AzTrials
AzTrials

Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic PurpuraPhase 3NCT00415532

Romiplostim (AMG 531) Versus Medical Standard of Care for Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura

A Phase 3 study testing Romiplostim in people with Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura and Thrombocytopenia, run by Amgen.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a phase 3b, multi-center, randomized, Standard of Care (SOC)-controlled, open-label, 52-week treatment study to compare romiplostim to medical SOC for Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia Purpura (ITP), with a 6-month Safety Follow-up. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Romiplostim
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
234 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Dec 2006to 11 May 2009
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject is ≥ 18 years of age
  • Subject has a diagnosis of Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia Purpura (ITP) according to the American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines
  • If subject is > 60 years of age, subject has a written bone marrow biopsy report confirming the diagnosis of ITP
  • Subject has received at least 1 prior therapy for ITP
  • Subject has a platelet count < 50,000 or their platelet count falls to < 50,000 during or after a clinically-indicated taper or discontinuation of current ITP therapy
  • Before any study-specific procedure, the appropriate written informed consent must be obtained

Who cannot join

  • Subject has had a splenectomy for any reason
  • Subject has an active malignancy
  • Subject has a history of cancer, other than basal cell carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ, with treatment or active disease within 5 years
  • Subject has a known history of bone marrow stem cell disorder
  • Subject has participated in any study evaluating polyethylene glycol-conjugated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF), recombinant human thrombopoietin (rHuTPO), AMG 531, or a thrombopoietic protein
  • Subject is receiving other investigational agents or procedures
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Subject is currently enrolled in, or has completed within the last 30 days, another investigational device or drug study
  • Subject is pregnant or breast feeding
  • Subject is not using adequate contraceptive precautions
  • Subject has known sensitivity to any recombinant E. coli-derived product
  • Subject has any kind of disorder that compromises the ability of the subject to give written informed consent and does not have a legally acceptable representative
  • Subject has any kind of disorder that compromises the ability of the subject to comply with study procedures

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Tolerability of AMG 531 Versus Medical Standard of Care as Chronic Therapy for Non-splenectomized Subjects With Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura

This is a phase 3b, multi-center, randomized, Standard of Care (SOC)-controlled, open-label, 52-week treatment study to compare romiplostim to medical SOC for Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia Purpura (ITP), with a 6-month Safety Follow-up. Patients randomized to romiplostim must complete the taper or discontinuation of medical SOC for ITP as soon as medically feasible after the initiation of romiplostim. After the completion or discontinuation of the study treatment period, any participant who does not transfer in to another romiplostim study will complete a 6-month Safety Follow-up period.

Being tested
Medical Standard of Care for ITP, Romiplostim
Keywords
splenectomy, platelet, AMG 531, thrombopoietin, blood disorder, bleeding disorder, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura, TPO, thrombopoietic protein
Medical subject headings
Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic, Thrombocytopenia, Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Jacobs syndrome, Hematologic Diseases, Hemostatic Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Medical Standard of Care for ITPDrug

  • RomiplostimBiological

    Also called AMG 531

Study groups in NCT00415532
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
RomiplostimExperimentalRomiplostim administered by subcutaneous injection once weekly at a starting dose of 3 μg/kg, adjusted to a maximum dose of 10 μg/kg to maintain a platelet count between 50 and 200 x 10^9/L for up to 52 weeks.
Receives: Biological: Romiplostim
Standard of CareOtherMedical standard of care treatments were selected and prescribed by the investigator according to standard institutional practices or therapeutic guidelines and administered for up to 52 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Medical Standard of Care for ITP

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Splenectomy During 52-Week Treatment Period

    Occurrence of a splenectomy. Participants who discontinued study during the treatment period prior to reporting a splenectomy were considered as having had a splenectomy.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  2. Number of Participants With Treatment Failure During 52-Week Treatment Period

    Treatment failure was defined by platelet counts ≤ 20 x 10^9/L for 4 consecutive weeks at the highest recommended dose and schedule, a major bleeding event, or change in therapy due to an intolerable side effect or bleeding symptom.

    Measured: 52 weeks

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Time to Splenectomy

    Time to splenectomy in days calculated from date of randomization to date of splenectomy, or censored at date of end of treatment visit if no splenectomy was done during treatment period.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  2. Percentage of Participants With Platelet Response

    Platelet response was defined as platelet counts > 50 x 10^9/L, measured at each study visit (excluding those within 8 weeks of prior rescue medication use) up to the time of splenectomy or the end of initial treatment period, whichever occurred first.

    Measured: Weeks 1-8, and Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52

  3. Change in ITP-PAQ Physical Health Domain of Symptoms

    Change from Baseline in the Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Patient Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ) physical health domain of symptoms. This domain has a range of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health-related quality of life.

    Model included fixed effects of baseline assessment, geographic region, treatment group, assessment week, splenectomy status and treatment group-by-assessment week interaction. Treatment group and splenectomy status are time-varying covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks

  4. Change in ITP-PAQ Physical Health Domain of Fatigue

    Change from Baseline in the Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Patient Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ) physical health domain of fatigue. This domain has a range of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health-related quality of life. Model included fixed effects of baseline assessment, geographic region, treatment group, assessment week, splenectomy status and treatment group-by-assessment week interaction. Treatment group and splenectomy status are time-varying covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks

  5. Change in ITP-PAQ Physical Health Domain of Bother

    Change from Baseline in the Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Patient Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ) physical health domain of bother. This domain has a range of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health-related quality of life. Model included fixed effects of baseline assessment, geographic region, treatment group, assessment week, splenectomy status and treatment group-by-assessment week interaction. Treatment group and splenectomy status are time-varying covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks

  6. Change in ITP-PAQ Physical Health Domain of Activity

    Change from Baseline in the Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Patient Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ) physical health domain of activity. This domain has a range of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health-related quality of life.

    Model included fixed effects of baseline assessment, geographic region, treatment group, assessment week, splenectomy status and treatment group-by-assessment week interaction. Treatment group and splenectomy status are time-varying covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Dec 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Dec 2006
  3. Primary completion7 Nov 2008
  4. Study completion11 May 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
234 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00415532
Sponsor's protocol ID
20060131
Status last verified
Nov 2022
First submitted
21 Dec 2006
Last updated
8 Nov 2022

Publications

  • Kuter DJ, Mathias SD, Rummel M, Mandanas R, Giagounidis AA, Wang X, Deuson RR. Health-related quality of life in nonsplenectomized immune thrombocytopenia patients receiving romiplostim or medical standard of care. Am J Hematol. 2012 May;87(5):558-61. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23163. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

    PubMed 22460421
  • Kuter DJ, Rummel M, Boccia R, Macik BG, Pabinger I, Selleslag D, Rodeghiero F, Chong BH, Wang X, Berger DP. Romiplostim or standard of care in patients with immune thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 11;363(20):1889-99. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002625.

    PubMed 21067381

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Romiplostim in people with Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura and Thrombocytopenia, run by Amgen.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jul 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Splenectomy During 52-Week Treatment Period (time frame: 52 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00415532, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in