Renal TransplantPhase 2NCT00402168
A Study of BMS-224818 (Belatacept) in Patients Who Have Undergone a Kidney Transplant and Are Currently on Stable Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus Regimen With or Without Corticosteroids
A Phase 2 study testing Belatacept, Cyclosporine A and Tacrolimus in people with Renal Transplant, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 44 sites in 12 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to learn if conversion to belatacept from cyclosporine or tacrolimus will preserve kidney function in people who have had a kidney transplant. The safety and tolerability of this treatment will also be studied Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Renal Transplant
- What is being tested?
- Belatacept, Cyclosporine A and Tacrolimus
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 173 participants
- Where
- 44 sitesin 12 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2007to Jun 2013
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men and women age 18 and older
- 6-36 months after kidney transplant receiving cyclosporine or tacrolimus
- calculated GFR ≥35 and ≤75mL/min/1.73 m²
- subjects must have completed 1 year in the IM103-010ST and remained on study treatment (Long Term Extension)
Who cannot join
- Significant infection
- acute rejection within 3 months
- prior graft loss due to rejection
- pregnancy
- positive crossmatch
Trial locations and contacts
44 sites in 12 countries.
44 sites in 12 countries
United States9 sites
University Of North Carolina School Of Medicine
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7155
University Of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Pharmacy, First Call Iv
Kenner, Louisiana, 70062
National Institute Of Transplantation
Los Angeles, California, 90057
Medical College Of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Tulane University Hospital & Clinic
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Mayo Clinic Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, 85054
California Institute Of Renal Research
San Diego, California, 92123
Ucsf
San Francisco, California, 94143-0106
Argentina5 sites
Local Institution
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, 1155
Local Institution
Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, C1425APQ
Local Institution
Córdoba, Córdoba Province, 5016
Local Institution
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, 2000
Local Institution
Santa Fe, Santa Fe Province, S3000EPV
Brazil5 sites
Local Institution
Bonsucesso, Rio de Janeiro, 21041-030
Local Institution
Curitiba, Paraná, 80240-000
Local Institution
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90020-090
Local Institution
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-003
Local Institution
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01323-900
Mexico5 sites
Local Institution
Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, 20000
Local Institution
Cuernavaca, Morelos, 62448
Local Institution
Df, Mexico City, 14000
Local Institution
San Luis Potosí City, Snl, 78240
Local Institution
Tlalpan, C P, 14080
Canada4 sites
Local Institution
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G3
Local Institution
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V8
Local Institution
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6
Local Institution
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7M 0Z9
India3 sites
Local Institution
Kochi, Kerala, 682304
Local Institution
Nadiād, Gujarat, 387001
Local Institution
Pāladi, Ahmedabad, 380007
Poland3 sites
Local Institution
Bydgoszcz, 85-094
Local Institution
Szczecin, 70-111
Local Institution
Warsaw, 02-006
Spain3 sites
Local Institution
Barcelona, 08026
Local Institution
Barcelona, 08907
Local Institution
Valencia, 46017
France2 sites
Local Institution
Paris, Cedex 15, 75743
Local Institution
Toulouse, Cedex 09
Germany2 sites
Charite Berlin Mitte
Berlin, 10117
Local Institution
Homburg/saar, 66421
About this study
Official title: Belatacept Conversion Trial in Renal Transplantation
The purpose of this study is to learn if conversion to belatacept from cyclosporine or tacrolimus will preserve kidney function in people who have had a kidney transplant. The safety and tolerability of this treatment will also be studied
- Conditions
- Renal Transplant
- Being tested
- Belatacept, Cyclosporine A, Tacrolimus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BelataceptDrug
Also called BMS-224818
IV, IV Infusion, 5 mg/kg once every 28 days for one year
Cyclosporine ADrug
Tablets, Oral, Trough of 100-250 ng/mL, 2* daily for one year
TacrolimusDrug
Tablets, Oral, Trough of 5-10 ng/mL, 2* daily for one year
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A: Belatacept | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Belatacept |
| B: calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppressive regimen | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Cyclosporine A; Drug: Tacrolimus |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) With Imputed Values to 12 Months Post Randomization - All Randomized Participants (Intent-to-Treat Population)
Calculated GFR assessment used the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula. GFR was measured as mL/min/1.73 m^2. For death or graft loss participants, calculated GFR (cGFR) value 10 was used, for other participants who had a post baseline cGFR value missing, but had baseline value and at least 2 post baseline values available, which were at least 120 days apart, linear regression model was used to impute the cGFR value. Baseline = value at screening. Randomization/First Dose was on Day 1.
Measured: Baseline to 12 months post randomization
Secondary outcomes (25)
Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) With Imputed Values to 6 Months Post Randomization - All Randomized Participants (Intent-to-Treat Population)
Calculated GFR assessment used the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula. GFR was measured as mL/min/1.73 m^2. For death or graft loss participants, calculated GFR (cGFR) value 10 was used, for other participants who had a post baseline cGFR value missing, but had baseline value and at least 2 post baseline values available, which were at least 120 days apart, linear regression model was used to impute the cGFR value. Baseline = value at screening.
Measured: Baseline to 6 months post randomization
Number of Participants With Acute Rejection (AR) by Months 6 and 12 Post Randomization - All Randomized Participants
AR defined: if either a or b was satisfied: a: the reason for clinical suspicion was reported to be an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness and the episode was a case of biopsy proven AR (AR of Banff histopathologic classification Grade IA or higher as assessed by the blinded central pathologist); b: the reason for clinical suspicion was reported to be something other than: an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; the episode was a case of biopsy proven AR, and the participant was treated for this episode. Banff 97 diagnostic category for renal allograft biopsies is an international standardized histopathological classification. AR is defined by a renal biopsy demonstrating a Banff 97 classification of Grade IA or greater, with higher scores indicating more severe rejection.
Measured: At 6 and 12 months post randomization
Percentage of Participants Surviving With a Functioning Graft, Have Graft Loss or Death (Graft Loss, Death, Death With Functioning Graft) By Month 6 and Month 12 Post Randomization
Graft loss was defined as either functional loss or physical loss. Functional loss was defined as a sustained level of serum creatinine (SCr) ≥ 6.0 mg/dL (530 μmol/L) for ≥ 4 weeks or administration of a maintenance dialysis regimen for at least 56 days or impairment of renal function to such a degree that the participant undergoes re-transplantation.
Measured: At 6 and 12 months post randomization
Number of Participants Who Had Any Study Drug Dose Alteration by Month 12 Due to Any Reason - Randomized and Treated Participants
Reasons for study drug dose modification included categories of decline in renal function (as determined by the investigator), treatment of acute rejection, and other reasons. More than 1 reason could be given for dose alteration.
Measured: Month 12
Percentage of Participants With a Composite Endpoint of Death, Graft Loss and Acute Rejection at Month 12
Percentage=number with composite divided by number randomized. Graft loss was functional loss or physical loss. Functional loss = sustained level of serum creatinine (SCr) ≥ 6.0 mg/dL for ≥ 4 weeks or administration of a maintenance dialysis regimen for at least 56 days or impairment of renal function to such a degree that participant undergoes re-transplantation. AR: if either a or b: (a) the reason for clinical suspicion was reported to be an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline; or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness and the episode was a case of biopsy-proven AR (grade IA or higher as assessed by the blinded central pathologist); (b) the reason for clinical suspicion was reported to be something other than: an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline; or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; the episode was a case of biopsy-proven AR, and the participant was treated for it.
Measured: 12 Months post randomization
Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus - All Randomized Participants
A participant who did not have diabetes prior to randomization is determined to have new onset diabetes mellitus if they received an antidiabetic medication for a duration of at least 30 days or at least two fasting plasma glucose (FPG) tests indicated that FPG is >=126 mg/dL. Percentage was the number of participants with new onset of diabetes mellitus divided by the number of participants without pre-randomization diabetes.
Measured: Month 12 post randomization
Number of Participants With Anti-Donor Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Positive Antibodies
Samples were obtained at Day 1 (first dose), Week 24, and Week 52 (or end of therapy). This was a cumulative summary in that once a participant was positive, that participant remained positive for later time points. Evaluation of anti-donor HLA antibodies was performed by an external laboratory (Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia).
Measured: Month 6 and Month 12 Post Randomization
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 6 and to Month 12 in Serum Creatinine - All Randomized Participants
Baseline was value at screening or prior to first dose of study drug. Serum creatinine was measured in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). Baseline = value at screening.
Measured: Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 Post Randomization
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events (AEs) From First Dose up to Month 12
AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Treatment-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug.
Measured: First Dose (Day 1) to Month 12
Mean Change From Baseline in SF-36 Questionnaire Physical Component Score and in Mental Component Score at Month 12 - All Randomized Participants
SF-36 was a Participant-Reported Quality of Life (QoL) Short Form (SF) questionnaire. The subscale in the mental component (MCS) part of the instrument ranged from 1 to 6 with 1=all of the time and 6= none of the time. The subscale for physical component (PCS) ranged from 1 to 3 with 1=Yes, limited a lot and 3=No, not limited at all. The subscale for the extent that physical health or emotional problems interfered with normal activities ranged from 1 to 5 with 1=not at all and 5= extremely. Baseline was at randomization or prior to first dose. Baseline = value at screening. The subscale scores were transformed using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, Month 12
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 12 for Eight Domain Scores of Quality of Life (QoL) Instrument SF-36 - All Randomized Participants
SF-36 was a Participant-Reported Quality of Life (QoL) Short Form (SF) questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) covering 8 domains of physical and mental component summaries: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, general health perception, and vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health.
All domains were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life.
Measured: Baseline (screening) to Month 12
Ridit Score at Month 12 - All Randomized Participants
The Modified Transplant Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress Scale (MTSOSD-59R) was used to assess the occurrence (never, occasionally, regularly, almost always, always) and distress (0=no distress to 4=terrible distress) of symptoms associated with immunosuppressive therapies. Ridit (relative to an identified distribution) analysis (Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley \& Sons, Inc. 1991) was used. Ridit scores were calculated at 12 months for overall symptom occurrence score and overall symptom distress. The Ridit score reflects the probability that a score observed for an individual randomly selected from a group would be higher (worse symptom) than a score observed for a randomly selected individual from the reference group. The reference group was constituted by the frequency distribution of the responses of all participants on all items at baseline. The ridit of the reference group is by definition, 0.5.
Measured: Month 12
Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria From Baseline up to Month 12 - Randomized and Treated Participants
Upper limits of normal (ULL). Leukocytes: < 2.0*10^3 cells per microliter (c/µL); Lymphocytes (absolute): < 0.5*10^3 c/µL; bilirubin: > 3.0*ULN milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL); Potassium: < 3.0 milliequivalents per liter (meq/L) or > 6.0 meq/L; Magnesium >2.6 meq/L; Sodium: < 130 meq/L; Phosphorus: < 2.0 mg/dL; Uric Acid: > 10 mg/dL. Baseline = value at screening.
Measured: Baseline up to Month 12
Long Term Period: Mean Change From Baseline to 54 Months Post Randomization in Calculated GFR on Imputed Values at Specified Timepoints - Intent to Treat (ITT) Participants Who Entered LT Period
ITT=participants randomized to their original treatment arm and who entered the LT period are presented. Baseline=value at screening. Calculated GFR assessment used the MDRD formula. GFR was measured as mL/min/1.73 m^2. For death or graft loss participants, calculated GFR (cGFR) value of 0 was imputed and carried forward after death or graft loss up to the end of the analysis period. Sponsor discontinued the CNI treatment arm in Year 3, and participants treated with CNI could elect to switch to belatacept. If a participant did not switch to belatacept, they were required to discontinue from the study. Therefore, efficacy results from Month 36 through Month 54 are difficult to interpret. No formal comparisons were planned between the belatacept and CNI treatment groups post Month 36, and the data up to the final database lock should be interpreted with caution.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54
Long Term Period: Number of Participants With Acute Rejection (AR) - All Randomized Participants in LT Period
AR was defined: if either a or b was satisfied: (a) the reason for clinical suspicion was reported to be an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness and the episode was a case of biopsy proven AR (AR of Banff histopathologic classification grade IA or higher as assessed by the blinded central pathologist); (b) the reason for clinical suspicion was reported to be something other than: an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine; or an unexplained decreased urine output; or fever and graft tenderness; the episode was a case of biopsy proven AR, and the participant was treated for this episode. Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology was used to categorize the severity of the AR.
Measured: Post Month 12 up to Year 6 of the Study
Long Term Period: Number of Participants Who Survived With a Functioning Graft or Survived With Pure Graft Loss or Death With Functioning Graft - ITT Participants Who Entered the LT Period
Graft loss = either pure graft loss (participant survived to the end of the study period after graft loss) or death with functioning graft. Pure graft loss = either functional loss or physical loss. Functional loss = a sustained level of serum creatinine (SCr) ≥ 6.0 mg/dL (530 μmol/L) for ≥ 4 weeks or administration of a maintenance dialysis regimen for at least 56 days or impairment of renal function to such a degree that the participant undergoes re-transplantation. The table was designed with built-in redundancy to capture all possible combinations of death and/or graft loss, but not all lines can be summed to reach the total number surviving and the total number who die and/or lose grafts. If a participant experiences pure graft loss and dies at a later date independent of the graft loss event, they are counted only once in the cumulative tabulation of death or graft loss. Only the first event experienced by the participant counted toward the cumulative total.
Measured: Post Months 24, 36, 48, up to Year 6 of the Study
Long Term Period: Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus Up to Month 36- All Randomized Participants Who Entered LT Period
A participant who did not have diabetes prior to randomization is determined to have new onset diabetes mellitus if they received an antidiabetic medication for a duration of at least 30 days or at least two fasting plasma glucose (FPG) tests indicated that FPG is >=126 mg/dL. Percentage was the number of participants with new onset of diabetes mellitus divided by the number of participants without pre-randomization diabetes.
Measured: Baseline (screening) up to Month 36 post randomization
Long Term Period: Number of Participants With SAEs, Death, Discontinuation Due to AEs - All Randomized Participants Who Entered the Long Term Period
AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Treatment-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug.
Measured: First dose after randomization (Day 1) to 56 days post last dose, up to Year 6 of the Study
Long Term Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest - All Randomized Participants Who Entered the Long Term Period
Prospectively identified events of special interest which were a subset of all AEs, and were either SAEs or non-serious AEs, included the following categories: Serious Infections, Thrombolic/embolic events, Autoimmune Disease, Malignancy, Peri-infusional reactions (only belatacept treatment group was IV) , Acute Peri-infusional events occurring within 24 hours of injection, Pulmonary Edema and Congestive Heart Failure. AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization.
Measured: First dose after randomization (Day 1) to last dose, plus 56 days, up to Year 6 of the Study
Long Term Period: Mean Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Serum Creatinine- ITT Participants Who Entered LT Period
Baseline was value at screening. Serum creatinine was measured in mg/dL. Only participants who entered into Long Term Period were included in the analysis.
Measured: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54
Long Term Period: Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria - All ITT Participants Who Entered the Long Term Period
Upper limits of normal (ULN). Hemoglobin: < 8 g/dL; Platelet count: < 50*10^9 c/L; Leukocytes: < 2.0*10^3 c/µL; Lymphocytes (absolute): < 0.5*10^3 c/µL; Neutrophils: < 1.0*10^3 c/µL; Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): > 5.0*ULN Units per liter (U/L); bilirubin: > 3.0*ULN mg/dL; Creatinine: > 3.0*ULN mg/dL; Calcium: < 7 mg/dL; Bicarbonate: > 12.5 mg/dL; Potassium: < 3.0 meq/L or > 6.0 meq/L; Magnesium >2.6 meq/L; Sodium: < 130 meq/L; Phosphorus: < 2.0 mg/dL; Uric Acid: > 10 mg/dL.
Measured: Baseline (Screening), up to Year 6 of the Study
Long Term Period: Mean Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Systolic Blood Pressure
Blood pressure was measured while the participant was sitting quietly for 5 minutes and was measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Baseline was value at screening. Only those participants who entered long term period were evaluated.
Measured: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54
Long Term Period: Mean Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Diastolic Blood Pressure
Blood pressure was measured while the participant was sitting quietly for 5 minutes and was measured in mmHg. Baseline was value at screening. Only those participants who entered long term period were evaluated.
Measured: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54
Participants Who Switched From CNI to Belatacept in Long Term Period : Mean Change in Calculated GFR Based on Imputed Values From Day of Switch to Week 96 Post Switch
Calculated GFR assessment used the MDRD formula. GFR was measured as mL/min/1.73 m^2. For death or graft loss participants, calculated GFR (cGFR) value 10 was used, for other participants who had a post baseline cGFR value missing, but had baseline value and at least 2 post baseline values available, which were at least 120 days apart, linear regression model was used to impute the cGFR value. Day of Switch = the first belatacept infusion day.
Measured: Day of Switch (first belatacept dose) to Week 96 Post Switch
Participants Who Switched to Belatacept in Long Term Period: Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs
AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Day of Switch = the first belatacept infusion day.
Measured: Day of Switch (first dose of belatacept ) to last dose plus 56 days, up to Year 6 of the Study
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Nov 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2007
- Primary completionJun 2009
- Study completionJun 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Renal TransplantStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 173 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00402168
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IM103-010
- Other IDs
- LEA29Y
- Status last verified
- Nov 2016
- First submitted
- 20 Nov 2006
- Last updated
- 5 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Rostaing L, Massari P, Garcia VD, Mancilla-Urrea E, Nainan G, del Carmen Rial M, Steinberg S, Vincenti F, Shi R, Di Russo G, Thomas D, Grinyo J. Switching from calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens to a belatacept-based regimen in renal transplant recipients: a randomized phase II study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Feb;6(2):430-9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05840710. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
PubMed 21051752
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Belatacept Conversion Trial in Renal Transplantation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00402168
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IM103-010
- Conditions
- Renal Transplant
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 173 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2007
- Primary completion
- Jun 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Nov 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Jan 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to learn if conversion to belatacept from cyclosporine or tacrolimus will preserve kidney function in people who have had a kidney transplant. The safety and tolerability of this treatment will also be studied
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A: Belatacept | Experimental | Drug: Belatacept |
| B: calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppressive regimen | Active comparator | Drug: Cyclosporine A, Drug: Tacrolimus |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Men and women age 18 and older
- 6-36 months after kidney transplant receiving cyclosporine or tacrolimus
- calculated GFR ≥35 and ≤75mL/min/1.73 m²
- subjects must have completed 1 year in the IM103-010ST and remained on study treatment (Long Term Extension)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Significant infection
- acute rejection within 3 months
- prior graft loss due to rejection
- pregnancy
- positive crossmatch
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BelataceptAlso: BMS-224818IV, IV Infusion, 5 mg/kg once every 28 days for one year | Drug | A: Belatacept |
| Cyclosporine ATablets, Oral, Trough of 100-250 ng/mL, 2* daily for one year | Drug | B: calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppressive regimen |
| TacrolimusTablets, Oral, Trough of 5-10 ng/mL, 2* daily for one year | Drug | B: calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppressive regimen |
Primary outcome
Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) With Imputed Values to 12 Months Post Randomization - All Randomized Participants (Intent-to-Treat Population)
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post randomization
Calculated GFR assessment used the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula. GFR was measured as mL/min/1.73 m^2. For death or graft loss participants, calculated GFR (cGFR) value 10 was used, for other participants who had a post baseline cGFR value missing, but had baseline value and at least 2 post baseline values available, which were at least 120 days apart, linear regression model was used to impute the cGFR value. Baseline = value at screening. Randomization/First Dose was on Day 1.
25 secondary outcomes
Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) With Imputed Values to 6 Months Post Randomization - All Randomized Participants (Intent-to-Treat Population)
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months post randomization
Number of Participants With Acute Rejection (AR) by Months 6 and 12 Post Randomization - All Randomized Participants
Time frame: At 6 and 12 months post randomization
Percentage of Participants Surviving With a Functioning Graft, Have Graft Loss or Death (Graft Loss, Death, Death With Functioning Graft) By Month 6 and Month 12 Post Randomization
Time frame: At 6 and 12 months post randomization
Number of Participants Who Had Any Study Drug Dose Alteration by Month 12 Due to Any Reason - Randomized and Treated Participants
Time frame: Month 12
Percentage of Participants With a Composite Endpoint of Death, Graft Loss and Acute Rejection at Month 12
Time frame: 12 Months post randomization
Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus - All Randomized Participants
Time frame: Month 12 post randomization
Number of Participants With Anti-Donor Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Positive Antibodies
Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12 Post Randomization
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 6 and to Month 12 in Serum Creatinine - All Randomized Participants
Time frame: Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 Post Randomization
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events (AEs) From First Dose up to Month 12
Time frame: First Dose (Day 1) to Month 12
Mean Change From Baseline in SF-36 Questionnaire Physical Component Score and in Mental Component Score at Month 12 - All Randomized Participants
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 12 for Eight Domain Scores of Quality of Life (QoL) Instrument SF-36 - All Randomized Participants
Time frame: Baseline (screening) to Month 12
Ridit Score at Month 12 - All Randomized Participants
Time frame: Month 12
Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria From Baseline up to Month 12 - Randomized and Treated Participants
Time frame: Baseline up to Month 12
Long Term Period: Mean Change From Baseline to 54 Months Post Randomization in Calculated GFR on Imputed Values at Specified Timepoints - Intent to Treat (ITT) Participants Who Entered LT Period
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54
Long Term Period: Number of Participants With Acute Rejection (AR) - All Randomized Participants in LT Period
Time frame: Post Month 12 up to Year 6 of the Study
Long Term Period: Number of Participants Who Survived With a Functioning Graft or Survived With Pure Graft Loss or Death With Functioning Graft - ITT Participants Who Entered the LT Period
Time frame: Post Months 24, 36, 48, up to Year 6 of the Study
Long Term Period: Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus Up to Month 36- All Randomized Participants Who Entered LT Period
Time frame: Baseline (screening) up to Month 36 post randomization
Long Term Period: Number of Participants With SAEs, Death, Discontinuation Due to AEs - All Randomized Participants Who Entered the Long Term Period
Time frame: First dose after randomization (Day 1) to 56 days post last dose, up to Year 6 of the Study
Long Term Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest - All Randomized Participants Who Entered the Long Term Period
Time frame: First dose after randomization (Day 1) to last dose, plus 56 days, up to Year 6 of the Study
Long Term Period: Mean Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Serum Creatinine- ITT Participants Who Entered LT Period
Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54
Long Term Period: Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria - All ITT Participants Who Entered the Long Term Period
Time frame: Baseline (Screening), up to Year 6 of the Study
Long Term Period: Mean Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Systolic Blood Pressure
Time frame: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54
Long Term Period: Mean Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time frame: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54
Participants Who Switched From CNI to Belatacept in Long Term Period : Mean Change in Calculated GFR Based on Imputed Values From Day of Switch to Week 96 Post Switch
Time frame: Day of Switch (first belatacept dose) to Week 96 Post Switch
Participants Who Switched to Belatacept in Long Term Period: Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs
Time frame: Day of Switch (first dose of belatacept ) to last dose plus 56 days, up to Year 6 of the Study
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jan 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21051752Rostaing L, Massari P, Garcia VD, Mancilla-Urrea E, Nainan G, del Carmen Rial M, Steinberg S, Vincenti F, Shi R, Di Russo G, Thomas D, Grinyo J. Switching from calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens to a belatacept-based regimen in renal transplant recipients: a randomized phase II study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Feb;6(2):430-9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05840710. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
Related trials for Renal Transplant
Enrolling by invitation
Online Exercise Program for Transplant Patients: A Pilot Study
Kidney Transplantation, Physical Function
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR) After a Kidney Transplant
Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR)
Not yet recruiting
Hypothermic Kidney Machine Perfusion With Omnisol
End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Kidney Transplant
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Biomarker-Guided Mycophenolate Mofetil Elimination in Low-Risk Older Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients
Kidney Transplant Recipient
Recruiting
Non-Invasive Monitoring of Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients and Immunosuppression Personalization: an Open-labeled Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
Pediatric Kidney Disease, Transplant;Failure,Kidney
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
44 sites in 12 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Belatacept, Cyclosporine A and Tacrolimus in people with Renal Transplant, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 44 sites in 12 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 44 sites in United States, Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Canada and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Jan 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change From Baseline in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) With Imputed Values to 12 Months Post Randomization - All Randomized Participants (Intent-to-Treat Population) (time frame: Baseline to 12 months post randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00402168, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jan 2017.