AzTrials
AzTrials

Bleeding and Cardiac SurgeryPhase 3NCT00396760

Comparison of Aprotinin and Tranexamic Acid in Routine Cardiac Surgery

A Phase 3 study testing aprotinin or tranexamic acid in people with Bleeding and Cardiac Surgery and Allogeneic Blood Transfusion, run by German Heart Center at 1 site in Germany.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The hypothesis of this study is that the antifibrinolytic drugs aprotinin and tranexamic acid equally influence bleeding tendency and transfusion requirement in patients undergoing first time cardiac procedures with a low risk of increased postoperative bleeding.Only patients undergoing first time CABG or first time… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
aprotinin or tranexamic acid
How many people
220 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Jan 2005to Jul 2006
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • informed consent
  • Patients undergoing primary CABG or Aortic valve replacement surgery

Who cannot join

  • Previous sternotomy
  • OPCAB surgery
  • urgent/emergency operation
  • Coumadin treatment
  • previous aprotinin exposure
  • preoperative renal impairment (Creatinine > 2 mg/dL)
  • patients refusing blood transfusions
  • no informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • German Heart Center Munich

    Munich, Munich, 80636

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: The Influence of High-Dose Aprotinin and Tranexamic Acid on Bleeding Tendency and Allogeneic Blood Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Primary Aortic Valve Replacement or Coronary Artery Revascularization

The hypothesis of this study is that the antifibrinolytic drugs aprotinin and tranexamic acid equally influence bleeding tendency and transfusion requirement in patients undergoing first time cardiac procedures with a low risk of increased postoperative bleeding.Only patients undergoing first time CABG or first time aortic valve replacement are included in this study.

Read the detailed description

Excessive bleeding during and after cardiac surgery is a serious complication. It exposes patients to the risk of allogeneic blood transfusion or other blood products and the risk of mediastinal re-exploration.Antifibrinolytic drugs like aprotinin and tranexamic acid are proven to reduce bleeding tendency and transfusion requirement in cardiac surgery. The efficacy of these drugs is proven, especially for the unspecific proteinase inhibitor aprotinin, however, there are concerns about the safety and the high costs of this drug. There are only limited head-to-head comparisons of these two drugs.

In this double-blind, prospective, controlled study the efficacy of aprotinin and tranexamic acid is compared. Primary outcome is the 24 hours postoperative drainage blood loss and the percentage of patients requiring allogeneic blood transfusion during the hospital stay. Subgroups of patients undergoing CABG surgery or aortic valve replacement are predefined for combined and separate data analysis.The power of the study is calculated for this subgroup-analysis.

Secondary outcome measurements are molecular marker of activation of hemostasis up to the 5th postoperative day.

Being tested
aprotinin or tranexamic acid
Keywords
cardiac surgery, blood transfusion, antifibrinolytics, aprotinin, tranexamic acid
Medical subject headings
Hemorrhage

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • aprotinin or tranexamic acidDrug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 24 hours postoperative drainage blood loss

  2. incidence of allogeneic blood transfusion

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. activation of fibrinolysis and hemostasis

  2. impairment of renal function

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Nov 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2005
  3. Study completionJul 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
220 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00396760
Sponsor's protocol ID
1172/04
Status last verified
Nov 2006
First submitted
6 Nov 2006
Last updated
7 Nov 2006
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Diprose P, Herbertson MJ, O'Shaughnessy D, Deakin CD, Gill RS. Reducing allogeneic transfusion in cardiac surgery: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of antifibrinolytic therapies used in addition to intra-operative cell salvage. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Mar;94(3):271-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei044. Epub 2004 Dec 10.

    PubMed 15591329
  • Henry DA, Moxey AJ, Carless PA, O'Connell D, McClelland B, Henderson KM, Sly K, Laupacis A, Fergusson D. Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(1):CD001886. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001886.

    PubMed 11279735
  • Royston D, Levy JH, Fitch J, Dietrich W, Body SC, Murkin JM, Spiess BD, Nadel A. Full-dose aprotinin use in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: an analysis of perioperative pharmacotherapy and patient outcomes. Anesth Analg. 2006 Nov;103(5):1082-8. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000238447.74029.f5.

    PubMed 17056936
  • Dietrich W, Busley R, Kriner M. High-dose aprotinin in cardiac surgery: is high-dose high enough? An analysis of 8281 cardiac surgical patients treated with aprotinin. Anesth Analg. 2006 Nov;103(5):1074-81. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000238446.30034.c8.

    PubMed 17056935
  • Lison S, Dietrich W, Braun S, Boehm J, Schuster T, Englhard A, Perchuc A, Spannagl M, Busley R. Enhanced thrombin generation after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jan;112(1):37-45. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181fc6df0. Epub 2010 Dec 2.

    PubMed 21127274
  • Dietrich W, Spannagl M, Boehm J, Hauner K, Braun S, Schuster T, Busley R. Tranexamic acid and aprotinin in primary cardiac operations: an analysis of 220 cardiac surgical patients treated with tranexamic acid or aprotinin. Anesth Analg. 2008 Nov;107(5):1469-78. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318182252b.

    PubMed 18931201

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing aprotinin or tranexamic acid in people with Bleeding and Cardiac Surgery and Allogeneic Blood Transfusion, run by German Heart Center at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

24 hours postoperative drainage blood loss. The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00396760, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2006.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in