanying symptoms from the esophagus may be present. The most important relevant medical examination is gastroscopy, and if the findings are normal the condition is usually classified as functional dyspepsia.

Read more

Several disturbances of function are now known as potential causes of such symptoms, and the optimal choice of treatment may vary.

In the study the investigators plan to examine whether different types of functional disturbances respond differently to medical therapy. In particular, the investigators want to assess whether comprehensive and individualized information will influence the results of therapy. This has not been previously studied systematically.

The investigators also postulate that disturbances of function of the esophagus may cause complaints that should be classified as functional dyspepsia even if the symptoms are atypical. Few studies have been done to evaluate this hypothesis, and there may be potential consequences for choice of appropriate treatment.

In animal models and in humans is recently demonstrated that elevated gastric pH because of anti-ulcer treatment can trigger food allergy. We use a proton pump inhibitor in our study and eventually development of food allergy will influence patient's condition in an observations period. That why we're observing IgE dynamics in our study.

Read the detailed description

Purpose

Functional dyspepsia is a common disorder affecting approximately 25 % of the adult population. Functional dyspepsia is defined from symptoms according to the Rome II criteria. A normal upper endoscopy is also warranted Many of these patients have specific motility disorders. A more accurate diagnosis could mean a more effective treatment.

In this study the patients take several tests in order to make a more specific diagnosis. These include: 24 hour pH-monitoring, oesophagusmanometry, drink test and scintigrafy.

We will study the effect of acid reducing treatment (proton pump inhibitors) on the different dysmotility-types and also the effect of medical information and advise.

We will observe concentrations of total IgE and various specific antibodies against food allergens in serum when taking PPI. Results here can vary dependent on whether the patient has used PPI anytime before or not.

Patients

The patients are included via referrals from general practitioners and hospital doctors. An upper endoscopy is performed. If this investigation is normal the patient is considered for inclusion in the study.

Criteria for inclusion are

  • Age 20 - 60 years
  • Rome II criteria fulfilled
  • Helicobacter test negative (urease-test)
  • Informed consent

Criteria for exclusion are

  • Diabetes
  • Prior gastrointestinal surgery
  • Treatment with proton pump inhibitors / H2 blockers the last 30 days
  • Pregnancy / lactation
  • Current use of NSAIDs
  • Serious psychiatric illness
  • Serious egg-allergy

Study design

Start of the study: symptom score based on symptoms within the last three days. Lanzo melt 30 mg daily is given as a morning dose. Patients are randomized in two groups. Group A is given thorough information based on the tests taken plus medical treatment. Group B receives medical treatment only.

After two weeks symptom score per telephone. After four weeks a new symptom score. A reduction by at least 25 % is defined as treatment response. These patients continue their medical treatment for three months. Now all patients receive thorough information.

Non responders end their medical treatment and they are followed with medical information and advise the next three months.

After eight weeks symptom score per telephone. After 12 weeks symptom score per telephone. After 16 weeks the study is ended. Symptom score is taken.

After 4 and 16 weeks the patient evaluates his/her treatment in five categories: Very satisfied, satisfied, less satisfied, no change, worse.

Symptom score

Seven symptoms are scored from 1-7 points based on the last week. The symptoms are: regurgitation, nausea, early satiety, belching, pain referred to meals, pain not referred to meals, postprandial fullness.

  1. No symptoms
  2. Insignificant symptoms (as usual ignored)
  3. Light symptoms (easy to ignore)
  4. Moderate symptoms (easy to tolerate)
  5. Quite marked symptoms (not easy to tolerate)
  6. Marked symptoms (affects daily activities)
  7. Substantional symptoms (can't do daily activities)

24 hour pH monitoring

Digitrapper III from Synectics is used. A probe is installed trans nasally to the gastric lumen where a pH value is registered. Afterwards the probe is placed five cm over the upper border of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). After 24 hours registration is completed and analyzed with the use of Polygram 98 from Medtronic Functional Diagnostics AS.

Total reflux index, reflux with meals, postprandial reflux, nightly reflux and long reflux episodes are registered. Pathologic reflux index is defined as pathological if reflux is over 5 %.

Acid Clearence Time (ACT) is also estimated. It is found by dividing total reflux time with the number of refluxes. Upper normal limit is set to 0,85 minutes/reflux.

Esophagusmanometry

We use perfusion manometry. The catheter has sensors in five levels five cm apart. LES is first localized and length and resting pressure are registered. We test for normal relaxation with swallowing. Then we test the motility (peristalsis and amplitude/duration of pressure waves).

Scintigraphy

We give a standard meal composed of two omelets, one slice of bread and a glass of water. Radioactive Technesium is injected into the omelet and the meal is eaten in ten minutes. Picture uptakes are taken according to the protocol the first hour after completion of the meal. Gastric emptying time is estimated.

Drink test The patients drink water 150 ml/min until they feel they must stop. Symptoms are registered when they stop and 15 and 30 minutes there after. This is a test to determine accommodation and visceral sensibility.

Blood tests Hemoglobin, sedimentation rate, CRP, leucocytes, thrombocytes, bilirubin, ALP, ALAT, g-GT, albumin and amylase are taken to exclude organic disease. It does not represent a variable in the study design.

Conditions
Dyspepsia
Being tested
Individualized and comprehensive information, Lanzo Melt
Keywords
dyspepsia, functional dyspepsia, treatment, drug therapy, information
Medical subject headings
Dyspepsia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Individualized and comprehensive informationProcedure or surgery

    Thorough verbal and written information about results of the tests. Individualized meals recommendation based on the results.

  • Lanzo MeltDrug

    30mg, od, 1/2 h before meal

  • Lanzo MeltDrug

    30mg, od, 1/2 h before meal

Study groups in NCT00437346
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group AActive comparatorPatients is given thorough information based on the tests taken plus medical treatment.
Receives: Procedure: Individualized and comprehensive information; Drug: Lanzo Melt
Group BActive comparatorPatients receive simple written information based on the tests taken plus medical treatment.
Receives: Drug: Lanzo Melt

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Improvement of symptom score

    Measured: november 2009-2013

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Feb 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2007
  3. Primary completionJul 2016
  4. Study completionJul 2016

Why it stopped: The project leader left our hospital and the project were shut down.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
35 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00437346
Sponsor's protocol ID
15312
Status last verified
Dec 2019
First submitted
15 Feb 2007
Last updated
16 Dec 2019
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Talley NJ, Stanghellini V, Heading RC, Koch KL, Malagelada JR, Tytgat GN. Functional gastroduodenal disorders. Gut. 1999 Sep;45 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):II37-42. doi: 10.1136/gut.45.2008.ii37.

    PubMed 10457043
  • Tack J, Bisschops R, Sarnelli G. Pathophysiology and treatment of functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterology. 2004 Oct;127(4):1239-55. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.05.030. No abstract available.

    PubMed 15481001
  • Talley NJ, Verlinden M, Jones M. Can symptoms discriminate among those with delayed or normal gastric emptying in dysmotility-like dyspepsia? Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 May;96(5):1422-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03683.x.

    PubMed 11374677
  • Talley NJ, Locke GR, Lahr BD, Zinsmeister AR, Cohard-Radice M, D'Elia TV, Tack J, Earnest DL. Predictors of the placebo response in functional dyspepsia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Apr 1;23(7):923-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02845.x.

    PubMed 16573795
  • Bolling-Sternevald E, Lauritsen K, Aalykke C, Havelund T, Knudsen T, Unge P, Ekstrom P, Jaup B, Norrby A, Stubberod A, Melen K, Carlsson R, Jerndal P, Junghard O, Glise H. Effect of profound acid suppression in functional dyspepsia: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002 Dec;37(12):1395-402. doi: 10.1080/003655202762671260.

    PubMed 12523588
  • Talley NJ, Vakil N; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for the management of dyspepsia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Oct;100(10):2324-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00225.x.

    PubMed 16181387
  • Jones MP, Roth LM, Crowell MD. Symptom reporting by functional dyspeptics during the water load test. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jun;100(6):1334-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40802.x.

    PubMed 15929766
  • Untersmayr E, Jensen-Jarolim E. The effect of gastric digestion on food allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Jun;6(3):214-9. doi: 10.1097/01.all.0000225163.06016.93.

    PubMed 16670517

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Individualized and comprehensive information and Lanzo Melt in people with Dyspepsia, run by Helse Fonna at 5 sites in Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: The project leader left our hospital and the project were shut down.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Improvement of symptom score (time frame: november 2009-2013). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00437346, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in