AnemiaPhase 3NCT00413894
A Study of Intravenous Mircera for the Treatment of Anemia in Dialysis Patients.
A Phase 3 study testing methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera] in people with Anemia, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 105 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
This single arm study will assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous Mircera, administered with pre-filled syringes, for the treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease who are on dialysis, and who have previously received treatment with epoetin alfa or beta or darbepoetin alfa. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Anemia
- What is being tested?
- methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera]
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 424 participants
- Where
- 105 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- Mar 2007to Oct 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adult patients, >=18 years of age;
- chronic renal anemia;
- longterm hemodialysis for >=12 weeks before screening;
- baseline Hb between 10 and 13g/dL;
- iv or sc maintenance epoetin alfa or beta or darbepoetin alfa therapy with same dosing interval for >=4 weeks before screening.
Who cannot join
- acute or chronic bleeding within 8 weeks prior to screening;
- transfusion of red blood cells within 8 weeks prior to screening;
- poorly controlled hypertension necessitating interruption of erythropoetin treatment in previous 6 months;
- previous treatment with Mircera.
Trial locations and contacts
105 sites in 1 country.
105 sites in 1 country
Germany105 sites
Study site
Aachen, 52066
Study site
Aachen, 52074
Study site
Alzey, 55232
Study site
Ansbach, 91522
Study site
Augsburg, 86157
Study site
Bad König, 64732
Study site
Bad Nenndorf, 31542
Study site
Bad Oeynhausen, 32545
Study site
Bad Orb, 63619
Study site
Bayreuth, 95445
Study site
Berlin, 10117
Study site
Berlin, 10249
Study site
Berlin, 12045
Study site
Berlin, 12099
Study site
Berlin, 12247
Study site
Bochum, 44789
Study site
Bottrop, 46242
Study site
Bovenden, 37120
Study site
Braunschweig, 38118
Study site
Bremen, 28277
Study site
Coesfeld, 48653
Study site
Cologne, 51109
Study site
Darmstadt, 64295
Study site
Darmstadt, 64925
Study site
Daun, 54550
Study site
Demmin, 17109
Study site
Dessau, 06847
Study site
Dortmund, 44263
Study site
Düsseldorf, 40210
Study site
Düsseldorf, 40225
Study site
Düsseldorf, 40625
Study site
Erfurt, 99089
Study site
Essen, 45122
Study site
Frankfurt am Main, 60596
Study site
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
Study site
Freiburg im Breisgau, 97110
Study site
Freudenstadt, 72250
Study site
Fulda, 36043
Study site
Fürstenzell, 94081
Study site
Fürth, 90766
Study site
Gelsenkirchen, 45886
Study site
Gelsenkirchen, 45894
Study site
Gerolstein, 54568
Study site
Giessen, 35392
Study site
Göttingen, 37075
Study site
Greifswald, 17489
Study site
Gütersloh, 33332
Study site
Halle, 06120
Study site
Hamburg, 20246
Study site
Hamburg, 22297
Study site
Hannoversch Münden, 34346
Study site
Harsewinkel, 33428
Study site
Heide, 25746
Study site
Heidelberg, 69120
Study site
Heilbronn, 74076
Study site
Hildesheim, 31139
Study site
Homburg, 66421
Study site
Homburg/saar, 66424
Study site
Idar-Oberstein, 55743
Study site
Jena, 07751
Study site
Karlsruhe, 76133
Study site
Kiel, 24105
Study site
Krefeld, 47798
Study site
Lauterbach, 36341
Study site
Leipzig, 04103
Study site
Leipzig, 04129
Study site
Lennestadt, 57368
Study site
Lüdenscheid, 58515
Study site
Ludwigsburg, 71640
Study site
Ludwigshafen, 67063
Study site
Marburg, 35043
Study site
Marl, 45768
Study site
Meiningen, 98617
Study site
Memmingen, 87700
Study site
Minden, 32425
Study site
Mönchengladbach, 41236
Study site
München, 81545
Study site
Neuruppin, 16816
Study site
Oberschleißheim, 85764
Study site
Offenbach, 63069
Study site
Offenburg, 77654
Study site
Potsdam, 14482
Study site
Recklinghausen, 45659
Study site
Regensburg, 93053
Study site
Reutlingen, 72764
Study site
Ribnitz-Damgarten, 18311
Study site
Rostock, 18057
Study site
Rostock, 18107
Study site
Saarbrücken, 6119
Study site
Schloss Holte-stutenbrock, 38758
Study site
Schwerin, 19049
Study site
Schwerin, 19057
Study site
Schwetzingen, 68723
Study site
Stralsund, 18435
Study site
Stuttgart, 70199
Study site
Stuttgart, 70376
Study site
Trier, 54292
Study site
Waiblingen, 71334
Study site
Weinheim, 69469
Study site
Weinheim, 79539
Study site
Wiesbaden, 65191
Study site
Wiesloch, 69168
Study site
Wuppertal, 42103
Study site
Wuppertal, 42283
Study site
Würzburg, 97072
About this study
Official title: An Open Label Study of the Effect of Intravenous Mircera on Hemoglobin Levels in Anemic Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Who Are on Dialysis, and Who Have Previously Received Epoetin Alfa or Beta or Darbepoetin Alfa Treatment.
This single arm study will assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous Mircera, administered with pre-filled syringes, for the treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease who are on dialysis, and who have previously received treatment with epoetin alfa or beta or darbepoetin alfa. Patients will receive monthly intravenous injections of Mircera, with the starting dose derived from the dose of epoetin alfa or beta or darbepoetin they were receiving in the week preceding study start. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 500+ individuals.
- Conditions
- Anemia
- Being tested
- methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera]
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera]Drug
iv monthly, with starting dose based on previous dose of epoetin alfa or beta or darbepoetin alfa
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera] |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Hb Levels Within 11.0-12.5 Grams Per Deciliter (g/dL) During Evaluation Phase
Measured: Visits 8 to 10 (Months 6 to 8)
Percentage of Participants With Hb Levels Within 10.0-13.0 g/dL During Evaluation Phase
Measured: Visits 8 to 10 (Months 6 to 8)
Percentage of Participants With Hb Levels Within 11.0-12.5 g/dL by Dose Modifications During Evaluation Phase
Dose adjustment included increase or decrease in dose. Percentage of participants with Hb levels within 11.0-12.5 g/dL by dose adjustment categories (with dose adjustment and without dose adjustment) were reported.
Measured: Visits 8 to 10 (Months 6 to 8)
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Levels Within 10.0-13.0 g/dL by Dose Modification During Evaluation Phase
Dose adjustment included increase or decrease in dose. Percentage of participants with Hb levels within 11.0-12.5 g/dL by dose adjustment categories (with dose adjustment and without dose adjustment) were reported.
Measured: Visits 8 to 10 (Months 6 to 8)
Secondary outcomes (8)
Percentage of Participants With Hb Levels Within 11.0-12.5 g/dL During Screening Phase
Measured: Visits 1 to 2 (Months -2 to -1)
Percentage of Participants With Hb Levels Within 10.0-13.0 g/dL During Screening Phase
Measured: Visits 1 to 2 (Months -2 to -1)
Percentage of Participants With Hb Levels Within 11.0-12.5 g/dL by Dose Modification During Screening Phase
Dose adjustment included increase or decrease in dose. Percentage of participants with Hb levels within 11.0-12.5 g/dL by dose adjustment categories (with dose adjustment and without dose adjustment) were reported.
Measured: Visits 1 to 2 (Months -2 to -1)
Percentage of Participants With HbLevels Within 10.0-13.0 g/dL by Dose Modification During Screening Phase
Dose adjustment included increase or decrease in dose. Percentage of participants with Hb levels within 11.0-12.5 g/dL by dose adjustment categories (with dose adjustment and without dose adjustment) were reported.
Measured: Visits 1 to 2 (Months -2 to -1)
Percentage of Participants With Changes Between Screening and Evaluation Phase With Respect To Hb Levels
Shifts in Hb levels between Screening and Evaluation Phase were classified as follows: Category A: Participants with Hb levels in both Screening and Evaluation Phase within 10-13 g/dL; Category B: Participants who had Hb values within 10-13 g/dL during Screening but shifted outside the range during Evaluation; Category C: Participants who had Hb values outside range during Screening but shifted to stable values (at least within 10 - 13 g/dL) during Evaluation.; Category D: Participants with less than two values available during Evaluation Phase.
Participants could appear in only 1 category. Participants had to have 2 or 3 values within range (depending on the number of measurements available) to be counted.
Measured: Visits 1 to 2 (Months -2 to -1) and Visits 8 to 10 (Months 6 to 8)
Percentage of Participants With Hb Fluctuations Within Evaluation Phase
Hb fluctuation was defined as the deviation from individual mean Hb-value within the study phase (Evaluation Phase) and was categorized as less than or equal to (≤) ±1 g/dL, greater than (>) ±1.0 to ±1.5 g/dL, > ±1.5 to ±2.0 g/dL, and > ±2.0 g/dL. Percentage of participants within these deviation categories were reported for Evaluation Phase of the study.
Measured: Visits 8 to 10 (Months 6 to 8)
Percentage of Participants With Hb Fluctuations Within Screening Phase
Hematology and clinical chemistry were performed partially by a central laboratory as well as by the local laboratories by means of their established methods. Normal ranges and methods as well as quality assurance certificates had to be available to the sponsor prior to the start of the study. Hb fluctuation was defined as the deviation from individual mean Hb-value within the study phase (Screening Phase) and was categorized as ≤ ±1 g/dL, >±1.0 to ±1.5 g/dL, >±1.5 to ±2.0 g/dL, and >±2.0 g/dL. Percentage of participants within these deviation categories are reported for Screening Phase of the study.
Measured: Visits 1 to 2 (Months -2 to -1)
Percentage of Participants Requiring Erythrocyte Transfusions
Measured: Visits 1 to 10 (Months -2 to 8)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Dec 2006 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2007
- Primary completionOct 2008
- Study completionOct 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 424 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00413894
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ML20572
- Status last verified
- Jan 2016
- First submitted
- 19 Dec 2006
- Last updated
- 15 Feb 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Locatelli F, Choukroun G, Truman M, Wiggenhauser A, Fliser D. Once-Monthly Continuous Erythropoietin Receptor Activator (C.E.R.A.) in Patients with Hemodialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease: Pooled Data from Phase III Trials. Adv Ther. 2016 Apr;33(4):610-25. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0309-6. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
PubMed 26965694Fliser D, Kleophas W, Dellanna F, Winkler RE, Backs W, Kraatz U, Fassbinder W, Wizemann V, Strack G. Evaluation of maintenance of stable haemoglobin levels in haemodialysis patients converting from epoetin or darbepoetin to monthly intravenous C.E.R.A.: the MIRACEL study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 May;26(5):1083-9. doi: 10.1185/03007991003666652.
PubMed 20225992
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open Label Study of the Effect of Intravenous Mircera on Hemoglobin Levels in Anemic Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Who Are on Dialysis, and Who Have Previously Received Epoetin Alfa or Beta or Darbepoetin Alfa Treatment.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00413894
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ML20572
- Conditions
- Anemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 424 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2007
- Primary completion
- Oct 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Dec 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 Feb 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This single arm study will assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous Mircera, administered with pre-filled syringes, for the treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease who are on dialysis, and who have previously received treatment with epoetin alfa or beta or darbepoetin alfa. Patients will receive monthly intravenous injections of Mircera, with the starting dose derived from the dose of epoetin alfa or beta or darbepoetin they were receiving in the week preceding study start. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 500+ individuals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera] |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- adult patients, >=18 years of age;
- chronic renal anemia;
- longterm hemodialysis for >=12 weeks before screening;
- baseline Hb between 10 and 13g/dL;
- iv or sc maintenance epoetin alfa or beta or darbepoetin alfa therapy with same dosing interval for >=4 weeks before screening.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- acute or chronic bleeding within 8 weeks prior to screening;
- transfusion of red blood cells within 8 weeks prior to screening;
- poorly controlled hypertension necessitating interruption of erythropoetin treatment in previous 6 months;
- previous treatment with Mircera.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera]iv monthly, with starting dose based on previous dose of epoetin alfa or beta or darbepoetin alfa | Drug | 1 |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Hb Levels Within 11.0-12.5 Grams Per Deciliter (g/dL) During Evaluation Phase
Time frame: Visits 8 to 10 (Months 6 to 8)
Percentage of Participants With Hb Levels Within 10.0-13.0 g/dL During Evaluation Phase
Time frame: Visits 8 to 10 (Months 6 to 8)
Percentage of Participants With Hb Levels Within 11.0-12.5 g/dL by Dose Modifications During Evaluation Phase
Time frame: Visits 8 to 10 (Months 6 to 8)
Dose adjustment included increase or decrease in dose. Percentage of participants with Hb levels within 11.0-12.5 g/dL by dose adjustment categories (with dose adjustment and without dose adjustment) were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Levels Within 10.0-13.0 g/dL by Dose Modification During Evaluation Phase
Time frame: Visits 8 to 10 (Months 6 to 8)
Dose adjustment included increase or decrease in dose. Percentage of participants with Hb levels within 11.0-12.5 g/dL by dose adjustment categories (with dose adjustment and without dose adjustment) were reported.
8 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Hb Levels Within 11.0-12.5 g/dL During Screening Phase
Time frame: Visits 1 to 2 (Months -2 to -1)
Percentage of Participants With Hb Levels Within 10.0-13.0 g/dL During Screening Phase
Time frame: Visits 1 to 2 (Months -2 to -1)
Percentage of Participants With Hb Levels Within 11.0-12.5 g/dL by Dose Modification During Screening Phase
Time frame: Visits 1 to 2 (Months -2 to -1)
Percentage of Participants With HbLevels Within 10.0-13.0 g/dL by Dose Modification During Screening Phase
Time frame: Visits 1 to 2 (Months -2 to -1)
Percentage of Participants With Changes Between Screening and Evaluation Phase With Respect To Hb Levels
Time frame: Visits 1 to 2 (Months -2 to -1) and Visits 8 to 10 (Months 6 to 8)
Percentage of Participants With Hb Fluctuations Within Evaluation Phase
Time frame: Visits 8 to 10 (Months 6 to 8)
Percentage of Participants With Hb Fluctuations Within Screening Phase
Time frame: Visits 1 to 2 (Months -2 to -1)
Percentage of Participants Requiring Erythrocyte Transfusions
Time frame: Visits 1 to 10 (Months -2 to 8)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Feb 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26965694Locatelli F, Choukroun G, Truman M, Wiggenhauser A, Fliser D. Once-Monthly Continuous Erythropoietin Receptor Activator (C.E.R.A.) in Patients with Hemodialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease: Pooled Data from Phase III Trials. Adv Ther. 2016 Apr;33(4):610-25. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0309-6. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20225992Fliser D, Kleophas W, Dellanna F, Winkler RE, Backs W, Kraatz U, Fassbinder W, Wizemann V, Strack G. Evaluation of maintenance of stable haemoglobin levels in haemodialysis patients converting from epoetin or darbepoetin to monthly intravenous C.E.R.A.: the MIRACEL study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 May;26(5):1083-9. doi: 10.1185/03007991003666652.
Related trials for Anemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
The Safety and Efficacy of Daratumumab in Patients With Refractory Aplastic Anemia
Aplastic Anemia, Refractory
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study of YTS109 Cell Injection in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, Anti-CD19 STAR T-cell Therapy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Systematic Intraoperative Cell Salvage in On-Pump Cardiac Surgery Within a Mature Patient Blood Management Programme
Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Blood Transfusion
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingObservational study
Defining the Natural History of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Fanconi Anemia
Fanconi Anemia, Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
105 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera] in people with Anemia, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 105 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 105 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Feb 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Hb Levels Within 11.0-12.5 Grams Per Deciliter (g/dL) During Evaluation Phase (time frame: Visits 8 to 10 (Months 6 to 8)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00413894, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2016.