Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic PurpuraPhase 3NCT00415532
Romiplostim (AMG 531) Versus Medical Standard of Care for Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura
A Phase 3 study testing Romiplostim in people with Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura and Thrombocytopenia, run by Amgen.
Trial summary
This is a phase 3b, multi-center, randomized, Standard of Care (SOC)-controlled, open-label, 52-week treatment study to compare romiplostim to medical SOC for Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia Purpura (ITP), with a 6-month Safety Follow-up. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura, Thrombocytopenia, Thrombocytopenia in Subjects With Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
- What is being tested?
- Romiplostim
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 234 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2006to 11 May 2009
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject is ≥ 18 years of age
- Subject has a diagnosis of Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia Purpura (ITP) according to the American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines
- If subject is > 60 years of age, subject has a written bone marrow biopsy report confirming the diagnosis of ITP
- Subject has received at least 1 prior therapy for ITP
- Subject has a platelet count < 50,000 or their platelet count falls to < 50,000 during or after a clinically-indicated taper or discontinuation of current ITP therapy
- Before any study-specific procedure, the appropriate written informed consent must be obtained
Who cannot join
- Subject has had a splenectomy for any reason
- Subject has an active malignancy
- Subject has a history of cancer, other than basal cell carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ, with treatment or active disease within 5 years
- Subject has a known history of bone marrow stem cell disorder
- Subject has participated in any study evaluating polyethylene glycol-conjugated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF), recombinant human thrombopoietin (rHuTPO), AMG 531, or a thrombopoietic protein
- Subject is receiving other investigational agents or procedures
Show all 12Show fewer
- Subject is currently enrolled in, or has completed within the last 30 days, another investigational device or drug study
- Subject is pregnant or breast feeding
- Subject is not using adequate contraceptive precautions
- Subject has known sensitivity to any recombinant E. coli-derived product
- Subject has any kind of disorder that compromises the ability of the subject to give written informed consent and does not have a legally acceptable representative
- Subject has any kind of disorder that compromises the ability of the subject to comply with study procedures
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Tolerability of AMG 531 Versus Medical Standard of Care as Chronic Therapy for Non-splenectomized Subjects With Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura
This is a phase 3b, multi-center, randomized, Standard of Care (SOC)-controlled, open-label, 52-week treatment study to compare romiplostim to medical SOC for Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia Purpura (ITP), with a 6-month Safety Follow-up. Patients randomized to romiplostim must complete the taper or discontinuation of medical SOC for ITP as soon as medically feasible after the initiation of romiplostim. After the completion or discontinuation of the study treatment period, any participant who does not transfer in to another romiplostim study will complete a 6-month Safety Follow-up period.
- Conditions
- Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura, Thrombocytopenia, Thrombocytopenia in Subjects With Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP), Thrombocytopenic Purpura
- Being tested
- Medical Standard of Care for ITP, Romiplostim
- Keywords
- splenectomy, platelet, AMG 531, thrombopoietin, blood disorder, bleeding disorder, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura, TPO, thrombopoietic protein
- Medical subject headings
- Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic, Thrombocytopenia, Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Jacobs syndrome, Hematologic Diseases, Hemostatic Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Medical Standard of Care for ITPDrug
RomiplostimBiological
Also called AMG 531
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Romiplostim | Experimental | Romiplostim administered by subcutaneous injection once weekly at a starting dose of 3 μg/kg, adjusted to a maximum dose of 10 μg/kg to maintain a platelet count between 50 and 200 x 10^9/L for up to 52 weeks. Receives: Biological: Romiplostim |
| Standard of Care | Other | Medical standard of care treatments were selected and prescribed by the investigator according to standard institutional practices or therapeutic guidelines and administered for up to 52 weeks. Receives: Drug: Medical Standard of Care for ITP |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Splenectomy During 52-Week Treatment Period
Occurrence of a splenectomy. Participants who discontinued study during the treatment period prior to reporting a splenectomy were considered as having had a splenectomy.
Measured: 52 weeks
Number of Participants With Treatment Failure During 52-Week Treatment Period
Treatment failure was defined by platelet counts ≤ 20 x 10^9/L for 4 consecutive weeks at the highest recommended dose and schedule, a major bleeding event, or change in therapy due to an intolerable side effect or bleeding symptom.
Measured: 52 weeks
Secondary outcomes (6)
Time to Splenectomy
Time to splenectomy in days calculated from date of randomization to date of splenectomy, or censored at date of end of treatment visit if no splenectomy was done during treatment period.
Measured: 52 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Platelet Response
Platelet response was defined as platelet counts > 50 x 10^9/L, measured at each study visit (excluding those within 8 weeks of prior rescue medication use) up to the time of splenectomy or the end of initial treatment period, whichever occurred first.
Measured: Weeks 1-8, and Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change in ITP-PAQ Physical Health Domain of Symptoms
Change from Baseline in the Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Patient Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ) physical health domain of symptoms. This domain has a range of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health-related quality of life.
Model included fixed effects of baseline assessment, geographic region, treatment group, assessment week, splenectomy status and treatment group-by-assessment week interaction. Treatment group and splenectomy status are time-varying covariates.
Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks
Change in ITP-PAQ Physical Health Domain of Fatigue
Change from Baseline in the Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Patient Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ) physical health domain of fatigue. This domain has a range of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health-related quality of life. Model included fixed effects of baseline assessment, geographic region, treatment group, assessment week, splenectomy status and treatment group-by-assessment week interaction. Treatment group and splenectomy status are time-varying covariates.
Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks
Change in ITP-PAQ Physical Health Domain of Bother
Change from Baseline in the Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Patient Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ) physical health domain of bother. This domain has a range of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health-related quality of life. Model included fixed effects of baseline assessment, geographic region, treatment group, assessment week, splenectomy status and treatment group-by-assessment week interaction. Treatment group and splenectomy status are time-varying covariates.
Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks
Change in ITP-PAQ Physical Health Domain of Activity
Change from Baseline in the Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Patient Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ) physical health domain of activity. This domain has a range of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health-related quality of life.
Model included fixed effects of baseline assessment, geographic region, treatment group, assessment week, splenectomy status and treatment group-by-assessment week interaction. Treatment group and splenectomy status are time-varying covariates.
Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Dec 2006 (estimated)
- Study start1 Dec 2006
- Primary completion7 Nov 2008
- Study completion11 May 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic PurpuraStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AmgenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 234 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amgen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MD, Study director, Amgen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00415532
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20060131
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 21 Dec 2006
- Last updated
- 8 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Kuter DJ, Mathias SD, Rummel M, Mandanas R, Giagounidis AA, Wang X, Deuson RR. Health-related quality of life in nonsplenectomized immune thrombocytopenia patients receiving romiplostim or medical standard of care. Am J Hematol. 2012 May;87(5):558-61. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23163. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
PubMed 22460421Kuter DJ, Rummel M, Boccia R, Macik BG, Pabinger I, Selleslag D, Rodeghiero F, Chong BH, Wang X, Berger DP. Romiplostim or standard of care in patients with immune thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 11;363(20):1889-99. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002625.
PubMed 21067381
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Tolerability of AMG 531 Versus Medical Standard of Care as Chronic Therapy for Non-splenectomized Subjects With Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00415532
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20060131
- Conditions
- Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura, Thrombocytopenia, Thrombocytopenia in Subjects With Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP), Thrombocytopenic Purpura
- Keywords
- splenectomy, platelet, AMG 531, thrombopoietin, blood disorder, bleeding disorder, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 234 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AmgenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2006 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Nov 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 May 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Dec 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Jul 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a phase 3b, multi-center, randomized, Standard of Care (SOC)-controlled, open-label, 52-week treatment study to compare romiplostim to medical SOC for Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia Purpura (ITP), with a 6-month Safety Follow-up. Patients randomized to romiplostim must complete the taper or discontinuation of medical SOC for ITP as soon as medically feasible after the initiation of romiplostim. After the completion or discontinuation of the study treatment period, any participant who does not transfer in to another romiplostim study will complete a 6-month Safety Follow-up period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Romiplostim | Experimental | Biological: RomiplostimRomiplostim administered by subcutaneous injection once weekly at a starting dose of 3 μg/kg, adjusted to a maximum dose of 10 μg/kg to maintain a platelet count between 50 and 200 x 10^9/L for up to 52 weeks. |
| Standard of Care | Other | Drug: Medical Standard of Care for ITPMedical standard of care treatments were selected and prescribed by the investigator according to standard institutional practices or therapeutic guidelines and administered for up to 52 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Subject is ≥ 18 years of age
- Subject has a diagnosis of Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia Purpura (ITP) according to the American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines
- If subject is > 60 years of age, subject has a written bone marrow biopsy report confirming the diagnosis of ITP
- Subject has received at least 1 prior therapy for ITP
- Subject has a platelet count < 50,000 or their platelet count falls to < 50,000 during or after a clinically-indicated taper or discontinuation of current ITP therapy
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Subject has had a splenectomy for any reason
- Subject has an active malignancy
- Subject has a history of cancer, other than basal cell carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ, with treatment or active disease within 5 years
- Subject has a known history of bone marrow stem cell disorder
- Subject has participated in any study evaluating polyethylene glycol-conjugated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF), recombinant human thrombopoietin (rHuTPO), AMG 531, or a thrombopoietic protein
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Medical Standard of Care for ITP | Drug | Standard of Care |
| RomiplostimAlso: AMG 531 | Biological | Romiplostim |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Splenectomy During 52-Week Treatment Period
Time frame: 52 weeks
Occurrence of a splenectomy. Participants who discontinued study during the treatment period prior to reporting a splenectomy were considered as having had a splenectomy.
Number of Participants With Treatment Failure During 52-Week Treatment Period
Time frame: 52 weeks
Treatment failure was defined by platelet counts ≤ 20 x 10^9/L for 4 consecutive weeks at the highest recommended dose and schedule, a major bleeding event, or change in therapy due to an intolerable side effect or bleeding symptom.
6 secondary outcomes
Time to Splenectomy
Time frame: 52 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Platelet Response
Time frame: Weeks 1-8, and Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change in ITP-PAQ Physical Health Domain of Symptoms
Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks
Change in ITP-PAQ Physical Health Domain of Fatigue
Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks
Change in ITP-PAQ Physical Health Domain of Bother
Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks
Change in ITP-PAQ Physical Health Domain of Activity
Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Nov 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 22460421Kuter DJ, Mathias SD, Rummel M, Mandanas R, Giagounidis AA, Wang X, Deuson RR. Health-related quality of life in nonsplenectomized immune thrombocytopenia patients receiving romiplostim or medical standard of care. Am J Hematol. 2012 May;87(5):558-61. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23163. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
- Background: PubMed 21067381Kuter DJ, Rummel M, Boccia R, Macik BG, Pabinger I, Selleslag D, Rodeghiero F, Chong BH, Wang X, Berger DP. Romiplostim or standard of care in patients with immune thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 11;363(20):1889-99. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002625.
- AmgenTrials clinical trials websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Assess the Tolerability of Ianalumab (VAY736) With Investigator's Choice Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonist (IC TPO-RA) in Patients With Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)
Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP), Primary Evans Syndrome (ES)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Pirtobrutinib in Participants With Immune Thrombocytopenia
Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Chronic Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia
Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
RecruitingPhase 2
Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of Tafasitamab in Adult Participants With Primary Autoimmune Blood Cell Disorders
Immune Thrombocytopenia
RecruitingPhase 3
A Follow-up Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Chronic Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia
Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MD study director
Amgen
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Romiplostim in people with Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura and Thrombocytopenia, run by Amgen.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jul 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Splenectomy During 52-Week Treatment Period (time frame: 52 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00415532, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2022.