AzTrials
AzTrials

PainPhase 1/2NCT00409552

Human Factors Analysis in VR for Burn Treatment

A Phase 1/2 study testing Virtual Reality based distraction, VR with flat projection display and non-interactive video with head display in people with Pain and Chronic Pain, run by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A number of studies have shown that virtual reality (VR) can be used to distract patients from pain and anxiety during painful medical procedures for which medication provides inadequate relief. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Pain, Chronic Pain
What is being tested?
Virtual Reality based distraction, VR with flat projection display and non-interactive video with head display
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Nov 2009to Dec 2010
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18-65, male or female, any ethnicity as long as candidates can understand and read English adequately.

Who cannot join

  • We will exclude participants who meet DSM-IV-TR criteria for alcohol or other substance abuse in the past year, or are currently using any recreational drugs, or taking more than 20 alcoholic drinks a week. In addition, the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) score must be less than 16, with no suicidal ideation.

About this study

Official title: Phase 1 and 2 Study of Human Factors Analysis in VR for Burn Treatment

A number of studies have shown that virtual reality (VR) can be used to distract patients from pain and anxiety during painful medical procedures for which medication provides inadequate relief. An inexpensive, commercially available VE could have significant impact in reducing perceived pain involved in a variety of medical procedures. The Virtual Reality Medical Center (VRMC) developed an engaging virtual world that proved to be effective in reducing reported pain ratings of participants experiencing several different forms of painful stimuli. The virtual world called Icy Cool World was found to successfully distract patients from painful stimuli and reduce patients' perceived levels of pain. Phase II looks to expand on these findings and examine the effectiveness as a pain distraction technique for a variety of acute and chronic pain etiologies. The main objective of the clinical investigation will be to expand on the findings from earlier studies and obtain a more comprehensive analysis regarding the clinical versatility of VR pain distraction.

Conditions
Pain, Chronic Pain
Being tested
Virtual Reality based distraction, VR with flat projection display, non-interactive video with head display, non-interactive video with with flat projection display
Medical subject headings
Pain, Chronic Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Virtual Reality based distractionBehavioural

    Participants will undergo virtual reality based distraction using the head display while they go through the pain process.

  • VR with flat projection displayBehavioural

    VR with flat projection display

  • non-interactive video with head displayBehavioural

    non-interactive video with head display

  • non-interactive video with with flat projection displayBehavioural

    non-interactive video with with flat projection display

Study groups in NCT00409552
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalVirtual Reality with head display
Receives: Behavioral: Virtual Reality based distraction
2Active comparatorVirtual Reality with flat projection display
Receives: Behavioral: VR with flat projection display
3Active comparatornon-interactive video with head display
Receives: Behavioral: non-interactive video with head display
4Active comparatornon-interactive video with flat projection display
Receives: Behavioral: non-interactive video with with flat projection display
5No interventionNo distraction

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain rating reduction

    Measured: Following each trial

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Dec 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2009
  3. Primary completionDec 2010
  4. Study completionDec 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00409552
Sponsor's protocol ID
N44DA-5-7744
Status last verified
Sep 2009
First submitted
8 Dec 2006
Last updated
12 Jan 2017
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Virtual Reality based distraction, VR with flat projection display and non-interactive video with head display in people with Pain and Chronic Pain, run by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain rating reduction (time frame: Following each trial). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jan 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in