Diabetes MellitusPhase 3NCT00395512
Efficacy of Alogliptin With Pioglitazone (Actos®) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
A Phase 3 study testing Alogliptin and Pioglitazone in people with Diabetes Mellitus, run by Takeda at 161 sites in 23 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the combination of alogliptin, once daily (QD), and pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are inadequately controlled with diet and exercise alone. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- Alogliptin and Pioglitazone
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 655 participants
- Where
- 161 sitesin 23 countries
- Study dates
- Nov 2006to Feb 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Historical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes.
- Failed treatment with diet and exercise for at least 2 months prior to Screening.
- Is experiencing inadequate glycemic control as defined as glycosylated hemoglobin concentration between 7.5-11%, inclusive.
- Has received any antidiabetic therapy for less than 7 days within 3 months prior to Screening.
- Has a body mass index greater than or equal to 23 kg/m2 and less than or equal to45 kg/m2.
- Fasting C-peptide greater than or equal to 0.8 ng per mL.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Regular use of other, non-excluded medications is allowed if participant is on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening.
- Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must agree to use adequate contraception, and can neither be pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study.
- Must be willing and able to monitor their blood concentrations with a home glucose monitor.
Who cannot join
- Systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 160 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 100 mmHg.
- Hemoglobin less than or equal to 12 g per dL for males and less than or equal to 10 g per dL for females.
- Alanine aminotransferase greater than or equal to 2.5times the upper limit of normal.
- Serum creatinine greater than 2.0 mg per dL.
- Thyroid stimulating hormone level greater than the upper limit of normal range.
- Major illness or debility that in the investigator's opinion prohibits the subject from completing the study.
Show all 22Show fewer
- Urine albumin to creatinine ratio of greater than 1000 ug per mg at Screening. If elevated, the subject may be rescreened within 1 week.
- History of cancer, other than squamous cell or basal cell carcinoma of the skin, that has not been in full remission for at least 5 years prior to Screening
- History of laser treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy within 6 months prior to Screening.
- History of gastroparesis.
- Has New York Heart Association Class I to IV heart failure regardless of therapy.
- History of coronary angioplasty, coronary stent placement, coronary bypass surgery, or myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to Screening.
- History of any hemoglobinopathy that may affect determination of glycosylated hemoglobin.
- History of infection with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus.
- History of a psychiatric disorder that will affect participant's ability to participate in the study.
- History of angioedema in association with use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor inhibitors.
- Any alteration in angiotensin-II receptor inhibitors within 2 months prior to Randomization, if applicable.
- History of alcohol (defined as regular or daily consumption of more than 4 alcoholic drinks per day) or substance abuse (defined as illicit drug use) within 2 years prior to Screening.
- Received any investigational drug within 30 days prior to Screening or a history of receipt of an investigational antidiabetic drug within 3 months prior to Screening.
- Previously participated in an investigational study of SYR-322.
- Glycosylated hemoglobin concentration between 7.5-11%, inclusive, and a fasting plasma glucose less than 310 mg per dL.
- At least 75% compliant with the single-blind placebo regimen during the run-in/stabilization period.
Trial locations and contacts
161 sites in 23 countries.
161 sites in 23 countries
United States83 sites
Study site
Altoona, Pennsylvania
Study site
Arlington, Texas
Study site
Arlington, Virginia
Study site
Ashland, Oregon
Study site
Augusta, Georgia
Study site
Barnesville, Georgia
Study site
Bay City, Michigan
Study site
Benzonia, Michigan
Study site
Billings, Montana
Study site
Bossier City, Louisiana
Study site
Charleston, South Carolina
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina
Study site
Chicago, Illinois
Study site
Cicero, New York
Study site
Colleyville, Texas
Study site
Columbiana, Alabama
Study site
Columbus, Georgia
Study site
Conroe, Texas
Study site
Corpus Christi, Texas
Study site
Dallas, Texas
Study site
Elizabeth, New Jersey
Study site
Elkton, Maryland
Study site
Euless, Texas
Study site
Fleetwood, Pennsylvania
Study site
Florence, South Carolina
Study site
Foothill Ranch, California
Study site
Fort Worth, Texas
Study site
Franklin, Ohio
Study site
Garland, Texas
Study site
Hamilton, New Jersey
Study site
Harleysville, Pennsylvania
Study site
Havertown, Pennsylvania
Study site
Houston, Texas
Study site
Hueytown, Alabama
Study site
Huntsville, Alabama
Study site
Irvine, California
Study site
Jacksonville, Florida
Study site
Jonesboro, Arkansas
Study site
Katy, Texas
Study site
Las Vegas, Nevada
Study site
Lewisburg, West Virginia
Study site
Libertyville, Illinois
Study site
Little Rock, Arkansas
Study site
Melbourne, Florida
Study site
Miami, Florida
Study site
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Study site
Mooresville, North Carolina
Study site
Morristown, Tennessee
Study site
Norfolk, Virginia
Study site
Norristown, Pennsylvania
Study site
North Dartmouth, Massachusetts
Study site
Northeast, North Dakota
Study site
Northern Cambria, Pennsylvania
Study site
Northport, Alabama
Study site
Northridge, California
Study site
Ogden, Utah
Study site
Orangeburg, South Carolina
Study site
Penndel, Pennsylvania
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Study site
Picayune, Mississippi
Study site
Port Charlotte, Florida
Study site
Portage, Michigan
Study site
Prince Frederick, Maryland
Study site
Richmond, Virginia
Study site
Saint Clair Shores, Michigan
Study site
San Antonio, Texas
Study site
San Diego, California
Study site
San Mateo, California
Study site
Santa Monica, California
Study site
Savannah, Georgia
Study site
Searcy, Arkansas
Study site
Sebastian, Florida
Study site
Seguin, Texas
Study site
South Bend, Indiana
Study site
South Miami, Florida
Study site
St Louis, Missouri
Study site
Sugarland, Texas
Study site
Taylors, South Carolina
Study site
Tomball, Texas
Study site
Towson, Maryland
Study site
Tucson, Arizona
Study site
Williamston, South Carolina
Study site
Winter Haven, Florida
Brazil7 sites
Study site
Belém, Pará
Study site
Curitiba, Paraná
Study site
Fortaleza, Ceará
Study site
Goiás, Goiás
Study site
Marília, São Paulo
Study site
Maringá, RP
Study site
Mogi das Cruzes, São Paulo
Poland7 sites
Study site
Bialystok
Study site
Bytom
Study site
Gdansk
Study site
Gniewkowo
Study site
Kamieniec Ząbkowicki
Study site
Krakow
Study site
Łęczyca
Argentina6 sites
Study site
Cap. Fed., Buenos Aires
Study site
Chacabuco, Buenos Aires
Study site
Córdoba
Study site
La Plata, Buenos Aires
Study site
Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires
Study site
Morón, Buenos Aires
Hungary6 sites
Study site
Budapest
Study site
Eger
Study site
Gyula
Study site
Makó
Study site
Nyíregyháza
Study site
Pécs
India6 sites
Study site
Bangalore, Karnataka
Study site
Chennai, Tamil Nadu
Study site
Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra
Study site
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh
Study site
Mumbai, Maharashtra
Study site
Nagpur, Maharashtra
Israel6 sites
Study site
Hadera
Study site
Haifa
Study site
Holon
Study site
Jaffa Tel Aviv
Study site
Jerusalem
Study site
Nahariya
South Africa6 sites
Study site
Bellville, Western Province
Study site
Cape Town, Western Province
Study site
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal
Study site
East Lynne, Pretoria
Study site
Johannesburg, Gauteng
Study site
Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape
Slovakia5 sites
Study site
Banska Bysterica
Study site
Interna Klinika II, Nitra Region
Study site
Lučenec
Study site
Riverside
Study site
Šahy
Ukraine4 sites
Study site
Dnipropetrovsk
Study site
Kharkiv
Study site
Lviv
Study site
Odesa
Australia3 sites
Study site
Fitzroy, Victoria
Study site
Frankston, Victoria
Study site
Kingswood, New South Wales
Mexico3 sites
Study site
Aguascalientes
Study site
Mexico City
Study site
Monterrey
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Double-Blind Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of SYR-322 Plus Pioglitazone HCl (Actos®), SYR-322 Alone or Pioglitazone HCl Alone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the combination of alogliptin, once daily (QD), and pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are inadequately controlled with diet and exercise alone.
Read the detailed description
There are approximately 19 million people in the United States who have been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, of which 90% to 95% is type 2. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes varies among racial and ethnic populations and has been shown to correlate with age, obesity, family history, history of gestational diabetes, and physical inactivity. Over the next decade, a marked increase in the number of adults with diabetes mellitus is expected, placing an ever-increasing burden on families and the health care system.
Current pharmacologic interventions for type 2 diabetes mellitus include a diverse range of antidiabetic medications with different mechanisms of action including insulin and insulin analogues, sulfonylureas, metformin, meglitinides, thiazolidinediones, inhibitors of alpha- glucosidase, analogs of glucagon-like peptide-1, and synthetic analogues of human amylin. Despite the variety of medications, many have clinically important or potentially life-threatening side effects, restricted use in many subpopulations, concerns with long-term tolerability, and challenges related to compliance due to side effects and route of administration. All of these reasons contribute to the difficulties patients have reaching the target glycosylated hemoglobin level less than 7%.
SYR-322 (alogliptin) is a selective, orally available inhibitor of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 enzyme. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 enzyme is thought to be primarily responsible for the in vivo degradation of 2 peptide hormones released in response to nutrient ingestion, namely glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide. Both peptides exert important effects on islet beta cells to stimulate glucose-dependent insulin secretion as well as regulating beta cell proliferation and cytoprotection. Glucagon-like peptide-1, but not glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, inhibits gastric emptying, glucagon secretion, and food intake. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide has been shown to enhance insulin secretion by direct interaction with a glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide -specific receptor on islet beta cells. The glucose-lowering actions of glucagon-like peptide-1, but not glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, are preserved in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Pioglitazone (ACTOS®) is a thiazolidinedione developed by Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan) that is approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pioglitazone is a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist that decreases insulin resistance in the periphery and liver resulting in increased insulin-dependent glucose disposal and decreased hepatic glucose output.
As the rate of newly diagnosed cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus continues to grow, so does the need for products that will provide better glycemic control and improved safety and tolerability. Alogliptin and pioglitazone have complementary actions. Alogliptin inhibits the degradation of glucagon-like peptide-1 by inhibiting the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV, thus augmenting glucose-dependent insulin secretion while pioglitazone is a peripheral and hepatic insulin sensitizer. Given the complementary mechanisms of action of alogliptin (stimulates insulin secretion) and pioglitazone (enhances insulin sensitivity), the addition of combination therapy in treatment naïve type 2 diabetes patients may potentially allow the patients to reach and maintain their glycosylated hemoglobin goal more effectively.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination of alogliptin with pioglitazone in patients who are inadequately controlled on diet and exercise alone. Study participation is anticipated to be approximately 8.5 months.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- Alogliptin, Pioglitazone, Placebo
- Keywords
- Glucose Metabolism Disorder, Dysmetabolic Syndrome, Type II Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Lipoatrophic, Dyslipidemia, Drug Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Glucose Metabolism Disorders, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetes Mellitus, Lipoatrophic, Dyslipidemias
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AlogliptinDrug
Also called SYR-322
Alogliptin tablets.
PioglitazoneDrug
Also called Actos, AD4833
Pioglitazone tablets.
PlaceboDrug
Matching placebo tablets.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Alogliptin 25 mg QD | Experimental | Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and pioglitazone placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks. Receives: Drug: Alogliptin; Drug: Placebo |
| Pioglitazone 30 mg QD | Active comparator | Pioglitazone 30 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and alogliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks. Receives: Drug: Pioglitazone; Drug: Placebo |
| Alogliptin 25 mg QD+ Pioglitazone 30 mg QD | Experimental | Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and pioglitazone 30 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks. Receives: Drug: Alogliptin; Drug: Pioglitazone |
| Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD | Active comparator | Alogliptin 12.5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and pioglitazone 30 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks. Receives: Drug: Alogliptin; Drug: Pioglitazone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
The change from Baseline to Week 26 in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound).
Measured: Baseline and Week 26
Secondary outcomes (40)
Change From Baseline in HbA1c Over Time
The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) at 4 week intervals during the study. Least Squares Means were from an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline HbA1c as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose Over Time
The change from Baseline in fasting plasma glucose was assessed at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least Squares Means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline plasma glucose as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Percentage of Participants With Marked Hyperglycemia
Marked Hyperglycemia is defined as fasting plasma glucose greater than or equal to 200 mg/dL. Study week windows are defined to place hyperglycemia into visit categories.
Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Percentage of Participants Meeting Rescue Criteria
Rescue was defined as meeting 1 of the following criteria, confirmed by a 2nd sample drawn within 5 days after the first sample and analyzed by the central laboratory:
- After more than 4 weeks of treatment but prior to the Week 8 Visit: a single fasting plasma glucose ≥310 mg/dL (≥17.5 mmol/L);
- From the Week 8 Visit but prior to the Week 12 Visit: a single fasting plasma glucose ≥275 mg/dL (≥15.27 mmol/L);
- From the Week 12 Visit through the End-of-Treatment Visit: HbA1c ≥8.5% and ≤0.5% reduction in HbA1c as compared with the Baseline HbA1c.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Less Than or Equal to 6.5%
Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c ≤6.5%.
Measured: Week 26
Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Less Than or Equal to 7.0%
Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c ≤ 7%.
Measured: Week 26
Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Less Than or Equal to 7.5%
Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c ≤ 7.5%.
Measured: Week 26
Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin Greater Than or Equal to 0.5%
Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of ≥ 0.5%.
Measured: Baseline and Week 26
Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin Greater Than or Equal to 1.0%
Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of ≥ 1%.
Measured: Baseline and Week 26
Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin Greater Than or Equal to 1.5%.
Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of ≥ 1.5%.
Measured: Baseline and Week 26
Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin Greater Than or Equal to 2.0%
Clinical response at Week 26 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of ≥ 2.0%.
Measured: Baseline and Week 26
Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin
Proinsulin is a precursor to insulin, and was measured as an indicator of pancreatic function. The change from Baseline in fasting proinsulin was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least Squares Means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline proinsulin as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Insulin
The change from Baseline in fasting insulin was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least Squares Means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline insulin as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio
The ratio of proinsulin to insulin was calculated as proinsulin (pmol/L) / insulin (μIU/mL) at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26 relative to the Baseline value. Least squares means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and Baseline proinsulin/insulin ratio as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Change From Baseline in C-peptide Levels
C-peptide is a byproduct created when the hormone insulin is produced and is measured by a blood test. Change from Baseline was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline C-peptide as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Calculated Homeostatic Model Assessment Insulin Resistance
The Homeostasis Model Assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA IR) measures insulin resistance based on fasting glucose and insulin measurements:
HOMA IR = fasting plasma insulin (µIU/mL) * fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) / 22.5
A higher number indicates a greater degree of insulin resistance. The change from Baseline in HOMA IR was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline HOMA IR as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Homeostatic Model Assessment Beta Cell Function
The Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) estimates steady state beta cell function (%B) as a percentage of a normal reference population.
HOMA %B = 20 * insulin (µIU/mL) / fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) - 3.5
The change from Baseline in the homeostasis model assessment of beta cell function was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline HOMA beta cell function as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Change from Baseline in body weight was assessed at Weeks 8, 12, 20 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and Baseline weight as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 8, 12, 20 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol Level
Change from Baseline in total cholesterol level was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline total cholesterol as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
Change from Baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline LDL cholesterol as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
Change from Baseline in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline HDL cholesterol as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Triglyceride Levels
Change from Baseline in triglycerides was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline triglycerides as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Free Fatty Acids
Change from Baseline in free fatty acids (FFA) was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline free fatty acid as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1
Change from Baseline in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein
Change from Baseline in high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline hsCRP as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Adiponectin
Change from Baseline in adiponectin was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline adiponectin as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1
Change from Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and Baseline apolipoprotein A1 as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A2
Change from Baseline in apolipoprotein A2 was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline apolipoprotein A2 as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B
Change from Baseline in apolipoprotein B was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline apolipoprotein B as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-III
Change from Baseline in apolipoprotein C-III was assessed at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline apolipoprotein C-III as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Lipid Fractionation Total Triglycerides
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) lipid fractionation was used to assess the change from Baseline in total triglyceride levels at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline NMR total triglycerides as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) / Chylomicron Particles
The change from Baseline in levels of total VLDL/chylomicron particles and large VLDL/chylomicron particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.
Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline VLDL/chylomicron particles as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in VLDL / Chylomicron Triglycerides
The change from Baseline in levels of VLDL/chylomicron triglycerides was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.
Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline VLDL/chylomicron triglycerides as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in VLDL Particles
The change from Baseline in levels of medium VLDL particles and small VLDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.
Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline VLDL particles as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Mean VLDL Particle Size
Change from Baseline in mean VLDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline mean VLDL particle size as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Intermediate Density Lipoprotein (IDL) Particles
The change from Baseline in levels of IDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.
Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline IDL particles as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Particles
The change from Baseline in levels of total, large, medium-small, total small and very small LDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.
Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline LDL particles as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Mean LDL Particle Size
Change from Baseline in mean LDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline mean LDL particle size as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Particles
The change from Baseline in levels of total, large, medium and small HDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26.
Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline HDL particles as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Mean HDL Particle Size
Change from Baseline in mean HDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12 and 26. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as class variables and baseline mean HDL particle size as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Nov 2006 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2006
- Primary completionFeb 2008
- Study completionFeb 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by TakedaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 655 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Takeda
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- VP, Biological Sciences, Study director, Takeda
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00395512
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 01-06-TL-322OPI-002
- Other IDs
- 2006-005492-17, U1111-1113-8616
- Status last verified
- Feb 2013
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 2006
- Last updated
- 27 Mar 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Rosenstock J, Inzucchi SE, Seufert J, Fleck PR, Wilson CA, Mekki Q. Initial combination therapy with alogliptin and pioglitazone in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010 Nov;33(11):2406-8. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0159. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
PubMed 20724648
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Mar 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Double-Blind Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of SYR-322 Plus Pioglitazone HCl (Actos®), SYR-322 Alone or Pioglitazone HCl Alone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00395512
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 01-06-TL-322OPI-002
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- Glucose Metabolism Disorder, Dysmetabolic Syndrome, Type II Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Lipoatrophic, Dyslipidemia, Drug Therapy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 655 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- TakedaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2006
- Primary completion
- Feb 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Nov 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 27 Mar 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the combination of alogliptin, once daily (QD), and pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are inadequately controlled with diet and exercise alone.
Detailed description
There are approximately 19 million people in the United States who have been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, of which 90% to 95% is type 2. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes varies among racial and ethnic populations and has been shown to correlate with age, obesity, family history, history of gestational diabetes, and physical inactivity. Over the next decade, a marked increase in the number of adults with diabetes mellitus is expected, placing an ever-increasing burden on families and the health care system.
Current pharmacologic interventions for type 2 diabetes mellitus include a diverse range of antidiabetic medications with different mechanisms of action including insulin and insulin analogues, sulfonylureas, metformin, meglitinides, thiazolidinediones, inhibitors of alpha- glucosidase, analogs of glucagon-like peptide-1, and synthetic analogues of human amylin. Despite the variety of medications, many have clinically important or potentially life-threatening side effects, restricted use in many subpopulations, concerns with long-term tolerability, and challenges related to compliance due to side effects and route of administration. All of these reasons contribute to the difficulties patients have reaching the target glycosylated hemoglobin level less than 7%.
SYR-322 (alogliptin) is a selective, orally available inhibitor of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 enzyme. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 enzyme is thought to be primarily responsible for the in vivo degradation of 2 peptide hormones released in response to nutrient ingestion, namely glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide. Both peptides exert important effects on islet beta cells to stimulate glucose-dependent insulin secretion as well as regulating beta cell proliferation and cytoprotection. Glucagon-like peptide-1, but not glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, inhibits gastric emptying, glucagon secretion, and food intake. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide has been shown to enhance insulin secretion by direct interaction with a glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide -specific receptor on islet beta cells. The glucose-lowering actions of glucagon-like peptide-1, but not glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, are preserved in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Pioglitazone (ACTOS®) is a thiazolidinedione developed by Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan) that is approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pioglitazone is a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist that decreases insulin resistance in the periphery and liver resulting in increased insulin-dependent glucose disposal and decreased hepatic glucose output.
As the rate of newly diagnosed cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus continues to grow, so does the need for products that will provide better glycemic control and improved safety and tolerability. Alogliptin and pioglitazone have complementary actions. Alogliptin inhibits the degradation of glucagon-like peptide-1 by inhibiting the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV, thus augmenting glucose-dependent insulin secretion while pioglitazone is a peripheral and hepatic insulin sensitizer. Given the complementary mechanisms of action of alogliptin (stimulates insulin secretion) and pioglitazone (enhances insulin sensitivity), the addition of combination therapy in treatment naïve type 2 diabetes patients may potentially allow the patients to reach and maintain their glycosylated hemoglobin goal more effectively.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination of alogliptin with pioglitazone in patients who are inadequately controlled on diet and exercise alone. Study participation is anticipated to be approximately 8.5 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Alogliptin 25 mg QD | Experimental | Drug: Alogliptin, Drug: PlaceboAlogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and pioglitazone placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks. |
| Pioglitazone 30 mg QD | Active comparator | Drug: Pioglitazone, Drug: PlaceboPioglitazone 30 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and alogliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks. |
| Alogliptin 25 mg QD+ Pioglitazone 30 mg QD | Experimental | Drug: Alogliptin, Drug: PioglitazoneAlogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and pioglitazone 30 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks. |
| Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD | Active comparator | Drug: Alogliptin, Drug: PioglitazoneAlogliptin 12.5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and pioglitazone 30 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Historical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes.
- Failed treatment with diet and exercise for at least 2 months prior to Screening.
- Is experiencing inadequate glycemic control as defined as glycosylated hemoglobin concentration between 7.5-11%, inclusive.
- Has received any antidiabetic therapy for less than 7 days within 3 months prior to Screening.
- Has a body mass index greater than or equal to 23 kg/m2 and less than or equal to45 kg/m2.
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 160 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 100 mmHg.
- Hemoglobin less than or equal to 12 g per dL for males and less than or equal to 10 g per dL for females.
- Alanine aminotransferase greater than or equal to 2.5times the upper limit of normal.
- Serum creatinine greater than 2.0 mg per dL.
- Thyroid stimulating hormone level greater than the upper limit of normal range.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AlogliptinAlso: SYR-322Alogliptin tablets. | Drug | Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD, Alogliptin 25 mg QD, Alogliptin 25 mg QD+ Pioglitazone 30 mg QD |
| PioglitazoneAlso: Actos, AD4833Pioglitazone tablets. | Drug | Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD, Alogliptin 25 mg QD+ Pioglitazone 30 mg QD, Pioglitazone 30 mg QD |
| PlaceboMatching placebo tablets. | Drug | Alogliptin 25 mg QD, Pioglitazone 30 mg QD |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
The change from Baseline to Week 26 in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound).
40 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in HbA1c Over Time
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose Over Time
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Percentage of Participants With Marked Hyperglycemia
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Percentage of Participants Meeting Rescue Criteria
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Less Than or Equal to 6.5%
Time frame: Week 26
Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Less Than or Equal to 7.0%
Time frame: Week 26
Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin Less Than or Equal to 7.5%
Time frame: Week 26
Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin Greater Than or Equal to 0.5%
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin Greater Than or Equal to 1.0%
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin Greater Than or Equal to 1.5%.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin Greater Than or Equal to 2.0%
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Insulin
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Change From Baseline in C-peptide Levels
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Calculated Homeostatic Model Assessment Insulin Resistance
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Homeostatic Model Assessment Beta Cell Function
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8, 12, 20 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol Level
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Triglyceride Levels
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Free Fatty Acids
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Adiponectin
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A2
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-III
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Lipid Fractionation Total Triglycerides
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) / Chylomicron Particles
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in VLDL / Chylomicron Triglycerides
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in VLDL Particles
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Mean VLDL Particle Size
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Intermediate Density Lipoprotein (IDL) Particles
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Particles
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Mean LDL Particle Size
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Particles
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Change From Baseline in Mean HDL Particle Size
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Mar 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 20724648Rosenstock J, Inzucchi SE, Seufert J, Fleck PR, Wilson CA, Mekki Q. Initial combination therapy with alogliptin and pioglitazone in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010 Nov;33(11):2406-8. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0159. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
- ACTOS® Package InsertLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
VP, Biological Sciences study director
Takeda
161 sites in 23 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Alogliptin and Pioglitazone in people with Diabetes Mellitus, run by Takeda at 161 sites in 23 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 161 sites in United States, Brazil, Poland, Argentina, Hungary and 18 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Mar 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (time frame: Baseline and Week 26). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00395512, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2013.