MenorrhagiaPhase 3NCT00386308
Efficacy and Safety Study of XP12B in Women With Menorrhagia
A Phase 3 study testing Tranexamic acid tablets in people with Menorrhagia and Heavy Menstrual Bleeding, run by Ferring Pharmaceuticals at 52 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether XP12B is effective and safe in the treatment of women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with menorrhagia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 49 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Menorrhagia, Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
- What is being tested?
- Tranexamic acid tablets
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 196 participants
- Where
- 52 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2006to May 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 49 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Women with menorrhagia
- 18-49 years of age
- Regularly occurring menstrual periods
Who cannot join
- History or presence of clinically significant disease or abnormalities that may confound the study
- History of bilateral oophorectomy or hysterectomy
- Hormone therapy
Trial locations and contacts
52 sites in 1 country.
52 sites in 1 country
United States52 sites
Investigative Site
Abington, Pennsylvania, 19001
Investigative Site
Amite, Louisiana, 70422
Investigative Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30328
Investigative Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Investigative Site
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808
Investigative Site
Canfield, Ohio, 44406
Investigative Site
Carmichael, California, 95608
Investigative Site
Centerville, Ohio, 45459
Investigative Site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29401
Investigative Site
Charleston, West Virginia, 25301
Investigative Site
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37403
Investigative Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44122
Investigative Site
Columbia, South Carolina, 29201
Investigative Site
Dallas, Texas, 75235
Investigative Site
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
Investigative Site
Denver, Colorado, 80206
Investigative Site
Eugene, Oregon, 97401
Investigative Site
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615
Investigative Site
Greer, South Carolina, 29651
Investigative Site
Groton, Connecticut, 06340
Investigative Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
Investigative Site
Huntington, West Virginia, 25701
Investigative Site
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404
Investigative Site
Inverness, Florida, 34452
Investigative Site
Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, 19046
Investigative Site
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920
Investigative Site
Lakewood, Colorado, 80228
Investigative Site
Lawrenceville, New Jersey, 08648
Investigative Site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Investigative Site
Marrero, Louisiana, 70072
Investigative Site
Medford, Oregon, 97504
Investigative Site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Investigative Site
Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, 53051
Investigative Site
Miami, Florida, 33133
Investigative Site
Miami, Florida, 33136
Investigative Site
Norman, Oklahoma, 73071
Investigative Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112
Investigative Site
Paw Paw, Michigan, 49079
Investigative Site
Portland, Oregon, 97210
Investigative Site
Reading, Pennsylvania, 19606
Investigative Site
Salem, Oregon, 97301
Investigative Site
San Diego, California, 92123
Investigative Site
Sandy City, Utah, 84070
Investigative Site
Savannah, Georgia, 31406
Investigative Site
Scottsbluff, Nebraska, 69361
Investigative Site
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71115
Investigative Site
Spokane, Washington, 99207
Investigative Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Investigative Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85741
Investigative Site
Upland, California, 91786
Investigative Site
West Hartford, Connecticut, 06117
Investigative Site
Zanesville, Ohio, 43701
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study To Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of XP12B for the Treatment of Menorrhagia
The purpose of this study is to determine whether XP12B is effective and safe in the treatment of women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with menorrhagia.
- Conditions
- Menorrhagia, Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
- Being tested
- Tranexamic acid tablets, Placebo tablets
- Keywords
- Heavy Menstrual Bleeding, Menorrhagia
- Medical subject headings
- Menorrhagia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tranexamic acid tabletsDrug
Also called Lysteda, XP12B
3900 mg/Day
Placebo tabletsDrug
Also called Lysteda, XP12B
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Tranexamic acid tablets |
| 2 | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo tablets |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Reduction From Baseline in Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL)
reduction of menstrual blood loss in mL
Measured: Baseline MBL over 6 menstrual cycles
Secondary outcomes (3)
Patient Reported Outcome Measure of Limitations in Social or Leisure Activities Associated With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
A positive unit change mean relects an improvement from baseline. Patient reported outcome scores had the following response categories: 1=not limited at all; 2=slightly limited; 3=moderately limited; 4=quite a bit limited; and 5=extremely limited
Measured: Change from Baseline scores over 6 menstrual cycles
Patient Reported Outcome Measure of Limitations in Physical Activities Associated With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
A positive unit change mean relects an improvement from baseline. Patient reported outcome scores had the following response categories: 1=not limited at all; 2=slightly limited; 3=moderately limited; 4=quite a bit limited; and 5=extremely limited
Measured: Change from Baseline scores over 6 menstrual cycles
Responder Analysis - Reduction in Large Stains
Percentage of subjects who experienced a reduction from baseline in the frequency of large stains
Measured: Reduction from Baseline over 6 menstrual cycles
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2006
- Primary completionMay 2008
- Study completionMay 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MenorrhagiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 196 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ferring Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Clinical Development Support, Study director, Ferring Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00386308
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- XP12B-MR-303
- Status last verified
- Jun 2010
- First submitted
- 6 Oct 2006
- Last updated
- 4 May 2011
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Bushnell DM, Martin ML, Moore KA, Richter HE, Rubin A, Patrick DL. Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire: assessing the influence of heavy menstrual bleeding on quality of life. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Dec;26(12):2745-55. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.532200. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
PubMed 21043553Lukes AS, Moore KA, Muse KN, Gersten JK, Hecht BR, Edlund M, Richter HE, Eder SE, Attia GR, Patrick DL, Rubin A, Shangold GA. Tranexamic acid treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;116(4):865-875. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f20177.
PubMed 20859150
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 May 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study To Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of XP12B for the Treatment of Menorrhagia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00386308
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- XP12B-MR-303
- Conditions
- Menorrhagia, Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
- Keywords
- Heavy Menstrual Bleeding, Menorrhagia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 196 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ferring PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2006
- Primary completion
- May 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Oct 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Feb 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether XP12B is effective and safe in the treatment of women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with menorrhagia.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: Tranexamic acid tablets |
| 2 | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo tablets |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 49 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Women with menorrhagia
- 18-49 years of age
- Regularly occurring menstrual periods
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- History or presence of clinically significant disease or abnormalities that may confound the study
- History of bilateral oophorectomy or hysterectomy
- Hormone therapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tranexamic acid tabletsAlso: Lysteda, XP12B3900 mg/Day | Drug | 1 |
| Placebo tabletsAlso: Lysteda, XP12B | Drug | 2 |
Primary outcome
Mean Reduction From Baseline in Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL)
Time frame: Baseline MBL over 6 menstrual cycles
reduction of menstrual blood loss in mL
3 secondary outcomes
Patient Reported Outcome Measure of Limitations in Social or Leisure Activities Associated With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
Time frame: Change from Baseline scores over 6 menstrual cycles
Patient Reported Outcome Measure of Limitations in Physical Activities Associated With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
Time frame: Change from Baseline scores over 6 menstrual cycles
Responder Analysis - Reduction in Large Stains
Time frame: Reduction from Baseline over 6 menstrual cycles
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 May 2011.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21043553Bushnell DM, Martin ML, Moore KA, Richter HE, Rubin A, Patrick DL. Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire: assessing the influence of heavy menstrual bleeding on quality of life. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Dec;26(12):2745-55. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.532200. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20859150Lukes AS, Moore KA, Muse KN, Gersten JK, Hecht BR, Edlund M, Richter HE, Eder SE, Attia GR, Patrick DL, Rubin A, Shangold GA. Tranexamic acid treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;116(4):865-875. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f20177.
Related trials for Menorrhagia
RecruitingObservational study
Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Progestin Treatment in Bleeding Disorders Study
Heavy Menstrual Bleeding, Bleeding Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Focal Adenomyosis
Adenomyosis, Adenomyoma of Uterus
Recruiting
A Clinical Study of the Aqua Therapeutics Thermal Therapy Vapor Ablation System in Premenopausal Women With Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
Menorrhagia
RecruitingPhase 2
HMBeacon: A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate ALN-6400 in Adult and Adolescent Female Patients With VWD and HMB
Von Willebrand Disease (VWD), Heavy Menstrual Bleeding (HMB)
Recruiting
Delivering tAN to Reduce HMB: The LUNA Study
Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Development Support study director
Ferring Pharmaceuticals
52 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Tranexamic acid tablets in people with Menorrhagia and Heavy Menstrual Bleeding, run by Ferring Pharmaceuticals at 52 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 52 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Feb 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Reduction From Baseline in Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) (time frame: Baseline MBL over 6 menstrual cycles). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00386308, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2011.