Kidney CancerPhase 3NCT00416871
Interleukin-2 and Interferon in Treating Patients With Metastatic Kidney Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing aldesleukin and recombinant interferon alfa in people with Kidney Cancer, run by Centre Leon Berard.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Biological therapies, such as interleukin-2 and interferon, may stimulate the immune system in different ways and stop tumor cells from growing. It is not yet known whether interleukin-2 given by infusion is more effective than interleukin-2 given by injection when combined with interferon in treating… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Kidney Cancer
- What is being tested?
- aldesleukin and recombinant interferon alfa
- How many people
- 220 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Start not givento Feb 2006
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically confirmed metastatic renal cell adenocarcinoma
- More than one resectable metastatic site
- No unresectable lesions after local curative treatment (i.e., radiotherapy)
- In case of secondary lesions suspected on imaging (< 1 cm and/or sparse lesions), metastatic disease must be confirmed by biopsy OR disease progression documented by imaging performed over several weeks
- If patient has known prior metastatic lesions, progressive disease must have been confirmed within the past 3 months by noninvasive techniques
- Nephrectomized
- Measurable or evaluable disease
- No brain metastases
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- Karnofsky performance status 90-100%
- Hematocrit ≥ 30%
- WBC ≥ 4,000/mm^3
- Platelet count ≥ 120,000/mm^3
- Bilirubin normal
- Creatinine ≤ 1.7 mg/dL
- FEV_1 ≥ 50%
- No severe cardiac dysfunction (i.e., grade III/IV heart disease), including any of the following:
- Congestive heart failure
- Coronary artery disease
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- Severe arrhythmia
- No active infections requiring antibiotic treatment
- No severe neuropsychiatric condition
- No geographical, psychological, or familial conditions that would preclude study treatment
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
- LVEF ≥ 50%
- No severe autoimmune disease
- No known chronic hepatitis
- No HIV positivity
- No hepatitis B surface antigen positivity
- No prior or concurrent other cancer, except basal cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
- No severe pulmonary, hepatic, or renal condition that would preclude study treatment
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- See Disease Characteristics
- At least 6 weeks since prior wide-field radiotherapy
- No prior allograft
- No prior cytokines or chemotherapy
- No concurrent corticosteroids
About this study
Official title: Cytokines in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (MRCC): Intravenous Interleukin and Subcutaneous Interferon-α Versus Subcutaneous Interleukin and Interferon-α for Good Prognosis Patients [PERCY DUO]
RATIONALE: Biological therapies, such as interleukin-2 and interferon, may stimulate the immune system in different ways and stop tumor cells from growing. It is not yet known whether interleukin-2 given by infusion is more effective than interleukin-2 given by injection when combined with interferon in treating metastatic kidney cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying interleukin-2 given by infusion to see how well it works compared to interleukin-2 given by injection when combined with interferon in treating patients with metastatic kidney cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the overall survival of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer treated with intravenous vs subcutaneous interleukin-2 in combination with interferon alfa.
Secondary
- Compare progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare response rates (complete and partial) in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
- Compare quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is an open-label, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive induction therapy comprising interleukin-2 (IL-2) IV continuously over days 1-5, 15-19, 43-47, and 57-61 (weeks 1, 3, 7, and 9) and interferon alfa (IFN-α) subcutaneously (SC) three times weekly in weeks 1-3 and 7-9. Patients then undergo restaging. Patients achieving a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) then receive maintenance therapy comprising IL-2 IV continuously over 5 days and IFN-α SC three times weekly in weeks 1, 5, 9, and 13.
- Arm II: Patients receive induction therapy comprising IL-2 SC twice daily on days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, and 22-26 (weeks 1-4). Patients also receive IFN-α SC three times weekly in weeks 1-4 and 6-9. Patients then undergo restaging. Patients achieving a CR, PR, or SD then receive maintenance therapy comprising IL-2 SC as in induction therapy and IFN-α SC three times weekly in weeks 1-4 and 8-11.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, at the end of induction therapy, and then at the end of maintenance therapy.
After completion of treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 3 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 220 patients will be accrued for this study.
- Conditions
- Kidney Cancer
- Being tested
- aldesleukin, recombinant interferon alfa
- Keywords
- stage IV renal cell cancer, recurrent renal cell cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Kidney Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Renal Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
aldesleukinBiological
recombinant interferon alfaBiological
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Dec 2006 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Kidney CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Leon BerardThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 220 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Leon Berard
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sylvie Negrier, MD, Study chair, Centre Leon Berard
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00416871
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000468028
- Other IDs
- LEONB-PERCY-DUO, LEONB-ET99-057, EU-20604, ROCHE-LEONB-PERCY-DUO, CHIRON-LEONB-PERCY-DUO
- Status last verified
- Sep 2012
- First submitted
- 27 Dec 2006
- Last updated
- 26 Sep 2012
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Negrier S, Perol D, Ravaud A, Bay JO, Oudard S, Chabaud S, Fargeot P, Delva R, Deplanque G, Gravis G, Escudier B; French Immunotherapy Group. Randomized study of intravenous versus subcutaneous interleukin-2, and IFNalpha in patients with good prognosis metastatic renal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Sep 15;14(18):5907-12. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0236.
PubMed 18794104
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Sep 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cytokines in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (MRCC): Intravenous Interleukin and Subcutaneous Interferon-α Versus Subcutaneous Interleukin and Interferon-α for Good Prognosis Patients [PERCY DUO]
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00416871
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000468028
- Conditions
- Kidney Cancer
- Keywords
- stage IV renal cell cancer, recurrent renal cell cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 220 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Leon BerardUniversity, hospital or other
- Study completion
- Feb 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Dec 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Biological therapies, such as interleukin-2 and interferon, may stimulate the immune system in different ways and stop tumor cells from growing. It is not yet known whether interleukin-2 given by infusion is more effective than interleukin-2 given by injection when combined with interferon in treating metastatic kidney cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying interleukin-2 given by infusion to see how well it works compared to interleukin-2 given by injection when combined with interferon in treating patients with metastatic kidney cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the overall survival of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer treated with intravenous vs subcutaneous interleukin-2 in combination with interferon alfa.
Secondary
- Compare progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare response rates (complete and partial) in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
- Compare quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is an open-label, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive induction therapy comprising interleukin-2 (IL-2) IV continuously over days 1-5, 15-19, 43-47, and 57-61 (weeks 1, 3, 7, and 9) and interferon alfa (IFN-α) subcutaneously (SC) three times weekly in weeks 1-3 and 7-9. Patients then undergo restaging. Patients achieving a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) then receive maintenance therapy comprising IL-2 IV continuously over 5 days and IFN-α SC three times weekly in weeks 1, 5, 9, and 13.
- Arm II: Patients receive induction therapy comprising IL-2 SC twice daily on days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, and 22-26 (weeks 1-4). Patients also receive IFN-α SC three times weekly in weeks 1-4 and 6-9. Patients then undergo restaging. Patients achieving a CR, PR, or SD then receive maintenance therapy comprising IL-2 SC as in induction therapy and IFN-α SC three times weekly in weeks 1-4 and 8-11.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, at the end of induction therapy, and then at the end of maintenance therapy.
After completion of treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 3 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 220 patients will be accrued for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| aldesleukin | Biological | – |
| recombinant interferon alfa | Biological | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Sep 2012.
- Results publication: PubMed 18794104Negrier S, Perol D, Ravaud A, Bay JO, Oudard S, Chabaud S, Fargeot P, Delva R, Deplanque G, Gravis G, Escudier B; French Immunotherapy Group. Randomized study of intravenous versus subcutaneous interleukin-2, and IFNalpha in patients with good prognosis metastatic renal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Sep 15;14(18):5907-12. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0236.
Related trials for Kidney Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Toripalimab and Lenvatinib With or Without SBRT Before Surgery for Non-Clear Cell Kidney Cancer
Nonmetastatic Locally Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Revumenib in Participants With Advanced Cancer and Hepatic or Renal Impairment
Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Hematologic Malignancies, Acute Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sylvie Negrier, MD study chair
Centre Leon Berard
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing aldesleukin and recombinant interferon alfa in people with Kidney Cancer, run by Centre Leon Berard.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00416871, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2012.