AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung Cancer, Non-Small CellPhase 3NCT00390806

Oral HYCAMTIN Plus Whole Brain Radiation Therapy In Treatment Of Brain Metastases Resulting From Non-Small Lung Cancer

A Phase 3 study testing HYCAMTIN, oral capsules and Radiation in people with Lung Cancer, Non-Small Cell, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 88 sites in 6 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The current prognosis for patients with metastatic brain cancer from NSCLC is very poor. The current standard treatment for this disease is radiation therapy to the brain. The goal of the current study is to test whether the combination of orally administered HYCAMTIN capsules and whole brain radiation therapy will… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Lung Cancer, Non-Small Cell
What is being tested?
HYCAMTIN, oral capsules and Radiation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
472 participants
Where
88 sitesin 6 countries
Study dates
Dec 2006to Sep 2013
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • At least one measurable cancerous lesion in the brain from primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
  • Must have received previous chemotherapy
  • Must be 18 years of age of greater
  • Must be Easter Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status 0, 1, 2
  • At least 2 weeks must have elapsed since any surgery
  • At least 4 weeks must have elapsed since any radiation to a non-CNS site
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Must have adequate bone marrow, renal, and live capacities
  • Women must be of non-childbearing potential or practice adequate birth control
  • Males must practice adequate methods of birth control
  • Must sign written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Previous whole brain radiation therapy
  • Prior treatment with topotecan
  • Investigational agent within 30 days or 5 half-live
  • Concomitant therapy with inhibitors of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) or P-glycoprotein such as erlotinib or gefitinib
  • Primary or secondary immunodeficiencies
  • Gastrointestinal conditions that affect GI absorption or motility
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Uncontrolled emesis
  • Brain metastasis at time of initial diagnosis of NSCLC
  • History of other malignancy except in situ carcinoma of cervix; nonmelanomatous skin cancer, low grade prostate cancer
  • Pregnant or intending to become pregnant or intending to father a baby
  • Any severe concurrent medical condition that could affect compliance.

Trial locations and contacts

88 sites in 6 countries.

88 sites in 6 countries

United States46 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Albany, New York, 12206

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87109

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Anaheim, California, 92801

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Aurora, Colorado, 80012

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bedford, Texas, 76022

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Buffalo, New York, 14215-1199

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Buffalo, New York, 14215

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29403

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Columbia, Missouri, 65201

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Columbus, Ohio, 43235

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Corpus Christi, Texas, 78412

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dallas, Texas, 75320-2510

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Duarte, California, 91010-3000

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Duncanville, Texas, 75137

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Eugene, Oregon, 97401-8122

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Everett, Washington, 98201

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fort Worth, Texas, 76104

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Galesburg, Illinois, 61401

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Glendale, Arizona, 85304

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hot Springs, Arkansas, 71913

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46227

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Jackson, Mississippi, 39216

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64154

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Lakeland, Florida, 33805

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89135

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Lincoln, Nebraska, 68510

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Lubbock, Texas, 79415

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Metairie, Louisiana, 70006

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Paducah, Kentucky, 42003

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Park Ridge, Illinois, 60068

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Pleasant Hill, California, 94523

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Rockford, Illinois, 61108

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Sherman, Texas, 75090

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Skokie, Illinois, 60077

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Sugarland, Texas, 77479

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tampa, Florida, 33606

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

  • GSK Investigational Site

    The Bronx, New York, 10467

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Vancouver, Washington, 98684

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Westwood, Kansas, 66205

Other trials in United States

Hungary12 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Budapest, 1529

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Csorna, 9300

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Győr, 9024

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Gyula, 5703

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Mátraháza, 3233

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Miskolc, 3529

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nyíregyháza, 4400

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Pécs, 7623

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Székesfehérvár, 8000

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Szombathely, 9700

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Törökbálint, 2045

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Zalaegerszeg-Pozva, 8900

Other trials in Hungary

Canada10 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2H1

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5P9

  • GSK Investigational Site

    London, Ontario, N6A 4L6

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Moncton, New Brunswick, E1C 8X3

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Québec, Quebec, G1R 2J6

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9

Other trials in Canada

Russia10 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kazan', 420111

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Moscow, 105229

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Moscow, 115 478

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Moscow, 128128

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Moscow, 129 128

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Obninsk, 249036

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Orenburg, 460021

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Saint Petersburg, 197022

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Saint Petersburg, 197758

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Voronezh, 394062

Other trials in Russia

Poland7 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bialystok, 15-540

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bydgoszcz, 85-769

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Gdansk, 80-211

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Krakow, 31-115

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Olsztyn, 10-226

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Olsztyn, 10-357

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Poznan, 60-569

Other trials in Poland

Slovakia3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Banská Bystrica, 975 17

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bratislava, 826 06

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nitra, 949 01

Other trials in Slovakia

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Phase III, Open-Label Study of Oral Topotecan Plus Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy (WBRT) Compared With WBRT Alone in Patients With Brain Metastases From Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The current prognosis for patients with metastatic brain cancer from NSCLC is very poor. The current standard treatment for this disease is radiation therapy to the brain. The goal of the current study is to test whether the combination of orally administered HYCAMTIN capsules and whole brain radiation therapy will prolong the survival time of patients with this potentially serious condition.

Being tested
HYCAMTIN, oral capsules, Radiation
Keywords
Brain metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Brain metastases brain tumor lung cancer oral chemotherapy HYCAMTIN topotecan NSCLC WBRT whole brain radiation
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HYCAMTIN, oral capsulesDrug

    Also called HYCAMTIN, oral capsules

    topotecan oral capsules 1.1 mg/m2

  • RadiationRadiation

    Whole brain radiation

Study groups in NCT00390806
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
topotecan plus radiationExperimentaltopotecan 1.1 mg/m2 followed by whole brain radiation 3 Gy/day for 10 days, followed by optional continuation therapy with topotecan 2.3 mg/m2 for 5 days Q21 days as monotherapy.
Receives: Drug: HYCAMTIN, oral capsules; Radiation: Radiation
Whole brain radiationActive comparatorWhole brain radiation 3 Gy/day for 10 days
Receives: Radiation: Radiation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall Survival

    Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization until the date of death due to any cause. The date of last contact was used for those participants who had not died or were lost to follow-up. These participants were classified as having been censored.

    Measured: From the time of Randomization until the date of death due to any cause (up to 195 weeks)

Secondary outcomes (30)
  1. Six-month Survival

    Six-month survival is defined as the percentage of participants alive at 6 months following randomization. The date of last contact was used for those participants who had not died or were lost to follow-up. These participants were classified as having been censored.

    Measured: Month 6

  2. Number of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) or a Partial Response (PR) (Central Nervous System [CNS]-Radiologic)

    The number of participants achieving either a CR or PR, per World Health Organization (WHO) Criteria, in the CNS was assessed. CR is defined as the complete disappearance of all known measurable (Must be accurately measured in >=1 dimension) and nonmeasurable disease, without clinical, laboratory, or radiological evidence of recurrence for at least 4 weeks. CR may have been defined in participants with measurable and/or non-measurable disease at Screening. PR is defined as at least a 50% decrease in the sum of the products of the greatest length and perpendicular width of all measurable disease with no clear increase in nonmeasurable disease in participants without measurable disease. In both cases, there must have been no appearance of new disease, and no clinical, laboratory, or radiological evidence of disease progression for at least 4 weeks. Assessment of response was performed by the investigator and was based on unconfirmed responses.

    Measured: From the time of Randomization until the time of CR or PR (up to 75 weeks)

  3. Time to Response (TTR) (CNS-radiologic)

    TTR is defined as the time from Randomization until the first documented evidence of CR or PR in the CNS. CR is defined as the complete disappearance of all known measurable (Must be accurately measured in >=1 dimension) and nonmeasurable disease, without clinical, laboratory, or radiological evidence of recurrence for at least 4 weeks. CR may have been defined in participants with measurable and/or non-measurable disease at Screening. PR is defined as at least a 50% decrease in the sum of the products of the greatest length and perpendicular width of all measurable disease with no clear increase in nonmeasurable disease in participants without measurable disease. In both cases, there must have been no appearance of new disease, and no clinical, laboratory, or radiological evidence of disease progression for at least 4 weeks. Assessment of response was performed by the investigator and was based on unconfirmed responses.

    Measured: From the time of Randomization until the first documented evidence of CR or PR (up to 75 weeks)

  4. Time to Progression (TTP) (CNS-radiologic)

    TTP is defined as the time from Randomization until the first documented sign of disease progression in the CNS. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as an increase >=25% in any measurable lesion or, in participants with non-measurable disease only, an estimation of an increase >=25%. In both cases, determination of progression included the appearance of any new lesions, or signification worsening of conditions presumed to be related to malignancy. Participants with clinical or laboratory evidence of possible disease progression were to be evaluated radiologically. TTP was analyzed with censoring for extended loss to follow-up to account for two or more missed assessments before a TTP event. The date of the last adequate CNS assessment before extended loss to follow-up was used for censored participants.

    Measured: From the time of Randomization until the first documented sign of disease progression (up to 75 weeks)

  5. Time to Progression (TTP) (All Sites of Disease-radiologic)

    TTP is defined as the time from Randomization until the first documented sign of disease progression in all sites of disease. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as an increase >=25% in any measurable lesion or, in participants with non-measurable disease only, an estimation of an increase >=25%. In both cases, determination of progression included the appearance of any new lesions, or signification worsening of conditions presumed to be related to malignancy. Participants with clinical or laboratory evidence of possible disease progression were to be evaluated radiologically. TTP was analyzed with censoring for extended loss to follow-up to account for two or more missed assessments before a TTP event. The date of the last adequate CNS assessment before extended loss to follow-up was used for censored participants.

    Measured: From the time of Randomization until the first documented sign of disease progression (up to 75 weeks)

  6. Number of Participants Who Ranked Each Individual Indicated Neurological Sign and Symptom as None, Mild, Moderate, or Severe at Months 1 and 3

    Neurological signs and symptoms data were derived from a participant-reported diary. The participants were asked to assess the following signs and symptoms on a scale of none, mild, moderate, or severe at Months 1 and 3: headache, problems with balance/coordination (PB/C), leg weakness, arm weakness, loss of feeling/numbness (LofF/N), speech difficulty (SD), confusion, loss of memory (LofM), drowsiness, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, visual problems (VP), seizures, leg/ankle swelling (L/AS), heart burn, difficulty sleeping (DS), tiredness, and appetite/weight gain (A/WG).

    Measured: Months 1 and 3

  7. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Level of Consciousness at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

    The investigator assessed participants for the neurological sign and symptom of level of consciousness and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; somnolence or sedation not interfering with function (not intefering); somnolence or sedation interfering with function, but not activities of daily living (ADLs) (interfering); obtundation or stupor, difficult to arouse, inteferring with ADLs (obtundation or stupor); coma.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

  8. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Headache at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

    The investigator (per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE], version 3.0) assessed participants for headache and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, Grade (G) 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

  9. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Dizziness/Lightheadedness at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

    The investigator (per CTCAE, version 3.0) assessed participants for dizziness/lightheadedness and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, G 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

  10. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Vertigo at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

    The investigator (per CTCAE, version 3.0) assessed participants for vertigo and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, G 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

  11. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Nausea/Vomiting at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

    The investigator (per CTCAE, version 3.0) assessed participants for nausea/vomiting and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, G 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

  12. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Visual Problem at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

    The investigator (per CTCAE, version 3.0) assessed participants for visual problem and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, G 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

  13. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Seizure at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

    The investigator (per CTCAE, version 3.0) assessed participants for seizure and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, G 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

  14. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Other Neurological Symptoms at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

    The investigator (per CTCAE, version 3.0) assessed participants for other neurological symptoms and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, G 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

  15. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Cranial Nerves II-XII at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

    The investigator assessed participants' status of cranial nerves II-XII and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; present, not interfering with ADLs; present, interfering with ADLs; life threatening, disabling.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

  16. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Language (Dysphasia or Aphasia) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

    The investigator assessed participants' status of language (dysphasia or aphasia) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent; awareness of receptive or expressive aphasia, not impairing ability to communicate (not impaired); receptive or expressive dysphasia, impairing ability to communicate (impaired); inability to communicate (unable).

    Measured: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

  17. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Strength (Right Upper Extremity) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

    The investigator assessed participants' status of strength (right upper extremity) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic with weakness on physical examination; Grade 2, symptomatic and interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, symptomatic and interfering with ADLs; Grade 4: bedridden or disabling.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

  18. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Strength (Left Upper Extremity) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

    The investigator assessed participants' status of strength (left upper extremity) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic with weakness on physical examination; Grade 2, symptomatic and interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, symptomatic and interfering with ADLs; Grade 4: bedridden or disabling.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

  19. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Strength (Right Lower Extremity) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

    The investigator assessed participants' status of strength (right lower extremity) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic with weakness on physical examination; Grade 2, symptomatic and interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, symptomatic and interfering with ADLs; Grade 4: bedridden or disabling.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

  20. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Strength (Left Lower Extremity) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

    The investigator assessed participants' status of strength (left lower extremity) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic with weakness on physical examination; Grade 2, symptomatic and interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, symptomatic and interfering with ADLs; Grade 4: bedridden or disabling.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

  21. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Sensation at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

    The investigator assessed participants' status of sensation and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; loss of deep tendon reflexes or paresthesia, but not interfering with function (not interfering with function); objective sensory loss or paresthesia interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs (interfering with function); sensory loss or paresthesia interfering with ADLs (intefering with ADLs); permanent sensory loss that interferes with function (permanent sensory loss).

    Measured: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

  22. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Ataxia (Right Upper Extremity: Finger to Nose Testing) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

    The investigator assessed participants' status of ataxia (right upper extremity: finger to nose testing) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic but abnormal on physical examination, and not interfering with function; Grade 2, mild symptoms interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, moderate symptoms interfering with ADLs; Grade 4, bedridden or disabling.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

  23. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Ataxia (Left Upper Extremity: Finger to Nose Testing) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

    The investigator assessed participants' status of ataxia (left upper extremity: finger to nose testing) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic but abnormal on physical examination, and not interfering with function; Grade 2, mild symptoms interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, moderate symptoms interfering with ADLs; Grade 4, bedridden or disabling.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

  24. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Ataxia (Gait) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

    The investigator assessed participants' status of ataxia (gait) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic but abnormal on physical examination, and not interfering with function; Grade 2, mild symptoms interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, moderate symptoms interfering with ADLs; Grade 4, bedridden or disabling.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

  25. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Ataxia (Balance) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

    The investigator assessed participants' status of ataxia (balance) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic but abnormal on physical examination, and not interfering with function; Grade 2, mild symptoms interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, moderate symptoms interfering with ADLs; Grade 4, bedridden or disabling.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

  26. Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE; Both Serious and Non-serious) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. For a list of all SAEs and AEs, see the SAE/AE module of this results summary.

    Measured: From Randomization until the last clinic visit associated with the study, up until 35 days after the start of the last course of treatment (up to 75 weeks)

  27. Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Change From Baseline in the Indicated Chemistry Parameters With Respect to the Normal Range

    The worst-case change from Baseline in chemistry parameters was measured as decrease to low (DTL), change to normal or no change (CTN/NC), or increase to high (ITH). The worst-case change value could have been measured at any point during the on-therapy period. Participants are counted twice if the participant "Decreased to Low" and "Increased to High" during the on-therapy period.

    Measured: From Randomization until the last clinic visit associated with the study, up until 35 days after the start of the last course of treatment (up to 75 weeks)

  28. Lesion Assessment and Measurement

    Lesions were assessed per WHO criteria. For lesion assessment data, see the outcome measure entitled "Number of participants with a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) (central nervous system [CNS]-radiologic)."

    Measured: From the time of Randomization until the time of CR or PR (up to 75 weeks)

  29. Brain Symptoms

    Brain symptoms were assessed as the number of participants with neurological signs and symptoms. For brain symptom data, see the outcome measures entitled "Number of participants with the indicated investigator assessment for the neurological sign and symptom of X at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3."

    Measured: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3

  30. Number of Participants Who Died or Progressed

    Disease-related events were measured as the number of participants who died or progressed. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as an increase >=25% in any measurable lesion or, in participants with non-measurable disease only, an estimation of an increase >=25%. In both cases, determination of progression included the appearance of any new lesions, or signification worsening of conditions presumed to be related to malignancy. Participants with clinical or laboratory evidence of possible disease progression were to be evaluated radiologically. Data were analyzed with censoring for extended loss to follow-up to account for two or more missed assessments before an event. The date of the last adequate CNS assessment before extended loss to follow-up was used for censored participants.

    Measured: From Randomization until the last clinic visit associated with the study, up until 35 days after the start of the last course of treatment (up to 75 weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Oct 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2006
  3. Primary completionJul 2012
  4. Study completionSep 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
472 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00390806
Sponsor's protocol ID
HYT105962
Status last verified
Dec 2013
First submitted
19 Oct 2006
Last updated
20 Jan 2014
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing HYCAMTIN, oral capsules and Radiation in people with Lung Cancer, Non-Small Cell, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 88 sites in 6 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jan 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 88 sites in United States, Hungary, Canada, Russia, Poland and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Jan 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall Survival (time frame: From the time of Randomization until the date of death due to any cause (up to 195 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jan 2014; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in