Hip FractureHip5NCT00389844
BHS5 - Testing the Effectiveness of the Exercise Plus Program
A study testing Exercise Trainer component of the Exercise Plus Program, Plus component (motivation) of the Exercise Plus Program and Exercise Plus Program (exercise + motivation) in people with Hip Fracture, run by University of Maryland, Baltimore at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The major goals of this study are: To implement a self-efficacy based intervention to strengthen efficacy beliefs related to exercise, decrease perceived barriers to exercise, and increase exercise behavior and overall activity of older women who have sustained a hip fracture. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Hip Fracture
- What is being tested?
- Exercise Trainer component of the Exercise Plus Program, Plus component (motivation) of the Exercise Plus Program and Exercise Plus Program (exercise + motivation)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 240 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2000to Sep 2005
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Hip fracture
Who cannot join
- Male
- Under 65 years old
- Non-community dwelling
- Fractured more than 72 hours before admission to the hospital
- Pathologic fracture
- Resides more than 70 from the hospital of admission
Show all 33Show fewer
- Recent diagnosis (in past 6 months) of angina or myocardial infarction
- Myocardial infarction or stroke concurrent with hip fracture
- Diagnosis of ventricular arrhythmia, third degree heart block, atrial fibrillation or if vital signs=heart <60 or >100
- Active or suspected myocarditis or pericarditis in the past year
- Recent (within past 6 months) deep venous thrombosis or intracardiac thrombi
- Persistent pulmonary edema during hospitalization
- Poorly controlled blood pressure w/ resting systolic >180 mm Hg or resting diastolic >100 mm Hg (3 or more readings with 24-hour period)
- Presence of ventricular aneurysm
- Paget's Disease
- Diabetes with blood sugar consistently > 300
- Diagnosis of thyrotoxicosis or myxedema within past year
- Any diagnosis of hyperparathyroidism, hypoparathyroidism, or osteomalacia
- Parkinson's, multiple sclerosis, or ALS (Lou Gehrig's disease)
- New (past 6 months) onset seizure disorder or seizure within the past 6 months
- Diagnosis of schizophrenia
- Recent (within past 6 months) GI hemorrhage or bleeding
- Preadmission coumadin therapy
- Cirrhosis or end stage renal disease (ESRD)
- Advanced hepatitis, AIDS, or endocarditis
- Cancer with metastases, or cancer under active treatment (chemotherapy with cytotoxic agents) other than non-melanomic skin cancers
- Current diagnosis of chronic alcohol abuse
- Preadmission narcotic use or preadmission benzodiazepine use more than 1 dose or tablet a day
- Required human assistance to walk prior to fracture
- Chest pains when climbing a flight of stairs, while walking on level ground, or at rest prior to the hip fracture
- Use of supplemental oxygen prior to fracture
- Other (Non-English speaking, severe blindness, paraplegia, hemiplegia
- Mini-Mental Status Exam score <20
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites
Greater Baltimore Medical Center (GBMC)
Baltimore, Maryland, 21204
Harbor Hospital Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21225
St. Agnes Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21229
Franklin Square Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21237
North Arundel Hospital
Glen Burnie, Maryland, 21061
About this study
Official title: Testing the Effectiveness of the Exercise Plus Program on Efficacy Expectations, Exercise Behavior & Activity of Older Adults Following a Hip Fracture
The major goals of this study are:
To implement a self-efficacy based intervention to strengthen efficacy beliefs related to exercise, decrease perceived barriers to exercise, and increase exercise behavior and overall activity of older women who have sustained a hip fracture.
To test the effectiveness of the Exercise Trainer component of the intervention on exercise behavior, activity, efficacy expectations, barriers to exercise, performance behaviors, overall health status, mood, pain, fear of falling, falls and fall-related injuries at 2, 6, and 12 months following fracture.
Read the detailed description
Hip fracture is a major public health problem with striking consequences for the older adult, his or her family, and the health care system. By the year 2040, over 650,00 hip fractures will occur annually in older adults over the age 65. Many surviving the hip fracture will have decreased functional performance and be unable to live independently in the community. Moreover, the greatest loss in bone density and muscle strength occurs in the first two months post hip fracture. Recovery following a hip fracture has been shown to be greatly facilitated by participation in a rehabilitation program, and continued participation in a regular exercise program can increase functional recovery, muscle strength, and prevent future fractures. Despite the benefits of exercise, it is difficult to initiate exercise activity in older adults, and helping them adhere to an exercise regime is even more challenging. Self-efficacy, a belief in the individual's capabilities to perform a course of action to attain a desired outcome, and outcome expectancy, the belief that carrying out behavior will lead to a desired outcome, are hypothesized to be critical factors in adhering to a regular exercise program.
A total of 240 subjects (60 per group) from five area hospitals meeting the eligibility criteria will be recruited into the study. A study nurse will periodically contact a designated liaison at each hospital to obtain the names of patients with hip fractures. Following identification, a study nurse will contact the patient to enroll them in the study.
An experimental 2 X 2 factorial design with repeated measures will be used to test the impact of a self-efficacy based intervention on exercise behavior, activity, efficacy beliefs and barriers, performance, health status, mood, falls, fear of falling, and fall-related injuries of older adults who sustained a hip fracture.
Participants will be randomized after consent is obtained and the baseline evaluation completed. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the four groups defined by the 2 X 2 design: (1) the Exercise Only component (2) the Plus (motivation) component; (3) Exercise Plus (exercise + motivation) components, and (4) routine care.
- Conditions
- Hip Fracture
- Being tested
- Exercise Trainer component of the Exercise Plus Program, Plus component (motivation) of the Exercise Plus Program, Exercise Plus Program (exercise + motivation)
- Keywords
- hip fracture, exercise, motivation
- Medical subject headings
- Hip Fractures, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Exercise Trainer component of the Exercise Plus ProgramBehavioural
Also called Exercise
With the exception of the routine care group, the exercise trainers visited each of the participant in their homes twice a week for two months, once a week for four months, and once a month for six months.
Plus component (motivation) of the Exercise Plus ProgramBehavioural
Also called Motivation
Motivation only
Exercise Plus Program (exercise + motivation)Behavioural
Also called Exercise, Motivation
Exercise plus motivation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | No intervention | Routine care |
| 2 | Active comparator | Exercise only Receives: Behavioral: Exercise Trainer component of the Exercise Plus Program |
| 3 | Active comparator | Motivation only Receives: Behavioral: Exercise Trainer component of the Exercise Plus Program; Behavioral: Plus component (motivation) of the Exercise Plus Program |
| 4 | Experimental | Exercise plus motivation Receives: Behavioral: Exercise Trainer component of the Exercise Plus Program; Behavioral: Plus component (motivation) of the Exercise Plus Program; Behavioral: Exercise Plus Program (exercise + motivation) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Self-efficacy
Measured: 2, 6, and 12 months post hip fracture
Exercise behavior and activity
Measured: 2, 6, and 12 months post hip fracture
Subjective report of exercise
Measured: 2, 6, and 12 months post hip fracture
Secondary outcomes (6)
Falls
Measured: 2, 6, and 12 months post hip fracture
Fall-related injuries
Measured: 2, 6, and 12 months post hip fracture
Fear of falling
Measured: 2, 6, and 12 months post hip fracture
Pain
Measured: 2, 6, and 12 months post hip fracture
36-item short-form health survey (SF-36)
Measured: 2, 6, and 12 months post hip fracture
Depression
Measured: 2, 6, and 12 months post hip fracture
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2000
- Primary completionSep 2004
- Study completionSep 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hip FractureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Maryland, Baltimore
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jay S. Magaziner, University of Maryland, Baltimore
- Investigators
- Jay Magaziner, Ph.D., MSHyg, Principal investigator, University of Maryland, Baltimore
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00389844
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-22361
- Other IDs
- 5R01AG017082-04
- Acronym
- Hip5
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 18 Oct 2006
- Last updated
- 22 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Fairhall NJ, Dyer SM, Mak JC, Diong J, Kwok WS, Sherrington C. Interventions for improving mobility after hip fracture surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 7;9(9):CD001704. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001704.pub5.
PubMed 36070134
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Testing the Effectiveness of the Exercise Plus Program on Efficacy Expectations, Exercise Behavior & Activity of Older Adults Following a Hip Fracture
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00389844
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Hip5 / H-22361
- Conditions
- Hip Fracture
- Keywords
- hip fracture, exercise, motivation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Maryland, BaltimoreUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Study start
- Jul 2000
- Primary completion
- Sep 2004 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2005 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The major goals of this study are:
To implement a self-efficacy based intervention to strengthen efficacy beliefs related to exercise, decrease perceived barriers to exercise, and increase exercise behavior and overall activity of older women who have sustained a hip fracture.
To test the effectiveness of the Exercise Trainer component of the intervention on exercise behavior, activity, efficacy expectations, barriers to exercise, performance behaviors, overall health status, mood, pain, fear of falling, falls and fall-related injuries at 2, 6, and 12 months following fracture.
Detailed description
Hip fracture is a major public health problem with striking consequences for the older adult, his or her family, and the health care system. By the year 2040, over 650,00 hip fractures will occur annually in older adults over the age 65. Many surviving the hip fracture will have decreased functional performance and be unable to live independently in the community. Moreover, the greatest loss in bone density and muscle strength occurs in the first two months post hip fracture. Recovery following a hip fracture has been shown to be greatly facilitated by participation in a rehabilitation program, and continued participation in a regular exercise program can increase functional recovery, muscle strength, and prevent future fractures. Despite the benefits of exercise, it is difficult to initiate exercise activity in older adults, and helping them adhere to an exercise regime is even more challenging. Self-efficacy, a belief in the individual's capabilities to perform a course of action to attain a desired outcome, and outcome expectancy, the belief that carrying out behavior will lead to a desired outcome, are hypothesized to be critical factors in adhering to a regular exercise program.
A total of 240 subjects (60 per group) from five area hospitals meeting the eligibility criteria will be recruited into the study. A study nurse will periodically contact a designated liaison at each hospital to obtain the names of patients with hip fractures. Following identification, a study nurse will contact the patient to enroll them in the study.
An experimental 2 X 2 factorial design with repeated measures will be used to test the impact of a self-efficacy based intervention on exercise behavior, activity, efficacy beliefs and barriers, performance, health status, mood, falls, fear of falling, and fall-related injuries of older adults who sustained a hip fracture.
Participants will be randomized after consent is obtained and the baseline evaluation completed. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the four groups defined by the 2 X 2 design: (1) the Exercise Only component (2) the Plus (motivation) component; (3) Exercise Plus (exercise + motivation) components, and (4) routine care.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | No intervention | –Routine care |
| 2 | Active comparator | Behavioral: Exercise Trainer component of the Exercise Plus ProgramExercise only |
| 3 | Active comparator | Behavioral: Exercise Trainer component of the Exercise Plus Program, Behavioral: Plus component (motivation) of the Exercise Plus ProgramMotivation only |
| 4 | Experimental | Behavioral: Exercise Trainer component of the Exercise Plus Program, Behavioral: Plus component (motivation) of the Exercise Plus Program, Behavioral: Exercise Plus Program (exercise + motivation)Exercise plus motivation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Hip fracture
Key exclusion criteria (33 listed)
- Male
- Under 65 years old
- Non-community dwelling
- Fractured more than 72 hours before admission to the hospital
- Pathologic fracture
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Exercise Trainer component of the Exercise Plus ProgramAlso: ExerciseWith the exception of the routine care group, the exercise trainers visited each of the participant in their homes twice a week for two months, once a week for four months, and once a month for six months. | Behavioural | 2, 3, 4 |
| Plus component (motivation) of the Exercise Plus ProgramAlso: MotivationMotivation only | Behavioural | 3, 4 |
| Exercise Plus Program (exercise + motivation)Also: Exercise, MotivationExercise plus motivation | Behavioural | 4 |
Primary outcome
Self-efficacy
Time frame: 2, 6, and 12 months post hip fracture
Exercise behavior and activity
Time frame: 2, 6, and 12 months post hip fracture
Subjective report of exercise
Time frame: 2, 6, and 12 months post hip fracture
6 secondary outcomes
Falls
Time frame: 2, 6, and 12 months post hip fracture
Fall-related injuries
Time frame: 2, 6, and 12 months post hip fracture
Fear of falling
Time frame: 2, 6, and 12 months post hip fracture
Pain
Time frame: 2, 6, and 12 months post hip fracture
36-item short-form health survey (SF-36)
Time frame: 2, 6, and 12 months post hip fracture
Depression
Time frame: 2, 6, and 12 months post hip fracture
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Mar 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36070134Fairhall NJ, Dyer SM, Mak JC, Diong J, Kwok WS, Sherrington C. Interventions for improving mobility after hip fracture surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 7;9(9):CD001704. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001704.pub5.
Related trials for Hip Fracture
Not yet recruiting
Monitored Anesthesia Care and Soft Tissue Infiltration With Local Anesthesia Feasibility Trial
Hip Fracture Surgeries, Intertrochanteric Fracture
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
BDSF Vs DHS With Anterotational Screw in Vertical FNF
Evaluation of BDSF in FNF
RecruitingObservational study
Pelvic and Acetabular Fracture: A Prospective Observational Study
Pelvic Fracture, Acetabular Fracture
RecruitingObservational study
Z1 Hip System: Post-Market Clinical Follow Up Study
Hip Osteoarthritis, Acute Traumatic Fracture of the Femoral Head or Neck
Not yet recruiting
Trochanteric Bursa Repair and Lateral Hip Pain After Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture
Femoral Neck Fracture
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jay Magaziner, Ph.D., MSHyg principal investigator
University of Maryland, Baltimore
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Exercise Trainer component of the Exercise Plus Program, Plus component (motivation) of the Exercise Plus Program and Exercise Plus Program (exercise + motivation) in people with Hip Fracture, run by University of Maryland, Baltimore at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 33 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Self-efficacy (time frame: 2, 6, and 12 months post hip fracture). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00389844, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Mar 2022.