Type I HypersensitivityPhase 3NCT00423787
Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Ragweed MATA MPL
A Phase 3 study testing Ragweed MATA MPL in people with Type I Hypersensitivity, run by Allergy Therapeutics at 76 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Ragweed MATAMPL has been developed by Allergy Therapeutics to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with proven type I hypersensitivity to cross reacting ragweed pollens causing rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis with or without mild to moderate asthma bronchiale. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 59 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type I Hypersensitivity
- What is being tested?
- Ragweed MATA MPL
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 993 participants
- Where
- 76 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2007to Mar 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 59 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Have given written informed consent;
- Are 18 to 59 years of age;
- history of moderate to severe symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis ascribed to ragweed pollen exposure that required repeated use of antihistamines, nasal steroids, and/or leukotriene modifiers;
- history of moderate to severe symptoms in the past ragweed pollen season;
- positive skin prick test to ragweed pollen and a positive RAST or equivalent test to ragweed pollen;
- positive skin prick test to histamine;
Show all 11Show fewer
- negative skin prick test to the negative control;
- forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ≥ 80% of predicted, with a FEV1/FVC ratio ≥ 70%;
- Women of childbearing potential must be using a medically acceptable method of birth control;
- able to understand and comply with study instructions;
- Demonstrate proper use of electronic diary with at least 85% compliance during the 1-week period between Visit 1 and Visit 2.
Who cannot join
- pregnant or lactating
- asthma requiring the daily use of controller medication;
- emergency room visit or admission for asthma in the 12 months prior to Visit 1;
- presence of secondary alteration at the affected organ (i.e., emphysema, bronchiectasis, nasal polyps, chronic sinusitis);
- auto-immune disease;
- acute or subacute (historic) atopic dermatitis, chronic dermatitis, urticaria factitia, and/or urticaria due to physical/chemical influence or any other skin conditions which might interfere with the interpretation of the skin prick test results;
Show all 42Show fewer
- history or presence of diabetes, cancer or concomitant illness that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would pose a safety risk or compromise the interpretation of efficacy for this ragweed immunotherapy;
- history of angioedema;
- manifest pulmonary or cardiac insufficiency;
- current malignant disease;
- disorders of tyrosine metabolism (i.e., alcaptonuria, tyrosinemia);
- acute or chronic infection;
- any clinically significant abnormal laboratory value at Visit 1;
- Perennial Allergens: positive skin prick test at Visit 1 to: house dust mites, molds, or epithelia. In these cases, a careful history is to be taken and if moderate or severe symptoms are reported when exposed to the aforementioned allergens, the subject is to be excluded. Exception: the source of the allergen (cat, dog, horse) can be avoided for the entire study.
- Springtime Flowering Plant Allergens: positive skin prick test at Visit 1 to birch, oak, sycamore, ash, red maple, black walnut, American elm, or poplar. In these cases, a careful history is to be taken and if moderate to severe symptoms are reported when exposed to the aforementioned allergens the subject is to be excluded. Exception: one or all of the listed allergens must not be tested if they are not common to the Investigator's region or, if common to the region, the treatment phase of the study can be initiated at least 30 days after the end of the allergen(s) season or treatment can be completed 30 days before the anticipated start of the allergen(s) season.
- Summertime Flowering Plant Allergens: positive skin prick test at Visit 1 to grass pollen mix or Bermuda grass. In these cases, a careful history is to be taken and if moderate to severe symptoms are reported when exposed to the aforementioned allergens the subject is to be excluded. Exception: No testing is required if there is no overlap between grass / Bermuda grass and ragweed season and if treatment can be completed 30 days before the start of grass / Bermuda grass season. Bermuda grass must not be tested if it is not common to the Investigator's region.
- Late Summer/Autumn Flowering Plant Allergens: positive skin prick test at Visit 1 to: goosefoot/lamb's quarters, firebush/kochia, or English plantain. In these cases, a careful history is to be taken and if moderate to severe symptoms are reported when exposed to the aforementioned allergens the subject is to be excluded. Exception: some or all of the listed allergens must not be tested if they are not common to the Investigator's region.
- Have inadequate washout period prior to screening (Visit 1). The following washout periods prior to Visit 1 are acceptable:
- Oral or parenteral corticosteroids (1 month)
- Inhaled, ocular or intranasal corticosteroids (1 day)
- Mast cell stabilizers (7 days)
- Intranasal or systemic decongestants including cold preparations (1 day)
- Leukotriene modifiers (7 days)
- Afrin (oxymetazoline hydrochloride) (14 days)
- Antihistamines
- Once-daily or twice-daily antihistamines (7 days)
- Short-acting 3 or 4 times a day antihistamines (3 days)
- Hydroxyzine (14 days)
- H2-blockers (1 day)
- Other anti-inflammatory, anti-allergy, and any other medications which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may interfere with the study objectives should be considered on a case-by-case basis
- Topical skin medications on the forearms (14 days);
- Require use of beta blockers;
- Are unable to receive epinephrine therapy (i.e., use of epinephrine is contraindicated);
- Have a history of anaphylactic reactions to foods, insect venom, exercise, or drugs;
- Have been treated with a preparation containing MPL® within 6 months prior to Visit 1;
- Have diseases with a pathogenesis interfering with the immune response, and who have received medication which could interfere with the results of the study;
- Have a history of allergy, hypersensitivity or intolerance to the excipients of the study medication;
- Have a history of allergy, hypersensitivity or intolerance to study relief medication;
- Have already undergone hyposensitisation therapy with comparable allergen extracts; An exception will be allowed if prior immunotherapy with comparable allergen was successful, symptoms reappeared some time after stopping the immunotherapy, and the immunotherapy was completed ≥ 3 years before Visit 1;
- Have participated in a clinical research trial with a new chemical substance within 4 weeks of Visit 1;
- Are unable or unwilling to cooperate with the Investigator and to comply with the protocol requirements, or not likely to complete the observation periods sufficiently;
- Have changed residence between geographical regions within the past 3 months
Trial locations and contacts
76 sites in 2 countries.
76 sites in 2 countries
United States59 sites
Dr. Jeffrey Rosch Office and Research Centre
Altoona, Pennsylvania, 16601
Regional Allergy & Asthma Consultants
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801
Allergy & Asthma Consultants
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Clinical Research Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Allergy & Asthma Associates Research Department
Austin, Texas, 78731
Lovelace Scientific Resources Allergy and Asthma Centre of Austin
Austin, Texas, 78759
Tricities Medical Research
Bristol, Tennessee, 37620
Allergy & Respiratory Center
Canton, Ohio, 44718
The Asthma Institute, PLLC
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37421
University Consultants in Allergy/Immunlogy
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
DataQuest Medical Research
Conyers, Georgia, 30013
AARA Research Centre
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Valley Clinical Research Centre
Easton, Pennsylvania, 18045
Allergy & Asthma Care Centre
Fargo, North Dakota, 58103
North Texas Institute for Clinical Trials
Fort Worth, Texas, 76132
Northeast Georgia Research Center LLC
Gainesville, Georgia, 30501
Allergy & Arthritis Treatment Centre
Gardner, Massachusetts, 01440
Allergy, Asthma & Sinus Centre, S.C.
Greenfield, Wisconsin, 53228
Allergy & Asthma Associates
Houston, Texas, 77054
Iowa Clinical Research Corporation
Iowa City, Iowa, 52244
The Allergy, Asthma & Sinus Centre PA
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909
Allergy and Consultants, PC
Lilburn, Georgia, 30047
Dean Foundation Medical Research
Madison, Wisconsin, 53715
University of Wisconsin, Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
Centre For Clinical Trials
Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, 53051
Advanced Healthcare SC
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53209
Clinical Research Institute
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55402
Clinical Research Associates, Inc
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Sneeze, Wheeze and Itch Associates, LLC
Normal, Illinois, 61761
Atlantic Research Center LLC
Ocean City, New Jersey, 07712
Midwest Allergy and Asthma Clinic
Omaha, Nebraska, 68130
Creighton University Medical Center Division of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology
Omaha, Nebraska, 68131
Kansas City Allergy & Asthma
Overland, Kansas, 66210
The Asthma and Allergy Centre
Papillion, Nebraska, 68046
Allergy and Asthma Research of New Jersey Inc.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19115
Allergy and Clinical Immunology Associates
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15241
Clinical Research Institute/West Health Building
Plymouth, Minnesota, 55441
North Carolina Clinical Research
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
Wake Research Associates
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612
Commonwealth Clinic Research Specialists Inc.
Richmond, Virginia, 23226
National Clinical Research
Richmond, Virginia, 23294
AAIR Research Center
Rochester, New York, 14618
Biogenics Research Institute
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Diagnostic Research Group
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Sylvana Research Associates
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Princeton Center for Clinical Research
Skillman, New Jersey, 08558
Timber Lane Allergy & Asthma Research
South Burlington, Vermont, 05403
The Clinical Research Center, LLC
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Clinical Research Atlanta
Stockbridge, Georgia, 30281
Pulmonary & Allergy Associates, P.A.
Summit, New Jersey, 07901
Toledo Center for Clinical Research
Sylvania, Ohio, 43560
The Medical Center at Teaneck
Teaneck, New Jersey, 07666
Asthma and Allergy Associates
Upland, Pennsylvania, 19013
Allergy & Asthma Care of Waco
Waco, Texas, 76708
Allergy Asthma Research Institute
Waco, Texas, 76712
The Centre for Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708
Allergic Diseases SC
West Allis, Wisconsin, 53227
Ira Finegold, M.D.
White Plains, New York, 10606
Respiratory Medical Research Institute of Michigan
Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48197
Canada17 sites
JBN Medical Diagnostic Services Inc.
Burlington, Ontario, L7M 4Y1
Co-Medica Health Centre
Courtice, Ontario, L1E 3C3
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5
Kanata Allergy Services Ltd.
Kanata, Ontario, K2L 3C8
Omnispec Clinical Research
Mirabel, Quebec, J7J 2K8
Allied Research International Inc
Mississauga, Ontario, L4W 1N2
Alpha Medical Research Inc.
Mississauga, Ontario, L5A 3V4
Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, The McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4
Niagara Clinical Research
Niagara Falls, Ontario, L2G 1J4
Northgate Medical Clinic
North Bay, Ontario, P1B2H3
Allergy & Asthma Research Centre
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4G2
Centre De Recherche Appliquée en Allergie De Quebec
Québec, Quebec, GiV 4M6
Q&T Research
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 4J6
Melimar Allergy Laboratory Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, M3H 3S3
Asthma, Allergy & Immunology
Toronto, Ontario, M4P 1P2
Gordon Sussman, 202 St. Clair Avenue West
Toronto, Ontario, M4V 1R2
Manna Research
Toronto, Ontario, M9W 4L6
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Ragweed MATA MPL, a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study
Ragweed MATAMPL has been developed by Allergy Therapeutics to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with proven type I hypersensitivity to cross reacting ragweed pollens causing rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis with or without mild to moderate asthma bronchiale. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Ragweed MATAMPL versus placebo in ragweed-allergic subjects following 4 subcutaneous injections of study medication administered before the start of the 2007 ragweed pollen season
Read the detailed description
Ragweed MATAMPL has been developed by Allergy Therapeutics to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with proven type I hypersensitivity to cross reacting ragweed pollens causing rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis with or without mild to moderate asthma bronchiale.
An earlier formulation of Ragweed MATAMPL developed by Allergy Therapeutics (UK), Ltd, available commercially in Canada since the 1980's, is 'Pollinex®-R'. 'Pollinex®-R' is formulated with modified allergens (allergoids) of ragweed pollen extract adsorbed onto L tyrosine at 4% w/v. Related formulations developed by ATL, available commercially in selected European countries since the 1970´s on a Named Patient Basis, are 'Pollinex Tree', 'Pollinex Grass', 'Pollinex Quattro Trees' (previously known as MATA tree + MPL), and 'Pollinex Quattro Grass' (previously known as MATA grass + MPL).
Ragweed MATAMPL contains an extract of ragweed pollens. This extract is chemically modified with glutaraldehyde to produce the active ingredient, an allergoid. Such modification reduces the reactivity of the extract with IgE antibody. However, a simultaneous reduction in other important immunological properties, such as IgG and T cell reactivity is not seen. The modified extract is adsorbed to L-tyrosine as a depot formulation. MPL®, a purified, detoxified glycolipid derived from the cell walls of Salmonella minnesota, is also included in the current product formulation. This excipient/adjuvant is included to increase the immunogenic effect of the product and to enhance the switch from an allergen-specific TH2 to TH1-like T cell profile.
The current formulation is designed to provide a product that will be efficacious with only 4 injections, in contrast to the longer schedules currently in use with unmodified extracts. The product will also be safer to use than a formulation containing a similar mass of unmodified allergen extract as regards its ability to cause severe local allergic reactions or anaphylaxis, because of its reduced reactivity with IgE antibody. The modification is greater than 75%, so that only a small amount of unmodified allergen is remaining in the product.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Ragweed MATAMPL versus placebo in ragweed-allergic subjects following 4 subcutaneous injections of study medication administered before the start of the 2007 ragweed pollen season.
- Conditions
- Type I Hypersensitivity
- Being tested
- Ragweed MATA MPL
- Keywords
- Allergy, Allergoid, Specific Immunotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Hypersensitivity, Immediate, Hypersensitivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ragweed MATA MPLBiological
4 injections of increasing dose strength:
- 300 SU/0.5 ml
- 700 SU/0.5 ml
- 2000 SU/0.5 ml
- 6000 SU/0.5 ml
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ragweed MATA MPL | Experimental | modified Ragweed pollen allergen absorbed to Tyrosine and containing MPL adjuvant Receives: Biological: Ragweed MATA MPL |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | 4 injections of placebo 0.5 ml (2% tyrosine) Receives: Biological: Ragweed MATA MPL |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Compare the efficacy of Ragweed MATA MPL versus placebo as measured by the combined allergy symptom (eyes and nose)+ medication scores self-reported by subjects during the 3 peak weeks of the 2007 ragweed pollen season.
Measured: 9 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Combined symptom + medication scores, Combined symptoms, Individual symptoms, Relief medication use, Specific immunological changes, quality of life, Health Assessments, Days absent from activities
Measured: 9 months
Adverse events, adverse reactions, clinical labs, ECG, and vitals
Measured: 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jan 2007 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2007
- Primary completionNov 2007
- Study completionMar 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Type I HypersensitivityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 993 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Allergy Therapeutics
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Karl Jürgen Fischer von Weikersthal-Drachenberg, MD, Study chair, Allergy Therapeutics
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00423787
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RagweedMATAMPL301
- Status last verified
- Jun 2010
- First submitted
- 17 Jan 2007
- Last updated
- 17 Jun 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jun 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Ragweed MATA MPL, a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00423787
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RagweedMATAMPL301
- Conditions
- Type I Hypersensitivity
- Keywords
- Allergy, Allergoid, Specific Immunotherapy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 993 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Allergy TherapeuticsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2007
- Primary completion
- Nov 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jan 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Ragweed MATAMPL has been developed by Allergy Therapeutics to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with proven type I hypersensitivity to cross reacting ragweed pollens causing rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis with or without mild to moderate asthma bronchiale. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Ragweed MATAMPL versus placebo in ragweed-allergic subjects following 4 subcutaneous injections of study medication administered before the start of the 2007 ragweed pollen season
Detailed description
Ragweed MATAMPL has been developed by Allergy Therapeutics to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with proven type I hypersensitivity to cross reacting ragweed pollens causing rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis with or without mild to moderate asthma bronchiale.
An earlier formulation of Ragweed MATAMPL developed by Allergy Therapeutics (UK), Ltd, available commercially in Canada since the 1980's, is 'Pollinex®-R'. 'Pollinex®-R' is formulated with modified allergens (allergoids) of ragweed pollen extract adsorbed onto L tyrosine at 4% w/v. Related formulations developed by ATL, available commercially in selected European countries since the 1970´s on a Named Patient Basis, are 'Pollinex Tree', 'Pollinex Grass', 'Pollinex Quattro Trees' (previously known as MATA tree + MPL), and 'Pollinex Quattro Grass' (previously known as MATA grass + MPL).
Ragweed MATAMPL contains an extract of ragweed pollens. This extract is chemically modified with glutaraldehyde to produce the active ingredient, an allergoid. Such modification reduces the reactivity of the extract with IgE antibody. However, a simultaneous reduction in other important immunological properties, such as IgG and T cell reactivity is not seen. The modified extract is adsorbed to L-tyrosine as a depot formulation. MPL®, a purified, detoxified glycolipid derived from the cell walls of Salmonella minnesota, is also included in the current product formulation. This excipient/adjuvant is included to increase the immunogenic effect of the product and to enhance the switch from an allergen-specific TH2 to TH1-like T cell profile.
The current formulation is designed to provide a product that will be efficacious with only 4 injections, in contrast to the longer schedules currently in use with unmodified extracts. The product will also be safer to use than a formulation containing a similar mass of unmodified allergen extract as regards its ability to cause severe local allergic reactions or anaphylaxis, because of its reduced reactivity with IgE antibody. The modification is greater than 75%, so that only a small amount of unmodified allergen is remaining in the product.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Ragweed MATAMPL versus placebo in ragweed-allergic subjects following 4 subcutaneous injections of study medication administered before the start of the 2007 ragweed pollen season.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ragweed MATA MPL | Experimental | Biological: Ragweed MATA MPLmodified Ragweed pollen allergen absorbed to Tyrosine and containing MPL adjuvant |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Biological: Ragweed MATA MPL4 injections of placebo 0.5 ml (2% tyrosine) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 59 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Have given written informed consent;
- Are 18 to 59 years of age;
- history of moderate to severe symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis ascribed to ragweed pollen exposure that required repeated use of antihistamines, nasal steroids, and/or leukotriene modifiers;
- history of moderate to severe symptoms in the past ragweed pollen season;
- positive skin prick test to ragweed pollen and a positive RAST or equivalent test to ragweed pollen;
Key exclusion criteria (42 listed)
- pregnant or lactating
- asthma requiring the daily use of controller medication;
- emergency room visit or admission for asthma in the 12 months prior to Visit 1;
- presence of secondary alteration at the affected organ (i.e., emphysema, bronchiectasis, nasal polyps, chronic sinusitis);
- auto-immune disease;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ragweed MATA MPL4 injections of increasing dose strength: 1. 300 SU/0.5 ml 2. 700 SU/0.5 ml 3. 2000 SU/0.5 ml 4. 6000 SU/0.5 ml | Biological | Placebo, Ragweed MATA MPL |
Primary outcome
Compare the efficacy of Ragweed MATA MPL versus placebo as measured by the combined allergy symptom (eyes and nose)+ medication scores self-reported by subjects during the 3 peak weeks of the 2007 ragweed pollen season.
Time frame: 9 months
2 secondary outcomes
Combined symptom + medication scores, Combined symptoms, Individual symptoms, Relief medication use, Specific immunological changes, quality of life, Health Assessments, Days absent from activities
Time frame: 9 months
Adverse events, adverse reactions, clinical labs, ECG, and vitals
Time frame: 9 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jun 2010.
Related trials for Type I Hypersensitivity
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Rinatabart Sesutecan (Rina-S, PRO1184, GEN1184) for Advanced Solid Tumors (GCT1184-01/ PRO1184-001)
High Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Novel Biomarkers of Non-IgE Immediate Hypersensitivity Drug Reactions
Healthy Volunteer, Hypersensitivity Reactions
Active, not recruiting
The COCCOS Study: a Transition Program for Young Persons With Chronic Conditions
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Obesity
RecruitingObservational study
Impaired Type I IFN Immunity Due to Autoantibodies or a Genetic Defect: a Prospective National Cohort
Immunology, Allergy
RecruitingPhase 3
STOP-HAE: A Phase 3 Study of ADX-324 in HAE
Hereditary Angioedema, HAE
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Karl Jürgen Fischer von Weikersthal-Drachenberg, MD study chair
Allergy Therapeutics
76 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Ragweed MATA MPL in people with Type I Hypersensitivity, run by Allergy Therapeutics at 76 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 42 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jun 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 76 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Compare the efficacy of Ragweed MATA MPL versus placebo as measured by the combined allergy symptom (eyes and nose)+ medication scores self-reported by subjects during the 3 peak weeks of the 2007 ragweed pollen season. (time frame: 9 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jun 2010.